ISSUE-185: Section 3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28)

Section 3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28)

State:

CLOSED

Product:

prov-dm

Raised by:

Satya Sahoo

Opened on:

2011-12-07

Description:

Hi,
The following are my comments about Section 3 of the PROV-DM as on Nov 28:

1. Why should actedOnBehalfOf be included and not actedOnItsOwn? Also, actedUnderDirectionOf, actedUnderSupervisionOf etc.? Its an application-specific property that should not be included in PROV-DM core or PROV-O.

2. Why only chains of responsibility - what about chains of authorization, supervision etc.? Again these seem to be domain-specific issues that are out of place in DM.

Thanks.

Best,
Satya

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Re: PROV-ISSUE-185: Section 3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-02-13)
2. Re: PROV-ISSUE-185: Section 3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (from satya.sahoo@case.edu on 2012-02-10)
3. Re: prov-dm - when are constructs too domain specific? (from GK@ninebynine.org on 2012-01-03)
4. prov-dm - when are constructs too domain specific? (from p.t.groth@vu.nl on 2011-12-07)
5. Re: PROV-ISSUE-185: Section 3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2011-12-07)
6. PROV-ISSUE-185: Section 3 (PROV-DM as on Nov 28) [prov-dm] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-12-07)

Related notes:

No additional notes.

Display change log