14:20:44 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #rdb2rdf
14:20:44 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/03/15-rdb2rdf-irc
14:20:46 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world
14:20:46 <Zakim> Zakim has joined #rdb2rdf
14:20:48 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be 7322733
14:20:48 <Zakim> I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot
14:20:49 <trackbot> Meeting: RDB2RDF Working Group Teleconference
14:20:49 <trackbot> Date: 15 March 2011
15:01:27 <cygri_> cygri_ has joined #rdb2rdf
15:01:39 <ivan> member:Zakim, this will be 7322733
15:01:51 <ivan> zakim, this will be 7322733
15:01:52 <Zakim> ok, ivan; I see SW_RDB2RDF()12:00PM scheduled to start in 59 minutes
15:04:33 <betehess> ivan, take 2 seconds to look at https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/FeDeRate/file/66e9d9e8a090/rdf2rdf/src/test/scala/RDF2RDFTest.scala#l16
15:04:36 <betehess> you'll love it :-)
15:05:14 <betehess> I fixed your example btw ;-)
15:07:16 <ivan> does this do the transformation? Ie, is it some sort of a CONSTRUCT based transformation engine?
15:07:52 <betehess> it is
15:07:59 <betehess> look at the assertion at the end
15:08:08 <betehess> assert(expectedGraph === resultGraph)
15:08:14 <ivan> yes, I have seen it
15:08:23 <ivan> hence my question
15:08:27 <ivan> :-)
15:08:32 <betehess> it's actually doing the computation
15:08:40 <betehess> your example is just alive now ;-)
15:08:47 <ivan> :-)
15:08:52 <ivan> so what did you fix?
15:09:03 <betehess> some predicated where missing
15:09:20 <betehess> s/predicated/predicates
15:09:32 <betehess> in the body of the WHERE
15:34:18 <mhausenblas> mhausenblas has joined #rdb2rdf
15:52:34 <mhausenblas> trackbot, start telecon
15:52:36 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs world
15:52:38 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be 7322733
15:52:38 <Zakim> ok, trackbot; I see SW_RDB2RDF()12:00PM scheduled to start in 8 minutes
15:52:39 <trackbot> Meeting: RDB2RDF Working Group Teleconference
15:52:39 <trackbot> Date: 15 March 2011
15:52:54 <mhausenblas> Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Mar/0050.html
15:52:59 <mhausenblas> Chair: Michael
16:00:03 <Zakim> SW_RDB2RDF()12:00PM has now started
16:00:11 <Zakim> + +3539149aaaa
16:00:48 <soeren> soeren has joined #RDB2RDF
16:00:53 <Zakim> - +3539149aaaa
16:00:54 <Zakim> SW_RDB2RDF()12:00PM has ended
16:00:54 <Zakim> Attendees were +3539149aaaa
16:01:16 <Zakim> SW_RDB2RDF()12:00PM has now started
16:01:24 <Zakim> + +3539149aaaa
16:01:27 <mhausenblas> Zakim, aaaa is me
16:01:27 <Zakim> +mhausenblas; got it
16:01:38 <mhausenblas> Zakim, cygri is with me
16:01:38 <Zakim> +cygri; got it
16:01:49 <Zakim> +??P13
16:02:00 <cygri> zakim, i'm with trackbot
16:02:00 <Zakim> sorry, cygri, I do not recognize a party named 'trackbot'
16:02:10 <mhausenblas> Zakim, ??P13 is soeren 
16:02:10 <Zakim> +soeren; got it
16:02:16 <mhausenblas> regrets+ Marcelo
16:02:20 <mhausenblas> present+ Soeren
16:02:30 <mhausenblas> present+ Richard
16:02:34 <mhausenblas> present+ Michael
16:02:41 <mhausenblas> RRSAgent, draft minutes
16:02:41 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/03/15-rdb2rdf-minutes.html mhausenblas
16:02:52 <mhausenblas> RRSAgent, make the logs public
16:02:52 <RRSAgent> I'm logging. I don't understand 'make the logs public', mhausenblas.  Try /msg RRSAgent help
16:03:07 <mhausenblas> RRSAgent, make logs public
16:04:08 <nunolopes> nunolopes has joined #RDB2RDF
16:04:13 <mhausenblas> Zakim, nunolopes is with me
16:04:13 <Zakim> +nunolopes; got it
16:04:33 <Seema> Seema has joined #rdb2rdf
16:05:31 <Zakim> + +1.603.897.aabb
16:05:44 <mhausenblas> Zakim, aabb is Souri
16:05:44 <Zakim> +Souri; got it
