ISSUE-159: note on how PROV-O inteprets DM's "type" and "subtype"

Tlebo

note on how PROV-O inteprets DM's "type" and "subtype"

State:

CLOSED

Product:

PROV-O HTML

Raised by:

Timothy Lebo

Opened on:

2011-11-21

Description:

The DM mentions "type" and "subtype". Should/Does the PROV-O HTML explicitly state that these should be interpreted as rdf:type and rdfs:subClassOf?

This is a follow up from http://www.w3.org/2011/prov/track/issues/144

Thanks,
Tim

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Re: PROV-ISSUE-159 (Tlebo): note on how PROV-O inteprets DM's 'type' and 'subtype' [Ontology] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-03-06)
2. Re: PROV-ISSUE-159 (Tlebo): note on how PROV-O inteprets DM's 'type' and 'subtype' [Ontology] (from dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es on 2012-03-06)
3. PROV-ISSUE-159 (Tlebo): note on how PROV-O inteprets DM's 'type' and 'subtype' [Ontology] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-11-21)

Related notes:

No additional notes.

Display change log