ISSUE-194: How should we ensure consent of users for DNT inputs?

user-consent

How should we ensure consent of users for DNT inputs?

State:
PENDING REVIEW
Product:
Compliance Next
Raised by:
Nick Doty
Opened on:
2013-04-10
Description:
This issue comprises the requirements on how to user agents can collect a valid user preference (=ensure that a transmitted DNT preference indeed reflects the preference of the user).

- Consent and user education requirements on browsers for collecting informed
consent to the initial tracking preferences.
- Consent and user education requirements on sites for collecting informed
consent on an exception that is collected by a site

It is related to ISSUE-195 that is a similar discussion on how sites are required to interact with the user before registering a valid exception with a browser.
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Batch closing of old issues (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2015-03-24)
  2. Re: Agenda for May 14 TPWG call (from jack@networkadvertising.org on 2014-05-14)
  3. Re: Agenda for May 14 TPWG call (from kulick@yahoo-inc.com on 2014-05-14)
  4. Re: Agenda for May 14 TPWG call - UPDATE (from ninja@w3.org on 2014-05-14)
  5. Re: Agenda for May 14 TPWG call (from singer@mac.com on 2014-05-13)
  6. Agenda for May 14 TPWG call (from ninja@w3.org on 2014-05-12)
  7. Agenda for May 7 TPWG call (from ninja@w3.org on 2014-05-06)
  8. Re: Agenda for April 30 TPWG call (from singer@apple.com on 2014-04-28)
  9. Agenda for April 30 TPWG call (from ninja@w3.org on 2014-04-28)
  10. Re: Status of ISSUE-143 (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2014-02-25)
  11. RE: Status of ISSUE-143 (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2014-02-21)
  12. Status of ISSUE-143 (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2014-02-19)
  13. Re: June Change Proposal, user agent compliance, ISSUE-172, ISSUE-194 (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2013-06-26)
  14. Re: June Change Proposal, user agent compliance, ISSUE-172, ISSUE-194 (from achapell@chapellassociates.com on 2013-06-26)
  15. Re: June Change Proposal, user agent compliance, ISSUE-172, ISSUE-194 (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-06-25)
  16. Re: June Change Proposal, user agent compliance, ISSUE-172, ISSUE-194 (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2013-06-25)
  17. Re: June Change Proposal, user agent compliance, ISSUE-172, ISSUE-194 (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-06-25)
  18. June Change Proposal, user agent compliance, ISSUE-172, ISSUE-194 (from jbrookman@cdt.org on 2013-06-25)
  19. Re: issue and action cleanup proposals (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-05-21)
  20. Agenda for May 22 call (from peter@peterswire.net on 2013-05-21)
  21. Re: issue and action cleanup proposals (from ylagos@futureofprivacy.org on 2013-05-21)
  22. Re: issue and action cleanup proposals (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-05-19)
  23. issue and action cleanup proposals (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-05-15)
  24. Re: Mapping the "framework" to ISSUEs (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-05-07)
  25. Mapping the "framework" to ISSUEs (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-05-07)
  26. Re: Call for proposals for ISSUE-194 (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-05-06)
  27. Re: Call for proposals for ISSUE-194 (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-05-05)
  28. Re: F2F: Open Issues for the TPE Discussion on Tuesday (from fielding@gbiv.com on 2013-05-05)
  29. F2F: Open Issues for the TPE Discussion on Tuesday (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-05-05)
  30. Re: Call for proposals for ISSUE-194 (from rigo@w3.org on 2013-05-05)
  31. Re: Call for proposals for ISSUE-194 (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-05-04)
  32. Re: Call for proposals for ISSUE-194 (from felten@CS.Princeton.EDU on 2013-05-03)
  33. Re: Call for proposals for ISSUE-194 (from ifette@google.com on 2013-05-03)
  34. RE: Call for proposals for ISSUE-194 (from bs3131@att.com on 2013-05-03)
  35. Re: Call for proposals for ISSUE-194 (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-05-03)