16:05:49 <mhausenblas> present+ Souri
16:05:52 <Souri> Souri has joined #rdb2rdf
16:06:05 <ivan> zakim, dial ivan-voip
16:06:05 <Zakim> ok, ivan; the call is being made
16:06:06 <Zakim> +Ivan
16:06:20 <mhausenblas> present+ Ivan
16:06:26 <mhausenblas> RRSAgent, draft minutes
16:06:26 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/03/15-rdb2rdf-minutes.html mhausenblas
16:06:29 <ericP> Zakim, please dial ericP-office
16:06:29 <Zakim> ok, ericP; the call is being made
16:06:31 <Zakim> + +1.603.897.aacc
16:06:31 <Zakim> +EricP
16:06:44 <Seema> Zakim, aacc is Seema
16:06:44 <Zakim> +Seema; got it
16:06:47 <mhausenblas> present+ Eric
16:06:47 <cygri> zakim, trackbot is with mhausenblas
16:06:47 <Zakim> +trackbot; got it
16:06:56 <cygri> zakim, RRSAgent is with mhausenblas
16:06:56 <Zakim> +RRSAgent; got it
16:07:05 <cygri> zakim, zakim is with mhausenblas
16:07:05 <Zakim> +zakim; got it
16:07:05 <mhausenblas> present+ Seema
16:07:26 <mhausenblas> Zakim, who's here?
16:07:26 <Zakim> On the phone I see mhausenblas, soeren, Souri, Ivan, Seema, EricP
16:07:28 <Zakim> mhausenblas has mhausenblas, cygri, nunolopes, trackbot, RRSAgent, zakim
16:07:30 <Zakim> On IRC I see Souri, Seema, nunolopes, soeren, mhausenblas, cygri, Zakim, RRSAgent, MacTed, ivan, LeeF_, LeeF, betehess, ericP, trackbot
16:07:30 <Zakim> +Alexandre
16:07:42 <mhausenblas> present+ Alexandre
16:08:20 <mhausenblas> regrets+ Juan
16:08:59 <mhausenblas> Zakim, pick a victim
16:08:59 <Zakim> Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Souri
16:09:13 <mhausenblas> scribenick: cygri 
16:09:45 <cygri> Topic: Admin
16:09:47 <cygri> PROPOSAL: Accept the minutes of last meeting, see
16:09:47 <mhausenblas> PROPOSAL: Accept the minutes of last meeting, see http://www.w3.org/2011/03/08-rdb2rdf-minutes.html
16:09:47 <cygri> http://www.w3.org/2011/03/08-rdb2rdf-minutes.html
16:10:04 <betehess> +1
16:10:11 <cygri> RESOLUTION: Accept the minutes of last meeting, see http://www.w3.org/2011/03/08-rdb2rdf-minutes.html
16:10:23 <cygri> Topic: Publication of the WD
16:10:42 <cygri> mhausenblas: idea is to go through issues to see if they are addressed
16:10:53 <mhausenblas> ISSUE-27?
16:10:53 <trackbot> ISSUE-27 -- NULL graphColumn value producing triples in an unnamed graph -- open
16:10:53 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/27
16:11:23 <cygri> souri: we addressed this
16:11:41 <cygri> ... document still uses "unnamed graph" in some places
16:11:50 <cygri> ... i'd prefer to keep that term
16:12:10 <cygri> seema: i don't think we updated the document
16:12:31 <cygri> ericP: SPARQL says, i'm querying a bunch of stores and one is the default graph
16:12:57 <cygri> ... we can define this directly like in SPARQL, or with a level of indirection
16:12:59 <cygri> q+
16:13:12 <cygri> mhausenblas: but needs to be clarified
16:13:27 <mhausenblas> ack cygri 
16:15:04 <Souri> q+
16:15:06 <ivan> q+
16:15:10 <mhausenblas> ack Souri 
16:15:29 <cygri> cygri: we should target RDF Dataset as in SPARQL
16:15:38 <ivan> q-
16:15:54 <cygri> souri: but default graph in SPARQL can be constructed e.g. as union of several graphs with FROM <a> <b> <c>
16:16:08 <cygri> q+
16:16:10 <mhausenblas> Michael: seems this needs to be addressed in the text, propose to action Richard with it
16:16:36 <cygri> souri: so the default graph can be synthesized or changed via protocol. you can change at query time
16:16:44 <mhausenblas> ack cygri
16:18:07 <Seema> we did add a special IRI rr:unnamedGraph to exlicitly refer to the unnamed graph
16:18:08 <ericP> test case: R2RML which asserts  { <s> <p> <o> }  into the "unnamed" graph and some other source <foo> { <s1> <p1> <o1> } : Query: FROM <foo> SELECT { ?s ?p ?o }
16:18:13 <ericP> does that give one triple or two?
