IRC log of xproc on 2012-01-26
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 14:58:00 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #xproc
- 14:58:00 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/01/26-xproc-irc
- 14:58:11 [Norm]
- Meeting: XML Processing Model WG
- 14:58:11 [Norm]
- Date: 26 January 2012
- 14:58:11 [Norm]
- Agenda: http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2012/01/26-agenda
- 14:58:11 [Norm]
- Meeting: 207
- 14:58:12 [Norm]
- Chair: Norm
- 14:58:14 [Norm]
- Scribe: Norm
- 14:58:16 [Norm]
- ScribeNick: Norm
- 14:58:18 [Norm]
- rrsagent, set logs world-visible
- 14:58:59 [alexmilowski]
- alexmilowski has joined #xproc
- 15:00:13 [Zakim]
- XML_PMWG()10:00AM has now started
- 15:00:19 [Vojtech]
- Vojtech has joined #xproc
- 15:00:20 [Zakim]
- +??P13
- 15:00:41 [Norm]
- zakim, passcode?
- 15:00:41 [Zakim]
- the conference code is 97762 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 sip:zakim@voip.w3.org), Norm
- 15:01:03 [Zakim]
- +Norm
- 15:01:08 [Zakim]
- +Vojtech
- 15:01:22 [Zakim]
- +??P20
- 15:01:32 [Norm]
- zakim, ??p20 is jfuller
- 15:01:32 [Zakim]
- +jfuller; got it
- 15:01:45 [Zakim]
- +Alex_Milows
- 15:01:49 [Norm]
- zakim, who's here?
- 15:01:49 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see ht, Norm, Vojtech, jfuller, Alex_Milows
- 15:01:50 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see Vojtech, alexmilowski, RRSAgent, Zakim, Norm, jfuller, ht, caribou
- 15:01:59 [Norm]
- zakim, alex_milows is alexmilowski
- 15:01:59 [Zakim]
- +alexmilowski; got it
- 15:02:07 [Norm]
- zakim, who's here?
- 15:02:10 [Norm]
- Regrets: Mohamed
- 15:02:12 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see ht, Norm, Vojtech, jfuller, alexmilowski
- 15:02:24 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see Vojtech, alexmilowski, RRSAgent, Zakim, Norm, jfuller, ht, caribou
- 15:02:38 [Zakim]
- +Cornelia
- 15:02:40 [Norm]
- Present: Henry, Norm, Vojtech, Jim, Alex, Cornelia, Carine
- 15:02:44 [Zakim]
- +Carine
- 15:04:18 [Norm]
- Topic: Accept this agenda?
- 15:04:18 [Norm]
- -> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2012/01/26-agenda
- 15:04:22 [Norm]
- Accepted.
- 15:04:26 [Norm]
- Topic: Accept minutes from the previous meeting?
- 15:04:26 [Norm]
- -> http://www.w3.org/XML/XProc/2012/01/19-minutes.html
- 15:04:33 [Norm]
- Accepted.
- 15:04:38 [Norm]
- Topic: Next meeting: telcon, 2 February 2012
- 15:04:54 [Norm]
- No regrets heard.
- 15:05:02 [Norm]
- Topic: Review of open action items
- 15:05:16 [Norm]
- A-206-01: continued
- 15:05:26 [Norm]
- A-206-02: continued
- 15:05:40 [Norm]
- A-206-03: completed
- 15:05:55 [Norm]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2012Jan/0041.html
- 15:06:13 [Norm]
- Topic: Processor profiles WD published
- 15:06:17 [Norm]
- Norm: Yay us.
- 15:06:24 [Norm]
- -> http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-xml-proc-profiles-20120124/
- 15:06:40 [Norm]
- ACTION: Norm to setup the last call comment list for new LCWD
- 15:07:01 [Norm]
- Topic: Rechartering troubles
- 15:07:46 [cornelia]
- cornelia has joined #xproc
- 15:08:19 [Norm]
- Norm: We got pushback on the charter; one of the possible solutions is to put FPWD of 2.0 in the charter.
- 15:08:36 [Norm]
- Carine: We got pushback because the goals weren't defined clearly enough.
- 15:08:52 [PGrosso]
- PGrosso has joined #xproc
- 15:09:38 [Norm]
- ...I was also surprised to see that issue of Rec-track documents as pushback. We've done that before for requirements and use cases.
- 15:10:57 [Norm]
- Some discussion of the clarity of our goals.
- 15:12:34 [Norm]
- Norm: So, basically, if we want to do V.next, we'll need to have a workshop or some other event to gauge interest. And if we don't put V.next in the charter, we won't get chartered.
- 15:12:52 [Norm]
- Carine: I think that's basically the case.
- 15:14:05 [Norm]
- Norm: Liam suggests putting FPWD of 2.0 and the possibility of a workshop in the charter. Maybe we should do that.
- 15:14:20 [Norm]
- Cornelia: And why wouldn't we do that, isn't that what we want to do?
- 15:14:32 [Norm]
- Henry: Yes, but earlier conversations suggested that we weren't ready to do 2.0.
- 15:14:39 [Norm]
- Alex: But we have community feedback for 2.0
- 15:14:49 [Norm]
- Henry: Yes, I think Liam just needs help writing that: point to wiki, point to mailing list.
- 15:15:23 [Norm]
- ACTION: Norm to work with Liam to get a new charter proposal drafted along those lines.
- 15:15:45 [Norm]
- Topic: XProc V.next discussion
- 15:15:57 [Norm]
- Norm: I sent a list of low-hanging fruit items.
- 15:16:02 [Norm]
- -> http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-xml-proc-profiles-20120124/
- 15:16:14 [Norm]
- Norm: And Vojtech observes that it doesn't anything about non-XML.
