15:56:29 RRSAgent has joined #rdb2rdf 15:56:29 logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/03/22-rdb2rdf-irc 15:57:54 zakim, this will be RDB2RDF 15:57:54 ok, Ashok; I see SW_RDB2RDF()12:00PM scheduled to start in 3 minutes 15:58:05 chair: Ashok 15:58:17 regrets: Juan, Marcelo 15:58:39 juansequeda has joined #rdb2rdf 15:59:17 yes, a liitle late 15:59:21 ok 15:59:25 just settling in 15:59:37 dmcneil has joined #RDB2RDF 15:59:40 SW_RDB2RDF()12:00PM has now started 15:59:47 +Ashok_Malhotra 15:59:54 regrets-: Juan 16:00:22 + +1.314.394.aaaa 16:00:23 +Alexandre 16:00:26 soeren has joined #RDB2RDF 16:00:39 Zakim, aaaa is dmcneil 16:00:40 +dmcneil; got it 16:00:51 nunolopes has joined #RDB2RDF 16:00:59 + +3539149aabb 16:01:09 Zakim, aabb is nunolopes 16:01:09 +nunolopes; got it 16:01:09 +EricP 16:01:21 zakim, aabb is cygri 16:01:21 sorry, cygri, I do not recognize a party named 'aabb' 16:01:27 + +569061aacc 16:01:33 zakim, i'm with nunolopes 16:01:33 +cygri; got it 16:01:44 Zakim, cygri is with nunolopes 16:01:44 cygri was already listed in nunolopes, betehess 16:01:47 zakim, aacc is soeren 16:01:47 +soeren; got it 16:01:49 present: David_McNeill, Richard, Nuno, Alexande, Soeren 16:02:07 a/Alexande/Alexandre/ 16:02:19 s/Alexande/Alexandre/ 16:02:43 s/Nuno, Alexande/Nuno, Alexandre/ 16:02:48 present+:: Eric 16:03:03 present+: Eric 16:03:36 scribenick: ericP 16:04:06 Topic: 1. Admin + PROPOSAL: Accept the minutes of last meeting, see http://www.w3.org/2011/03/15-rdb2rdf-minutes.html 16:04:12 http://www.w3.org/mid/82AD6EAF-514D-4950-A61E-5FF2F56106A7@deri.org 16:04:24 +??P12 16:04:30 zakim, ??P12 is me 16:04:30 +ivan; got it 16:04:31 + +1.603.897.aadd 16:04:36 agenda is here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Mar/0091.html 16:04:49 present+: Ivan 16:04:51 PROPOSED: accept http://www.w3.org/mid/82AD6EAF-514D-4950-A61E-5FF2F56106A7@deri.org as a record of the Feb 15 meeting 16:04:54 APPROVED 16:04:55 Souri has joined #rdb2rdf 16:05:11 Seema has joined #rdb2rdf 16:05:25 s/Feb 15/Mar 15/ 16:05:34 + +575737aaee 16:05:49 present+ cygri 16:05:54 present+ nunolopes 16:06:21 Ashok: any open actions? 16:06:26 + +1.603.897.aaff 16:06:31 cygri: i have some which don't block publication 16:06:38 Zakim, aaff is Seema 16:06:38 +Seema; got it 16:07:04 Ashok: what about Ted's action on blank nodes? 16:07:17 ... [noting that Ted is not present] 16:07:33 present+: Souri, Seema 16:07:58 topic: investigating open issues 16:08:04 ISSUE-10? 16:08:04 ISSUE-10 -- Hash vs Slash -- open 16:08:04 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/10 16:09:01 closed 16:09:02 -soeren 16:09:41 + +030061aagg 16:09:52 zakim, aagg is soeren 16:09:52 +soeren; got it 16:10:02 issues 18, 19, 20: re-use, query as a subquyer, predicate/object refer to join table 16:10:20 Ashok: David are these showstoppers? 16:10:51 dmcneil: they are important to my organization (we treat them as extensions), but they shouldn't hold up publication 16:11:05 issue-26? 16:11:05 ISSUE-26 -- Producing triples in named graphs and the default graph -- open 16:11:05 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/26 16:11:25 Souri: i've modified r2rml to include clarifications 16:11:43 ... s/unnamed graph/default graph/g'd 16:12:11 ... gen'd triples can go arbitrarily to default graph, some named graph, or both 16:12:21 action-111? 16:12:21 ACTION-111 -- Souripriya Das to clarify that with use of (newly introduced) rr:defaultGraph value for rr:graph property of a PredicateObjectMap, we now allow triples to be produced either in the default graph, or a set of named graphs, or the default graph as well as a set of named graphs -- due 2011-03-26 -- OPEN 16:12:21 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/111 16:12:26 CLOSED 16:12:30 action-26? 16:12:30 ACTION-26 -- Michael Hausenblas to create F2F Wiki page -- due 2010-03-05 -- CLOSED 16:12:30 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/26 16:12:32 CLOSED 16:12:37 issue-27 16:12:40 issue-27? 