ISSUE-476: (Editorial comment) hadOriginalSource still occurs in LC documents
(Editorial comment) hadOriginalSource still occurs in LC documents
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- PROV-O HTML
- Raised by:
- Tom De Nies
- Opened on:
- 2012-08-09
- Description:
- This is to address the comment by Jacek Kopecky found here:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-comments/2012Aug/0000.html
Apparently, hadOriginalSource still occurs a few times in some of the documents (from what I gather by a quick search, only in PROV-O), and should be changed to primary source. - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: PROV-O editorial issue: hadOriginalSource (from j.kopecky@open.ac.uk on 2012-11-02)
- Re: PROV-O editorial issue: hadOriginalSource (from tom.denies@ugent.be on 2012-11-02)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-476: (Editorial comment) hadOriginalSource still occurs in LC documents [PROV-O HTML] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-08-14)
- Re: PROV-O editorial issue: hadOriginalSource (from tom.denies@ugent.be on 2012-08-09)
- PROV-ISSUE-476: (Editorial comment) hadOriginalSource still occurs in LC documents [PROV-O HTML] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-08-09)
Related notes:
No additional notes.
Display change log
