Agenda RDF-WG telecon 29 June 2011
Wednesdays at 11am US Eastern time for 75 minutes 17:00 Paris/Berlin/A'dam; 16:00 London) Telephone US: +1.617.761.6200 SIP: firstname.lastname@example.org UK: +44.203.318.0479 FR: +184.108.40.206.79.03 Zakim code: 73394 IRC channel: #rdf-wg on irc.w3.org on port 6665 Zakim instructions: http://www.w3.org/2001/12/zakim-irc-bot.html RRSAgent instructions: http://www.w3.org/2002/03/RRSAgent Scribe list: http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/wiki/Scribes
- Chair: Lee Feigenbaum
- Scribe: Nick Humfrey
- Alternate: Matteo Brunati
PROPOSED to accept the minutes of the 22 June telecon:
http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/meeting/2011-06-22 draft version: http://www.w3.org/2011/06/22-rdf-wg-minutes.html
Action item review:
Relevant issues currently in the tracker, provisionally organized in three groups:
Noyes SPARQL/RDF WG Meeting regarding graph terminology:
- LINK NEEDED
- short report
- overview proposed resolutions and actions
ISSUE-14 What is a named graph and what should we call it?
ISSUE-38 graph-vocabulary: What new vocabulary should be added to RDF to talk about graphs?
ISSUE-29 default-graph: Do we support SPARQL's notion of "default graph"?
ISSUE-30 sparql datasets: How does SPARQL's notion of RDF dataset relate our notion of multiple graphs?
Graph concepts & semantics
ISSUE-15 What is the relationship between the IRI and the triples in a dataset/quad-syntax/etc
- Status of Action-65 http://www.w3.org/2011/rdf-wg/track/users/21507
- Amendment of Pierre-Antoine: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Jun/0153.html
Other action under this heading (with proposed discussion order):
ISSUE-32 naming g-snaps: Can we identify both g-boxes and g-snaps?
ISSUE-33 subgraphs: Do we provide a way to refer to sub-graphs and/or individual triples?
ISSUE-35 rdf:Graph?: Should there be an rdf:Graph construct, or something like that?
ISSUE-17 Graph merge: How are RDF datasets to be merged?
ISSUE-21 Shared Node-IDs: Can Node-IDs be shared between parts of a quad/multigraph format?
ISSUE-22 empty-graphs: Does multigraph syntax need to support empty graphs?
ISSUE-31 multigraph syntax needed: Do we produce a standard (REC) syntax for conveying multiple graphs?
SPARQL Last Call: see message from Lee: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011May/0192.html
Review of Pierre-Antoine: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-wg/2011Jun/0154.html