13:55:24 RRSAgent has joined #webtv 13:55:24 logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/08/30-webtv-irc 13:55:57 Meeting: Home Networking Task Force Teleconference 13:56:07 Chair: Giuseppe 13:57:25 +??P29 13:57:44 zakim, ??P29 is me 13:57:44 +giuseppe; got it 13:59:14 +francois 13:59:23 +??P31 13:59:29 zakim, mute me 13:59:30 francois should now be muted 13:59:34 zakim, ??P31 is MattH 13:59:34 +MattH; got it 14:00:19 +??P35 14:00:30 igarashi has joined #webtv 14:00:35 zakim, ??P35 is Juhani 14:00:35 +Juhani; got it 14:01:54 +??P42 14:02:00 +??P44 14:02:13 +??P48 14:02:36 zakim, ??P48 is JeanClaude_Dufourd 14:02:37 +JeanClaude_Dufourd; got it 14:02:43 + +1.303.503.aaaa 14:02:59 +??P51 14:03:10 Oops, sorry, thats me 14:03:34 zakim, mute panze 14:03:39 Panze should now be muted 14:03:41 zakim, unmute panze 14:03:45 Panze should no longer be muted 14:03:45 ack me 14:03:47 zakim, who is noisy? 14:04:03 + +1.703.234.aabb 14:04:05 kaz, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: giuseppe (25%), Clarke (15%) 14:04:12 zakim, aabb is Jerry 14:04:13 zakim, mute me 14:04:31 +Jerry; got it 14:04:31 zakim, mute me 14:04:31 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-and-tv/2011Aug/0148.html 14:04:33 francois should now be muted 14:04:50 Kazuyuki should now be muted 14:05:10 + +1.503.712.aacc 14:05:28 kaz has left #webtv 14:05:54 kaz has joined #webtv 14:05:56 zakim, aacc is Narm 14:05:58 zakim, who is here? 14:06:04 Scribe: francois 14:06:07 Topic: Security section 14:06:19 narm_gadiraju has joined #webtv 14:06:22 +Narm; got it 14:06:28 On the phone I see Kazuyuki (muted), giuseppe, francois (muted), MattH, Juhani, Clarke, Igarashi, JeanClaude_Dufourd, Bob, Panze, Jerry, Narm 14:06:32 Giuseppe: Proposal from me highlighting some of the security problems the use cases can raise. 14:06:41 On IRC I see narm_gadiraju, kaz, igarashi, RRSAgent, MattH, Zakim, giuseppe, panze, francois, trackbot 14:06:53 ... Got some comments. I tried to clarify the text. 14:07:00 Present: Kazuyuki, giuseppe, francois, MattH, Juhani, Clarke, Igarashi, JeanClaude_Dufourd, Bob, Panze, Jerry, Narm 14:07:04 ... If no further comments, I'll merge it into requirements doc. 14:07:14 [none heard] 14:07:21 Giuseppe: ok, will do then 14:07:35 Topic: Requirement on Application Communication 14:07:50 Giuseppe: following mailing-list discussion, split requirements into 2. 14:08:00 ... If no other comment, we can move on. 14:08:05 Matt: Happy with the result. 14:08:11 Giuseppe: OK, good. 14:08:17 Topic: Content Protection 14:08:47 Giuseppe: discussion last time on whether we should drop the requirements or update the text. Bob and Russell wanted to propose text but didn't see text. 14:08:52 kaz_ has joined #webtv 14:09:01 Bob: I haven't had time to send text. 14:09:42 Giuseppe: We can probably review that during the IG F2F. We can leave the requirements in and review it during the F2F then. 14:09:46 Bob: fine. 14:10:01 Topic: Recommendations and categorization of requirements 14:10:21 Giuseppe: I tried to summarize feedback I got on the list. 14:10:31 Matt: Pretty happy with what you've done there. 14:10:32 +Joseph_Scheuhammer 14:10:51 zakim, Joseph is Russell 14:10:51 +Russell; got it 14:10:51 zakim, Joseph_Scheuhammer is really Russell 14:10:52 sorry, francois, I do not recognize a party named 'Joseph_Scheuhammer' 14:11:19 Giuseppe: I wrote a section called "Next Steps", I invite people to review that section. 14:11:20 Present+ Russell 14:12:05 ... DAP group already has device discovery in its charter so next step is to propose requirements there and create another WG if and only if some of them are not taken up by DAP. 14:12:21 ... Then I categorized requirements into higher and lower priorities. 14:12:33 ... based on what we discussed last week. 14:12:34 + +1.678.795.aadd 14:12:56 Igarashi: How do you handle divergences of opinions on priorities? 14:13:28 Giuseppe: What is there is supposed to be the consensus of the discussions we already had. I encourage you to review the text and raise concerns. 14:13:45 ... If there are objections, we can record them in the requirements doc. 14:14:07 Igarashi: OK, I think Application communication should be higher priority. 14:14:23 zakim, who is here? 14:14:23 On the phone I see Kazuyuki (muted), giuseppe, francois (muted), MattH, Juhani, Clarke, Igarashi, JeanClaude_Dufourd, Bob, Panze, Jerry, Narm, Russell, +1.678.795.aadd 14:14:26 On IRC I see kaz_, narm_gadiraju, kaz, igarashi, RRSAgent, MattH, Zakim, giuseppe, panze, francois, trackbot 14:14:28 Giuseppe: One way is to discuss this and see if we can reach agreement. 14:14:31 zakim, unmute me 14:14:32 Kazuyuki should no longer be muted 14:14:37 ... Otherwise, we'll just record disagreement. 14:15:01 zakim, aadd is Steven 14:15:01 +Steven; got it 14:15:42 -Russell 14:16:00 Present+ Steven_Wright 14:16:07 +Russell 14:16:20 q? 14:16:27 Igarashi: [comment I missed on Application communication and other requirements priorities] 14:16:40 Bob: Could you summarize the issue? 14:16:54 + +1.650.483.aaee 14:17:20 Giuseppe: issue is should we move "Application communication" to high priority? 14:17:22 mav has joined #webtv 14:17:29 zakim, aaee is Mark_Vickers 14:17:29 +Mark_Vickers; got it 14:17:49 Yes 14:17:59 Sorry late 14:18:44 [scribe missed gist of discussion here, Igarashi-san, feel free to record your points down on IRC!] 14:18:56 Giuseppe: I can move this in high priority list if no one objects. 14:19:36 Russell: In terms of UPnP, we don't recognize applications per se, only devices, that would be difficult for us to accomodate. 14:20:04 -Bob 14:20:40 Matt: the requirement could be fulfilled by different implementations. I would not translate it into meaning UPnP has to provide this set of functionalities. 14:20:47 +Bob 14:20:57 -Russell 14:20:58 Igashari: also, it's pretty generic, not bound to a particular protocol. 14:21:12 +Russell 14:21:31 Giuseppe: I don't think it's a big deal moving it to high priority. 14:22:28 zakim, who is noisy? 14:22:39 kaz, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: giuseppe (58%), Igarashi (84%) 14:23:24 Igashari: important point. Generic that can be extended [echo heard, scribe missed most of it again] 14:23:38 s/Igashari/Igarashi/ 14:24:21 +1 14:24:35 Giuseppe: Let's resolve it over email. Please send comments on current text and we'll resolve this during F2F. Try to be specific and propose text. 14:25:02 Topic: Remote UI Overview (ISSUE-48) 14:25:07 ISSUE-48? 14:25:07 ISSUE-48 -- CEA-2014 Remote UI Overview -- raised 14:25:07 http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/track/issues/48 14:25:28 Giuseppe: I saw some text from JC. I can go ahead and integrate that text. 14:25:37 ... Please send comments if needed. 14:25:52 ... Any other comments on requirements document? 14:25:53 mav_ has joined #webtv 14:26:11 [none heard] 14:26:22 Topic: Remaining open issues 14:26:32 -Russell 14:26:43 -> http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/track/products/2 HNTF issues 14:26:46 jcdufourd has joined #webtv 14:27:09 issue-30? 14:27:09 ISSUE-30 -- Home Network Enabled User-Agent - Network Device Controller -- open 14:27:09 http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/track/issues/30 14:27:23 +Russell 14:27:49 Giuseppe: not sure what we should do with implementation alternatives. 14:28:04 Clarke: fine if you include an informative link to reference the proposals. 14:28:22 Giuseppe: OK, thanks, sounds good, we can close it then. 14:28:44 [comment scribe missed on adding reference link] 14:28:58 Giuseppe: Russell, about closing ISSUE-30? 14:29:17 Russell: Yes, I'm fine with that. 14:29:22 Close ISSUE-30 14:29:22 ISSUE-30 Home Network Enabled User-Agent - Network Device Controller closed 14:29:34 Giuseppe: ok, good. 14:29:37 Topic: Next Steps. 14:29:51 Giuseppe: Next step is to circulate the requirements doc within the whole IG. 14:30:03 ... get feedback, address comments, and close the doc during the IG F2F. 14:30:21 +??P2 14:30:27 -Bob 14:30:27 ... In parallel to this, the co-chairs are trying to write an IG report describing IG history and progress. 14:30:34 q+ to ask about possible (additional?) agenda topic idea 14:30:43 ... The requirements doc would be linked from the IG report. 14:30:58 Russell: [question about IG report] 14:31:47 Giuseppe: The IG is a public group, so everyone will be able to send comments on the doc. During the F2F, only IG participants are allowed to attend/ 14:31:55 s|/|| 14:32:00 q? 14:32:14 -Russell 14:32:17 JeanClaude: What is the status of the implementation alternative doc? 14:32:23 +Russell 14:32:55 Giuseppe: we just said we should probably drop it. It's reflected by the different solutions proposed by Opera, CableLabs. We should close it as it was meant to trigger discussions (and it did). 14:33:16 q? 14:33:23 ??1: How many items remain to be addressed? You mentioned a couple. 14:33:31 s/??1/mav/ 14:34:05 Giuseppe: We're not looking into adding more requirements. There is nothing pending as far as I can see. I'm expecting comments to clarify what the text says. 14:34:55 ... The agenda for the F2F is to review this document and approve it, to discuss next steps, e.g. involvement within DAP, discuss possible joint meeting at TPAC, etc. 14:35:25 jcdufourd has joined #webtv 14:35:54 ... Then, during the F2F, we'll have another discussion at the IG level, to see if we need to continue discussions in this TF, in another one on another TF, things that worked out well, things that should be improved. 14:36:05 ack k 14:36:05 kaz, you wanted to ask about possible (additional?) agenda topic idea 14:36:07 ... Be prepared to share pro/cons about TF during the F2F! 14:36:55 Kaz: It might make sense to ask TF participants about how to form the agenda of the IG. 14:37:09 s/IG/IG f2f meeting/ 14:37:28 StevenWright: question about definition about home network in requirements doc. Restricted to IPv4? Open to IPv6? 14:37:44 Bob: CableLabs is planning to support IPv6. 14:37:57 StevenWright: perhaps worth being explicit. 14:38:20 zakim, who is speaking? 14:38:30 kaz, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: ??P2 (4%), giuseppe (98%), Narm (14%) 14:38:38 Narm: does home network cover only local device, or "extended" home networks with remote devices? 14:38:38 narm gadiraju spok 14:39:04 +q 14:39:21 Giuseppe: home/home communications is important but we haven't investigated it thoroughly. Idea would be to mention it as something that requires more work. 14:39:41 Giuseppe: Could someone provide text for home network clarifications? 14:39:48 -q 14:39:49 ??2: Happy to. 14:40:13 Giuseppe: back to Kaz point. F2F points? 