IRC log of htmlspeech on 2011-11-17
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 16:51:47 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #htmlspeech
- 16:51:47 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/11/17-htmlspeech-irc
- 16:51:57 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #htmlspeech
- 16:52:15 [burn]
- trackbot, start telcon
- 16:52:17 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs public
- 16:52:19 [trackbot]
- Zakim, this will be
- 16:52:19 [Zakim]
- I don't understand 'this will be', trackbot
- 16:52:20 [trackbot]
- Meeting: HTML Speech Incubator Group Teleconference
- 16:52:20 [trackbot]
- Date: 17 November 2011
- 16:52:24 [burn]
- zakim, this will be htmlspeech
- 16:52:25 [Zakim]
- ok, burn; I see INC_(HTMLSPEECH)11:30AM scheduled to start 22 minutes ago
- 16:52:33 [burn]
- Chair: Dan_Burnett
- 16:53:09 [burn]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2011Nov/0072.html
- 16:56:12 [Zakim]
- INC_(HTMLSPEECH)11:30AM has now started
- 16:56:19 [Zakim]
- +[IPcaller]
- 16:57:06 [mbodell]
- mbodell has joined #htmlspeech
- 16:57:18 [Zakim]
- +Milan_Young
- 16:57:20 [Zakim]
- -[IPcaller]
- 16:57:22 [Zakim]
- +[IPcaller]
- 16:57:36 [Milan]
- Milan has joined #HtmlSpeech
- 16:59:18 [Zakim]
- +Michael_Bodell
- 16:59:24 [smaug]
- smaug has joined #htmlspeech
- 16:59:56 [burn]
- zakim, who's on the phone?
- 16:59:57 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see [IPcaller], Milan_Young, Michael_Bodell
- 17:00:03 [Zakim]
- +[IPcaller.a]
- 17:00:09 [smaug]
- that is me
- 17:00:33 [burn]
- zakim, [IPcaller] is Dan_Burnett
- 17:00:34 [Zakim]
- +Dan_Burnett; got it
- 17:00:47 [burn]
- zakim, [IPcaller.a] is Olli_Pettay
- 17:00:47 [Zakim]
- +Olli_Pettay; got it
- 17:01:22 [ddahl1]
- ddahl1 has joined #htmlspeech
- 17:01:48 [Charles]
- Charles has joined #htmlspeech
- 17:02:06 [Zakim]
- +Debbie_Dahl
- 17:02:11 [bringert]
- bringert has joined #htmlspeech
- 17:02:52 [Zakim]
- +Joseph_Scheuhammer
- 17:03:16 [glen]
- glen has joined #htmlspeech
- 17:03:46 [burn]
- zakim, Joseph_Scheuhammer is Bjorn_Bringert,Satish_Sampath
- 17:04:09 [Zakim]
- +Bjorn_Bringert,Satish_Sampath; got it
- 17:04:17 [Zakim]
- +Charles_Hemphill
- 17:04:38 [smaug]
- Zakim, nick smaug is Olli_Pettay
- 17:04:58 [Zakim]
- ok, smaug, I now associate you with Olli_Pettay
- 17:05:06 [Zakim]
- + +1.650.253.aaaa
- 17:05:08 [Zakim]
- + +1.425.381.aabb
- 17:05:31 [Milan]
- Scribe: Milan
- 17:05:35 [burn]
- zakim, aaaa is Glen_Shires
- 17:05:35 [Zakim]
- +Glen_Shires; got it
- 17:06:03 [burn]
- zakim, aabb is Dan_Druta
- 17:06:03 [Zakim]
- +Dan_Druta; got it
- 17:06:20 [burn]
- ScribeNick: Milan
- 17:06:44 [burn]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2011Nov/0072.html
- 17:07:01 [Milan]
- Topic: Review final report
- 17:07:17 [Zakim]
- -Bjorn_Bringert,Satish_Sampath
- 17:07:21 [Milan]
- Dan: Content complete
- 17:07:41 [Milan]
- ... but a few editorial nits remain
- 17:07:48 [Zakim]
- +Bjorn_Bringert,Satish_Sampath
- 17:09:03 [Milan]
- ... contentfull changes have been available for public review
- 17:09:25 [Milan]
- Debbie: I'd like to review changes
- 17:10:12 [Milan]
- Bjorn: Add discussion about future working group to agenda today
- 17:11:37 [burn]
- first set of changes: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2011Nov/0067.html
- 17:17:04 [burn]
- second list of changes: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2011Nov/0071.html
- 17:21:33 [Milan]
- Burn: Any questions?
