ISSUE-667: attribute/element/type usage conventions in note
attribute/element/type usage conventions in note
- State:
- RAISED
- Product:
- XML Serialization
- Raised by:
- Stephan Zednik
- Opened on:
- 2013-04-17
- Description:
- From Luc's feedback on PROV-XML WG Note:
I find the use of terms "attribute", "element" and "type" very confusing.
I suggest a systematic replace as follows, to distinguish the prov
and xml usages of the terms.
- attribute to become prov-"attribute" or xml-attribute
- element to become prov-"element" or xml-element
- type to become prov-"type" or xml-type
For prov, I would also put them in quote.
Likewise, see attached file for some occurrences. But systematic
search is required. - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-667: attribute/element/type usage conventions in note [XML Serialization] (from zednis2@rpi.edu on 2013-04-17)
- PROV-ISSUE-667: attribute/element/type usage conventions in note [XML Serialization] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-04-17)
- Re: {Disarmed} Re: PROV-XML staged, ready for review (from zednis2@rpi.edu on 2013-04-16)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-667: attribute/element/type usage conventions in note [XML Serialization] (from zednis2@rpi.edu on 2013-04-16)
Related notes:
No additional notes.
Display change log
