12:27:08 RRSAgent has joined #er 12:27:08 logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/08/31-er-irc 12:27:10 RRSAgent, make logs public 12:27:10 Zakim has joined #er 12:27:12 Zakim, this will be 3794 12:27:12 ok, trackbot; I see WAI_ERTWG()8:30AM scheduled to start in 3 minutes 12:27:13 Meeting: Evaluation and Repair Tools Working Group Teleconference 12:27:13 Date: 31 August 2011 12:27:24 philipA has joined #er 12:27:46 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-wai-ert/2011Aug/0010.html 12:27:52 chair: Shadi 12:28:28 agenda+ Welcome 12:28:28 agenda+ Continue processing comments 12:28:28 agenda+ Upcoming meeting schedule 12:29:37 sinarmaya has joined #er 12:30:38 WAI_ERTWG()8:30AM has now started 12:30:45 + +1.858.017.aaaa 12:31:04 +??P8 12:32:29 zakim, call shadi-617 12:32:29 ok, shadi; the call is being made 12:32:30 +Shadi 12:33:41 zakim, aaaa is really Emmanuelle 12:33:41 +Emmanuelle; got it 12:33:52 zakim, ? is Philip 12:33:52 +Philip; got it 12:34:25 regrets: CarlosV 12:36:16 scribe: Shadi 12:36:20 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-earl10-comments/2011May/0024.html 12:36:35 zakim, take up agendum 2 12:36:35 agendum 2. "Continue processing comments" taken up [from shadi] 12:36:38 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-earl10-comments/2011May/0024.html 12:37:03 samuelm has joined #er 12:39:05 PA: comment makes sense 12:39:16 SAZ: let's look one by one 12:39:24 [[Assertor]] 12:39:46 +??P10 12:40:14 zakim, ? is Samuel 12:40:14 +Samuel; got it 12:40:37 http://www.w3.org/TR/EARL10/#Assertor 12:41:20 http://www.w3.org/TR/EARL10-Guide/#EARL10Reports 12:43:33 kostas has joined #er 12:43:42 + +30231125aabb 12:43:54 SAZ: comment not really precise -- EARL 1.0 requires an identfying name which could be dc:title, foaf:name, or doap:name 12:44:21 zakim, aabb is Kostas 12:44:21 +Kostas; got it 12:44:37 ...any issues with that requirement? 12:44:40 [none] 12:45:46 ...description is not required though, because it may not be known 12:46:30 ...same for TestSubject 12:46:53 ...maybe could say "one identifier" rather than "identifying name/title"? 12:49:01 PA: conformance section looks clearer than in the comment 12:51:27 RESOLUTION: change "identifying name/title" to "identifyer" in conformance requirements 2.a, 3.a, and 4.a 12:53:14 [TestResult] 12:53:54 SAZ: requirement is dc:date and earl:outcome (which in turn must have an identifyer and a description) 12:54:10 ...additional information is only optional 12:54:13 ...ok? 12:54:55 KV: agree 12:55:52 SS: agree 12:56:07 EG: don't see why we need consistency 12:56:51 [TestMode] 12:57:05 SAZ: provide pre-defined values for test mode 12:57:17 ...if you define your own then you need to describe them 12:58:38 ...for example, if a vendor uses foo:heuristic, they would need to disambiguiate it 12:58:57 ...title would be "heuristic" but also need a description of what that means 12:59:34 yes 13:00:04 shadi has joined #er 13:01:07 RESOLUTION: conistency does not make sense because every case has its own justification; some improvement of the wording will be made 13:01:16 yes 13:01:27 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-earl10-comments/2011May/0025.html 13:03:11 http://www.w3.org/TR/EARL10/#TestCriterion 13:04:30 KV: it is clear, not sure what is requested 13:07:12 SAZ: TestRequirement is broader than "test suite" 13:07:44 cstrobbe has joined #er 13:08:00 ...could use TestRequirement to refer to test suites or other compound tests that are not necessarily test suites 13:08:12 ...or introduce "earl:TestSuite" 13:09:18 +Christophe_Strobbe 13:09:26 shadi has joined #er 13:09:44 SS: test suite could contain a set of unrelated tests, while a test requirment is a set of related tests 13:10:20 zakim, who is on the call? 13:10:20 On the phone I see Emmanuelle (muted), Philip, Shadi, Samuel, Kostas, Christophe_Strobbe 13:12:55 uhmmm 13:13:05 SAZ: add test suite or not? 13:14:00 KV: maybe good to include because informative about what TestRequirement and TestSuite is 13:14:26 EG: can be a good idea because can be more flexible 13:16:32 RESOLUTION: introduce earl:TestSuite to mean a series of (related or unrelated) test cases 13:16:58 PA: TestRequirement can still be a combination of TestSuites and TestCases, right? 13:17:05 SAZ: yes, it is more generic 13:17:16 Sounds good to me. 13:17:19 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-earl10-comments/2011May/0026.html 13:17:27 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-earl10-comments/2011May/0035.html 13:18:57 http://www.w3.org/TR/EARL10/#OutcomeValue 13:21:13 http://www.w3.org/TR/EARL10/#TestMode 13:23:51 SAZ: OutcomeValue is likely to have gradients so proposed sub-classes 13:24:04 ...TestMode may not need the same level of specifity 13:24:18 KV: why these gradients? 13:24:28 SAZ: to maximize query-ability 13:24:42 KV: don't think we need it 13:26:13 (keep current approach) 13:26:20 CS: could keep it 13:26:22 +1 13:27:59 RESOLUTION: keep as is because no use-cases are known for further subclasses of TestMode 13:28:54 zakim, take up next 13:28:54 agendum 1. "Welcome" taken up [from shadi] 13:29:00 zakim, take up agendum 3 13:29:00 agendum 3. "Upcoming meeting schedule" taken up [from shadi] 13:29:07 SS: regrets for next week 13:29:27 -Emmanuelle 13:29:29 [next meeting on 7th september] 13:29:31 sinarmaya has left #er 13:29:35 -Samuel 13:29:39 samuelm has left #er 13:29:39 -Kostas 13:29:40 trackbot, end meeting 13:29:40 Zakim, list attendees 13:29:41 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 13:29:41 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/08/31-er-minutes.html trackbot 13:29:41 As of this point the attendees have been +1.858.017.aaaa, Shadi, Emmanuelle, Philip, Samuel, +30231125aabb, Kostas, Christophe_Strobbe 13:29:41 -Philip 13:29:42 RRSAgent, bye 13:29:42 I see no action items 13:29:43 -Christophe_Strobbe