16:18:14 <Souri> default graph in SPARQL => synthesized at query processing by UNIONing the graphs named in the FROM clauses
16:18:47 <Souri> default graph in SPARQL is different from unnamed graph in an RDF store
16:19:26 <Souri> I am worried about confusing people with these two distinct concepts being named by the same term
16:19:29 <ericP> PROPOSE that "unnamed graph" be called the "default graph" with the intension that the output of the R2RML mapping is the same RDF database described by SPARQL
16:20:41 <ericP> q+ to see if discussing the above test case will approach consensus
16:20:54 <privera> privera has joined #RDB2RDF
16:21:04 <cygri> souri: propose to mark it as open issue in the spec
16:21:09 <mhausenblas> ack ericP 
16:21:09 <Zakim> ericP, you wanted to see if discussing the above test case will approach consensus
16:21:33 <Souri> I am ok to discuss it after the call
16:21:53 <ericP> s/with the intension/with the intention/
16:22:13 <cygri> ericP: i have a test case; souri does this appeal to you?
16:22:21 <Zakim> +[IPcaller]
16:22:49 <privera> Zakim, [IPcaller] is privera
16:22:49 <Zakim> +privera; got it
16:22:57 <mhausenblas> present+ Percy
16:24:09 <cygri> (discussion of ericP's test case)
16:24:47 <privera> Zakim mute me
16:24:55 <cygri> souri: maybe we can get some time to discuss this (after call)
16:25:16 <privera> Zakim, mute me
16:25:16 <Zakim> privera should now be muted
16:25:24 <cygri> ericP: can you put an action on souri and me to resolve this after the call
16:25:33 <mhausenblas> ACTION: Eric and Souri to resolve ISSUE-27 (note or text proposal)
16:25:33 <trackbot> Created ACTION-107 - And Souri to resolve ISSUE-27 (note or text proposal) [on Eric Prud'hommeaux - due 2011-03-22].
16:25:48 <mhausenblas> ISSUE-24?
16:25:48 <trackbot> ISSUE-24 -- Clarify support for complex joinConditions -- open
16:25:48 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/24
16:26:56 <cygri> mhausenblas: this has been addressed in section 3.9.1
16:27:00 <Souri> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#RefObjectMapClass_joinCondition_Property
16:27:07 <cygri> s/mhausenblas/souri/
16:27:25 <cygri> souri: this addresses ISSUE-24 and ISSUE-32
16:27:41 <mhausenblas> close ISSUE-24
16:27:42 <trackbot> ISSUE-24 Clarify support for complex joinConditions closed
16:27:51 <mhausenblas> ISSUE-22?
16:27:51 <trackbot> ISSUE-22 -- Support for database vendor specific SQL statements. -- open
16:27:51 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/22
16:28:21 <cygri> seema: we added a note about this
16:28:41 <mhausenblas> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#sql-conformance
16:28:49 <cygri> souri: we extended the note that was already present in 1.3
16:28:55 <mhausenblas> close ISSUE-22
16:28:55 <trackbot> ISSUE-22 Support for database vendor specific SQL statements. closed
16:29:12 <mhausenblas> ISSUE-29?
16:29:12 <trackbot> ISSUE-29 -- Require blank node and IRI identifier expressions to produce strings -- open
16:29:12 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/29
16:29:21 <mhausenblas> ACTION-105?
