Data Cube comments

Comments Disposition: Data Cube

This page consolidates information on disposition of comments from the CR period together with the prior summary of comments from LC.

CR comments disposition

Disposition of comments
Commenter Message Summary Status GLD response Acknowledgement
Jose Emilio Labra Gayo [1] Sample data correctly failed IC-12 on the provided validator but passed a local validation based on the published specification Tracked as ISSUE-68. Resolved by clarifying use of RDFS closure prior to validation. [2] [3] [4]
Laurent Lefort [5] Discrepancy in the domain of qb:slicekey, correctly stated in bulk of specification but incorrect in reference section Corrected reference section as an editorial change [6] [7]
Ghislain Atemezing [8] Examples include Turtle prefixed terms with local name parts with leading number, which was not legal in the Team Submission version of Turtle Pointed out that this is legal in the Turtle CR specification, as referenced. No change required. [9] [10] [11]
Timothy Lebo [12] Duplicate of above comment As above [13]
Timothy Lebo [14] Requested that vocabulary namespace be stated earlier in the document for convenience. Editorial change made as suggested. [15]

Last Call comments disposition

Comments and draft responses for Data Cube Last Call ending 2013-04-08.

Disposition of comments
Commenter Message Summary Status GLD response Acknowledgement
Frans Knibbe [16] Editorial comment on missing namespace prefix used in Example 1. Prefix added [17] [18] [19]
Guillaume Duffes [20] Special nature of qb:MeasureType is a divergence from SDMX Clarification sought [21]. [22] [23]
Guillaume Duffes [24] Editorial Editorial changes made. [25] [26]
Peter Winstanley [27] Endorsement plus evidence of use. Acknowledged, no change needed. [28] N/A
Leigh Dodds [29] Endorsement plus evidence of use. Acknowledged, no change needed. [30] N/A
├śrnulf Risnes [31] Endorsement plus evidence of use. Acknowledged, no change needed. [32] N/A
Bill Roberts [33] Endorsement, evidence of use. Suggest additional metadata properties for granularity and spatial coverage. Question need for IC-2, IC-4, IC-5. Push back on suggested changes. Resolve IC-4/5 issue by change to external resources. No changes to documents. [34] [35]
Ulrich Atz [36] 15 comments believed to be all editorial and primarily related to ordering of exposition and examples Clarification sought [37] and given [38]. All editorial, changes made. [39] [40]
Franck Cotton [41] "hesitant about the introduction of the qb:HierarchicalCodeList" Working group resolved to retain qb:HeirarchicalCodeList. [42] [43]
Franck Cotton [44] 22 Editorial comments Editorial changes made. [45] [46]
Laurent Bihanic via Franck Cotton [47] Two claimed errors in sdmx-*.ttl - NOT part of GLD products. Dealt with outside working group. One fixed, one is not an error. [48] N/A


Last Call Summary

Eight responses from a broad range of contributors, four of which explicitly state that they have been using the vocabulary including several references to deployed applications of it.

The bulk of comments are editorial and can be addressed as such. Some of the other comments that might have been interpreted as non-editorial have been confirmed as editorial via follow up clarification.

The non-editorial comments are:

Non-editorial comments
Commenter Comment Status
Bill Roberts Additional metadata properties for granularity and spacial coverage Accepted "no change" response
Bill Roberts Need for IC-2 Accepted "no change" response
Bill Roberts Need for IC-4/5 Accepted "no change" response (given proposed update to sdmx* vocabs)
Franck Cotton hesitant about the introduction of the qb:HierarchicalCodeList Tracked as ISSUE-59 Accepted: [49]
Laurent Bihanic via Franck Cotton Two claimed errors in sdmx-*.ttl Not part of Data Cube specification or GLD work products. (Responded, one is not an error, one fixed).
Last modified on 5 December 2013, at 19:36