IRC log of html-a11y on 2012-01-19
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 15:58:23 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #html-a11y
- 15:58:23 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2012/01/19-html-a11y-irc
- 15:58:25 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs world
- 15:58:27 [trackbot]
- Zakim, this will be 2119
- 15:58:28 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #html-a11y
- 15:58:28 [trackbot]
- Meeting: HTML Accessibility Task Force Teleconference
- 15:58:28 [trackbot]
- Date: 19 January 2012
- 15:59:00 [janina]
- Meeting: HTML-A11Y Task Force Teleconference
- 15:59:00 [janina]
- Chair: Janina_Sajka
- 15:59:00 [janina]
- agenda+ Issue Followup: What new issues? Next steps?
- 15:59:00 [janina]
- agenda+ Subteam Reports: ARIA Mapping; Text; Media
- 15:59:00 [janina]
- agenda+ Other Business
- 15:59:01 [janina]
- agenda+ Actions Review http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/track/actions/open
- 15:59:03 [janina]
- agenda+ Identify Scribe for 26 January http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/index.php?title=Scribe_List
- 15:59:05 [janina]
- agenda+ be done
- 15:59:57 [lwatson]
- lwatson has joined #html-a11y
- 16:00:05 [paulc]
- paulc has joined #html-a11y
- 16:02:11 [LeonieW]
- LeonieW has joined #html-a11y
- 16:02:42 [janina]
- zakim, who's here?
- 16:02:43 [paulc]
- zakim, who is on the call?
- 16:02:47 [Zakim]
- sorry, janina, I don't know what conference this is
- 16:02:53 [Zakim]
- sorry, paulc, I don't know what conference this is
- 16:02:59 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see LeonieW, paulc, Zakim, RRSAgent, Shilpi, janina, MichaelC, MikeSmith, trackbot, [tm]
- 16:04:02 [janina]
- zakim, this will be WAI_PFWG(HTML
- 16:04:19 [Zakim]
- ok, janina, I see WAI_PFWG(HTML TF)11:00AM already started
- 16:04:30 [paulc]
- zakim, who is on the call?
- 16:05:09 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see ??P57, John_Foliot, Cynthia_Shelly, [Microsoft], ??P50, ??P53 (muted)
- 16:05:10 [LeonieW]
- scribe: LeonieW
- 16:05:27 [MikeSmith]
- Zakim, call Mike
- 16:05:30 [janina]
- zakim, ??P50 is Janina_Sajka
- 16:05:51 [Zakim]
- ok, MikeSmith; the call is being made
- 16:05:53 [Zakim]
- +Judy
- 16:05:54 [Zakim]
- +Mike
- 16:05:57 [Zakim]
- +Janina_Sajka; got it
- 16:06:53 [richardschwerdtfe]
- richardschwerdtfe has joined #html-a11y
- 16:07:15 [paulc]
- Zakin, [Microsoft] has paulc
- 16:07:23 [Zakim]
- +Rich
- 16:07:29 [Zakim]
- +Cooper
- 16:07:31 [paulc]
- Zakim, [Microsoft] has paulc
- 16:07:31 [Zakim]
- +paulc; got it
- 16:07:34 [janina]
- zakim, who's on the phone?
- 16:07:34 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see ??P57, John_Foliot, Cynthia_Shelly, [Microsoft], Janina_Sajka, ??P53 (muted), Judy, Mike, Rich, Cooper
- 16:07:36 [Zakim]
- [Microsoft] has paulc
- 16:07:59 [LeonieW]
- scribenick: LeonieW
- 16:08:36 [MichaelC]
- zakim, Janina is Léonie_Watson
- 16:08:36 [Zakim]
- +Léonie_Watson; got it
- 16:08:41 [MichaelC]
- zakim, ??P57 is Janina_Sajka
- 16:08:41 [Zakim]
- +Janina_Sajka; got it
- 16:08:49 [Zakim]
- +??P15
- 16:09:04 [MichaelC]
- zakim, ??P15 is Steve_Faulkner
- 16:09:04 [Zakim]
- +Steve_Faulkner; got it
- 16:09:08 [Stevef]
- Stevef has joined #html-a11y
- 16:10:04 [MichaelC]
- zakim, drop ??P53
- 16:10:05 [Zakim]
- ??P53 is being disconnected
- 16:10:06 [Zakim]
- -??P53
- 16:10:52 [LeonieW]
- JS: Two things to do. Figure out if we got everything we wanted, and to figure out our next steps before Feb 11th.
- 16:11:31 [LeonieW]
- JS: Thank you to Paul for forwarding escalations and other information through to the TF list.