  36. Re: Call for proposals for ISSUE-194 (from rigo@w3.org on 2013-05-03)
  37. Re: Call for proposals for ISSUE-194 (from walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl on 2013-05-03)
  38. Re: Call for proposals for ISSUE-194 (from rigo@w3.org on 2013-05-03)
  39. Re: Call for proposals for ISSUE-194 (from walter.van.holst@xs4all.nl on 2013-05-03)
  40. Re: Call for proposals for ISSUE-194 (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-05-02)
  41. Re: Call for proposals for ISSUE-194 (from rigo@w3.org on 2013-05-01)
  42. RE: Call for proposals for ISSUE-194 (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2013-05-01)
  43. RE: Call for proposals for ISSUE-194 (from jccannon@microsoft.com on 2013-05-01)
  44. Re: Call for proposals for ISSUE-194 (from rob@blaeu.com on 2013-05-01)
  45. Re: Call for proposals for ISSUE-194 (from chris.mejia@iab.net on 2013-05-01)
  46. RE: Call for proposals for ISSUE-194 (from wileys@yahoo-inc.com on 2013-04-30)
  47. Re: Call for proposals for ISSUE-194 (from rob@blaeu.com on 2013-04-30)
  48. Call for proposals for ISSUE-194 (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-04-30)
  49. Re: ISSUE-161: Discussion of semantics and alternatives to "!" (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-04-16)
  50. Re: ISSUE-161: Discussion of semantics and alternatives to "!" (from singer@apple.com on 2013-04-16)
  51. Re: ISSUE-161: Discussion of semantics and alternatives to "!" (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-04-15)
  52. Re: ISSUE-161: Discussion of semantics and alternatives to "!" (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-04-15)
  53. RE: Batch closing of TPE-related issues (response by April 16) (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2013-04-15)
  54. Re: Batch closing of TPE-related issues (response by April 16) (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-04-15)
  55. ISSUE-161: Discussion of semantics and alternatives to "!" (was: Batch closing) (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-04-15)
  56. Re: Batch closing of TPE-related issues (response by April 16) (from john@consumerwatchdog.org on 2013-04-12)
  57. Re: Batch closing of TPE-related issues (response by April 16) (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-04-12)
  58. Re: Batch closing of TPE-related issues (response by April 16) (from david@appnexus.com on 2013-04-12)
  59. RE: Batch closing of TPE-related issues (response by April 16) (from michael.oneill@baycloud.com on 2013-04-12)
  60. Batch closing of TPE-related issues (response by April 16) (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-04-12)
  61. Re: Closing ISSUE-187 by focusing our discussion on consent standard (ISSUE-194) [Response required by Monday April 15] (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-04-12)
  62. Re: Closing ISSUE-187 by focusing our discussion on consent standard (ISSUE-194) [Response required by Monday April 15] (from jmayer@stanford.edu on 2013-04-11)
  63. Closing ISSUE-187 by focusing our discussion on consent standard (ISSUE-194) [Response required by Monday April 15] (from mts-std@schunter.org on 2013-04-11)
  64. tracking-ISSUE-194 (user education): How should we address user education about DNT? (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-04-10)
  65. Re: user interface/user education (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-04-09)
  66. Re: user interface/user education (from npdoty@w3.org on 2013-04-09)

Related notes:

[npdoty]: agreement that we would continue with DNT: 0 and DNT: 1 (rather than a change to obsolete legacy clients, or for other reasons), but issue-194 may cover additional things

22 May 2013, 16:21:22

During issue cleanup, changed short-name to reflect focus on consent; issue-172 is related and more on the user education side. Also changed to Tracking Compliance and Scope product, though it might touch on both documents.

Nick Doty, 29 May 2013, 01:49:33

Addressed in TPE and by group decision to remove user agent requirements from TCS. Moved to pending review.

Justin Brookman, 10 Sep 2014, 15:28:32

Display change log ATOM feed

Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 194.html,v 1.1 2019/02/01 09:32:34 vivien Exp $