15:00:32 RRSAgent has joined #webevents 15:00:32 logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/10/11-webevents-irc 15:00:40 RRSAgent, make log public 15:00:56 RWC_WebEven()11:00AM has now started 15:00:57 ScribeNick: ArtB 15:00:57 Scribe: Art 15:00:57 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webevents/2011OctDec/0035.html 15:00:57 Date: 11 October 2011 15:00:57 Chair: Art 15:00:58 Meeting: Web Events WG Voice Conference 15:01:00 +??P10 15:01:03 +Doug_Schepers 15:01:05 -Doug_Schepers 15:01:05 +Doug_Schepers 15:01:09 Zakim, ??P10 is me 15:01:09 +sangwhan; got it 15:01:29 + +1.781.993.aaaa 15:01:35 zakim, aaaa is Art_Barstow 15:01:35 +Art_Barstow; got it 15:01:45 smaug has joined #webevents 15:01:54 zakim, who is here? 15:01:54 On the phone I see Doug_Schepers, sangwhan, Art_Barstow 15:01:55 On IRC I see smaug, RRSAgent, Zakim, ArtB, sangwhan, ted_, mbrubeck, scottmg, trackbot, shepazu 15:02:15 +[IPcaller] 15:02:28 Zakim, [IPcaller] is Olli_Pettay 15:02:28 +Olli_Pettay; got it 15:02:51 Zakim, nick smaug is Olli_Pettay 15:02:51 ok, smaug, I now associate you with Olli_Pettay 15:05:09 Present: Art_Barstow, Doug_Schepers, Olli_Pettay, Cathy_Chan 15:05:14 Topic: Tweak Agenda 15:05:20 AB: I submitted a draft agenda on October 10 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webevents/2011OctDec/0035.html. Any change requests? The focus today is addressing comments for the Touch Events LCWD. 15:05:34 AB: we'll skip testing today 15:05:39 Topic: Announcements 15:05:43 AB: any short announcements today? 15:05:49 AB: re the f2f meeting on Tuesday November 1, I still consider its status as "undecided" but if we do meet that day it will be 9:00-12:00 maximum and we will have a teleconf bridge for remote participants. 15:06:05 AB: given there are only 5 WG members registered yet almost 20 non-members, it may make sense to meet for the first half-hour or so just to give people an update/status. 15:06:24 AB: Reminder: October 11 is the deadline for comments for the TEv1 LC 15:06:31 AB: The comment tracking document is http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/wiki/TouchEvents-LCWD-13-Sep-2011. 15:06:41 Topic: Issue-21 and Issue-22 ; status of Cathy's proposals 15:06:46 AB: it looks like Cathy submitted changesets to address Issue-21 and Issue-22 so I think we can now close both of them (http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/track/issues/21, http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/track/issues/22). 15:06:54 AB: I already updated the DoC doc to reflect the WG and Commenter are in agreement (LC-1 and LC-2) 15:07:15 AB: thanks Cathy! 15:07:24 Topic: Feedback from PFWG on Touch Events 13 September 2011 draft 15:07:33 AB: the WAI PFWG submitted some comments and no one has responded yet http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webevents/2011JulSep/0091.html so let's look at them and make some decisions 15:07:43 AB: LC-6 and LC-7 15:07:59 AB: we need someone to agree to propose text to address these issues 15:08:06 … any volunteers? 15:08:07 Cathy has joined #webevents 15:09:14 Present+ Sangwhan_Moon 15:10:08 SM: I will take an action to address comment #2 15:10:24 ACTION: moon respond to PFWG comment #2 (the editorial nits) 15:10:25 Created ACTION-81 - Respond to PFWG comment #2 (the editorial nits) [on Sangwhan Moon - due 2011-10-18]. 15:10:37 AB: I would split comment #1 into 2 pieces 15:10:46 … one is a request for Primer doc 15:11:02 … and the other asks for a clarification re mouse events and touch events 15:11:21 DS: we mention that in the charter 15:12:18 AB: "The relation between touch events and mouse 15:12:19 events should be explained in more detail for authors who want to 15:12:19 achieve device independence. 15:12:19 " 15:12:26 DS: agree with that point 15:12:41 … but it is not something the spec should necessarily address 15:12:54 … e.g. this spec does not define mouse events 15:13:18 … and I think that is appropriate 15:13:45 … I do agree having a clear defn would be useful but it doesn't belong in the TE spec 15:13:58 quite bad echo 15:14:03 AB: can you respond to that Doug? 15:14:10 DS: would prefer someone else to take it 15:14:17 SM: OK, I can take care of that 15:14:37 ACTION: Moon respond to PFWG comment #1 15:14:37 Created ACTION-82 - Respond to PFWG comment #1 [on Sangwhan Moon - due 2011-10-18]. 15:14:57 AB: do you have enuf info Sangwhan? 15:15:01 SM: yes 15:15:28 DS: agree a Primer would be useful but don't think the TE spec should include it 15:15:40 s/Primer/Primer-type info/ 15:15:41 Zakim, who is noisy 15:15:41 I don't understand 'who is noisy', smaug 15:16:00 AB: ok, then we have a plan to address the PFWG comments 15:16:05 Zakim, who is making noise? 15:16:18 sangwhan, listening for 12 seconds I heard sound from the following: Doug_Schepers (8%), Art_Barstow (62%) 15:16:31 AB: Sangwhan, when can you address these Actions? 