- 16:11:39 [Stevef]
- q+
- 16:11:53 [Zakim]
- -John_Foliot
- 16:12:03 [LeonieW]
- JS: Does anyone have a direct concern about any issues?
- 16:12:20 [LeonieW]
- JB: Thank you also to Paul for the update on the longdesc issue.
- 16:12:22 [Zakim]
- +John_Foliot
- 16:13:21 [LeonieW]
- PC: Judy is referring to a thread open on the chair's list.
- 16:14:03 [LeonieW]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 16:14:03 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/01/19-html-a11y-minutes.html LeonieW
- 16:14:46 [Zakim]
- -John_Foliot
- 16:14:48 [LeonieW]
- PC: If the TF has a preferred order that issues are processed in, information on how or why an issue should be prioritised would be helpful.
- 16:15:06 [Zakim]
- +John_Foliot
- 16:15:15 [paulc]
- q+
- 16:15:25 [janina]
- q?
- 16:15:31 [janina]
- ack ste
- 16:16:07 [LeonieW]
- SF: Only re-opened requests have to be provided by 11th Feb. Most change proposals are due by 18th Feb.
- 16:16:22 [paulc]
- http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html
- 16:17:31 [LeonieW]
- PC: Most are due on the 15th or 16th. The chairs were being conservative, and considerate to the TF at the same time.
- 16:17:35 [paulc]
- q-
- 16:17:40 [janina]
- q?
- 16:17:58 [LeonieW]
- PC: We did decide to stick to the 11th for re-opned requests.
- 16:18:07 [LeonieW]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 16:18:07 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/01/19-html-a11y-minutes.html LeonieW
- 16:18:14 [cyns]
- cyns has joined #html-a11y
- 16:18:19 [paulc]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2012Jan/0022.html
- 16:18:59 [LeonieW]
- PC: We sent a personal reminder to people who have re-opned requests without change proposals.
- 16:19:24 [LeonieW]
- PC: Job 1 is to figure out who, and when.
- 16:19:41 [LeonieW]
- JS: We need our wiki updated with these new issues. Could someone take that on?
- 16:21:03 [LeonieW]
- LW: If someone can let me know what and where, I don't mind.
- 16:21:31 [LeonieW]
- RS: Paul, were the chairs able to review the proposal for the baseline?
- 16:21:47 [LeonieW]
- PC: I'll be frank, no. It rings a bell though. Let me check a moment.
- 16:21:54 [LeonieW]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 16:21:54 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/01/19-html-a11y-minutes.html LeonieW
- 16:22:32 [LeonieW]
- JS: Lets walk through the issues one by one and identify a primary stakeholder.
- 16:23:33 [LeonieW]
- Topic: Issue 193
- 16:24:08 [MichaelC]
- -> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/193 HTML-ISSUE-193
- 16:24:15 [Zakim]
- -Judy
- 16:24:44 [paulc]
- Re ISSUE-131 - see my email to the TF in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2012Jan/0161.html
- 16:24:57 [LeonieW]
- SF: There is an example in the spec that advocates a CSS technique that causes problems for keyboard only users in relation to visible focus.
- 16:25:01 [Zakim]
- +Judy
- 16:25:04 [paulc]
- ISSUE-131 is open and there is a pending call for change proposals.
- 16:25:13 [LeonieW]
- Topic: Issue 194
- 16:25:26 [MichaelC]
- -> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/194 HTML-ISSUE-194
- 16:26:10 [LeonieW]
- JF: There is no way to link a transcript with an audio or video element.
- 16:26:47 [LeonieW]
- JF: I can write the change proposal for this. I'll ping Silvia, as she filed the bug originally.
- 16:27:51 [LeonieW]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 16:27:51 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/01/19-html-a11y-minutes.html LeonieW
- 16:28:19 [LeonieW]
- Topic: Issue 199
- 16:28:31 [MichaelC]
- -> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/199 HTML-ISSUE-199
- 16:28:52 [LeonieW]
- MC: This is the omnibus escalation that encompasses all ARIA bugs.
- 16:29:31 [LeonieW]
- MC: We took a representative bug and escalated it, then tied similar smaller bugs into it.
- 16:29:31 [Stevef]
- q+
- 16:30:36 [paulc]
- See http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html#ISSUE-199 which lists the other bugs
- 16:30:42 [LeonieW]
- RS: How does one write a change proposal for this? Was the plan for multiple proposals?
- 16:32:00 [LeonieW]
- RS: What's the time frame for proposals?
- 16:32:13 [LeonieW]
- PC: Until 16th Feb.
