IRC log of webperf on 2012-01-25
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 18:00:04 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #webperf
- 18:00:04 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/01/25-webperf-irc
- 18:00:06 [plh]
- trackbot-ng, start telcon
- 18:00:08 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs world
- 18:00:10 [trackbot]
- Zakim, this will be WPWG
- 18:00:10 [Zakim]
- I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot
- 18:00:11 [trackbot]
- Meeting: Web Performance Working Group Teleconference
- 18:00:11 [trackbot]
- Date: 25 January 2012
- 18:00:26 [JatinderMann]
- JatinderMann has joined #webperf
- 18:00:36 [JatinderMann]
- trackbot, start telecon
- 18:00:38 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs world
- 18:00:40 [trackbot]
- Zakim, this will be WPWG
- 18:00:41 [Zakim]
- I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot
- 18:00:41 [trackbot]
- Meeting: Web Performance Working Group Teleconference
- 18:00:42 [trackbot]
- Date: 25 January 2012
- 18:00:46 [ganesh]
- ganesh has joined #webperf
- 18:01:24 [JatinderMann]
- present+ JatinderMann
- 18:01:28 [JatinderMann]
- present+ Ganesh
- 18:01:39 [JatinderMann]
- present+ plh
- 18:01:44 [JatinderMann]
- scribe: Jatinder
- 18:02:31 [zhiheng]
- zhiheng has joined #webperf
- 18:02:36 [JatinderMann]
- present+ Zhiheng
- 18:03:40 [JatinderMann]
- present+ Tony
- 18:06:09 [JatinderMann]
- http://w3c-test.org/webperf/tests/approved/navigation-timing/html5/test_navigation_type_reload.html
- 18:06:30 [JatinderMann]
- Jatinder: Per Action 77, James updated navigation_type_reload.html. It works in IE9 and IE10.
- 18:07:02 [JatinderMann]
- plh: Are we good with pushing this to approved?
- 18:07:04 [JatinderMann]
- JatindeR: Yes.
- 18:07:09 [JatinderMann]
- Tony: Yes.
- 18:08:00 [JatinderMann]
- close action-77
- 18:08:01 [trackbot]
- ACTION-77 Update the test_navigation_type_reload.html to fix the compare issue closed
- 18:08:39 [plh]
- http://w3c-test.org/webperf/tests/submission/Google/NavigationTiming/test_document_readiness_exist.html
- 18:08:47 [plh]
- http://w3c-test.org/webperf/tests/submission/Google/NavigationTiming/test_performance_attributes_exist_in_object.html
- 18:09:47 [JatinderMann]
- Zhiheng: Can we move these tests to approved?
- 18:09:57 [JatinderMann]
- Zhiheng: They work in IE and Chrome.
- 18:10:25 [JatinderMann]
- Jatinder: And Karen responded saying document readiness doesn't work as expected on iframe. This shouldn't impact Navigation timing.
- 18:10:35 [JatinderMann]
- Plh: Yes, let's move them to approved.
- 18:10:42 [plh]
- -> http://www.w3.org/2012/01/navigation-cr-issues.html CR issues list
- 18:12:39 [JatinderMann]
- Tony: James provided feedback on the test_timing_attributes_order.html on the mailing list. We should just test the order.
- 18:13:52 [simonjam]
- simonjam has joined #webperf
- 18:14:00 [Zakim]
- +Roger.a
- 18:16:30 [JatinderMann]
- Jatinder: I will work with Karen to get that test updated. This will be the last update needed for PR to move forward.
- 18:18:18 [plh]
- zakim, mute Roger
- 18:18:18 [Zakim]
- Roger should now be muted
- 18:18:33 [JatinderMann]
- Plh: Considering Page Visibility is stable, we should move it forward to CR. Do we have any other feedback on that spec?
- 18:18:45 [JatinderMann]
- Tony: No, it appears all feedback has been met. We should be able to move it forward.
- 18:18:59 [JatinderMann]
- Jatinder: Yes, let's move to CR. I will work with Karen to have the Page Visibility test suite available in two weeks.
- 18:21:09 [JatinderMann]
- plh: We should consider moving requestAnimationFrame to last call. We should ping James/Cameron to see if there are any other issues.
- 18:21:32 [JatinderMann]
- JatindeR: I can send mail asking James/Cameron if there are any other issues. If not, we can move this one to LC and then to CR shortly thereafter.
- 18:22:20 [JatinderMann]
- plh: Is anyone working on a test suite for requestAnimationFrame?
- 18:22:32 [JatinderMann]
- Jatinder: I can work on getting a test suite for requestAnimationFrame together.
- 18:24:18 [JatinderMann]
- plh: What about the HAR format? Any updates?
- 18:24:40 [JatinderMann]
- Jatinder: I believe we wanted a draft spec prior to re-chartering. I will ask Arvind the question in the meeting minutes.
- 18:25:11 [Zakim]
- - +1.503.264.aaaa
- 18:25:14 [Zakim]
- - +1.404.978.aabb
- 18:25:16 [Zakim]
- -Plh
- 18:25:16 [Zakim]
- -[Microsoft]
- 18:25:19 [Zakim]
- -Roger
- 18:25:20 [Zakim]
- -Roger.a
- 18:25:21 [Zakim]
- RWC_web-per()1:00PM has ended
- 18:25:23 [Zakim]
- Attendees were Plh, +1.503.264.aaaa, [Microsoft], Roger, +1.404.978.aabb
- 18:26:35 [JatinderMann]
- rrsagent, generate minutes
- 18:26:35 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/01/25-webperf-minutes.html JatinderMann
- 19:55:41 [plh]
- zakim, bye
- 19:55:41 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #webperf
- 19:55:44 [plh]
- rrsagen,t bye
- 19:55:49 [plh]
- rrsagent, bye
- 19:55:49 [RRSAgent]
- I see no action items