14:55:49 RRSAgent has joined #eval 14:55:49 logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/11/10-eval-irc 14:55:51 RRSAgent, make logs world 14:55:51 Zakim has joined #eval 14:55:53 Zakim, this will be 3825 14:55:53 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_ERTWG(Eval TF)10:00AM scheduled to start in 5 minutes 14:55:54 Meeting: WCAG 2.0 Evaluation Methodology Task Force Teleconference 14:55:54 Date: 10 November 2011 14:56:07 WAI_ERTWG(Eval TF)10:00AM has now started 14:56:15 + +1.301.975.aaaa 14:56:26 houtepen has joined #eval 14:56:27 zakim, call shadi-617 14:56:27 ok, shadi; the call is being made 14:56:28 +Shadi 14:56:30 Ryladog has joined #eval 14:56:41 Wilco has joined #eval 14:57:09 Zakim, aaaa is Liz 14:57:09 +Liz; got it 14:57:59 +[IPcaller] 14:58:18 zakim, ??[IPcaller] is me 14:58:18 sorry, vivienne, I do not recognize a party named '??[IPcaller]' 14:58:35 + +1.978.443.aabb 14:58:38 zakim, [IPcaller] is me 14:58:38 +vivienne; got it 14:58:45 zakim, mute me 14:58:46 vivienne should now be muted 14:59:16 zakim, aabb is Kathy 14:59:16 +Kathy; got it 14:59:28 ericvelleman has joined #eval 14:59:41 AmyChen has joined #eval 14:59:54 +Katie_Haritos-Shea 15:00:22 + +31.30.239.aacc 15:00:22 + +1.510.522.aadd 15:00:31 zakim, aadd is me 15:00:31 +AmyChen; got it 15:00:32 ssirois has joined #eval 15:00:47 zakim, mute me 15:00:59 AmyChen should now be muted 15:01:01 Zakim, aacc is ericvelleman 15:01:07 kerstin has joined #eval 15:01:23 +ericvelleman; got it 15:01:57 +??P37 15:02:05 zakim, mute me 15:02:07 + +31.30.239.aaee 15:02:12 zakim, ??p37 is me 15:02:18 zakim, aaee is me 15:02:34 Kathy should now be muted 15:02:46 zakim, mute me 15:02:48 +??P43 15:02:52 +ssirois; got it 15:02:58 +houtepen; got it 15:03:05 zakim, mute me 15:03:09 +houtepen.a 15:03:15 zakim, who is on the phone? 15:03:16 zakim, mute 15:03:26 zakim, mute me 15:03:41 houtepen should now be muted 15:04:01 ssirois should now be muted 15:04:07 zakim, unmute me 15:04:13 On the phone I see Liz, Shadi, vivienne (muted), Kathy (muted), Katie_Haritos-Shea, ericvelleman, AmyChen (muted), ssirois (muted), houtepen (muted), ??P43, houtepen.a 15:04:18 I don't understand 'mute', kerstin 15:04:30 sorry, kerstin, I do not know which phone connection belongs to you 15:04:34 zakim, ??p43 is Kerstin 15:04:57 zakim, ??P43 is me 15:05:00 vivienne should no longer be muted 15:05:07 zakim, mute me 15:05:08 +Kerstin; got it 15:05:15 zakim, mute me 15:05:22 I already had ??P43 as Kerstin, kerstin 15:05:22 was darth vader i guess 15:05:28 vivienne should now be muted 15:05:36 Kerstin should now be muted 15:05:42 zakim, houtepen.a is Wilco 15:05:51 scribe: Katie 15:05:56 scribenick: Ryladog 15:06:01 +Wilco; got it 15:06:04 zakim, mute me 15:06:13 Shadi should now be muted 15:06:44 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-evaltf/2011Nov/0031.html 15:06:51 chair: Eric 15:07:02 agenda+ Table of Contents 15:07:06 Chair: Eric 15:07:14 agenda+ Specific discussion 15:07:22 zakim, take up agendum 1 15:07:22 agendum 1. "Table of Contents" taken up [from shadi] 15:08:10 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20111109.html 15:08:40 Wilco has joined #eval 15:09:03 EV: Tried to add more explanantion for the Website Accessibility Evaluation Methodology for WCAG 2.0. Please try to review 15:09:32 EV: Want to publish before the end of the year 15:10:10 EV: We Want to be ready for WCAG and EART to review 15:10:20 q+ 15:10:22 s/EART/ERT 15:10:33 EV: I will try to captutre all by next Tues 15:10:48 EV: The send to WCAG as a First DRFAT 15:10:55 ack me 15:10:57 q? 15:11:01 q+ 15:11:02 I'm fine with that 15:11:02 q+ 15:11:05 ack me 15:11:06 EV: Any Comments? 