14:40:37 Igarashi: Comments on requirements could be discussed at the F2F before it is approved. 14:41:12 Giuseppe: yes, this is one point of the agenda. 14:41:37 ... I drafted an initial agenda 14:41:46 -> http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/First_F2F_Schedule Draft F2F schedule 14:42:43 Jerry has joined #webtv 14:42:44 Giuseppe: For HNTF, next steps on standardization works, next steps as a TF (close? continue?) and perhaps presentations of preliminary work as we experienced in e.g. CableLabs and Opera 14:42:54 ... [going through the remaining agenda] 14:43:10 ... Any proposal to add to our slot? 14:43:14 -Russell 14:43:39 +Russell 14:44:11 ... Agenda is on the wiki, please look at it and propose additions. 14:44:15 ... Any other question? 14:44:27 ack me 14:44:51 s/??2/Clarke/ 14:44:55 zakim, mute me 14:44:55 francois should now be muted 14:44:55 zakim, ??P2 is Clarke 14:44:56 +Clarke; got it 14:45:30 Giuseppe: I have one comment on Media Identification, put as other requirement. 14:45:44 ... Not sure if it's related to what DAP is chartered to do. 14:46:25 Matt: depends on the level of complexity you put in media identification. At the beginning, it was a means to get access to an identifier that applications can use. 14:46:49 ... Support for enabling metadata as a way to store the identifier. 14:47:17 Giuseppe: yes, social TV was another aspect, as you need an identifier to be able to share it. 14:47:35 ... Not limited to home network scenarios. 14:47:54 Matt: Question for the IG as a whole. 14:48:25 Bob: The media metadata work that's going on, does that cover what you're talking about? 14:48:26 ack me 14:48:46 Francois: Media Annotations WG? 14:48:50 Bob: yes. 14:48:56 +Russell.a 14:48:59 -Russell 14:49:15 Clarke: But not talking about media identification per se. 14:49:17 zakim, mute me 14:49:17 francois should now be muted 14:49:43 Giuseppe: we should look in this WG and see if its scope overlaps with this requirement. 14:50:06 Igashari: Proposal for agenda F2F. 14:50:44 s/Igashari/Igarashi/ 14:51:01 ... Need to include feedback from workshop on home networks. 14:51:11 Giuseppe: yes, included in global agenda. 14:51:27 [it's included in: http://www.w3.org/2011/webtv/wiki/First_F2F_Schedule#Main_IG_.28IG_report_review.29] 14:51:51 -Clarke.a 14:51:52 Giuseppe: no more calls by F2F, we'll continue discussions on the list. 14:51:56 -Mark_Vickers 14:51:58 -Clarke 14:51:58 ... Thanks everybody! Bye! 14:51:59 -Jerry 14:51:59 -JeanClaude_Dufourd 14:52:02 -Juhani 14:52:02 [call adjourned] 14:52:03 -Igarashi 14:52:05 -Russell.a 14:52:07 -Steven 14:52:09 -MattH 14:52:10 -Kazuyuki 14:52:13 -francois 14:52:19 -Panze 14:52:34 -Narm 14:54:44 I'm logging. I don't understand 'draft mintues', kaz. Try /msg RRSAgent help 14:55:17 zakim, drop giuseppe 14:55:17 giuseppe is being disconnected 14:55:19 UW_WebTVIG(Home Net)10:00AM has ended 14:55:21 Attendees were Kazuyuki, giuseppe, francois, MattH, Juhani, Clarke, Igarashi, JeanClaude_Dufourd, +1.303.503.aaaa, Bob, Panze, +1.703.234.aabb, Jerry, +1.503.712.aacc, Narm, 14:55:24 ... Joseph_Scheuhammer, Russell, +1.678.795.aadd, Steven, +1.650.483.aaee, Mark_Vickers 14:57:23 MattH has left #webtv 15:08:51 oh sorry didn't realize 15:09:02 I use sip 15:09:15 ah kaz 15:09:19 are you still around? 15:10:36 what time is the call tomorrow? 15:15:05 RRSAgent, draft minutes 15:15:05 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/08/30-webtv-minutes.html francois 15:15:31 RRSAgent, make logs public 15:15:50 RRSAgent, bye 15:15:50 I see no action items