16:02:46 RRSAgent has joined #hcls2 16:02:46 logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/05/05-hcls2-irc 16:02:46 zakim, this is tmo 16:02:50 scribenick Bob 16:02:54 Zakim has joined #hcls2 16:04:34 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lKdDSb2uBBIeTEQAv2CyTHN_aVW63k9si1hmmilOMi0/edit?hl=en&authkey=CJGUtcwF# 16:04:35 AmitSheth has joined #HCLS2 16:05:16 there is nothing at http://www.w3.org/wiki/HCLSIG/SWANSIOC/Actions/RhetoricalStructure/ 16:05:25 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lKdDSb2uBBIeTEQAv2CyTHN_aVW63k9si1hmmilOMi0/edit?hl=en&authkey=CJGUtcwF# 16:08:28 epichler has joined #HCLS2 16:08:36 Michel: Use case plus the data and the ontological discussions 16:08:43 joanne has joined #hcls2 16:09:19 ... paper is about SNPs pxgx, how SNP's might be recorded in patient records 16:09:19 pls post link to paper again. i see only a link to rhetorical structure 16:09:38 https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lKdDSb2uBBIeTEQAv2CyTHN_aVW63k9si1hmmilOMi0/edit?hl=en&authkey=CJGUtcwF# 16:09:59 bbalsa has joined #HCLS2 16:10:28 ... breast cancer case: info still tied around gene expression as a biomarker 16:10:46 ... a little bit further away from what we wanted to embark 16:10:54 12:09 Bob https://docs.google.com/document/d/1lKdDSb2uBBIeTEQAv2CyTHN_aVW63k9si1hmmilOMi0/edit?hl=en&authkey=CJGUtcwF# 16:11:02 for bo 16:12:12 Michel: Breast cancer case suited for collab w BioRDF 16:12:42 +q 16:12:55 ... maybe a separate paper. One paper for SNPs, one paper for pharmacogenomics 16:13:46 Joanne: TMO to bridge; 16:14:21 Michel: Introduction by Eiker(?), startup w breast cancer interest 16:15:05 ... there is a front end that uses TMO; based on what we published 16:16:16 Michel: Learned as much as there is about warfarin 16:16:54 ... dosing, SNP ids; also prediciton algorithms, interesting to see lots of work 16:17:17 was this shared on this group? http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2011/04/computer-algorithm-may-speed-dru.html?ref=hp 16:17:36 ... pharmGKB is interested. Wonder if we can look at semantic web services 16:17:45 +q 16:18:36 ... would be well placed to do prediction for a speicific patient 16:19:05 Elgar: What are predictions based on? 16:19:45 Michel: Testing is done by int'l normalized ratio INR: how active is the pathway for coagulation 16:19:59 ... amt of warfarin needs to be balanced 16:20:18 ... there are home monitoring kits to manage dosing 16:20:46 ... factors other than the two genes are diet, etc that can change 16:21:18 ... this is already a nice patient-specific case 16:21:44 Joanne: bc w BioRDF; warf w... 16:22:07 ... Lib of Personalized Med has published on warfarin 16:22:44 Michel: Also genetic tests for low $ 16:23:00 ... genetic component explains 40% of dosage variance 16:23:23 ... FDA has published the table reproduced in the doc 16:23:48 ... but the table is less effective than other research 16:25:17 Elgar: We have two things that determine dosing 16:25:47 ... so there is an input vector for the algorithms 16:26:01 ... dosage recommendation is not great for accuracy 16:26:13 what are the inputs? 16:26:37 ... we would like to look at 1) can we find other features to consider? and 2) look at diff prediction algorithms 16:27:21 Michel: There are papers that crit pgx approach; doesn't work for people >65 16:27:39 ... reduced metabolism, loss of liver function, etc 16:27:55 Looks like being on the queue does not help: so here are questions/comments: (a) have you thought about the quality of data you are integrating? (b) quality of intergration? 16:28:03 ... consider a range of factors beyond genetics, should be able to account for more variance 16:28:23 (well, warfariin dosing is tough!) 