IRC log of webevents on 2011-05-24
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 14:59:09 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #webevents
- 14:59:09 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/05/24-webevents-irc
- 14:59:16 [Cathy]
- Cathy has joined #webevents
- 14:59:19 [ArtB]
- RRSAgent, make log public
- 14:59:30 [ArtB]
- ScribeNick: ArtB
- 14:59:30 [ArtB]
- Scribe: Art
- 14:59:30 [ArtB]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webevents/2011AprJun/0112.html
- 14:59:30 [ArtB]
- Date: 24 May 2011
- 14:59:30 [ArtB]
- Chair: Art
- 14:59:31 [ArtB]
- Meeting: Web Events WG Voice Conference
- 14:59:55 [Cathy]
- Present+ Cathy_Chan
- 15:00:02 [Zakim]
- +Cathy_Chan
- 15:01:45 [Zakim]
- +Doug_Schepers
- 15:02:16 [ArtB]
- Present: Art_Barstow, Cathy_Chan, Doug_Schepers
- 15:02:24 [Zakim]
- +Matt_Brubeck
- 15:02:44 [ArtB]
- Present+ Matt_Brubeck
- 15:03:13 [Zakim]
- + +1.781.534.aabb
- 15:03:27 [ArtB]
- zakim, aabb is Laszlo_Gombos
- 15:03:27 [Zakim]
- +Laszlo_Gombos; got it
- 15:03:35 [ArtB]
- Present+ Laszlo_Gombos
- 15:03:47 [ArtB]
- Topic: Tweak Agenda
- 15:03:53 [ArtB]
- AB: I submitted a Draft Agenda yesterday ( http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webevents/2011AprJun/0112.html ). Any change requests?
- 15:04:13 [ArtB]
- Topic: Announcements
- 15:04:19 [ArtB]
- AB: any short announcements?
- 15:04:56 [ArtB]
- Topic: Issue-6 (Open) Touch targets in frames
- 15:05:07 [ArtB]
- AB: Issue-6 is the Open state ( http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/track/issues/6 ). I has two open actions ( http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/track/actions/24 ) for Doug and ( http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/track/actions/48 ) for Matt.
- 15:05:29 [ArtB]
- MB: I still need to address my action
- 15:05:37 [ArtB]
- ... as discussed previously
- 15:05:45 [smaug]
- smaug has joined #webevents
- 15:06:02 [ArtB]
- AB: can you give us a rough ETA Matt?
- 15:06:14 [ArtB]
- MB: yes, I'll try to get proposals out by Friday
- 15:06:18 [ArtB]
- AB: ok, that's good
- 15:06:19 [smaug]
- is there a conf call?
- 15:06:28 [smaug]
- I'm in HTML Speech f2f
- 15:06:34 [smaug]
- so can't attend, sorry
- 15:06:37 [ArtB]
- DS: I haven't had time for my action
- 15:06:49 [ArtB]
- ... will try to get to it this week
- 15:07:00 [mbrubeck]
- smaug: Looks like we don't have much new business since the last call, anyway.
- 15:07:08 [Zakim]
- + +1.415.812.aacc
- 15:07:13 [ArtB]
- ... I have some other obligations that will make it difficult for me to address my actions
- 15:07:34 [ArtB]
- zakim, aacc is Josh_Soref
- 15:07:34 [Zakim]
- +Josh_Soref; got it
- 15:07:41 [ArtB]
- Present+ Josh_Soref
- 15:08:07 [timeless]
- timeless has joined #webevents
- 15:08:21 [ArtB]
- AB: if anyone can help Doug with Doug's actions, that would be great!
- 15:15:28 [ArtB]
- Topic: Issue-3 (Raised) Click event target after DOM mutation during touchstart
- 15:15:33 [ArtB]
- AB: Issue-3 is Raised state ( http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/track/issues/3 ). Doug has an open action ( http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/track/actions/23 ) for this issue.
