ISSUE-384: prov:role in attribution or not?

prov-role-in-attribution

prov:role in attribution or not?

State:
CLOSED
Product:
prov-dm
Raised by:
Luc Moreau
Opened on:
2012-05-24
Description:
In the example,
http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-dm/#anexample-attribution,
we write:
wasAttributedTo(tr:WD-prov-dm-20111215, ex:Paolo, [prov:role="editor"])


But in
http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-dm/#term-attribute-role
we say:
The attribute prov:role denotes the function of an entity with respect to an activity, in the context of a usage, generation, association, start, and end.


So,
1. Do we want to accept prov:role in Attribution?
(or, it's not a prov:role but prov:type we should use?)

2. If yes, does it mean the definition of prov:role needs to be changed? where is the activity?

3. Should we have an optional activity in Attribution?

Luc
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. suggested resolution ISSUE-532 (from p.t.groth@vu.nl on 2012-09-27)
  2. Re: PROV-ISSUE-532: Data Model Section 5.7.2.3 [prov-dm] (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-09-10)
  3. Re: [owl changed] Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-09-04)
  4. [owl changed] Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-06-08)
  5. Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-06-08)
  6. Re: Definition of role (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-06-05)
  7. Re: ISSUE 384 comment. (Was: prov-wg meeting minutes 2012-05-31) (from Graham.Klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2012-06-04)
  8. Re: ISSUE 384 comment. (Was: prov-wg meeting minutes 2012-05-31) (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-06-04)
  9. Re: Definition of role (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-06-04)
  10. Re: Definition of role (from graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2012-06-04)
  11. Re: Definition of role (from p.t.groth@vu.nl on 2012-06-04)
  12. Re: Definition of role (from graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2012-06-03)
  13. Re: Definition of role (from p.t.groth@vu.nl on 2012-06-03)
  14. Re: Definition of role (from graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2012-06-03)
  15. ISSUE 384 comment. (Was: prov-wg meeting minutes 2012-05-31) (from graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2012-06-03)
  16. Re: Definition of role (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-06-01)
  17. Re: Definition of role (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-06-01)
  18. Re: Definition of role (from p.t.groth@vu.nl on 2012-06-01)
  19. Re: Definition of role (from p.t.groth@vu.nl on 2012-06-01)
  20. Re: prov-wg meeting minutes 2012-05-31 (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-06-01)
  21. Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-05-31)
  22. Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-05-31)
  23. Re: Definition of role (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-05-31)
  24. Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-05-31)
  25. Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] (from graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2012-05-30)
  26. Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-05-30)
  27. Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] (from graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2012-05-30)
  28. Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-05-29)
  29. Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] (from graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2012-05-29)
  30. Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] (from zednis@rpi.edu on 2012-05-29)
  31. Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-05-29)
  32. Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] (from zednis@rpi.edu on 2012-05-29)
  33. Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-05-29)
  34. Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-05-29)
  35. Re: PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] (from p.t.groth@vu.nl on 2012-05-26)
  36. PROV-ISSUE-384 (prov-role-in-attribution): prov:role in attribution or not? [prov-dm] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-05-24)

Related notes:

No additional notes.

Display change log ATOM feed

Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 384.html,v 1.1 2013-06-20 07:37:40 vivien Exp $