15:04:48 RRSAgent has joined #webid 15:04:48 logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/04/04-webid-irc 15:04:50 RRSAgent, make logs world 15:04:50 Zakim has joined #webid 15:04:52 Zakim, this will be WEBID 15:04:52 ok, trackbot, I see INC_WEBID(WEBID)11:00AM already started 15:04:53 Meeting: WebID Incubator Group Teleconference 15:04:53 Date: 04 April 2011 15:05:47 doodle: http://doodle.com/txugsrtpe2tp9ted 15:08:14 mike has joined #webid 15:08:28 agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-webid/2011Apr/0006.html 15:09:32 topic: last minutes approval 15:09:38 scribe: pchampin 15:09:42 +1 15:09:44 minutes here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-webid/2011Mar/0096.html 15:09:47 +1 15:10:00 Is that Google +1? 15:10:11 +??P32 15:10:25 RESOLUTION: minutes approved 15:10:53 topic: deliverables 15:11:20 bblfish: didn't have time to work on the spec yet 15:11:29 ... there has been some work on the IRC channel about test cases 15:11:44 ... I think every implementation of webid should have a page 15:11:54 ... where people can test their certificate, 15:12:14 ... with human readable information about the outcome, 15:12:31 ... but also machine readable data, to build reports. 15:12:57 q+ 15:13:01 ... A test agent could then create a webid in RDFa (to test conneg) 15:13:10 ... and crowl different services to test them. 15:13:43 Deiu? 15:14:03 jeffsayre: should we be monitoring the IRC in addition to the public mailing list 15:14:06 ... ? 15:14:11 bblfish, yeah, I'm here 15:14:18 are you on teleconf? 15:14:38 no, sorry (missing a telephone in the office right now) 15:14:43 bblfish: there has been more activity on the IRC lately 15:14:50 you can join here: +1-617-761-6200 15:14:59 ah thre is a SIP client you can use 15:15:03 do you have sip 15:15:06 ? 15:15:16 nope (no headset/mic anyway) 15:15:32 q+ about IRC vs. email 15:15:39 (totally got carried away and forgot about the conference) :( 15:15:48 q+ to ask about IRC vs. email 15:16:18 +??P24 15:16:19 bbfish: we have now settled the political issues, should now focus on more technical issues 15:16:23 Zakim, i am ??P24 15:16:23 +webr3; got it 15:16:51 ... I have more problems than expected with Clerezza, but test cases are important. 15:17:02 +1 15:17:26 ... We need to work on the ontology to allow to build test reports. 15:18:05 http://www.w3.org/2011/identity-ws/ 15:18:24 topic: report for identity in the browser 15:18:36 by April 22nd 2011 15:18:50 bblfish: we should submit a position paper at the identity-ws (URI above) 15:19:03 ... deadline is april 22nd 15:19:15 ... everyone in the group may of course submit something on their own behalf, 15:19:31 ... but as a group we could make a submission as well. 15:19:47 ... Harry suggested we should not put to much semweb in it. 15:20:05 ... Buzzword compliant identity system: 15:20:21 ... works in current browser or require minimal changes, 15:20:32 is secure 15:20:52 s/is secure/... is secure/ 15:21:05 re demo's: data.fm is looking pretty awesome of late 15:21:27 ... then show how webid complies with those criteria 15:22:13 4 sections: 15:22:13 +OpenLink_Software 15:22:22 Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily m 15:22:22 +m; got it 15:22:28 1. Buzzword compliant description 15:22:31 Zakim, m is temporarily me 15:22:31 +MacTed; got it 15:22:34 2. WebID description 15:22:44 ... We need to show what are the problems with the browsers. 15:22:45 Zakim, mute me 15:22:45 MacTed should now be muted 15:23:07 3. Demo 15:23:07 4. Browser issues and improvements 15:23:31 zakim, mute me 15:23:31 sorry, claudio, I do not know which phone connection belongs to you 15:23:45 pchampin: +1 to the proposed plan 15:24:03 "who"? can work on it? 15:25:11 I'll work in on it 15:25:12 ""ACTION, name to etc"" 15:26:08 ACTION, jeffsayre position paper for Identity in the browser workshop http://www.w3.org/2011/identity-ws/ 15:26:21 ACTION: jeffsayre to start a position paper for Identity in the browser workshop http://www.w3.org/2011/identity-ws/ 15:26:21 Sorry, couldn't find user - jeffsayre 15:27:00 ACTION: jeff to start a position paper for Identity in the browser workshop http://www.w3.org/2011/identity-ws/ 15:27:01 Created ACTION-23 - Start a position paper for Identity in the browser workshop http://www.w3.org/2011/identity-ws/ [on Jeff Sayre - due 2011-04-11]. 15:28:55 ACTION: bblfish, follow up on Berlin conference 15:28:55 Sorry, couldn't find user - bblfish, 15:29:41 ACTION: henry follow up on Berlin conference 15:29:42 Created ACTION-24 - Follow up on Berlin conference [on Henry Story - due 2011-04-11]. 15:29:58 URL for Berlin? 15:30:44 http://d-cent.org/fsw2011/ 15:33:59 gaedke: will probably be in Berlin. 