17:49:23 RRSAgent has joined #audio 17:49:23 logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/03/19-audio-irc 17:49:28 zakim, this will be audio 17:49:28 ok, olivier; I see RWC_Audio()2:00PM scheduled to start in 11 minutes 17:50:23 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-audio/2012JanMar/0392.html 17:50:28 Chair: Alistair 17:50:32 Scribe: Olivier 17:51:04 Agenda+ Proposed use case: metronome 17:51:13 Agenda+ ISSUE-4: setting sample rates for individual JavaScriptProcessingNodes 17:51:23 Agenda+ Followup on UC-15, Video with multiple audio tracks 17:51:32 Agenda+ Discuss/document Issue: Pausing a subgraph 17:51:44 Agenda+ New WD of Web Audio API published 17:51:51 rrsagent, make logs public 17:53:14 smus has joined #audio 17:55:00 chrislowis has joined #audio 17:55:19 RWC_Audio()2:00PM has now started 17:55:26 +[IPcaller] 17:55:50 zakim, IPCaller is Alistair 17:55:50 +Alistair; got it 17:56:00 +??P2 17:56:07 gcardoso has joined #audio 17:56:17 Zakim: ??P2 is me 17:56:59 Zakim, P2 is chrislowis 17:56:59 sorry, chrislowis, I do not recognize a party named 'P2' 17:57:04 Zakim, ??P2 is chrislowis 17:57:04 +chrislowis; got it 17:57:08 :) 17:57:15 heh 17:57:24 One day I'll learn! 17:57:50 Olivier, you with us today? 17:58:28 +??P3 17:58:29 yup, getting ready 17:59:10 Zakim, +??P3 is really me 17:59:10 sorry, gcardoso, I do not recognize a party named '+??P3' 17:59:19 Zakim, P3 is really me 17:59:19 sorry, gcardoso, I do not recognize a party named 'P3' 17:59:29 zakim, ??P3 is gcardoso 17:59:29 +gcardoso; got it 17:59:44 thanks 17:59:46 +??P4 17:59:55 zakim, ??P4 is me 17:59:55 +olivier; got it 18:01:04 agenda? 18:01:09 +Doug_Schepers 18:01:37 + +1.862.201.aaaa 18:01:58 tmichel has joined #audio 18:02:33 olivier: want me to scribe? 18:02:40 zakim, next agendum 18:02:40 agendum 1. "Proposed use case: metronome" taken up [from olivier] 18:02:45 chrislowis: nah, that's ok for today 18:02:48 roc has joined #audio 18:02:54 olivier: cool. 18:02:56 zakim, +1.862 is me 18:02:56 +cwilso; got it 18:02:59 Alistair: there's been quite a lot of discussion on this on the list 18:03:17 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-audio/2012JanMar/0405.html 18:03:40 +??P12 18:04:02 Zakim, ??P12 is tmichel 18:04:02 +tmichel; got it 18:05:29 passcode not working :-( 18:05:32 Al: what Joe mentioned is that there would be a need to sync input and output in a frame-accurate manner 18:05:45 Al: many ways to do beat detection 18:05:47 pass code is audio# 18:06:04 Al: is "automatically analyse" may be too much? 18:06:23 +??P15 18:07:18 Olivier: wrote the UC in terms of what could be done, not necessarily what the API could do 18:07:35 Thierry: looked at your proposal 18:07:40 … I think it's good 18:08:00 … not trying to add use cases if they are not useful, but I think this is a nice UC which anyone can understand 18:08:18 … comes from a real use case from a discussion with my daughter 18:08:32 … happy that we are merging with UC-13 18:08:35 q? 18:08:37 q+ 18:09:02 Al: agree it has appeal to musicians, not just audio professionals 18:09:06 ack me 18:10:58 Olivier: trying to keep the use cases doc short because I'd like us to document how our APIs will satisfy the use cases 18:11:01 q+ 18:11:24 Doug: are we really working for performance musician? 18:12:02 CLowis: with upcoming web-based operating systems, and likewise on smartphones, there are tons of such musician-focused applications 18:12:16 … not browser as an instrument but as a platform to help musicians 18:13:18 Olivier: agree with Chris - and I've also seen smartphones used as performance instruments 18:13:55 zakim, next agendum 18:13:55 I see a speaker queue remaining and respectfully decline to close this agendum, Alistair 18:14:00 Olivier: if everyone happy with it I will add that text to UC-13 18:14:03 q- 18:14:07 zakim, next agendum 18:14:07 agendum 2. "ISSUE-4: setting sample rates for individual JavaScriptProcessingNodes" taken up [from olivier] 18:15:15 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-audio/2012JanMar/0393.html 18:16:00 Olivier: is this related? (I can't quite understand it) 18:16:05 Al: yes it is related 18:16:25 … Grant has been making game emulators with sounds, very impressive 18:16:35 … he's making interesting arguments about performance 18:17:05 … the gist of what he is suggesting is that the Web Audio API does not provide him with the tools he needs for this application 18:17:16 … might be good to get Grant on a call 18:17:18 -Alistair 18:17:46 Doug: could be good to get more info about what he needs 18:18:14 … be clearer than the current e-mail 18:19:03 +[IPcaller] 18:19:15 zakim, IPcaller is Alistair 18:19:15 +Alistair; got it 18:20:18 zakim, next agendum 18:20:18 agendum 3. "Followup on UC-15, Video with multiple audio tracks" taken up [from olivier] 18:20:41 http://www.w3.org/2011/audio/wiki/Use_Cases_and_Requirements#UC-15:_Video_commentary 18:22:17 q+ 18:23:01 Olivier: do we need to explicitely add as a requirement the need to capture audio from a video stream? 