- 15:16:25 [Norm]
- ...And I think maybe we could do something smallish about that.
- 15:16:51 [Norm]
- Vojtech: I was thining especially about small stuff.
- 15:17:02 [Norm]
- ...Like if you could save binary data, with p:store.
- 15:18:10 [Norm]
- ...To make it more symetrical. We have p:load with p:document and p:data but we have nothing to store binary data.
- 15:18:27 [Norm]
- Norm: Yes, and an option on p:store seems pretty straightfoward.
- 15:20:24 [Norm]
- Vojtech: What I did is just what Norm did, I added an extension to p:store. But mine was a bit more generic in the sense that both and XML and non-XML data can flow through the pipeline. Whatever the p:store gets, it saves it.
- 15:20:59 [Norm]
- ...I was thinking about p:document and p:data and their relationship. At the moment I didn't want to change that much. I changed p:data so that it can produce binary data that's not base64 encoded.
- 15:21:19 [Norm]
- ...But I wonder if p:document, if you point it to binary data, whether it should do the same thing. Or if p:data should return XML.
- 15:23:24 [Norm]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xml-processing-model-wg/2012Jan/0041.html
- 15:23:51 [Norm]
- Norm: We should consider a proposal to do some work in this area; being able to load XML, HTML, JSON, etc.
- 15:24:05 [Norm]
- Jim: In the past, have we ever talked about p:document*s*?
- 15:24:25 [Norm]
- Henry: Yes, the possibility of having a set of documents flowing through the pipeline was there in the Markup pipeline. We did discuss it briefly, a while ago.
- 15:24:53 [Norm]
- ...But it's not low-hanging fruit. You have to talk about how to generate names for these things; it really has to be a map so that steps down the pipeline can extract documents from the set.
- 15:25:37 [Norm]
- Jim: But multiple p:document elements can be used. That might let you implement something like an ant fileset.
- 15:26:46 [Norm]
- Vojtech: So like in ant, you could specify a base URI and some sort of mask, so you get a sequence of files.
- 15:27:44 [Norm]
- Jim: it's a little awkward to work with sets of files and baking in at that level would remove the contortion from some pipelines.
- 15:28:38 [Norm]
- Norm: That seems like it might be low hanging fruit; you could implement it yourself.
- 15:28:45 [Norm]
- Jim: Yes, but it wouldn't bake in at the p:input level.
- 15:29:40 [Norm]
- Norm: Yeah, I can see that.
- 15:30:01 [Norm]
- ...I'll add that to the low-hanging fruit.
- 15:30:26 [Norm]
- Alex: With AVTs, I can imagine that we might be able to do the same sort of thing with HTTP URIs.
- 15:30:44 [Norm]
- ...So if you had a set of documents, you could iterate with numerical positions, perhaps.
- 15:31:10 [Norm]
- Vojtech: You can also imagine doing this on the p:load step.
- 15:32:22 [Norm]
- Jim: I've got one other thing. I did an experiment with my implementation, I enabled "AVT-everywhere".
- 15:32:39 [Norm]
- Norm: You mean you made "{" and "} expand everywhere all the time.
- 15:32:56 [Norm]
- Vojtech: But what if you want to include an XSLT pipelien?
- 15:33:02 [Norm]
- Jim: You can turn it on and off.
- 15:33:50 [Norm]
- Norm: I don't understand how that works.
- 15:34:00 [Norm]
- Jim: There are lots of details; I just made them up.
- 15:34:48 [Norm]
- Alex: That sounds a little bit like an alternative pipeline syntax.
- 15:35:19 [Norm]
- Norm: I'd like to see some examples.
- 15:36:13 [Norm]
- Norm runs through his list
- 15:36:56 [jfuller]
- completely agree on xpath 2.0 going forwards
- 15:41:45 [Norm]
- Vojtech: There's also the question of optional not-specified options.
- 15:45:29 [jfuller]
- https://github.com/jpcs/rbtree.xq
- 15:48:45 [Norm]
- Discussion inevitably returns to parameters.
- 15:51:27 [Norm]
- Cornelia: I think another area we should be looking at is mashup-technologies. Those should be using XProc.
- 15:51:47 [jfuller]
- be great Cornelia if you have any links to mashups tech
- 15:52:39 [Norm]
- Norm: I'll summarize again the low-hanging fruit and then I'd like everyone to think about whether or not that list is complete.
- 15:52:52 [Norm]
- Topic: Any other business
- 15:52:58 [Norm]
- None heard.
- 15:53:13 [Zakim]
- -Vojtech
- 15:53:14 [Zakim]
- -jfuller
- 15:53:14 [Zakim]
- -Norm
- 15:53:17 [Zakim]
- -Cornelia
- 15:53:19 [Zakim]
- -alexmilowski
- 15:53:21 [Norm]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 15:53:21 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/01/26-xproc-minutes.html Norm
- 15:53:22 [Zakim]
- -Carine
- 15:53:24 [cornelia]
- cornelia has left #xproc
- 15:53:42 [Zakim]
- -ht
- 15:53:44 [Zakim]
- XML_PMWG()10:00AM has ended
- 15:53:45 [Zakim]
- Attendees were ht, Norm, Vojtech, jfuller, alexmilowski, Cornelia, Carine
- 15:55:39 [PGrosso]
- leave
- 15:55:42 [PGrosso]
- PGrosso has left #xproc
- 16:07:18 [ht]
- ht has joined #xproc
- 17:07:15 [ht]
- ht has joined #xproc
- 17:07:18 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #xproc
- 17:59:47 [ht]
- ht has joined #xproc