- 15:16:01 [ArtB]
- DS: I still need to address this action
- 15:16:09 [ArtB]
- MB: we discussed this during May 10 call
- 15:16:28 [mbrubeck]
- http://www.w3.org/2011/05/10-webevents-minutes.html#item05
- 15:16:30 [ArtB]
- ... people should read those minutes, especially if they want to help Doug with his actions
- 15:16:39 [ArtB]
- Topic: Issue-16 (Raised) Should the spec be silent or prescriptive re Object Identity
- 15:16:44 [ArtB]
- AB: Issue-16 is Raised ( http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/track/issues/16 ). Laszlo has an open action ( http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/track/actions/46 ) for this issue.
- 15:17:22 [ArtB]
- LG: no progress yet on this
- 15:17:27 [ArtB]
- ... need some more context
- 15:18:05 [ArtB]
- MB: subsequent touch events contain objects that refer to the same touch point
- 15:18:13 [ArtB]
- ... or the touch points are in diff lists
- 15:18:26 [ArtB]
- ... Impl wise, it would be possible to reuse same objects b/w events
- 15:18:34 [ArtB]
- ... or to always use distinct objects
- 15:18:43 [ArtB]
- ... This impl detail can leak out to content
- 15:19:03 [ArtB]
- ... Thus for interop reasons, we may want to specify if objects should be reused or not
- 15:19:15 [ArtB]
- LG: I was wondering about existing impls?
- 15:19:22 [ArtB]
- ... e.g. the pros and cons here
- 15:19:38 [ArtB]
- MB: PPK did some research for Webkit browsers
- 15:19:46 [ArtB]
- ... there is a link to that blog in the Issue
- 15:20:01 [ArtB]
- ... and he notes the behaviour may change in Webkit
- 15:20:17 [ArtB]
- LG: ok, I can make it clear what Webkit is going to do in the future
- 15:20:45 [ArtB]
- ... Some of the initial iPhone and Android impls have not been merged to the WK trunk
- 15:21:05 [ArtB]
- ... so there could be some differences between the WK trunk and what has been implemented
- 15:21:45 [ArtB]
- ... I assume existing impls will have a significant weight in our decision
- 15:22:06 [ArtB]
- AB: I think historically, we have emphasized existing impls
- 15:22:23 [ArtB]
- Topic: Issue-17 (Raised) Page X and Y parameters to createTouch
- 15:22:29 [ArtB]
- AB: Issue-17 is Raised ( http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/track/issues/17 ). Matt has an open action ( http://www.w3.org/2010/webevents/track/actions/50 ) for this issue.
- 15:22:59 [ArtB]
- MB: this is ongoing and should have a proposal by Friday
- 15:23:24 [ArtB]
- Topic: Proposal to specify behavior for terminals without touch hardware
- 15:23:40 [ArtB]
- AB: this topic was started by Gregers Gram Rygg on 12-May-2011 ( http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webevents/2011AprJun/0098.html ). There were some follow-ups.
- 15:24:38 [ArtB]
- MB: a question is how can content do feature detection to determin if the UA is going to make use of touch events or not
- 15:24:45 [timeless]
- s/determin/determine/
- 15:24:59 [ArtB]
- ... there is concern we don't want content discriminating based on h/w or other factors
- 15:25:15 [ArtB]
- ... Think we can address some of this by UA capabilities
- 15:25:39 [ArtB]
- ... e.g. if a user with eye detection h/w could translate eye movements to touch events
- 15:26:06 [ArtB]
- ... But for UAs that don't implement any of this spec, is it useful for the content to detect this
- 15:27:15 [ArtB]
- MB: most people probably haven't thought about all of the UCs especially wrt accessibility
- 15:27:32 [ArtB]
- JS: need something like action events (not swipe)
- 15:27:46 [ArtB]
- ... I want to be able to register for zoom
- 15:28:04 [ArtB]