18:23:10 I beleive UC 15 is a new UC introducing use of audio from a video. Not yet introduces in other UC 18:23:14 Al: I thought we might have had it from the other use cases 18:23:40 http://www.w3.org/2011/audio/wiki/Use_Cases_and_Requirements#UC-12:_Soundtrack_and_sound_effects_in_a_video_editing_tool 18:23:50 I think we should keep this UC 15 18:24:10 Al: already captured in UC 12? 18:24:24 ROC: what is not captured in UC-12 is the need to stay in sync with the video 18:24:37 right. 18:24:40 … and the ducking effect is interesting because it is very common 18:25:02 Al: so do we want to merge this with UC-12 or have a different one 18:25:10 q+ 18:25:16 ack Al 18:25:27 ROC: would seem artificial to merge the two 18:26:35 Olivier: I think it makes sense to add a requirement to add effects to the audio part of a video stream, and keep it in sync with the video playback 18:27:01 … that requirement would match UC-15 and UC-1 18:27:07 chris has joined #audio 18:27:23 ACTION: olivier to add new requirement to "add effects to the audio part of a video stream, and keep it in sync with the video playback" 18:27:23 Created ACTION-38 - Add new requirement to "add effects to the audio part of a video stream, and keep it in sync with the video playback" [on Olivier Thereaux - due 2012-03-26]. 18:28:29 +CRogers 18:28:37 Al: as an aside, have been contacting companies doing HTML5 gaming. One of them reviewed the specs - am in the process of encouraging them to send that feedback to the group 18:29:16 q? 18:29:18 ack me 18:29:39 agenda? 18:30:02 zakim, take up agendum 5 18:30:02 agendum 5. "New WD of Web Audio API published" taken up [from olivier] 18:30:49 http://www.w3.org/TR/webaudio/ 18:30:57 (re-published as WD) 18:31:16 Thierry: we've complied with a rule which makes sure we update our spec to show progress 18:32:52 Olivier: next big chunk of work on this spec will be to make sure we solve dependencies with other groups 18:33:12 Thierry: we should contact at least the HTML group and WebRTC group to tell them about this new WD 18:33:13 -cwilso 18:34:29 Olivier: volunteers to contact those groups? 18:34:55 ACTION: Doug to contact HTML, WebRTC and webapps group, point to new WD of Web Audio API 18:34:55 Created ACTION-39 - Contact HTML, WebRTC and webapps group, point to new WD of Web Audio API [on Doug Schepers - due 2012-03-26]. 18:35:02 tmichel has joined #audio 18:35:04 q? 18:35:07 zakin, take up agendum 4 18:35:14 zakim, take up agendum 4 18:35:14 agendum 4. "Discuss/document Issue: Pausing a subgraph" taken up [from olivier] 18:36:38 Olivier: would like to know if this is an issue or "just a conversation" 18:36:55 CRogers: we discussed this a while ago 18:37:09 … seems like Jussi said he was OK with it 18:37:34 … would be good to make sure he's ok with it and move on 18:38:44 Olivier: will ask Jussi and we can record the resolution 18:39:04 zakim, close agendum 18:39:04 I don't understand 'close agendum', olivier 18:39:10 zakim, close this agendum 18:39:10 agendum 4 closed 18:39:11 I see 2 items remaining on the agenda; the next one is 18:39:11 3. Followup on UC-15, Video with multiple audio tracks [from olivier] 18:39:21 zakim, closed agendum 3 18:39:21 I don't understand 'closed agendum 3', olivier 18:39:37 Topic: face-to-face meetings 18:39:44 Thierry: TPAC in Lyon 18:39:59 … we need to answer by April 30th whether we will meet there 18:40:24 http://www.w3.org/2012/10/TPAC/Overview.html 18:41:27 Olivier: think it would be good to meet f2f 18:41:52 … so question would be "how many times can we reasonably meet again f2f this year?" 18:41:57 … and if so, when 18:42:11 Thierry: would be good to meet when we are dealing with last call comments 18:42:22 Al: would be happy to meet earlier than TPAC 18:42:28 … US would be easier 18:42:54 Doug: agree f2f is useful - also agree it is time consuming and expensive 18:43:02 … would be happy to meet before TPAC 18:45:58 Olivier: should we poll the group to see who could make it to TPAC 18:46:14 ACTION: Olivier to start poll to see if group members could be at TPAC 18:46:14 Created ACTION-40 - Start poll to see if group members could be at TPAC [on Olivier Thereaux - due 2012-03-26]. 18:46:35 ADJOURNED 18:46:37 -??P15 18:46:40 -Doug_Schepers 18:46:42 -olivier 18:46:42 -CRogers 18:46:43 -Alistair 18:46:44 -tmichel 18:46:48 -gcardoso 18:46:49 -chrislowis 18:46:51 RWC_Audio()2:00PM has ended 18:46:51 Attendees were Alistair, chrislowis, gcardoso, olivier, Doug_Schepers, +1.862.201.aaaa, cwilso, tmichel, CRogers 18:46:53 rrsagent, make minutes 18:46:53 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/03/19-audio-minutes.html olivier 19:18:30 FILT3R has joined #audio 20:08:15 Biggest has joined #audio