ISSUE-29: can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other

mutual-iVP-of

can two bobs be mutually "IVP of" each other

State:
CLOSED
Product:
prov-dm
Raised by:
Stephen Cresswell
Opened on:
2011-07-11
Description:
As it currently stands, I believe that it does not exclude the possibility that two bobs may be mutually "IVP of" each other -
i.e. you could have bobs A, B such that (B IVPof A) & (A IVPof B), and this is surely not intended.

This could arise if, for bobs A, B :
- A and B both represent the same entity
- A and B share some immutable properties, and they have corresponding values.
- B has some immutable properties which correspond to mutable properties of A
- A has some immutable properties which correspond to mutable properties of B

Possibly the asserter-defined test (included in "IPV of" definition) that real world states modelled by A and B are "consistent" may disallow
"IPV of" in this situation. However, unless that is guaranteed, I think that the definition of "B IPV of A" (if it is still to have a definition) should additionally require that:
"A has no immutable properties which correspond to mutable properties of B"

Stephen
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: PROV-ISSUE-526: Data Model Section 5.5.2 [prov-dm] (from Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk on 2012-09-28)
  2. Re: PROV-ISSUE-526: Data Model Section 5.5.2 [prov-dm] (from jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk on 2012-09-28)
  3. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-05-30)
  4. Re: PROV-ISSUE-331 (review-dm-wd5): issue to collect feedback on prov-dm wd5 [prov-dm] (from graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2012-04-26)
  5. Re: Different senses of specialization (from tom.denies@ugent.be on 2012-04-12)
  6. Re: Different senses of specialization (from jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk on 2012-04-12)
  7. Re: Different senses of specialization (from jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk on 2012-04-12)
  8. Re: Different senses of specialization (from jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2012-04-12)
  9. Re: Different senses of specialization (from graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2012-04-12)
  10. Re: Different senses of specialization (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-04-11)
  11. Re: Different senses of specialization (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-04-11)
  12. Re: Different senses of specialization (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-04-11)
  13. Re: PROV-ISSUE-331 (review-dm-wd5): issue to collect feedback on prov-dm wd5 [prov-dm] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-04-11)
  14. Re: Different senses of specialization (from graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2012-04-11)
  15. Re: Different senses of specialization (from jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk on 2012-04-11)
  16. Re: PROV-ISSUE-331: feedback on PROV-Dm WD5 (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-04-11)
  17. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-04-11)
  18. Re: Different senses of specialization (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-04-11)
  19. Re: PROV-ISSUE-331 (review-dm-wd5): issue to collect feedback on prov-dm wd5 [prov-dm] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-04-11)
  20. Re: Different senses of specialization (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-04-11)
  21. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from mccusj@rpi.edu on 2012-04-03)
  22. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from GK@ninebynine.org on 2012-04-03)
  23. Re: is specializationOf transitive or not? (from GK@ninebynine.org on 2012-04-03)
  24. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2012-04-03)
  25. RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from stephen.cresswell@tso.co.uk on 2012-04-03)
  26. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk on 2012-04-03)
  27. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from mccusj@rpi.edu on 2012-04-02)
  28. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-04-02)
  29. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from mccusj@rpi.edu on 2012-04-02)
  30. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-04-02)
  31. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from mccusj@rpi.edu on 2012-04-02)
  32. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk on 2012-04-02)
  33. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-04-02)
  34. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from mccusj@rpi.edu on 2012-04-02)
  35. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-04-02)
  36. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-04-02)
  37. Re: is specializationOf transitive or not? (from dlm@cs.rpi.edu on 2012-04-02)
  38. RE: is specializationOf transitive or not? (from stephen.cresswell@tso.co.uk on 2012-04-02)
  39. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-04-02)
  40. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-04-02)
  41. Re: is specializationOf transitive or not? (from tom.denies@ugent.be on 2012-04-02)
  42. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-04-02)
  43. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-04-02)
  44. RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk on 2012-04-02)
  45. Re: is specializationOf transitive or not? (from Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk on 2012-04-02)
  46. is specializationOf transitive or not? (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-04-02)
  47. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-04-02)
  48. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk on 2012-04-02)
  49. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-04-02)
  50. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-04-02)
  51. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from tom.denies@ugent.be on 2012-04-02)
  52. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk on 2012-04-02)
  53. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-04-02)
  54. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-04-02)
  55. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-04-02)
  56. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-04-02)