15:16:53 SM: I will try to get a draft out tomorrow 15:17:01 AB: OK, that would be great 15:17:22 Topic: comments from Greg Dennis 15:17:29 AB: during the Sept 20 call, we discussed comments from Greg Dennis and Doug agreed to Action-77 http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/track/actions/77 15:17:43 The echo is really bad 15:18:00 zakim, who is making noise? 15:18:11 sangwhan, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: Art_Barstow (5%) 15:18:24 action-77? 15:18:24 ACTION-77 -- Doug Schepers to reply to Greg Dennis table for each touch event type per agreement on 20-Sep-2011 call -- due 2011-10-10 -- OPEN 15:18:24 http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/track/actions/77 15:18:37 DS: so this is Action-77? 15:18:41 Action-77? 15:18:41 ACTION-77 -- Doug Schepers to reply to Greg Dennis table for each touch event type per agreement on 20-Sep-2011 call -- due 2011-10-10 -- OPEN 15:18:41 http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/track/actions/77 15:18:43 AB: yes 15:18:49 DS: not sure when I can get to it 15:19:04 SM: is this critical for LC? 15:19:15 DS: good point; we will go back to LC 15:19:19 AB: yes, that's correct 15:19:26 DS: I can point somebody to my code 15:20:31 AB: f.ex. http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-3-Events/#event-type-DOMActivate 15:21:51 http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-3-Events/#event-types-list 15:21:53 http://www.w3.org/TR/DOM-Level-3-Events/#event-types-list 15:22:27 DS: we can add the table 15:23:02 AB: the table will be normative I presume 15:23:11 DS: what is the LC#2 plan? 15:23:22 AB: I was hoping to publish it next week 15:23:35 SM: could this be easily done with ReSpec? 15:23:42 DS: I think it needs to be modified 15:24:21 AB: is it clear what Greg is asking for? 15:24:29 SM: yes, I think so 15:24:40 DS: yes, I think we have all of the info 15:24:47 … D3E is more specific 15:24:56 … all of the info is derivable 15:25:17 SM: if I have an extra week, I can look into it 15:25:58 AB: can anyone else help? 15:26:08 SM: I can get something out by the end of next week 15:26:45 ACTION: moon create an input to address the table requested by Greg Dennis 15:26:46 Created ACTION-83 - Create an input to address the table requested by Greg Dennis [on Sangwhan Moon - due 2011-10-18]. 15:26:56 AB: I'll see if I can get to it sooner 15:27:19 ACTION: barstow try to help Sangwhan with Action-83 15:27:19 Created ACTION-84 - Try to help Sangwhan with Action-83 [on Arthur Barstow - due 2011-10-18]. 15:27:34 Topic: Plan for Touch Events LC#2 15:27:40 AB: I'd like to get a new LC published as soon as we can - Oct 18 if possible - and certainly before TPAC starts and set a longer term goal of publishing a Candidate Recommendation in November. 15:28:42 AB: based on the actions created today, it looks like a pub on Oct 18 won't happen 15:29:10 … but we can still try to get it pub'ed before TPAC 15:30:17 DS: last day to submit a pubreq before TPAC is Oct 25 15:30:24 AB: so that is still do-able 15:30:56 DS: I'll be offline on Oct 24 and limited availability next week 15:32:02 AB: it doesn't seem like that much work is needed to get LC#2 out 15:32:10 DS: yes, I think that's true 15:32:30 AB: I think we have a set of actions 15:32:35 … now we need to execute 15:32:44 AB: anything else on LC#2? 15:32:59 Topic: Any Other Business (AOB) 15:33:15 DS: I won't be available next week 15:33:44 … hope to talk to some Members about joining Web Events 15:33:56 … during my biz trip 15:34:03 AB: OK; good 15:34:19 AB: tentatively have a call next week 15:34:33 … and Sangwhan, please keep me posted on the status of your actions 15:34:35 SM: will do 15:34:58 AB: perhaps we can use email to synch up rather than have a meeting next week 15:35:04 AB: anything else for today? 15:35:10 AB: meeting adjourned 15:35:23 -Olli_Pettay 15:35:26 -Art_Barstow 15:35:27 -sangwhan 15:35:27 -Doug_Schepers 15:35:28 RWC_WebEven()11:00AM has ended 15:35:30 Attendees were Doug_Schepers, sangwhan, +1.781.993.aaaa, Art_Barstow, Olli_Pettay 15:35:30 RRSAgent, make minutes 15:35:30 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/10/11-webevents-minutes.html ArtB 15:47:22 oh, oops. 15:47:25 Sorry I missed today's meeting. 15:50:18 sangwhan has left #webevents 15:56:12 zakim, bye 15:56:12 Zakim has left #webevents 15:56:17 rrsagent, bye 15:56:17 I see 4 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2011/10/11-webevents-actions.rdf : 15:56:17 ACTION: moon respond to PFWG comment #2 (the editorial nits) [1] 15:56:17 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/10/11-webevents-irc#T15-10-24 15:56:17 ACTION: Moon respond to PFWG comment #1 [2] 15:56:17 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/10/11-webevents-irc#T15-14-37 15:56:17 ACTION: moon create an input to address the table requested by Greg Dennis [3] 15:56:17 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/10/11-webevents-irc#T15-26-45 15:56:17 ACTION: barstow try to help Sangwhan with Action-83 [4] 15:56:17 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/10/11-webevents-irc#T15-27-19