- 17:21:49 [Milan]
- ... OK, no questions
- 17:22:33 [Milan]
- Debbie: Need more explanation behind DanD's diagram.
- 17:22:46 [Milan]
- ... but maybe not necessary because it'
- 17:22:56 [Milan]
- ... it is just explanitory
- 17:23:30 [Milan]
- Burn: Probably a major effort to add detailed wording
- 17:24:07 [Milan]
- Debbie: Perhaps I can take a look to find low-hanging fruit that brings clairity
- 17:24:46 [Milan]
- Burn: Need to stop edits in about one week
- 17:25:35 [Milan]
- Glen: One sample has allot of psudeo code
- 17:25:48 [Milan]
- ... and TODOs
- 17:26:08 [Milan]
- Burn: Agree
- 17:27:43 [MJ]
- MJ has joined #htmlspeech
- 17:27:49 [Zakim]
- + +1.212.341.aacc
- 17:28:01 [Milan]
- Michael: I will look at that example
- 17:28:16 [burn]
- zakim, aacc is Michael_Johnston
- 17:28:16 [Zakim]
- +Michael_Johnston; got it
- 17:28:35 [glen]
- sample is "Speech Enabled Email Client"
- 17:28:55 [glen]
- particularly onMicClicked method
- 17:29:12 [Milan]
- Topic: Satish's proposal to move methods into collections
- 17:29:16 [burn]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-htmlspeech/2011Nov/0064.html
- 17:30:36 [Milan]
- Burn: I'm comfortable either way
- 17:30:42 [Milan]
- ... other comments?
- 17:31:34 [Milan]
- Milan: Nice to be able to add collection as a whole
- 17:32:37 [Milan]
- Satish: Yes, this was part of the design
- 17:32:51 [Milan]
- Dan: I also like this
- 17:33:17 [smaug]
- looks ok to me
- 17:34:01 [Milan]
- Dan: Objections to making this change?
- 17:34:10 [ddahl1]
- i think this is a good idea
- 17:34:16 [Milan]
- ... OK, I'll make the change
- 17:34:34 [Milan]
- Topic: Next steps
- 17:34:51 [Milan]
- Dan: Editorial cleanup and short summary
- 17:35:25 [Milan]
- ... questions?
- 17:35:52 [Milan]
- Bjourn: Good work so far
- 17:36:09 [Milan]
- ... Need input from all browser vendors
- 17:36:45 [Milan]
- ... Google will not join working group unless all browser vendors also join
- 17:37:11 [Milan]
- ... And bring our work to the attention to the HTML working groups
- 17:38:02 [Milan]
- ... Need Apple and Opera as well as Mozilla, Chrome, and IE
- 17:38:27 [Milan]
- MBodell: Will not get participation if going to WhatWG
- 17:38:36 [Milan]
- ... IE participation
- 17:39:01 [Milan]
- Bjorn: Need more browser discussion, not more speech discussion
- 17:39:16 [Milan]
- Dan: And also web developer participation
- 17:40:03 [Milan]
- ... best feedback will probably result from a more focused group
- 17:40:18 [Milan]
- Bjorn: Yes, as long as all vendors are present
- 17:40:43 [Milan]
- Satish: Haven't heard from Opera and Apple
- 17:40:59 [Milan]
- Dan: Yes, I've tried
- 17:41:29 [Milan]
- ... Charter proposal will be circulated, and we can add strong wording
- 17:42:04 [Milan]
- MichaelJ: I made a request to Apple
- 17:42:15 [Milan]
- ... perhaps we could be happy with 4/5
- 17:42:38 [Milan]
- Bjorn: Then need to take discussion to where they are
- 17:43:04 [Milan]
- Dan: This is a significant change in position from Google
- 17:43:45 [Milan]
- Bjorn: Continued work is almost pointless without browser vendords
- 17:44:33 [Milan]
- Statish: For example, if we proceed in a silo, we will not know if what we produce will be palitable
- 17:45:07 [Milan]
- Bjorn: Yes, will be a waste to flesh out details if fundamentals are not strong
- 17:46:16 [Milan]
- MichaelJ: Most significant point is the reco element wrt the HTML WG
- 17:46:35 [Milan]
- ... But JS may not produce as much feedback
- 17:47:21 [Milan]
- Bjorn: To be clear, I'm not referring to protocol. And JS API is included with declarative.
- 17:48:00 [Milan]
- ... we'll get good feedback when we post XG results
- 17:48:27 [Milan]
- Dan: Purpose of group is to give a home to feedback requests
- 17:48:44 [Milan]
- ... and will be best in a dedicated group
- 17:50:04 [Milan]
- Michael: Nobody is against posting this
- 17:50:16 [Milan]
- ... to a location of choosing
- 17:50:27 [Milan]
- Dan: The question is where to handle that feedback
- 17:50:48 [Milan]
- ... HTML WG is a good major source of comments
- 17:51:01 [Milan]
- Bjorn: But where does the discussion happen?
- 17:52:18 [Milan]
- Ollie: Do you expect that HTML WG will produce a separate specification or incorporate into existing spec?
- 17:52:26 [Milan]
- Bjorn: Don't care
- 17:52:48 [Milan]
- Satish: Should be left to the editor
- 17:53:15 [Milan]
- Ollie: HTML spec is too large, and this will be lost
- 17:53:26 [Milan]
- ... so prefer a dedicated spec
- 17:53:40 [Milan]
- Dan: I'm involved in WebRTC
- 17:53:56 [Milan]
- ... similar dicussions
- 17:54:13 [Milan]
- ... and there is a large amount of independent feedback
- 17:54:37 [Milan]
- ... so it's a framework that is functional
- 17:56:44 [Milan]
- Debbie: What about an interest group that forms in the interim?
- 17:57:24 [Milan]
- Bjorn: Yes, good idea to take a pause for feedback, but maybe don't need formal structure
- 17:57:47 [Milan]
- Michael: Want to see this on a standards track
- 17:58:07 [Milan]
- ... so don't want it in an informal group
- 17:58:35 [Milan]
- Debbie: Interest group is a formal W3C structure, but agree not a standards track
- 17:59:26 [Milan]
- Dan: OK with Bjorn's idea as long as we don't creat a spec
- 17:59:49 [Milan]
- MIchael: Feedback is different that standarizing
- 18:00:47 [Milan]
- Bjorn: Let's keep XG, and its main purpose should be to collect feedback
- 18:01:22 [Milan]
- Michael: Do not want to move discussion outside W3C
- 18:01:35 [Milan]
- Bjorn: Would like to include WhatWG
- 18:02:07 [Milan]
- Michael: Want to start a new WG for that
- 18:04:23 [Milan]
- Dan: WhatWG doesn't include all browser vendors
- 18:06:02 [Milan]
- Bjorn: We can separate topics of feedback of spec building
- 18:06:22 [Milan]
- Michael: Fine as long as discussion doesn't build specs
- 18:07:44 [Milan]
- Dan: WebRTC and its own WG. List is monitored by WhatWG
- 18:08:21 [Milan]
- ... interesting WhatWG discussion is brought to the attention of the WG
- 18:08:43 [Milan]
- ... and the Google chair of the group has support of Hixie
- 18:09:14 [Milan]
- ... this is a working process
- 18:09:30 [Milan]
- ... so how is our group different?
