ISSUE-630: PROV-SEM review for FPWD

prov-sem-fpwd-review

PROV-SEM review for FPWD

State:

CLOSED

Product:

Formal Semantics

Raised by:

James Cheney

Opened on:

2013-02-25

Description:

Hi,

I have completed a cleanup pass on the semantics. There are definitely still (mostly clearly-marked) areas where work is needed.

Satya, Simon, Paolo, and Khalid had indicated willingness to review by Thursday, so that we can vote on release with other documents as part of the PR release cycle.

Please respond to this issue with comments so that they are tracked.

Review questions:

1. Is the purpose of the document clear and consistent with the working group's consensus about the semantics? If not, can you suggest clarifications or improvements?

2. Are there minor issues that can be corrected easily prior to FPWD release?

3. Are there blocking issues that must be addressed prior to release as a first public working draft?

4. Are there non-blocking, but important issues that should be discussed and resolved for future editions? (no need to list TODOs already reflected in the document itself, unless there is disagreement about how to resolve them).

--James

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Re: PROV-ISSUE-630 (prov-sem-fpwd-review): PROV-SEM review for FPWD [Formal Semantics] (from jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk on 2013-03-05)
2. Re: PROV-ISSUE-630 (prov-sem-fpwd-review): PROV-SEM review for FPWD [Formal Semantics] (from jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk on 2013-03-02)
3. Re: PROV-ISSUE-630 (prov-sem-fpwd-review): PROV-SEM review for FPWD [Formal Semantics] (from Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk on 2013-03-02)
4. Re: a question on semantics prov-sem and soundness of constraints (issue-630) (from jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk on 2013-02-28)
5. Re: a question on semantics prov-sem and soundness of constraints (issue-630) (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2013-02-28)
6. Re: a question on semantics prov-sem and soundness of constraints (issue-630) (from jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk on 2013-02-28)
7. Re: PROV-ISSUE-630 (prov-sem-fpwd-review): PROV-SEM review for FPWD [Formal Semantics] (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2013-02-28)
8. a question on semantics prov-sem and soundness of constraints (issue-630) (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2013-02-28)
9. Re: PROV-ISSUE-630 (prov-sem-fpwd-review): PROV-SEM review for FPWD [Formal Semantics] (from jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk on 2013-02-28)
10. Re: PROV-ISSUE-630 (prov-sem-fpwd-review): PROV-SEM review for FPWD [Formal Semantics] (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2013-02-28)
11. Re: PROV-ISSUE-630 (prov-sem-fpwd-review): PROV-SEM review for FPWD [Formal Semantics] (from satya.sahoo@case.edu on 2013-02-27)
12. Re: PROV-ISSUE-630 (prov-sem-fpwd-review): PROV-SEM review for FPWD [Formal Semantics] (from Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk on 2013-02-27)
13. Re: PROV-ISSUE-630 (prov-sem-fpwd-review): PROV-SEM review for FPWD [Formal Semantics] (from Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk on 2013-02-27)
14. RE: PROV-ISSUE-630 (prov-sem-fpwd-review): PROV-SEM review for FPWD [Formal Semantics] (from simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk on 2013-02-26)
15. Re: PROV-ISSUE-630 (prov-sem-fpwd-review): PROV-SEM review for FPWD [Formal Semantics] (from jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk on 2013-02-25)
16. PROV-ISSUE-630 (prov-sem-fpwd-review): PROV-SEM review for FPWD [Formal Semantics] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-02-25)

Related notes:

No additional notes.

Display change log