15:11:37 Vincent_ has joined #eval 15:11:41 Kathy: Do we want to keep it general? 15:11:46 EV: Yes 15:12:09 Kathy: Do we want to re-arrange the order - did we do that? 15:12:17 + +1.514.312.aaff 15:12:27 ack me 15:12:32 zakim, aaff is Vincent 15:12:32 +Vincent; got it 15:12:34 q? 15:12:36 EV: I thougth we agreed to do a split - but we will do that later 15:12:37 ack v 15:12:40 zakim, mute me 15:12:40 Kathy should now be muted 15:12:47 Hi, sorry to be late 15:12:59 zakim, mute me 15:12:59 sorry, Vincent_, I do not know which phone connection belongs to you 15:12:59 Vivienne: How are we editing individually? 15:13:08 q+ 15:13:22 Tim has joined #eval 15:13:31 zakim, mute me 15:13:31 Kerstin was already muted, kerstin 15:13:37 EV: I will add the text for how to do it. Please send an emailk to the list with your comments 15:13:40 zakim, unmute me 15:13:40 Kerstin should no longer be muted 15:13:41 zakim, aaff is Vincent_ 15:13:42 sorry, Vincent_, I do not recognize a party named 'aaff' 15:13:43 zakim, mute me 15:13:43 vivienne should now be muted 15:14:23 zakim, mute me 15:14:23 Shadi should now be muted 15:14:33 zaim, mute me 15:14:36 zakim, who is on the phone? 15:14:36 On the phone I see Liz, Shadi (muted), vivienne (muted), Kathy (muted), Katie_Haritos-Shea, ericvelleman, AmyChen (muted), ssirois (muted), houtepen (muted), Kerstin, Wilco, 15:14:40 ... Vincent 15:14:42 zakim, mute me 15:14:42 sorry, Vincent_, I do not know which phone connection belongs to you 15:14:44 EV: Other questions about doc so far? 15:14:46 q? 15:14:56 zakim, Vincent is Vincent_ 15:14:56 +Vincent_; got it 15:15:00 zakim, mute me 15:15:00 Wilco should now be muted 15:15:04 zakim, mute me 15:15:04 Vincent_ should now be muted 15:15:12 Thank you 15:15:13 Kerstin: I don't understand the need for splitting the document 15:15:32 EV: We will not do that now. We will make that determination later 15:15:45 +Tim_Boland 15:15:59 EV: Seperate documents may be a risk 15:16:14 q? 15:16:18 zakim, mute me 15:16:18 Kerstin should now be muted 15:16:25 Kerstin: I am very fine with not seperating it 15:16:30 EV: OK 15:17:30 EV: I will add. Please be a bit more specific in your comments. Hopefully will finish it on Tues and Shadi will be able to put the new Draft on Wed 15:17:42 q? 15:17:56 q- k 15:17:59 that sounds fine to me, Eric 15:17:59 dont unterstand why? 15:18:28 ack me 15:18:37 EV: There are a number of versions. What about that Shadi? 15:18:49 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/methodology/ 15:18:57 Shadi: There is a link for the latest internal verson 15:19:19 Shadi: from that you can always go back to the previous version 15:19:46 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20111109.html 15:19:59 Shadi: Eric will notify the list when there is a new draft, with a specific dedicated URI 15:21:06 q? 15:23:19 zakim, take up agendum 3 15:23:20 I only see 2 items on the agenda 15:23:36 zakim, take up agendum 2 15:23:36 agendum 2. "Specific discussion" taken up [from shadi] 15:23:55 