From RDF Working Group Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Wednesdays at 11am US Eastern time for 60 minutes

  17:00 Paris/Berlin/A'dam; 16:00 London
Telephone US: +1.617.761.6200
  Zakim code: 73394
IRC channel: #rdf-wg on on port 6665
Zakim instructions:
RRSAgent instructions:
Scribe list:


  • Chair: David Wood
  • Scribe: <please volunteer>

Minutes of last meeting

PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 5 June telecon:

Review of action items

LC Drafts of Concepts and Semantics

Editors Drafts:

On ISSUE-131, Sandro suggests: PROPOSED: We'll add some text to rdf-concepts saying systems MAY support blank node graph names and that communication between systems that do and don't can be aided by using Skolemization (and this closes ISSUE-131).

On ISSUE-136 Sandro suggests: PROPOSED: The formal meaning of an RDF Dataset is no less than the formal meaning of its default graph. This revises an earlier decision that datasets in general have no formal semantics, in order to allow for the use of specific dataset semantics to be signalled within a dataset. This feature to be added to rdf-concepts and rdf-mt, marked AT RISK for LC, since it hasn't been discussed much yet.

PROPOSED: Publish rdf-concepts as a Last Call Working Draft (after incorporating any changes agreed on during this meeting)

PROPOSED: Publish rdf-mt as a Last Call Working Draft (after incorporating any changes agreed on during this meeting)

Admin on LC prep:

  • Status of reviews.

Other Serializations

  • Status of TriG, NT, NQ
  • ISSUE-23 resolution?

On ISSUE-23, Sandro suggests: PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-23 without general comment. We have been deciding on a case-by-case basis (YES for Turtle/TriG, NO for JSON-LD) and we expect to continue to do so.

JSON-LD/RDF Alignment

Thread on rdf-comments: