ISSUE-398: Is ProvenanceService rdfs:subClassOf prov:SoftwareAgent ?
Is ProvenanceService rdfs:subClassOf prov:SoftwareAgent ?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- Accessing and Querying Provenance
- Raised by:
- Timothy Lebo
- Opened on:
- 2012-06-05
- Description:
- PAQ editors,
Is ProvenanceService rdfs:subClassOf prov:SoftwareAgent ?
Thanks,
Tim
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-398: Is ProvenanceService rdfs:subClassOf prov:SoftwareAgent ? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (from graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2012-06-08)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-398: Is ProvenanceService rdfs:subClassOf prov:SoftwareAgent ? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-06-05)
- Re: PROV-ISSUE-398: Is ProvenanceService rdfs:subClassOf prov:SoftwareAgent ? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (from p.t.groth@vu.nl on 2012-06-05)
- PROV-ISSUE-398: Is ProvenanceService rdfs:subClassOf prov:SoftwareAgent ? [Accessing and Querying Provenance] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-06-05)
Related notes:
I note that the file PROV-AQ.ttl *does* declare ProvenanceService as a subclass of SoftwareAgent. I disagree with making this blanket assertion (see previous response on this issue), but in any case it does not affect the document so I propose to close the issue without further action.
Graham Klyne, 6 Nov 2012, 14:58:07In closing this issue, we the editors make the explicit confirmation that vocabulary terms introduced by PROV-AQ should not have any ontological commitments with respect to other vocabularies; i.e. no subclassing, sub properties, etc.
Graham Klyne, 14 Nov 2012, 21:46:06Display change log