16:28:52 Elgar: No idea at moment how data analysis and prediction would sound 16:29:21 Michel: Have touched the surface; maybe take closer look at prediction aspect 16:30:02 Joanne: Interested in prediction, along w Elgar 16:30:23 Michel: We need a better understanding of what they use to train 16:30:55 ... one of papers in section on prediction; performance of the different approaches 16:31:13 ... are there some elements that are being missed, even in state-of-the-art 16:31:39 ... could we add more features to explain more variance? 16:31:44 here's one tonellato warfarin avatar paper: http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&cd=4&sqi=2&ved=0CDAQFjAD&url=http%3A%2F%2Fpeople.dbmi.columbia.edu%2F~rip7002%2FSite%2FHome_files%2FSimulated%2520Comparison%2520of%2520Warfarin%2520Treatment%2520Protocols%2520Chi%25202010.pdf&ei=itDCTeG-K9PqgQeMlJHaBg&usg=AFQjCNGRNZdX7CCrLw3Mh5YJK3pIHkV7Yg&sig2=GmqL31HAsPP 16:32:27 What is quality of data that you are going to use? 16:33:16 Michel: Reduce dimensionality of data; can analytically find strong correlates in the input 16:33:44 ... we would complement what they already use w new contributions 16:33:59 Look at page 17 and 18 of this (at least!) http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:gaOqmO8SKj4J:online.law.asu.edu/events/Personalized_Medicine/ppts/Monday/Afternoon/Session_III/Tonellato.pdf+tonellato+warfarin+filetype:PDF&hl=en&gl=us&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESi-OP2QSvCcWEh-8WEj1Ukq0ApfCCv3_xqKfTNFBWbTdKlZ3_TzyCVp475MFh1xs1qbV8YTcHVXGWnfxpXHSE8HXiak2sH59WHNMhSzd 16:35:07 Amit(?): question about correlates and alignment 16:35:23 Michel: Can't comment on even their quality of data 16:35:41 ... won't build a new algorithm for paper 16:36:18 ... how do we represent facts; mostly focus on rep of knowledge 16:36:37 ... we might build a better predictor later :-) 16:37:08 Michel: Looked at pathways from pharmGKB; basically a diagram 16:37:29 ... don't know how well maps out to Reactome or Kegg 16:39:10 Michel: There was a GWAS on pharmGKB; want to convert patient data wrt outcomes 16:39:15 http://www.pharmgkb.org/do/serve?objId=PA135603152#tabview=tab2 16:39:36 that's not the right link! 16:39:45 here's another one: 16:40:15 http://www.pharmgkb.org/do/serve?objId=PA165291561&objCls=PhenotypeDataset#tabview=tab1 16:40:53 Michel: Based on clinical and other demo factors 16:42:31 ... this is the most important dataset for us; need to convert to semantic set for individual 16:43:12 ... convert to RDF; ensure that our representation has all the fields, and in ontologies 16:43:38 ... ontological nature of the representations 16:43:59 Joanne: will do tab-to-RDF 16:44:30 Michel: Are there other datasets that we might consider? 16:45:30 Joanne: emailing warfarin paper to everyone 16:47:33 ... can set parameters flexibility in the avatars 16:47:54 Michel: Which field; does our ont have the slots? 16:48:37 ... vis-a-vis predictive stuff that Russ did? Which fields might be missing, overlap of these. 16:48:56 Joanne: Probably have captured all the important ones 16:50:41 Michel: Warfarin case: enough for good investigation 16:52:10 Bosse: Would like to see link to pharam co 16:52:37 Michel: Label has been updated twice; gene but no dosing 16:52:56 ... 2009 updated w table, w variance accounted for 16:54:17 ... What kind of data are required to make decision? expensive to do trials 16:55:23 Bosse: Clinical trial could be the angle here. 16:55:51 Michel: Also what data the FDA requires so that becomes part of the label? 16:57:47 Amit: Interested to see how this is realized. Issues of data access, quality etc 16:59:31 ... have developed tools to produce RDF 17:00:17 ... capturing data is what I would like 17:00:45 Matthias: Interested in clinical decision support; how pgx data can be used for alerts etc 17:01:04 ... seamless integration into clincial workloads 17:02:58 Michel: Adrian Coulet and I will work on representations 17:12:10 iker has joined #hcls2 17:14:08 michel has joined #hcls2 17:14:12 rrsagent, draft minutes 17:14:12 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/05/05-hcls2-minutes.html michel 17:14:20 rrsagent, make log world-visible 18:46:54 Zakim has left #hcls2