ISSUE-145: qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs

Tlebo

qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs

State:
CLOSED
Product:
prov-dm
Raised by:
Timothy Lebo
Opened on:
2011-11-06
Description:
There is a note in prov-dm:

"We are going to introduce a notion of qualified identifier, which allows us to refer to an identifier in the scope of a given account. Given that accounts may be nested, a qualifier identifier will be prefixed by a sequence of account identifiers, and then followed by an identifier, local to the innermost account."

This non-global scoping mechanism will prevent the many nice uses of out-of-the-box named graphs, and instead require an entire extra level of implementation that is not currently supported in triple stores.

I propose that we require the asserters to define appropriately-scoped URIs for their identifiers. Letting them be lazy up front will cause headaches when actually trying to use it.
Related Actions Items:
No related actions
Related emails:
  1. Re: Review of DM WD4 (from Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk on 2012-03-05)
  2. Re: Review of DM WD4 (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-03-02)
  3. Re: {Disarmed} Feedback about DM draft 4 (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-03-02)
  4. Re: VOTE: PROV-DM Identifiers (deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT) (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-03-01)
  5. RE: VOTE: PROV-DM Identifiers (deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT) (from simon.miles@kcl.ac.uk on 2012-02-29)
  6. Re: VOTE: PROV-DM Identifiers (deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT) (from Khalid.Belhajjame@cs.man.ac.uk on 2012-02-29)
  7. Re: VOTE: PROV-DM Identifiers (deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT) (from jun.zhao@zoo.ox.ac.uk on 2012-02-29)
  8. Re: {Disarmed} Feedback about DM draft 4 (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-02-29)
  9. Re: Review of DM WD4 (from l.moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-02-29)
  10. Re: VOTE: PROV-DM Identifiers (deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT) (from satya.sahoo@case.edu on 2012-02-28)
  11. Re: VOTE: PROV-DM Identifiers (deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT) (from dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es on 2012-02-28)
  12. Re: VOTE: PROV-DM Identifiers (deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT) (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-02-28)
  13. Re: VOTE: PROV-DM Identifiers (deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT) (from Curt.Tilmes@nasa.gov on 2012-02-27)
  14. Feedback about DM draft 4 (from dgarijo@delicias.dia.fi.upm.es on 2012-02-24)
  15. Re: VOTE: PROV-DM Identifiers (deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT) (from reza.bfar@oracle.com on 2012-02-23)
  16. Re: VOTE: PROV-DM Identifiers (deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT) (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-02-23)
  17. VOTE: PROV-DM Identifiers (deadline Wednesday 29/02, midnight GMT) (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2012-02-23)
  18. Review of DM WD4 (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2012-02-22)
  19. Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (from GK@ninebynine.org on 2011-11-22)
  20. Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2011-11-22)
  21. Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2011-11-22)
  22. Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2011-11-22)
  23. Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2011-11-22)
  24. Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2011-11-22)
  25. Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (from GK@ninebynine.org on 2011-11-14)
  26. Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2011-11-14)
  27. Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (from soiland-reyes@cs.manchester.ac.uk on 2011-11-14)
  28. Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (from GK@ninebynine.org on 2011-11-13)
  29. Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2011-11-10)
  30. Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (from GK@ninebynine.org on 2011-11-10)
  31. Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (from GK@ninebynine.org on 2011-11-10)
  32. Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2011-11-08)
  33. Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2011-11-08)
  34. Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2011-11-08)
  35. Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2011-11-07)
  36. Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (from Paolo.Missier@ncl.ac.uk on 2011-11-07)
  37. Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2011-11-06)
  38. Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2011-11-06)
  39. Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (from lebot@rpi.edu on 2011-11-06)
  40. Re: PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (from L.Moreau@ecs.soton.ac.uk on 2011-11-06)
  41. PROV-ISSUE-145 (Tlebo): qualified identifiers may not work well with named graphs [Data Model] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2011-11-06)

Related notes:

No additional notes.

Display change log ATOM feed

Chair, Staff Contact
Tracker: documentation, (configuration for this group), originally developed by Dean Jackson, is developed and maintained by the Systems Team <w3t-sys@w3.org>.
$Id: 145.html,v 1.1 2013-06-20 07:37:23 vivien Exp $