ISSUE-91: what should we define under the heading 'location'

what-to-define-for-location

what should we define under the heading 'location'

State:

CLOSED

Product:

prov-dm

Raised by:

Luc Moreau

Opened on:

2011-09-06

Description:

We have received little input and there has been barely any discussion on location.
The current text is essentially copied from the wiki and is not aligned with the rest of the model.

So, can entities have location? If so, should location appear as an attribute of an entity?
So, should PIDM define some core attributes? or should this be left to a generic profile?

What about process executions? PIDM does not have "attribute" for PEs. So, do we need to define a relation hasLocation?

Is location unique for an entity/pe?

Can people who have interest in location for provenance provide us with some guidance, so that we can write something sensible for the FPWD.

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Re: PROV-ISSUE-91 (what-to-define-for-location): what should we define under the heading 'location' [Conceptual Model] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2011-12-02)
2. Re: PROV-ISSUE-91 (what-to-define-for-location): what should we define under the heading 'location' [Conceptual Model] (from soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk on 2011-12-01)
3. Re: PROV-ISSUE-91 (what-to-define-for-location): what should we define under the heading 'location' [Conceptual Model] (from p.t.groth@vu.nl on 2011-11-30)
4. Re: PROV-ISSUE-91 (what-to-define-for-location): what should we define under the heading 'location' [Conceptual Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2011-11-30)
5. Re: PROV-ISSUE-91 (what-to-define-for-location): what should we define under the heading 'location' [Conceptual Model] (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2011-09-23)
6. PROV-ISSUE-91 (what-to-define-for-location): what should we define under the heading 'location' [Conceptual Model] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-09-06)

Related notes:

No additional notes.

Display change log