15:34:01 ... my advice for the workshop would be to stick to presenting webid 15:35:45 ... (some project) make a lot of work related to identity 15:36:08 ... not only on the tech side, but also political 15:36:51 s/(some project)/PrimeLife, which is organizing the workshop,/ 15:38:54 And PrimeLife uses Elgg 15:38:57 ... PrimeLife is a FP7 big project: http://www.primelife.eu/ 15:39:36 q? 15:39:49 q? 15:41:05 pchampin: coming back to the IRC vs. email discussion, I think the mailing list has the advantage of being asynchronous and archived 15:41:22 ... so it would be nice to have a summary on the mailing list whenever an important discussion happens on the IRC 15:41:51 +1 15:41:54 +1 15:42:24 bblfish: it would be nice to have an IRC logger 15:42:47 +1 15:42:55 http://www.dajobe.org/software/logger/ 15:43:23 pchampin: I now that some service used to do that 15:43:26 - +39.011.228.aabb 15:43:45 ACTION nathan to find out about logging on w3 irc servers and organize something 15:43:45 Created ACTION-25 - Find out about logging on w3 irc servers and organize something [on Nathan Rixham - due 2011-04-11]. 15:43:49 ... but I was more suggesting that someone involved in the discussion wrote a summary for the sake of others 15:43:55 q- 15:44:21 Really? I did not receive notice. 15:44:35 Next Federated Social Web Telecon Friday April 8th 15:00 UTC 15:44:52 Did something go out via the mailing list? 15:44:59 http://www.w3.org/mid/302a810b657346da3e3d170b3c708a6e.squirrel@webmail-mit.w3.org 15:45:07 zakim, who's here? 15:45:07 On the phone I see +1.574.277.aaaa, ??P10, ??P19, [IPcaller], ??P27, ??P32, webr3, MacTed (muted) 15:45:29 -MacTed 15:45:50 webr3: Hum. I do not recall receiving it. 15:46:13 topic: open actions 15:46:16 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/actions/open 15:46:34 jeffsayre: was sent on 03/04/2011 17:49 to the group list, should check your subscribed? (I normally do a manual subscribe int he normal fashion to ensure) 15:47:33 action-16: bblfish has been talking to them 15:47:33 ACTION-16 Look into us joining Identity Commons notes added 15:47:37 q+ 15:48:19 bblfish: anybody has progressed on the social web XG stories? 15:48:27 ACTION 20? 15:48:27 Sorry, bad ACTION syntax 15:48:31 ACTION-20? 15:48:31 ACTION-20 -- Nathan Rixham to find out how to set actions to be default of 2 weeks -- due 2011-03-14 -- OPEN 15:48:31 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/track/actions/20 15:48:33 jeff: have started, will continue next week 15:49:29 pchampin: That is fine. :) 15:50:00 topic: ontology 15:50:08 foaf:identity to foaf:publicKey 15:50:22 :me foaf:publicKey id1, id2, id3. 15:50:53 s/foaf:publicKey/cert:publicKey/g 15:50:59 pk1 cert:publicKey id1 . 15:50:59 pk2 cert:publicKey id1 . 15:50:59 pk3 cert:publicKey id1 . 15:51:23 (my mistake above using foaf) 15:52:31 bblfish: the issue of direction of the property has already be raised; 15:52:51 ... may be it should be the opposite (person -> public key) 15:53:09 ... furthermore, this would be more natural as the pk is almost a literal 15:53:15 can we have a webid: ontology 15:53:33 ... (it is identified by two literals) 15:54:01 Anybody would have a problem with that? 15:54:16 pchampin: no problem with that for me 15:54:36 bblfish: how many people here have an implementation? 15:54:38 I have a couple, none released yet (in node.js and php) 15:54:39 ... I have one 15:55:03 webr3, what was the discussion with danbri? 15:55:33 pchampin: +1 on Node 15:56:11 bblfish: Another issue is about namespaces 15:56:35 ... using two namespaces is somewhat strange 15:57:06 I think it is a good thing 15:57:12 yes 15:57:13 everyone deeply thinking 15:57:13 pchampin: +1 15:58:00 q+ to discuss ACTION-20 quickly 15:58:34 q- 15:59:06 close ACTION-20 15:59:06 ACTION-20 Find out how to set actions to be default of 2 weeks closed 15:59:12 ACTION-20: web3r discussed that with (knowledgeabl people), they say it is not possible for the moment 15:59:12 ACTION-20 Find out how to set actions to be default of 2 weeks notes added 15:59:34 http://doodle.com/txugsrtpe2tp9ted 15:59:36 Wife's Birthday on April 11 16:00:17 s/(knowledgeabl people)/Dominique Hazael-Massieux (Tracker software author)/ 16:01:43 "at this time, on irc" 16:01:57 is it not bi-weekly? 16:02:55 q+ 16:03:11 bblfish: to webr3: we are thinking on making the telecon weekly 16:04:29 do we do the writing on google docs or the like? 16:04:46 +1 16:05:18 EtherPad is more freeform, not too structured 16:05:56 yes, I'll ping IRC 16:06:46 webr3: :) Ideadump 16:07:06 +1 16:07:08 trackbot, end meeting 16:07:08 Zakim, list attendees 16:07:08 As of this point the attendees have been +1.574.277.aaaa, +39.011.228.aabb, [IPcaller], webr3, MacTed 16:07:09 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 16:07:09 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/04/04-webid-minutes.html trackbot 16:07:10 RRSAgent, bye 16:07:10 I see 4 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2011/04/04-webid-actions.rdf : 16:07:10 ACTION: jeffsayre to start a position paper for Identity in the browser workshop http://www.w3.org/2011/identity-ws/ [1] 16:07:10 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/04/04-webid-irc#T15-26-21 16:07:10 ACTION: jeff to start a position paper for Identity in the browser workshop http://www.w3.org/2011/identity-ws/ [2] 16:07:10 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/04/04-webid-irc#T15-27-00 16:07:10 ACTION: bblfish, follow up on Berlin conference [3] 16:07:10 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/04/04-webid-irc#T15-28-55 16:07:10 ACTION: henry follow up on Berlin conference [4] 16:07:10 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/04/04-webid-irc#T15-29-41