http://www.w3.org/TR/EARL10/#changes 15:24:22 Shadi: You can see the specs 15:24:37 zakim, mute me 15:24:38 Shadi should now be muted 15:24:39 EV: Specific discussion in the mil 15:24:49 zakim, mute me 15:24:49 Tim_Boland should now be muted 15:24:56 EV: Section 7 needs much more work 15:25:09 http://www.w3.org/WAI/ER/conformance/ED-methodology-20111109.html#expertiseforevaluating 15:25:09 EV: Lets start with Section 6 15:25:58 q+ 15:26:09 ack me 15:26:13 EV: I have a short description (from the evaluation suite). We need to add text for using persons with disabilities. Any questions about section 6? 15:27:01 Vivienne: I think we need to spell ot out a bit more clearly for a person to be tasked as an expert. Difference between novice and expert 15:27:19 q+ 15:27:48 Vivienne: You need a basic understanding of HTML, CSS, Code Validation, AT - we need to have a list in order to do a successful eval 15:28:09 q+ 15:28:13 q? 15:28:24 EV: I agree, but there is already a nice description in the eval suite 15:28:52 zakim, mute me 15:28:52 vivienne should now be muted 15:28:52 ack me 15:29:07 q? 15:29:23 ack me 15:29:23 q+ 15:30:04 Vincent: I want to point out that we can have a questions that need some expertise in order to give an answer 15:30:36 Vincent: We should explain that some questions need an expert and some do not 15:31:08 Vincent: I think we should offer a way for the people who are new to make a first step into this process 15:31:54 q? 15:31:56 zakim, mute me 15:31:56 Vincent_ should now be muted 15:31:57 ack me 15:32:24 EV: Maybe we did not explain well enough between the full and the quick evaluation - so for people who do not have alot of skills - we should point them to the quick eval 15:32:44 Shadi: I agree with you and Vivienne 15:32:58 http://www.w3.org/WAI/eval/reviewteams.html#expertise 15:33:06 Shadi: Recommended Expertise 15:33:56 Shadi: For carrying out this methodology - use this list - 15:34:06 Shadi: This is still open 15:34:29 Shadi: It is not really clear what we are suggesting here 15:34:57 EV: I will provide information for people with less skills and a link 15:35:30 Shadi: Quoted text. Lets check with Shaun. 15:35:56 zakim, mute me 15:35:56 Shadi should now be muted 15:35:56 q? 15:36:08 Shadi: Basde rwquirements - an evaluator with expertise 15:36:35 EV: Section 6.1 15:36:56 EV: Here I copied part of the Eval Suite 15:37:10 q+ 15:37:19 EV: Would this be enough - or do we need to be more specific or provide a link? 15:37:26 ack me 15:38:01 q+ 15:38:29 q+ 15:38:39 q? 15:38:41 zakim, mute me 15:38:41 vivienne should now be muted 15:38:43 Vivienne: We wnat to link to other resources but we want people to feel that this is a reource. We should provide guidance on how to include different pefsons with disabilities 15:38:45 ack me 15:39:14 Amy: I actaully like the section the way it is. I don't think we should use numbers on how or who 15:39:24 Amy: Examples might be good 15:40:07 Amy: Should the text include "if you don't have the expertise. See here" 15:40:13 EV: I agree 15:40:31 EV: Skills for evaluator 15:40:43 q? 15:40:46 ack me 15:40:47 zakim, mute me 15:40:50 AmyChen should now be muted 15:40:51 EV: I will try to provide more freindly text 15:41:07 zakim, who is on the phone? 