ISSUE-82: Should we introduce a notion of event in the data model?

pidm-event

State:

CLOSED

Product:

prov-dm

Raised by:

Luc Moreau

Opened on:

2011-08-25

Description:

The notion of event is defined implicitly, but not listed as one of the concepts. Would it facilitate the presentation of the model to define this concept explicitly.

See James' comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2011Aug/0349.html

See Satya's comment: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2011Aug/0342.html

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

Re: PROV-ISSUE-121: Constraint on PE (PROV-DM and PROV-OM) [Conceptual Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-01-11)
Re: PROV-ISSUE-121: Constraint on PE (PROV-DM and PROV-OM) [Conceptual Model] (from satya.sahoo@case.edu on 2012-01-11)
Re: PROV-ISSUE-121: Constraint on PE (PROV-DM and PROV-OM) [Conceptual Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2011-12-20)
Re: PROV-ISSUE-82 (pidm-event): Should we introduce a notion of event in the data model? [Conceptual Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2011-11-30)
Re: PROV-ISSUE-82 (pidm-event): Should we introduce a notion of event in the data model? [Conceptual Model] (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2011-09-23)
Re: PROV-ISSUE-71 (Conceptual Model draft): Section 3.2 of Conceptual Model draft (Content and Editing) [Conceptual Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2011-08-25)
PROV-ISSUE-82 (pidm-event): Should we introduce a notion of event in the data model? [Conceptual Model] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-08-25)

No additional notes.