- 16:32:37 [LeonieW]
- JS: Do we need to reconstitute the ARIA mapping sub team?
- 16:34:07 [paulc]
- I don't understand the statement "the Editor is not responding".
- 16:34:48 [LeonieW]
- SF: Is it worth us providing the information needed for these bugs, and asking him to write something?
- 16:35:01 [LeonieW]
- MC: No, it's probably better for us to write something.
- 16:35:54 [MikeSmith]
- for the record, I believe it was a mistake to escalate those issues at this point
- 16:36:23 [paulc]
- q+
- 16:36:25 [LeonieW]
- SF: We hadn't responded to the needs info request. They're important for HTML5 now, not just down the track.
- 16:36:32 [MikeSmith]
- in general, I think it's a mistake to prematurely escalate any issues until we have clearly reached a point of disagreement with an editor
- 16:36:33 [LeonieW]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 16:36:33 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/01/19-html-a11y-minutes.html LeonieW
- 16:36:34 [janina]
- q?
- 16:36:42 [Stevef]
- ak stevef
- 16:36:46 [janina]
- ack stack pau
- 16:36:51 [janina]
- ack ste
- 16:36:52 [janina]
- ack pau
- 16:37:44 [MikeSmith]
- the escalation path was intended for not being used until we had reached an impasse -- that is, when it was clear the we could not get agreement between the editor and a commenter
- 16:37:50 [LeonieW]
- PC: The bugs here are linked because I recommended to the TF that they should be. If they need to be split at any point for whatever reason, you should let me know.
- 16:38:19 [paulc]
- q-
- 16:39:18 [LeonieW]
- SF: What happens if we de-escalate them? Does that move them out of LC bugs?
- 16:39:20 [MikeSmith]
- what we are doing by escalating them is cutting off the normal process of attempting to reach agreement in a reasonable way and instead imposing months of additional change-proposal-writing and process overhead on ourselves and the group and the chairs
- 16:40:05 [LeonieW]
- PC: The chairs are always willing to see bugs closed based on consensus. The editor has told us he's not working on LC bugs at the moment.
- 16:40:18 [MikeSmith]
- despite him having said that, he has been resolving LC bugs
- 16:40:27 [MikeSmith]
- we are now down to 35 LC bugs
- 16:40:36 [MikeSmith]
- and Hixie is continuing to work on them
- 16:40:51 [LeonieW]
- PC: If you don't escalate them and don't get agreement with the editor, they will be moved into the next LC or to a later draft of the spec.
- 16:41:11 [LeonieW]
- SF: We can still provide further information to the editor, or we can go further and provide the change proposal.
- 16:41:30 [LeonieW]
- JS: Suggest a meeting is the sensible next step.
- 16:41:34 [LeonieW]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 16:41:34 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/01/19-html-a11y-minutes.html LeonieW
- 16:41:54 [LeonieW]
- SF: Mike, what do you suggest?
- 16:42:38 [LeonieW]
- MS: Suggest we continue to get these bugs resolved. In particular the bug about lexical processing rules in ARIA. Hixie couldn't do anythig further, he was waiting for information.
- 16:43:13 [LeonieW]
- SF: If we de-escalate them, can we later re-escalate them?
- 16:43:19 [LeonieW]
- PC: No, that date has passed.
- 16:43:51 [Judy]
- Judy has joined #html-a11y
- 16:43:56 [MikeSmith]
- q+ to repeat that the escalation path was intended for bugs for which we had clearly reached an impasse and have no other way of reaching agreement
- 16:44:04 [Judy]
- q+
- 16:44:22 [LeonieW]
- JS: Isn't this substantively the same thing?
- 16:44:44 [paulc]
- q+
- 16:45:19 [Judy]
- q?
- 16:45:20 [LeonieW]
- CS: If there's information to be provided, let's provide it.
- 16:45:25 [Judy]
- ack ju
- 16:45:43 [LeonieW]
- RS: Paul, what is the response time after a change proposal has been submitted?
- 16:46:46 [LeonieW]
- PC: As soon as the change proposal deadline passes, there will be a counter proposal invitation.
- 16:48:00 [Judy]
- agenda?
- 16:48:01 [LeonieW]
- PC: After 15th and 16th Feb, there will be a month for counter proposals to be submitted.
- 16:48:21 [LeonieW]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 16:48:21 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/01/19-html-a11y-minutes.html LeonieW
- 16:48:30 [LeonieW]
- RS: That timetable might be difficult.
- 16:48:33 [Judy]
- q?
- 16:48:45 [LeonieW]
- PC: The timetable has been published for some while now.
