From RDF Working Group Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Agenda RDF-WG telecon 04 Jan 2012

Wednesdays at 11am US Eastern time for 75 minutes
  17:00 Paris/Berlin/A'dam; 16:00 London)
Telephone US: +1.617.761.6200
  UK: +44.203.318.0479
  FR: +
Zakim code: 73394
IRC channel: #rdf-wg on on port 6665
Zakim instructions:
RRSAgent instructions:
Scribe list:


  • Chair: Guus Schreiber
  • Scribe: Souripriya Das
  • Alternate: Thomas Steiner

PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 21 Dec telecon:

Action item review:

Next telecon: 11 Jan 2012


Review by RDF-WG, See message from Manu

Status comments received

December comments:



RDF-ISSUE-82 (TriG repeated graph iris)

How should repeated graph IRI labels be handled in TriG [RDF Turtle]

See thread starting with:

Named Graphs

Issue: should/must the 4th slot be an IRI?

See thread starting with

Two alternative points of view (see minutes 30 Nov):

  1. we are not in a position to constrain the type of the "4th slot"
  2. we are standardizing graph identifiers, so they better be identifiers (= IRI)

Todo: list arguments in favor/against these positions (e.g. #1 breaks TriG).

IRI names for both graph containers and graphs?

Leave this ambiguous? See Pat's message:

  • Are names for a graph (as opposed to a graph container) needed? Potential use case: signing a graph.
  • Can we handle ambiguity of IRI names?

More test cases?