16:33:49 RRSAgent has joined #text 16:33:49 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/04/17-text-irc 16:34:04 zakim, room for 10? 16:34:06 ok, Judy; conference Team_(text)16:34Z scheduled with code 2119 (A11Y) for 60 minutes until 1734Z 16:34:49 Meeting: HTML-A11Y Text Alternatives Subteam 16:34:59 Chair: Judy 16:35:21 agenda+ check of deadlines this week 16:35:21 agenda+ alt bugs: update on CP for HTML5 in-spec alt guidance bugs--gathering, explaining, rechecking whole doc 16:35:21 agenda+ buggy alts: update on checking alt texts in HTML5 spec itself 16:35:21 agenda+ issue 204: update on CP for re-alignment of HTML5 spec text about ARIA with actual ARIA provisions 16:35:21 agenda+ issue 203: update on a specific CP 16:35:22 agenda+ update on revised CP on meta-name generator 16:35:24 agenda+ other business? 16:35:27 agenda+ confirm next meeting; identify next scribe; adjourn 17:00:16 janina has joined #text 17:00:27 Team_(text)16:34Z has now started 17:00:34 +Judy 17:00:41 +??P1 17:01:11 zakim, ??P1 is Janina 17:01:11 +Janina; got it 17:01:30 JF has joined #text 17:02:01 +John_Foliot 17:02:50 +David_MacDonald 17:03:50 scribe: janina 17:03:58 zakim, take up next 17:03:58 agendum 1. "check of deadlines this week" taken up [from Judy] 17:04:15 David has joined #text 17:05:14 http://w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/204 17:05:15 Issue 204 (ARIA hidden) has a deadline of April 18th, which is tomorrow 17:05:53 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/203 17:06:34 Issue 203 (allow alt and longdesc on video) had a deadline, and needs a revised CP 17:10:39 Issue 31-c (meta name generator) has a target date (not deadline) for an updated CP of April 20th 17:14:11 Issue (###) (buggy alt in the spec itself) by the next coordination meeting 17:14:17 zakim, take up next 17:14:17 agendum 2. "alt bugs: update on CP for HTML5 in-spec alt guidance bugs--gathering, explaining, rechecking whole doc" taken up [from Judy] 17:15:25 dm: Spec has images with null alt, probably not WCAG conformant -- at least 4 17:15:34 +Q 17:15:52 ack j 17:16:46 jb: We were going to do an internal pass plus Steve before forwarding on list, were we not? 17:19:04 Regrets: Leif, Laura 17:19:39 jb: Do I understand you're finding missing alt sometimes, what about alt that is there? 17:19:42 dm: Mostly good 17:23:31 laura has joined #text 17:25:10 http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/single-page.html 17:25:22 That's the single page current as of March last 17:26:37 jb: Janina, were you going to coordinate with David on the write up of this? 17:26:41 js: I could do that 17:27:17 zakim, next item 17:27:17 agendum 3. "buggy alts: update on checking alt texts in HTML5 spec itself" taken up [from Judy] 17:27:55 jb: Oops, we got our labels reversed! 17:28:08 jb: This topic we just discussed 17:28:22 jb: So we're now on Alt Bugs 17:28:54 s/labels/topic names/ 17:32:05 +Laura_Carlson 17:40:07 js will proceed with help from the group to: 17:40:30 1> ascertain whether or not 4.8 re alt is by far the most extensive prescriptive guidance for authoring 17:40:50 2. Pont out that 4.8 and Steve's doc are not the same, and the WG needs to decide between the two 17:41:03 3. List out all the points of disagreement re guidance provided 17:41:14 agreement on approach 17:41:45 dm: alt descript of network diagram is really a longdesc, not an alt 17:42:02 dm: but in 8.2.1 same image is null alt text 17:42:19 jf: And no describedby, or other 17:42:22 zakim, next item 17:42:22 agendum 4. "issue 204: update on CP for re-alignment of HTML5 spec text about ARIA with actual ARIA provisions" taken up [from Judy] 17:42:43 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/204 17:43:04 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/CorrectHidden 17:43:21 jb: Laura has taken recent discussion into a proposed CP 17:44:04 jb: One question is whether JS wants to work from this or start another? 17:44:11 +Q 17:44:14 jb: What needed to get this done? 17:47:56 jf: My action was to withdraw mine once we have a replacement in place 17:48:09 jf: Apologize for my loaded language, but the basics are there 17:48:50 jf: Not sure how to make my points if I withdraw my cp 17:49:12 jf: Maybe rather than ref my note, just rewrite to make lang more neutral and straight forward 17:49:30 jb: Do you want to flag items? 17:49:47 jf: Laura has captured the key items 17:49:49 q+ 17:49:54 ack j 17:51:47 jb: Can I reverse the question? 17:52:05 jb: John, are there specific things that you want to make sure Laura and Janina don't drop? 17:55:10 jb: Important not to accuse someone of misunderstand or of intentionally misusing. Better to focus on the substance of what we need to put forward. 17:56:41 [jb discussing with lc wiki editing strategies ... ] 17:57:18 -Laura_Carlson 17:59:27 q+ to suggest something about blogged evidence 17:59:30 ack jf 17:59:40 jf: I'm working on my own blog illustrating the points around hidden, including screenshots from ZoomText 18:00:23 jb: Wondering how one maximizes reads of external blog evidence? 18:00:56 jb: Suggest providing the text of what is said even when providing a URI in the WBS 18:01:26 q+ to suggest *how* to provide linked off-survey evidence 18:03:55 jb: Even though it sounds redundant, it's useful to include these things in a WBS response to make sure that the dots are connected for people 18:04:44 jf: My goal is to have in hand evidence to backup our assertions 18:05:01 jb: Agree and appreciate. My comments are to make sure people get it and actually look at it 18:07:40 jf: My intent is to withdraw once there's another in place, is that still the group's understanding? 18:07:45 [agreement in meeting] 18:09:13 zakim, next item 18:09:13 I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, janina 18:09:19 q? 18:09:23 ack j 18:09:23 Judy, you wanted to suggest something about blogged evidence and to suggest *how* to provide linked off-survey evidence 18:09:23 ack ju 18:09:28 q? 18:10:00 zakim, take up next item 18:10:00 agendum 5. "issue 203: update on a specific CP" taken up [from Judy] 18:10:40 jb: Last meeting, John, I think you were wrestling with this? 18:10:47 jf: Yes, my action is to rewrite 18:11:00 jf: Something along the lines of let video take longdesc 18:11:22 jf: I was out of town last week 18:11:34 jf: Now thinking of 2 cps 18:11:40 jf: One for alt, one for longdesc 18:12:14 jb: Are you sure you need separate proposals? 18:12:20 jf: That's what we said last week! 18:12:29 js: I think we misunderstood each other last week 18:13:09 http://w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposal/Issue203 18:27:27 zakim, next item 18:27:28 agendum 6. "update on revised CP on meta-name generator" taken up [from Judy] 18:27:44 jb: We're now calling it issue-31c 18:27:53 http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/Text_Alternatives/Meta_Generator_Decision_Comments 18:28:34 jb: We have a skelaton from LC using Maciej's rejection ... 18:28:55 jb: My task is to add content re what they're missing 18:31:15 jb: We have also had use cases added that I'm unconvinced help. Would appreciate feedback on that 18:32:34 agenda? 18:33:19 -John_Foliot 18:33:24 zakim, bye 18:33:24 leaving. As of this point the attendees were Judy, Janina, John_Foliot, David_MacDonald, Laura_Carlson 18:33:24 Zakim has left #text 18:33:29 rrsagent, make minutes 18:33:29 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/04/17-text-minutes.html janina 18:34:28 rrsagent, make log public 18:34:33 rrsagent, make minutes 18:34:33 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/04/17-text-minutes.html janina 18:52:11 laura has joined #text 20:23:53 Judy has left #text