- 16:49:18 [LeonieW]
- JF: Is it reasonable to presume that we could request an extension to the timeline?
- 16:49:24 [LeonieW]
- PC: No idea how the chairs would respond.
- 16:49:32 [LeonieW]
- JF: So would it be unreasonable to request?
- 16:49:52 [LeonieW]
- PC: If you want to do that, you should go ahead. I can't offer an opinion.
- 16:50:08 [LeonieW]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 16:50:08 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/01/19-html-a11y-minutes.html LeonieW
- 16:51:10 [janina]
- q?
- 16:51:15 [MikeSmith]
- q-
- 16:51:29 [cyns]
- q+
- 16:51:31 [janina]
- ack mi
- 16:51:37 [janina]
- ack pau
- 16:52:39 [janina]
- ack cy
- 16:54:30 [LeonieW]
- Topic: Issue 200
- 16:54:36 [MichaelC]
- -> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/200 HTML-ISSUE-200
- 16:54:42 [LeonieW]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 16:54:42 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/01/19-html-a11y-minutes.html LeonieW
- 16:54:55 [LeonieW]
- MC: Not sure this is a11y related.
- 16:55:06 [LeonieW]
- JS: Not for us to worry about.
- 16:55:06 [MichaelC]
- -> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/201 HTML-ISSUE-201
- 16:55:18 [LeonieW]
- Topic: Issue 201
- 16:55:30 [LeonieW]
- RS: Frank was looking into this one.
- 16:55:46 [LeonieW]
- CS: He is aware of it, but it's not his first priority right now.
- 16:55:57 [LeonieW]
- RS: We can help him write it up.
- 16:57:18 [LeonieW]
- RS: I'm trying to get Ian some use cases to address deficiencies relating to carat and fallback etc.
- 16:57:22 [LeonieW]
- Topic: Issue 202
- 16:57:25 [LeonieW]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 16:57:25 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/01/19-html-a11y-minutes.html LeonieW
- 16:57:26 [MichaelC]
- -> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/202 HTML-ISSUE-202
- 16:58:07 [LeonieW]
- JS: One for the text sub team.
- 16:58:21 [LeonieW]
- JB: We can discuss on the text call.
- 16:58:26 [LeonieW]
- Topic: Issue 203
- 16:58:40 [MichaelC]
- -> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/203 HTML-ISSUE-203
- 16:59:03 [LeonieW]
- JF: This is dependent on the outcome of issue 30 (longdesc).
- 16:59:17 [LeonieW]
- JF: Therefore not sure how to proceed on this one.
- 17:00:20 [LeonieW]
- PC: You should raise up that issue 30 needs to be processed in a timely way before issue 203 can be addressed.
- 17:00:22 [LeonieW]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 17:00:22 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/01/19-html-a11y-minutes.html LeonieW
- 17:00:26 [paulc]
- ISSUE-131 email:
- 17:00:27 [paulc]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2012Jan/0161.html
- 17:00:46 [LeonieW]
- PC: Earlier we spoke about issue 131. I've pasted the response in channel.
- 17:00:58 [LeonieW]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 17:00:58 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/01/19-html-a11y-minutes.html LeonieW
- 17:01:15 [Zakim]
- -Steve_Faulkner
- 17:01:17 [Zakim]
- -John_Foliot
- 17:01:19 [Zakim]
- -Mike
- 17:01:23 [Zakim]
- -Cynthia_Shelly
- 17:01:25 [Zakim]
- -Léonie_Watson
- 17:01:27 [Zakim]
- -Cooper
- 17:01:29 [Zakim]
- -Janina_Sajka
- 17:01:31 [Zakim]
- -Judy
- 17:01:33 [paulc]
- quit
- 17:01:57 [Zakim]
- -[Microsoft]
- 17:05:53 [LeonieW]
- Present: Janina Sajka, Mike Smith, Judy Brewer, Michael Cooper, Paul Cotton, Rich Schwerdtfeger, John Foliot, Cynthia Shelley, Léonie Watson, Steve Faulkner
- 17:06:04 [LeonieW]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 17:06:04 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2012/01/19-html-a11y-minutes.html LeonieW
- 17:06:56 [LeonieW]
- zakim, please part
- 17:06:56 [Zakim]
- leaving. As of this point the attendees were John_Foliot, Cynthia_Shelly, Judy, Mike, Janina_Sajka, Rich, Cooper, paulc, Léonie_Watson, Steve_Faulkner
- 17:06:56 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #html-a11y
- 17:07:07 [LeonieW]
- rrsagent, please part
- 17:07:07 [RRSAgent]
- I see no action items