  57. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk on 2012-04-02)
  58. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from mccusj@rpi.edu on 2012-04-01)
  59. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from p.t.groth@vu.nl on 2012-04-01)
  60. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-04-01)
  61. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from p.t.groth@vu.nl on 2012-04-01)
  62. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-04-01)
  63. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-04-01)
  64. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from mccusj@rpi.edu on 2012-03-31)
  65. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk on 2012-03-31)
  66. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-03-30)
  67. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from mccusj@rpi.edu on 2012-03-29)
  68. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from Graham.Klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2012-03-29)
  69. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-03-29)
  70. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk on 2012-03-29)
  71. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk on 2012-03-28)
  72. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-03-27)
  73. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2012-03-27)
  74. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from jcheney@inf.ed.ac.uk on 2012-03-27)
  75. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-03-27)
  76. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from mccusj@rpi.edu on 2012-03-27)
  77. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-03-27)
  78. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-03-27)
  79. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-03-27)
  80. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk on 2012-03-27)
  81. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk on 2012-03-27)
  82. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from mccusj@rpi.edu on 2012-03-26)
  83. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-03-26)
  84. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-03-26)
  85. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-03-26)
  86. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from mccusj@rpi.edu on 2012-03-26)
  87. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk on 2012-03-26)
  88. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-03-26)
  89. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-03-26)
  90. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from graham.klyne@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2012-03-26)
  91. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-03-25)
  92. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-03-25)
  93. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from mccusj@rpi.edu on 2012-03-25)
  94. RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk on 2012-03-25)
  95. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from GK@ninebynine.org on 2012-03-25)
  96. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from GK@ninebynine.org on 2012-03-25)
  97. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from mccusj@rpi.edu on 2012-03-24)
  98. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from p.t.groth@vu.nl on 2012-03-24)
  99. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from mccusj@rpi.edu on 2012-03-24)
  100. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from p.t.groth@vu.nl on 2012-03-24)
  101. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-03-23)
  102. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from mccusj@rpi.edu on 2012-03-23)
  103. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk on 2012-03-23)
  104. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from mccusj@rpi.edu on 2012-03-23)
  105. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-03-23)
  106. [PROV-O] issues in document (from p.t.groth@vu.nl on 2011-10-13)
  107. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk on 2011-09-30)
  108. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk on 2011-09-30)
  109. RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from MYERSJ4@rpi.edu on 2011-09-29)
  110. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk on 2011-09-29)
  111. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2011-09-29)
  112. RE: RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from MYERSJ4@rpi.edu on 2011-09-29)
  113. RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from stephen.cresswell@tso.co.uk on 2011-09-29)
  114. RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from stephen.cresswell@tso.co.uk on 2011-09-27)
  115. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk on 2011-09-26)
  116. RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from MYERSJ4@rpi.edu on 2011-09-26)
  117. RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from MYERSJ4@rpi.edu on 2011-09-26)
  118. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk on 2011-09-26)
  119. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2011-09-26)
  120. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from GK@ninebynine.org on 2011-09-26)
  121. RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from stephen.cresswell@tso.co.uk on 2011-09-25)
  122. RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from MYERSJ4@rpi.edu on 2011-09-24)
  123. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from mccusj@rpi.edu on 2011-09-23)
  124. RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from MYERSJ4@rpi.edu on 2011-09-23)
  125. RE: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from stephen.cresswell@tso.co.uk on 2011-09-23)
  126. Re: PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk on 2011-09-23)
  127. Re: Regarding the definition of IVP OF (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2011-07-11)
  128. PROV-ISSUE-29 (mutual-iVP-of): can two bobs be mutually 'IVP of' each other [Conceptual Model] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-07-11)

Related notes:

Related email:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-prov-wg/2011Jul/0040.html

Luc Moreau, 11 Jul 2011, 11:27:17

Display change log ATOM feed


Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 29.html,v 1.1 2013-06-20 07:37:34 vivien Exp $