15:41:07 On the phone I see Liz, Shadi (muted), vivienne (muted), Kathy, Katie_Haritos-Shea, ericvelleman, AmyChen (muted), ssirois (muted), houtepen (muted), Kerstin (muted), Wilco 15:41:10 q+ 15:41:11 ... (muted), Vincent_ (muted), Tim_Boland (muted) 15:41:23 zakim, drop ssirois 15:41:23 ssirois is being disconnected 15:41:24 -ssirois 15:41:35 Kathy: Also, good to ask for feedback from current users as well as PWD 15:41:51 q? 15:41:59 q+ 15:42:00 q- a 15:42:07 Kathy: Explain the more informal process - ask them for their feeedback 15:42:13 ack me 15:42:19 q+ 15:42:21 q+ 15:42:24 q+ 15:42:25 +??P1 15:42:30 q? 15:42:32 zakim, ??P1 is me 15:42:32 +ssirois; got it 15:42:36 zakim, mute me 15:42:36 ssirois should now be muted 15:42:44 zakim, mute me 15:42:45 Kathy should now be muted 15:43:02 Vivienne: I agree with Amy - newer website ask for feedback from users 15:43:09 I think it was Kathy 15:43:25 +1 to what Kathy said for me too 15:43:37 Vivienne: If there is a link do you have suggestions 15:43:42 q? 15:43:45 zakim, mute me 15:43:45 vivienne should now be muted 15:43:50 q- v 15:43:52 ack me 15:44:21 Shadi: linking out to existing resources, how much oveflap do we want 15:45:08 q? 15:45:27 Shadi: I think what you have copied is good - the Eval Suite should be suplemental - the most content should be in the spec. I will talk with Shawn about what is best. 15:45:46 EV: I had thsat problem when writing this stuff 15:46:37 EV: I was unsure about rephrasing text that has already been well thought out. But i think the recommended expertise belongs here 15:46:51 Shadi: I understand the dilemma 15:47:24 Shadi: Short sentence and then link to resource 15:47:48 Shadi: Some amount of overlap may be necessary 15:47:49 q? 15:48:03 zakim, mute me 15:48:03 Shadi should now be muted 15:48:05 ack me 15:48:47 Amy: I agree - lets not repeat what is in other document. We encourage using PWD and then link to resoucres 15:49:01 q? 15:49:08 zakim, mute me 15:49:08 AmyChen should now be muted 15:49:52 EV: I have ideas for the text. At least for the first part of Sections - add another subsection as Shadi proposed. Add more direct links 15:50:52 q? 15:50:53 q+ 15:50:56 EV: Lets stop here at Section 6. Review Section 7 if the idea is clear. Anyone have any ideas? 15:50:57 ack me 15:52:26 Amy: I think it is a hard question - scope for full or partial product 15:52:27 q+ 15:52:47 EV: In the document we are talking about full websites 15:53:04 Amy: One could talk about what has been tested 15:53:14 ack me 15:53:21 q+ 15:53:29 EV: Maybe we should make that division in the document now? 15:53:49 EV: Maybe we should discuss later 15:54:16 q? 15:54:17 q+ 15:54:29 zakim, mute me 15:54:29 AmyChen should now be muted 15:54:49 q+ 15:54:49 q- v 15:55:13 Viveinne: are we eval the inernet, intranet, extranet, etc. They will have very different sets of requirements 15:55:50 q? 15:55:57 zakim, mute me 15:55:57 vivienne should now be muted 15:56:00 Vivienne: Identify the number of levels, whether they are starting from a base URI and going three clicks form thrre etc 15:56:00 ack me 15:56:31 q+ 15:57:00 [[Other target audiences of the Methodology include]] -> [[Other audiences who may benefit from the Methodology include]] 15:57:04 Shadi: I think there is a misunderstanding of the scope of the target audience. Maybe we need to change that in Section C 15:57:31 That sounds better to me, Shadi 15:57:40 Shadi: other audiences may benefit