16:29:21 <trackbot> ACTION-105 -- Eric Prud'hommeaux to provide text for ISSUE-29 -- due 2011-03-15 -- OPEN
16:29:21 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/105
16:29:46 <cygri> ericP: can anybody hear me?
16:29:55 <cygri> mhausenblas: yes we can. nice try!
16:30:32 <cygri> ericP: this was about how SQL does datatype conversions/casting
16:31:56 <ivan> q+ back to the join condition
16:32:04 <mhausenblas> ack ivan 
16:32:13 <mhausenblas> q?
16:32:37 <cygri> ericP: ACTION-105 continues
16:32:39 <mhausenblas> ack back
16:32:39 <Zakim> back, you wanted to the join condition
16:33:10 <mhausenblas> RRSAgent, draft minutes
16:33:10 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/03/15-rdb2rdf-minutes.html mhausenblas
16:33:14 <cygri> ivan: re ISSUE-22 changed text, are the curlies in the right place?
16:33:30 <cygri> seema: we missed it in the last example
16:33:40 <cygri> souri: yes this has to be changed
16:34:07 <cygri> ivan: i don't understand this one. why do we need the curlies around the pseudo table names?
16:34:13 <cygri> souri: so we can avoid parsing the SQL
16:34:14 <cygri> q+
16:34:39 <cygri> ivan: i guess that's where i'll have to believe you
16:35:00 <cygri> souri: (explains example)
16:35:35 <mhausenblas> regrets+ Boris
16:35:51 <mhausenblas> regrets+ Alex
16:35:58 <mhausenblas> RRSAgent, draft minutes
16:35:58 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/03/15-rdb2rdf-minutes.html mhausenblas
16:36:19 <mhausenblas> q?
16:36:33 <cygri> souri: we tried to make the name of the pseudo tables very esoteric to avoid clashes
16:37:02 <cygri> ivan: what would happen if i bound the rr namespace URI to bla: instead of rr: ?
16:37:31 <cygri> souri: it would not change anything here. maybe we can make this simpler
16:38:01 <cygri> ... maybe we don't need the 'rr:' part in there
16:38:14 <mhausenblas> ack cygri
16:38:46 <cygri> ... so we'll take that out
16:38:46 <Souri> Issue-24, Issue-32
16:38:51 <cygri> ISSUE-32?
16:38:51 <trackbot> ISSUE-32 -- Remove the use of curly braces in joinCondition -- open
16:38:51 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/32
16:40:59 <Souri> then they must escape the { and } with \
16:43:27 <cygri> cygri: (wants either limited expressivity in the join, or allow full sql without curlies)
16:43:34 <cygri> mhausenblas: so how to resolve?
16:44:00 <cygri> souri: well limited expressivity might also be ok
16:44:11 <cygri> ... i'm not sure which one is better
16:44:22 <cygri> ... yes a bit hacky, you have to escape curlies
16:44:42 <cygri> ... but there are similar examples in other languages
16:45:18 <mhausenblas> PROPOSAL: postpone ISSUE-32, put a note in the R2RML text explaining the options (limited expressivity, current hack, full SQL)
16:46:50 <cygri> +1
16:47:14 <cygri> RESOLUTION: postpone ISSUE-32, put a note in the R2RML text explaining the options (limited expressivity, current hack, full SQL)
16:47:18 <mhausenblas> ACTION: Richard to add note re ISSUE-32 to R2RML
16:47:18 <trackbot> Created ACTION-108 - Add note re ISSUE-32 to R2RML [on Richard Cyganiak - due 2011-03-22].
16:47:30 <Souri> a PL/SQL string with SQL query: select empno || 'Souri''s document' from emp -- notice the double single-quote
16:47:31 <mhausenblas> ISSUE-30?
16:47:31 <trackbot> ISSUE-30 -- Different blank node identifier than was defined in mapping -- open
16:47:31 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/30
16:47:32 <cygri> Topic: ISSUE-30
16:47:59 <Zakim> -soeren
16:48:24 <mhausenblas> ACTION: Richard to address ISSUE-30
16:48:25 <trackbot> Created ACTION-109 - Address ISSUE-30 [on Richard Cyganiak - due 2011-03-22].
16:48:33 <mhausenblas> ISSUE-31?
16:48:34 <trackbot> ISSUE-31 -- Clarify reference to "blank node label" -- open
16:48:34 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/31
16:48:36 <cygri> cygri: i said i'd modify the text, didn't do yet, can i have an issue?
