ISSUE-57: comment on ivp of

comment-on-ivp-of

comment on ivp of

State:

CLOSED

Product:

prov-dm

Raised by:

Graham Klyne

Opened on:

2011-07-29

Description:

The revised
(w.r.t. http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/wiki/F2F1ConceptDefinitions#IVP_of)
treatment of IVP-of, and relabeling as "complement-of" completely
overturns my understanding of what this was intended to capture. I
understood the whole point of A IVP-of B was intended to capture the
notion that A denotes a contextually constrained form of the entity
denoted by B. I don't see what useful purpose this relation serves.

From a practical perspective, given the asymmetric nature of IVP-of
(as was) it is easy to express the effect of complement-of in RDF by
introducing a new entity node. But I see no way of constructing the
strict constraining role of IVP using complement-of.

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Re: PROV-ISSUE-57 (comment-on-ivp-of): comment on ivp of (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-01-05)
2. [PROV-O] issues in document (from p.t.groth@vu.nl on 2011-10-13)
3. RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from MYERSJ4@rpi.edu on 2011-09-29)
4. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk on 2011-09-29)
5. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2011-09-29)
6. RE: RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from MYERSJ4@rpi.edu on 2011-09-29)
7. RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from stephen.cresswell@tso.co.uk on 2011-09-29)
8. RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from stephen.cresswell@tso.co.uk on 2011-09-27)
9. RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from MYERSJ4@rpi.edu on 2011-09-26)
10. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2011-09-26)
11. RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from stephen.cresswell@tso.co.uk on 2011-09-25)
12. RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from MYERSJ4@rpi.edu on 2011-09-24)
13. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from mccusj@rpi.edu on 2011-09-23)
14. RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from MYERSJ4@rpi.edu on 2011-09-23)
15. RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from stephen.cresswell@tso.co.uk on 2011-09-23)
16. Re: PROV-ISSUE-57 (comment-on-ivp-of): comment on ivp of (from Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk on 2011-09-23)
17. Re: PROV-ISSUE-57 (comment-on-ivp-of): comment on ivp of (from Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk on 2011-08-02)
18. PROV-ISSUE-57 (comment-on-ivp-of): comment on ivp of (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-07-29)

Related notes:

No additional notes.

Display change log