16:12:40 ISSUE-27 -- NULL graphColumn value producing triples in an unnamed graph -- open 16:12:40 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/27 16:13:03 dmcneil: i think the s/unnamed graph/default graph/g resolves this 16:13:06 CLOSED 16:13:12 issue-28? 16:13:12 ISSUE-28 -- Clarify whether blank nodes are equivalent based on their identifier -- pending review 16:13:12 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/28 16:13:45 Ashok: [noting cygri's email about equivalent bnodes] 16:13:48 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/28 16:14:14 +q 16:14:17 cygri: i believe r2rml section 4 discussing the scope of bnodes address this 16:14:33 ... would like feedback from e.g. PatH 16:15:18 Ashok: propose to publish, and solicit feedback from PatH afterwards 16:15:56 ISSUE-28 still pending review 16:16:54 Issue 28 is marked PENDING REVIEW ... keep this status 16:16:56 dmcneil: two triple maps producing the same labeled bnode in the same graph reference the same bnode 16:17:26 cygri: i had taken the path of saying that bnodes were the same unless the spec said they were distinct 16:17:40 someone has a link to the definition of blank node equality? 16:17:42 +Kingsley_Idehen 16:17:48 ... if we're ok with last-minute fixes, i can tweak this now, or after publication 16:17:51 Zakim, Kingsley_Idehen is OpenLink_Software 16:17:51 +OpenLink_Software; got it 16:17:59 Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me 16:17:59 +MacTed; got it 16:18:23 +1 to Richard fixing the bNode text today 16:18:31 Zakim, mute me 16:18:34 MacTed should now be muted 16:18:47 PROPOSED: cygri tweaks bnode label scope text for publication without further review from WG 16:18:50 APPROVED 16:18:54 issue-29? 16:18:54 ISSUE-29 -- Require blank node and IRI identifier expressions to produce strings -- open 16:18:54 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/29 16:19:11 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/29 16:19:50 Ashok: i recall discussing this a couple weeks ago. what came out of it? 16:20:05 zakim, mute me 16:20:05 ivan should now be muted 16:22:45 ericP: [SQL casting to strings] 16:22:55 ... have app-specific length limits 16:23:13 Ashok: i think those limits are large enough to be ignorable 16:24:03 Ashok: can casting produce chars that are not allowed in IRIs? 16:25:44 dmcneil: not closed in my mind 16:25:54 ... but we can publish 16:25:58 issue-30? 16:25:58 ISSUE-30 -- Different blank node identifier than was defined in mapping -- open 16:25:58 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/30 16:26:22 dmcneil: addressed by latest text in r2rml section 4 16:26:32 issue-33? 16:26:32 ISSUE-33 -- How can rr:template be used in an ObjectMapClass to produce IRI's or Strings -- raised 16:26:32 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/33 16:27:31 dmcneil: if you use templates to produce an object, is that an IRI or a string? 16:28:02 Souri: templates in objectmaps default to a plain literal (unless you specify that it's an IRI) 16:28:18 ... so in your issue example, it will be treated as a string 16:29:08 dmcneil: it seems rr:TermType and rr:DataType are only allowed to come from a column 16:29:23 ... ergo precludes coming from a template 16:29:38 ... refering to 3.6.1.3… 16:31:04 cygri: separate sections cover the SubjectMap and ObjectMap 16:31:42 ... it's all well defined in the SubjectMap 16:31:55 ... the ObjectMap is a bit different 16:32:05 Souri: i think we need to fix this 16:32:21 cygri: points to a deeper issue; lots of duplication in the text 16:32:46 ... these properties can appear in different positions and do pretty much the same thing 16:33:42 ... could we define all of these properties once in the most flexible way (i.e. as they'd be use in an ObjectMap) 16:34:07 ... then add restrictions for e.g. PredicateMap not allowing [literals or bnodes] 16:34:26 +1 to cygri's proposed factoring 16:34:39 Souri: need a "common properties" 16:34:44 +1 to refactoring 16:35:01 cygri: needs to wait 'till after pub 16:35:28 3.6.1.3 16:36:02 -soeren 16:36:27 ACTION: Souri to edit the restrictions in sec 3.6.1.3 and 3.6.1.4 to include rr:template as well 16:36:27 Created ACTION-112 - Edit the restrictions in sec 3.6.1.3 and 3.6.1.4 to include rr:template as well [on Souripriya Das - due 2011-03-29]. 