16:48:42 <cygri> Topic: ISSUE-32
16:49:06 <cygri> souri: i clarified the text to consistently call it "blank node identifier"
16:49:18 <cygri> ... only required a change in section 5.1
16:49:30 <mhausenblas> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#Blank_Nodes
16:49:51 <Souri> -1
16:49:52 <cygri> s/Topic: ISSUE-32/Topic/ISSUE-31/
16:50:04 <ericP> i OBJECT!
16:50:12 <cygri> s/-1/+1/
16:50:21 <mhausenblas> close ISSUE-31
16:50:21 <trackbot> ISSUE-31 Clarify reference to "blank node label" closed
16:50:30 <ericP> s/i OBJECT/tacit approval/
16:50:32 <cygri> Topic: ISSUE-7
16:50:33 <mhausenblas> ISSUE-7
16:50:36 <mhausenblas> ISSUE-7?
16:50:36 <trackbot> ISSUE-7 -- Linked Data aspects for mapping RDB2RDF -- open
16:50:36 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/7
16:50:41 <mhausenblas> ACTION-106?
16:50:41 <trackbot> ACTION-106 -- Sören Auer to review R2RML draft and tell editors where notes should be made -- due 2011-03-15 -- OPEN
16:50:41 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/106
16:50:57 <cygri> mhausenblas: we lost soeren
16:51:01 <mhausenblas> soeren? 
16:51:26 <mhausenblas> Michael: see discussion http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Mar/0044.html
16:53:14 <mhausenblas> close ACTION-106
16:53:14 <trackbot> ACTION-106 Review R2RML draft and tell editors where notes should be made closed
16:55:28 <cygri> ISSUE-28?
16:55:28 <trackbot> ISSUE-28 -- Clarify whether blank nodes are equivalent based on their identifier -- open
16:55:28 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/28
16:56:00 <mhausenblas> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Mar/0048.html
16:56:02 <cygri> Topic: ISSUE-28
16:56:08 <cygri> mhausenblas: there's a new test case
16:57:34 <mhausenblas> RRSAgent, draft minutes
16:57:34 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/03/15-rdb2rdf-minutes.html mhausenblas
16:58:49 <cygri> souri: there was discussion on how to generate class URIs ... we'll handle without ISSUE/ACTION
16:58:53 <cygri> Topic: Direct mapping
16:58:56 <mhausenblas> ISSUE-10?
16:58:56 <trackbot> ISSUE-10 -- Hash vs Slash -- open
16:58:56 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/10
16:58:59 <cygri> Topic: ISSUE-10
16:59:05 <mhausenblas> ACTION-104?
16:59:05 <trackbot> ACTION-104 -- Juan Sequeda to implement decision re ISSUE-10 (remove hash) and close ISSUE-10 -- due 2011-03-15 -- OPEN
16:59:05 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/104
16:59:30 <cygri> ivan: last time i checked this wasn't done yet in the spec
16:59:35 <mhausenblas> ISSUE-9?
16:59:35 <trackbot> ISSUE-9 -- Generate Blank Nodes for duplicate tuples -- open
16:59:35 <trackbot> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/9
16:59:37 <cygri> Topic: ISSUE-9
16:59:41 <Souri> Richard's email regarding rr:class: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Mar/0063.html
16:59:54 <cygri> mhausenblas: we also asked the RDF WG about this
17:00:02 <cygri> ... so i'd prefer to keep that open
17:00:37 <mhausenblas> PROPOSAL: postpone ISSUE-9 and take feedback from RDF WG into account
17:01:05 <ivan> +1
17:01:20 <cygri> RESOLUTION: postpone ISSUE-9 and take feedback from RDF WG into account
17:02:27 <cygri> mhausenblas: all editors, could the drafts be ready for review on monday morning?
17:02:43 <cygri> ericP: should we line up reviewers?