- 18:09:42 [smaug]
- Hmm, is it possible that Apple doesn't participate this work because of IP issues ? If that is the case, this work couldn't go to HTML WG
- 18:10:30 [Milan]
- Satish: Perhaps because our group doesn't touch because of declaritive
- 18:15:40 [Milan]
- Dan: Charter of working group forces this class of discussion by all major browser vendors
- 18:19:39 [Zakim]
- + +1.650.279.aadd
- 18:20:19 [glen]
- zakim, aadd is Glen_Shires
- 18:20:19 [Zakim]
- +Glen_Shires; got it
- 18:20:27 [Milan]
- Bjorn: Most important thing is wide feedback
- 18:20:58 [Milan]
- MichaelJ: Can run into problems with focusing too much on feedback, because bogs progress
- 18:21:37 [Milan]
- ... but W3C does require addressing feedback as approach last call
- 18:22:41 [Milan]
- MichaelB: External discussion is fine, but spec work must take place in W3C
- 18:23:30 [Milan]
- Dan: Dicussion is fine, but decisions need to be made in SDL
- 18:23:39 [Milan]
- ... SDO
- 18:24:10 [Milan]
- ... For example VoiceXML forum and VBWG
- 18:25:28 [Milan]
- Bjorn: Need commitment to listen to external feedback
- 18:25:44 [Milan]
- Michael: That's already part of W3C
- 18:25:55 [Milan]
- Dan: Must address every public comment
- 18:26:16 [Milan]
- ... tracked and recorded
- 18:26:38 [Milan]
- ... disagreements are escalated
- 18:27:12 [Milan]
- Michael: As long as comments are sent to the W3C
- 18:27:45 [Milan]
- Bjorn: Google would like to think about this more internally
- 18:27:58 [Milan]
- ... can we discuss on mailing list?
- 18:28:18 [Milan]
- Dan: We are almost out of time
- 18:28:54 [Milan]
- ... may need to schedule an emergency call
- 18:29:46 [Milan]
- ... recommend contacting Harold A from WebRTC
- 18:30:14 [Milan]
- Michael: Please also proof the draft
- 18:30:47 [Milan]
- Glen: Schedule call for December 1st.
- 18:31:08 [Milan]
- ... or at least reserve it
- 18:32:11 [Zakim]
- -Glen_Shires.a
- 18:32:27 [Milan]
- MichaelJ: Correction to minutes
- 18:33:10 [Milan]
- ... comment was that we shouldn't worry about not addressing feedback within W3C. Safety checks are in place.
- 18:33:31 [Zakim]
- -Olli_Pettay
- 18:33:32 [Zakim]
- -Glen_Shires
- 18:33:32 [Zakim]
- -Bjorn_Bringert,Satish_Sampath
- 18:33:33 [Zakim]
- -Michael_Johnston
- 18:33:34 [Zakim]
- -Michael_Bodell
- 18:33:35 [Zakim]
- -Debbie_Dahl
- 18:33:36 [Zakim]
- -Milan_Young
- 18:33:44 [burn]
- rrsagent, make logs public
- 18:33:45 [Zakim]
- -Charles_Hemphill
- 18:33:55 [burn]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 18:33:55 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/11/17-htmlspeech-minutes.html burn
- 18:34:29 [Zakim]
- -Dan_Burnett
- 18:34:43 [burn]
- zakim, who's on the phone?
- 18:34:43 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see Dan_Druta
- 18:36:58 [burn]
- zakim, bye
- 18:36:58 [Zakim]
- leaving. As of this point the attendees were Milan_Young, Michael_Bodell, Dan_Burnett, Olli_Pettay, Debbie_Dahl, Bjorn_Bringert,Satish_Sampath, Charles_Hemphill, +1.650.253.aaaa,
- 18:36:58 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #htmlspeech
- 18:37:01 [Zakim]
- ... +1.425.381.aabb, Glen_Shires, Dan_Druta, +1.212.341.aacc, Michael_Johnston, +1.650.279.aadd
- 18:38:01 [burn]
- Present: Milan_Young, Michael_Bodell, Dan_Burnett, Olli_Pettay, Debbie_Dahl, Bjorn_Bringert, Satish_Sampath, Charles_Hemphill, Glen_Shires, Dan_Druta, Michael_Johnston
- 18:38:07 [burn]
- rrsagent, draft minutes
- 18:38:07 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/11/17-htmlspeech-minutes.html burn
- 19:22:49 [ddahl1]
- ddahl1 has left #htmlspeech
- 19:28:14 [smaug]
- smaug has joined #htmlspeech