16:36:31 + +666061aahh 16:36:42 zakim, aahh is soeren 16:36:42 +soeren; got it 16:37:03 Ashok: two issues remain open 16:37:09 ... neither blocks publication 16:37:18 topic: publication 16:38:14 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#introduction 16:38:22 cygri: additional editorial TODO: 16:38:52 +q 16:38:55 ... intro needs to be reworded to reflect the existence of the DM 16:39:34 +1 to formally recording all the issues 16:39:38 +1 to use links to the tracker 16:39:40 +q 16:40:38 ... propose that we copy around ~7 issues from the spec to tracker 16:40:42 @@Issue: The use of a "convention over configuration" approach has been proposed, where a mapping is not expressed completely, but rather as a delta from the default mapping. In other words, only those parts that one wants to be different from the default mapping have to be written down in the mapping file. 16:40:55 ACTION: cygri to copy around ~7 issues from the spec to tracker 16:40:56 Created ACTION-113 - Copy around ~7 issues from the spec to tracker [on Richard Cyganiak - due 2011-03-29]. 16:41:06 @@Issue: As currently defined, the output of an R2RML mapping is an RDF dataset that contains triples reflecting the records in the database. The output is thus on the "instance level". A feature under discussion is the additional generation of an RDF Schema or OWL Ontology that reflects the constraints and valid inferences over the classes and properties in the generated dataset. This output would be on the "terminology level". 16:41:52 dmcneil: +1 to cygri. also good to record issue resolution in the issue tracker 16:42:16 ... noticed that 3.9.1.2 has moved the '.' to inside the "{}"s 16:42:35 Souri: the goal is to be able to string replace them if we don't parse them 16:42:53 dmcneil: seems just as esoteric with the '.' inside 16:43:12 Souri: the "alias." is a unit 16:43:18 -q 16:43:30 ... happy to update if we acquire wisdom 16:43:34 dmcneil: OK 16:44:00 soeren: the "owner" is mentioned throughout the document 16:44:06 ... propose an issue for this 16:44:32 ... i think this is Oracle-specific. called "database" and MySQL and @@1 in DB2 16:44:41 q+ 16:45:04 Souri: In Orac;le it is called "owner" or "schema" 16:45:05 Souri: yeah, we can have a glossary connecting these terms to outside use 16:45:24 soeren: could add paragraph for SQL concepts to 1.1 16:45:56 ACTION: cygri to update paragraph in the introduction that talks about the direct mapping spec 16:45:57 Created ACTION-114 - Update paragraph in the introduction that talks about the direct mapping spec [on Richard Cyganiak - due 2011-03-29]. 16:47:05 Souri: i think we have very few refs to "owner" now 16:47:11 ACTION: soeren to create an issue addressing vendor-specific names like "owner" 16:47:11 Sorry, couldn't find user - soeren 16:47:48 ACTION: saueren to create an issue addressing vendor-specific names like "owner" 16:47:48 Sorry, couldn't find user - saueren 16:47:53 saure 16:47:53 sauer 16:47:54 sauer 16:47:56 sauer 16:48:05 ACTION: sauer to create an issue addressing vendor-specific names like "owner" 16:48:05 Created ACTION-115 - Create an issue addressing vendor-specific names like "owner" [on Sören Auer - due 2011-03-29]. 