17:03:38 <Souri> I have updated, based on Ivan's comment, the rr:joinCondition section and corr examples: new version 1.45
17:04:10 <ivan> Thanks SOuri
17:07:19 <mhausenblas> RRSAgent, draft minutes
17:07:19 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/03/15-rdb2rdf-minutes.html mhausenblas
17:08:29 <mhausenblas> close ACTION-104
17:08:29 <trackbot> ACTION-104 Implement decision re ISSUE-10 (remove hash) and close ISSUE-10 closed
17:08:31 <cygri> (discussing how to get the remaining actions done and till when)
17:08:45 <mhausenblas> ACTION: Eric to implement decision re ISSUE-10 (remove hash) and close ISSUE-10
17:08:46 <trackbot> Created ACTION-110 - Implement decision re ISSUE-10 (remove hash) and close ISSUE-10 [on Eric Prud'hommeaux - due 2011-03-22].
17:08:49 <cygri> ericP: (volunteers to take over ACTON-104)
17:09:28 <mhausenblas> PROPOSAL: Both R2RML and DM address all open action till Fr 18 March and report on the list
17:09:32 <cygri> +1
17:10:25 <ivan> +1
17:10:26 <cygri> RESOLUTION: Both R2RML and DM address all open action till Fr 18 March and report on the list
17:10:40 <betehess> +1
17:11:10 <cygri> ericP: is it acceptable to refer to the draft version of SQL?
17:11:17 <cygri> mhausenblas: as fallback, yes
17:11:46 <cygri> mhausenblas: adjourned
17:11:46 <ivan> zakim, drop me
17:11:46 <Zakim> Ivan is being disconnected
17:11:48 <Zakim> -Ivan
17:11:49 <mhausenblas> [meeting adjourned]
17:11:53 <Zakim> -Alexandre
17:11:56 <Zakim> -mhausenblas
17:11:59 <privera> Zakim, drop me
17:11:59 <Zakim> privera is being disconnected
17:12:01 <Zakim> -privera
17:12:02 <Zakim> -Seema
17:12:11 <mhausenblas> RRSAgent, draft minutes
17:12:11 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/03/15-rdb2rdf-minutes.html mhausenblas
17:12:42 <privera> privera has left #RDB2RDF
17:13:46 <ivan> ivan has joined #rdb2rdf
17:14:02 <nunolopes> nunolopes has joined #RDB2RDF
17:14:14 <ivan> zakim, code?
17:14:14 <Zakim> the conference code is 7322733 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.26.46.79.03 tel:+44.203.318.0479), ivan
17:20:22 <Souri> FROM <g1> FROM <g2> ... FROM NAMED <ng1> FROM NAMED <ng2> ...
17:22:00 <boris> boris has joined #RDB2RDF
17:23:30 <Souri> default graph = UNION(<g1>,<g2>)
17:44:53 <MacTed> boo, calendar fail...  :-(
17:49:32 <Zakim> -Souri
18:05:00 <Zakim> disconnecting the lone participant, EricP, in SW_RDB2RDF()12:00PM
18:05:01 <Zakim> SW_RDB2RDF()12:00PM has ended
18:05:05 <Zakim> Attendees were +3539149aaaa, mhausenblas, cygri, soeren, nunolopes, +1.603.897.aabb, Souri, Ivan, +1.603.897.aacc, EricP, Seema, trackbot, RRSAgent, zakim, Alexandre, privera
18:11:15 <mhausenblas> trackbot, end telecon
18:11:15 <trackbot> Zakim, list attendees
18:11:15 <Zakim> sorry, trackbot, I don't know what conference this is
18:11:16 <trackbot> RRSAgent, please draft minutes
18:11:16 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/03/15-rdb2rdf-minutes.html trackbot
18:11:17 <trackbot> RRSAgent, bye
18:11:17 <RRSAgent> I see 4 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2011/03/15-rdb2rdf-actions.rdf :
18:11:17 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Eric and Souri to resolve ISSUE-27 (note or text proposal) [1]
18:11:17 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/03/15-rdb2rdf-irc#T16-25-33
18:11:17 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Richard to add note re ISSUE-32 to R2RML [2]
18:11:17 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/03/15-rdb2rdf-irc#T16-47-18
18:11:17 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Richard to address ISSUE-30 [3]
18:11:17 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/03/15-rdb2rdf-irc#T16-48-24
18:11:17 <RRSAgent> ACTION: Eric to implement decision re ISSUE-10 (remove hash) and close ISSUE-10 [4]
18:11:17 <RRSAgent>   recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/03/15-rdb2rdf-irc#T17-08-45