from.... 15:57:44 q? 15:58:20 Shadi: The scope for us is done completed website - not developing websites 15:58:24 zakim, mute me 15:58:24 Shadi should now be muted 15:58:26 q? 15:58:30 EV: That would save us 15:58:35 +1 to what Shadi said 15:58:40 +1 15:58:42 +1 15:58:45 +1 15:58:46 +1 15:58:47 +1 :-) 15:58:53 +1 15:59:05 ack me 15:59:25 q- t 15:59:27 +1, new proposal is worded more on what i have understood of our agreement 15:59:53 Tim: Are we specifically excluding third party content? And, are we excluding open sources? 16:00:25 Tim: 1.Are we specifically excluding third party and user-submitted content? 16:00:37 Tim: 2> Colaborative content 16:00:54 q+ 16:00:58 zakin, ack me 16:01:02 Tim: Are we going ti include these two ? 16:01:11 zakim, close queue 16:01:11 ok, shadi, the speaker queue is closed 16:01:12 EV: Not excluding 16:01:46 ack me 16:01:46 EV: It is something we will have to cover or look to WCAG 16:02:28 Shadi: This is a tough question. The website owner has to decide what the evaluation covers 16:03:00 zakim, mute me 16:03:02 Tim_Boland should now be muted 16:03:31 q? 16:03:44 Shadi: The EM will just doicuemnt is this part of the evaluation or not 16:03:49 zakim, mute me 16:03:49 Shadi should now be muted 16:04:01 ack me 16:04:02 zakim, ack me 16:04:02 unmuting Wilco 16:04:06 I see no one on the speaker queue 16:04:30 Amy: 1. Otyher target audience. Not intende to be used for prodcuts in developement 16:05:21 Amy: 2. Back to Tims question. What we do at Oracle - we own the whole product - 16:06:23 Amy: Some third party content we can't controll - if accessible - we just warp it up - if there is a problem - we say that this contnet is not included in our conformance claim 16:07:11 Wilco: Must evaluate full website. Different projects with different team. Different report for different teams 16:07:47 bye now 16:07:50 thx, bye 16:07:51 -Tim_Boland 16:07:51 houtepen has left #eval 16:07:52 -Kathy 16:07:52 -Wilco 16:07:53 RRSAgent, set logs world-visible 16:07:53 -ericvelleman 16:07:53 thanks everyone, bye! 16:07:55 -Liz 16:07:55 bye 16:07:56 ericvelleman has left #eval 16:07:58 -vivienne 16:07:58 -houtepen 16:08:00 bye 16:08:02 Bye 16:08:02 vivienne has left #eval 16:08:05 RRSAgent, make minutes 16:08:05 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/11/10-eval-minutes.html Ryladog 16:08:06 -Vincent_ 16:08:07 -Kerstin 16:08:08 -AmyChen 16:08:22 -vivienne 16:08:31 -Katie_Haritos-Shea 16:08:52 ssirois has left #eval 16:09:06 zakim, who is on the phone? 16:09:06 On the phone I see Shadi (muted), ssirois (muted) 16:09:11 zakim, drop me 16:09:12 Shadi is being disconnected 16:09:12 -Shadi 16:09:17 zakim, drop s 16:09:19 ssirois is being disconnected 16:09:21 WAI_ERTWG(Eval TF)10:00AM has ended 16:09:24 Attendees were +1.301.975.aaaa, Shadi, Liz, +1.978.443.aabb, vivienne, Kathy, Katie_Haritos-Shea, +31.30.239.aacc, +1.510.522.aadd, AmyChen, ericvelleman, +31.30.239.aaee, ssirois, 16:09:28 ... houtepen, Kerstin, Wilco, +1.514.312.aaff, Vincent_, Tim_Boland 16:09:30 trackbot, end meeting 16:09:30 Zakim, list attendees 16:09:30 sorry, trackbot, I don't know what conference this is 16:09:31 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 16:09:31 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/11/10-eval-minutes.html trackbot 16:09:32 RRSAgent, bye 16:09:32 I see no action items