ISSUE-156: information flow ordering record - no temporal constraints?

TLebo

information flow ordering record - no temporal constraints?

State:
CLOSED
Product:
prov-dm
Raised by:
Timothy Lebo
Opened on:
2011-11-21
Description:
According to 6.3 Activity Ordering Record

"wasInformedBy" is:

"An information flow ordering record is a representation that an entity was generated by an activity, before it was used by another activity."

But the only constraint does not include the temporal aspects described above:

"Given two activity records identified by a1 and a2, the record wasInformedBy(a2,a1) holds, if and only if there is an entity record identified by e and sets of attribute-value pairs attrs1 and attrs2, such that wasGeneratedBy(e,a1,attrs1) and used(a2,e,attrs2) hold."


Does the temporal constraint fall out of constraints that apply to wasGeneratedBy and used?
* If so, could this be made explicit?
* If not, can "attrs1" and "attrs2" be elaborated to include the "time used" and "time generated" AND their constrained ordering?

Thanks,
Tim
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: PROV-ISSUE-156 (TLebo): information flow ordering record - no temporal constraints? [Data Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2011-12-02)
  2. Re: PROV-ISSUE-156 (TLebo): information flow ordering record - no temporal constraints? [Data Model] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2011-12-02)
  3. Re: PROV-ISSUE-156 (TLebo): information flow ordering record - no temporal constraints? [Data Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2011-11-30)
  4. Re: PROV-ISSUE-156 (TLebo): information flow ordering record - no temporal constraints? [Data Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2011-11-21)
  5. PROV-ISSUE-156 (TLebo): information flow ordering record - no temporal constraints? [Data Model] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-11-21)

Related notes:

email is not getting picked up by the tracker: repeating here:



(reposting to list so that the tracker finds it - I updated the diagram and phrasing, too.)

Luc,

Thank you for adding the time constraint. I illustrated it with a red line in the diagram below.

I'm curious if another constraint should be added.

Nothing is stating that the usage event must follow the generation event.

Regards,
Tim





http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/prov/raw-file/f8c191710aad/diagrams/activity-ordering-records-information-flow-ordering.png

Timothy Lebo, 2 Dec 2011, 19:26:49

Display change log ATOM feed


Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 156.html,v 1.1 2013-06-20 07:37:24 vivien Exp $