16:48:38 cygri: SQL spec defines terminology for e.g. "catalog" and "schema" 16:49:07 ... catalog*/schema* 16:49:15 ... i think we should use those terms 16:49:25 +1 16:49:48 if we're going to make readers learn something, let's make them learn standard terms 16:50:06 zakim, unmute me 16:50:06 ivan should no longer be muted 16:50:41 no 16:51:58 Alexandre: the Webmaster is ok to publish on Thursday Mar 24 16:52:43 Ashok has joined #rdb2rdf 16:52:56 Ashok: what's the status of the DM? 16:54:26 ericP: it lacks the polish of the DM 16:54:37 ... i'm content to let it go as it is 16:54:38 +1 to publish both 16:54:49 +1 to publish them together 16:54:53 +1 to publish both 16:54:56 +1 16:54:59 +1 16:55:20 yay! 16:55:20 +1 to publish them together 16:55:27 PROPOSED: publish R2RML spec after cygri's bnode scope text (expected EOB 22 March), update paragraph introducing direct mapping spec and souri's updates per ACTION-112 and no further WG review 16:55:53 ACTION-112,113,114 16:56:47 PROPOSED: publish R2RML spec after cygri's updates per ACTION-113 and ACTION-114 and souri's updates per ACTION-112 and no further WG review 16:57:03 +1 16:58:22 -1 16:58:58 APPROVED 16:59:18 -Alexandre 16:59:20 PROPOSED: publish DM as is 16:59:39 Souri, ivan, me too 16:59:40 +1 16:59:42 +1 16:59:42 +1 16:59:46 +1 16:59:56 APPROVED 16:59:57 +1 17:00:30 +1 17:01:22 ACTION: betehess to update DM for publication on 24 March 17:01:22 Sorry, couldn't find user - betehess 17:01:29 ACTION: alexandre to update DM for publication on 24 March 17:01:29 Sorry, couldn't find user - alexandre 17:01:32 -MacTed 17:01:38 ACTION: bertails to update DM for publication on 24 March 17:01:38 Sorry, couldn't find user - bertails 17:02:00 try abertai5 17:03:03 -soeren 17:03:05 -nunolopes 17:03:06 -ivan 17:03:09 - +575737aaee 17:03:19 -EricP 17:04:32 - +1.603.897.aadd 17:04:33 -dmcneil 17:04:33 -Seema 17:04:35 -Ashok_Malhotra 17:04:35 SW_RDB2RDF()12:00PM has ended 17:04:37 Attendees were Ashok_Malhotra, +1.314.394.aaaa, Alexandre, dmcneil, +3539149aabb, EricP, nunolopes, +569061aacc, cygri, soeren, ivan, +1.603.897.aadd, +575737aaee, +1.603.897.aaff, 17:04:40 ... Seema, +030061aagg, MacTed, +666061aahh 17:04:50 rrsagent, make logs public 17:04:59 rrsagent, make logs public 17:05:15 rrsagent, make minutes 17:05:15 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/03/22-rdb2rdf-minutes.html Ashok 17:06:32 ACTION: bertails to update DM for publication on 24 March 17:06:32 Sorry, couldn't find user - bertails 17:08:22 ACTION: bertails to update DM for publication on 24 March 17:09:35 rsagent, create minutes 17:09:41 tx 17:09:58 rrsagent, create minutes 17:09:58 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/03/22-rdb2rdf-minutes.html Ashok 17:10:56 Sorry, couldn't find user - bertails 17:11:54 oh weak 17:11:57 whatever 17:14:52 ACTION: bertails to update DM for publication on 24 March 17:14:52 Sorry, couldn't find user - bertails 17:15:04 ted has joined #rdb2rdf 17:15:10 ACTION: bertails to update DM for publication on 24 March 17:15:10 Sorry, couldn't find user - bertails 17:15:23 trackbot, status? 17:16:05 action-1? 17:16:05 ACTION-1 -- Michael Hausenblas to create a section in the Wiki for ISSUE-2 -- due 2009-10-08 -- CLOSED 17:16:05 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/1 17:16:31 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/users 17:16:38 ACTION: bertails to update DM for publication on 24 March 17:16:38 Sorry, couldn't find user - bertails 17:16:50 ACTION: betehess to update DM for publication on 24 March 17:16:51 Sorry, couldn't find user - betehess 17:18:02 ACTION: alex to update DM for publication on 24 March 17:18:02 Sorry, couldn't find user - alex 17:20:29 rrsagent, make minutes 17:20:29 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/03/22-rdb2rdf-minutes.html Ashok 17:26:00 privera has joined #RDB2RDF 17:27:52 SW_RDB2RDF()12:00PM has now started 17:27:59 +??P0 17:28:00 -??P0 17:28:01 SW_RDB2RDF()12:00PM has ended 17:28:01 Attendees were 17:47:49 cygri has joined #rdb2rdf 18:29:07 betehess has joined #RDB2RDF 18:38:37 cygri has joined #rdb2rdf 18:54:21 Zakim has left #rdb2rdf