- ... The higher-level spec about user intentions is important
- 15:28:19 [ArtB]
- MB: we still have a feature detection issue for contents
- 15:28:54 [shepazu]
- q+
- 15:29:09 [ArtB]
- JS: we may want to make it hard to use touch events
- 15:29:28 [ArtB]
- ... and get content devs to focus on High Level Intentional events
- 15:29:46 [ArtB]
- DS: I do not want to make it hard for anyone to do anything
- 15:30:07 [ArtB]
- ... We want it to be easy to do simple things
- 15:30:23 [ArtB]
- ... Apple's James Craig has done some work related to Intentional Events
- 15:30:42 [ArtB]
- ... I expect him to ping us when that doc is published (by WAI P&F WG)
- 15:30:55 [ArtB]
- ... I think people will implement that spec, at least eventually
- 15:31:04 [ArtB]
- ... and I agree some people will want to use that spec
- 15:31:16 [ArtB]
- MB: well, Touch Events will not go away
- 15:31:36 [ArtB]
- ... f.ex., there will not necessarily be a "paint" event
- 15:31:54 [ArtB]
- ... Some UCs will use Touch Events and other UCs will use Intentional Events
- 15:32:06 [ArtB]
- ... and feature detection is needed for Touch Events
- 15:32:24 [ArtB]
- DS: I don't think we will see the INDIE events implemented before mid-2012
- 15:32:43 [ArtB]
- ... but Touch Events as we have been spec'ing are already out there (implemented)
- 15:32:57 [ArtB]
- ... So devs will need to code for both types of events
- 15:33:31 [ArtB]
- ... If native impls don't support either of these specs, some script impls may help
- 15:33:49 [ArtB]
- ... e.g. add to JQuery
- 15:33:57 [timeless]
- s/JQuery/jQuery/
- 15:34:08 [ArtB]
- ... There will be a period of time where Touch Events is supported by Intentional Events are not
- 15:34:14 [timeless]
- s/by/but/
- 15:34:50 [ArtB]
- DS: there will be a market reality that these specs will be implemented in phases
- 15:35:56 [ArtB]
- AB: we don't have a draft of Intention Events so it causes a problem for use communicating what we intend to do
- 15:36:06 [ArtB]
- DS: I can ping James and the P&F WG
- 15:36:20 [ArtB]
- ... for starters, would like to have an idea of a starting point
- 15:36:42 [ArtB]
- ... but because of scheduling issues, I don't think that will happen for a couple of weeks
- 15:37:09 [ArtB]
- AB: is there an action for me here Doug?
- 15:37:24 [ArtB]
- ... or do you want to continue to be the lead?
- 15:37:34 [ArtB]
- DS: I'll start dialog now
- 15:38:14 [ArtB]
- ... and then I'll report back
- 15:38:28 [ArtB]
- AB: ok, that seems like a reasonable plan
- 15:39:43 [ArtB]
- RRSAgent, make minutes
- 15:39:43 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/05/24-webevents-minutes.html ArtB
- 15:40:24 [ArtB]
- Topic: AOB
- 15:40:54 [ArtB]
- AB: let's plan to have the next call in 2 weeks
- 15:41:07 [ArtB]
- ... June 7
- 15:42:13 [ArtB]
- AB: meeting adjourned
- 15:42:21 [Zakim]
- -Josh_Soref
- 15:42:23 [Zakim]
- -Art_Barstow
- 15:42:23 [Zakim]
- -Doug_Schepers
- 15:42:25 [Zakim]
- -Cathy_Chan
- 15:42:29 [ArtB]
- RRSAgent, make minutes
- 15:42:29 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/05/24-webevents-minutes.html ArtB
- 15:42:40 [Zakim]
- -Matt_Brubeck
- 15:43:45 [Zakim]
- -Laszlo_Gombos
- 15:43:47 [Zakim]
- RWC_WebEven()11:00AM has ended
- 15:43:48 [Zakim]
- Attendees were +1.781.993.aaaa, Art_Barstow, Cathy_Chan, Doug_Schepers, Matt_Brubeck, +1.781.534.aabb, Laszlo_Gombos, +1.415.812.aacc, Josh_Soref
- 15:45:21 [ArtB]
- zakim, bye
- 15:45:21 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #webevents
- 15:47:33 [ArtB]
- RRSAgent, bye
- 15:47:33 [RRSAgent]
- I see no action items