IRC log of rdb2rdf on 2011-03-15

Timestamps are in UTC.

14:20:44 [RRSAgent]
RRSAgent has joined #rdb2rdf
14:20:44 [RRSAgent]
logging to http://www.w3.org/2011/03/15-rdb2rdf-irc
14:20:46 [trackbot]
RRSAgent, make logs world
14:20:46 [Zakim]
Zakim has joined #rdb2rdf
14:20:48 [trackbot]
Zakim, this will be 7322733
14:20:48 [Zakim]
I do not see a conference matching that name scheduled within the next hour, trackbot
14:20:49 [trackbot]
Meeting: RDB2RDF Working Group Teleconference
14:20:49 [trackbot]
Date: 15 March 2011
15:01:27 [cygri_]
cygri_ has joined #rdb2rdf
15:01:39 [ivan]
member:Zakim, this will be 7322733
15:01:51 [ivan]
zakim, this will be 7322733
15:01:52 [Zakim]
ok, ivan; I see SW_RDB2RDF()12:00PM scheduled to start in 59 minutes
15:04:33 [betehess]
ivan, take 2 seconds to look at https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/FeDeRate/file/66e9d9e8a090/rdf2rdf/src/test/scala/RDF2RDFTest.scala#l16
15:04:36 [betehess]
you'll love it :-)
15:05:14 [betehess]
I fixed your example btw ;-)
15:07:16 [ivan]
does this do the transformation? Ie, is it some sort of a CONSTRUCT based transformation engine?
15:07:52 [betehess]
it is
15:07:59 [betehess]
look at the assertion at the end
15:08:08 [betehess]
assert(expectedGraph === resultGraph)
15:08:14 [ivan]
yes, I have seen it
15:08:23 [ivan]
hence my question
15:08:27 [ivan]
:-)
15:08:32 [betehess]
it's actually doing the computation
15:08:40 [betehess]
your example is just alive now ;-)
15:08:47 [ivan]
:-)
15:08:52 [ivan]
so what did you fix?
15:09:03 [betehess]
some predicated where missing
15:09:20 [betehess]
s/predicated/predicates
15:09:32 [betehess]
in the body of the WHERE
15:34:18 [mhausenblas]
mhausenblas has joined #rdb2rdf
15:52:34 [mhausenblas]
trackbot, start telecon
15:52:36 [trackbot]
RRSAgent, make logs world
15:52:38 [trackbot]
Zakim, this will be 7322733
15:52:38 [Zakim]
ok, trackbot; I see SW_RDB2RDF()12:00PM scheduled to start in 8 minutes
15:52:39 [trackbot]
Meeting: RDB2RDF Working Group Teleconference
15:52:39 [trackbot]
Date: 15 March 2011
15:52:54 [mhausenblas]
Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Mar/0050.html
15:52:59 [mhausenblas]
Chair: Michael
16:00:03 [Zakim]
SW_RDB2RDF()12:00PM has now started
16:00:11 [Zakim]
+ +3539149aaaa
16:00:48 [soeren]
soeren has joined #RDB2RDF
16:00:53 [Zakim]
- +3539149aaaa
16:00:54 [Zakim]
SW_RDB2RDF()12:00PM has ended
16:00:54 [Zakim]
Attendees were +3539149aaaa
16:01:16 [Zakim]
SW_RDB2RDF()12:00PM has now started
16:01:24 [Zakim]
+ +3539149aaaa
16:01:27 [mhausenblas]
Zakim, aaaa is me
16:01:27 [Zakim]
+mhausenblas; got it
16:01:38 [mhausenblas]
Zakim, cygri is with me
16:01:38 [Zakim]
+cygri; got it
16:01:49 [Zakim]
+??P13
16:02:00 [cygri]
zakim, i'm with trackbot
16:02:00 [Zakim]
sorry, cygri, I do not recognize a party named 'trackbot'
16:02:10 [mhausenblas]
Zakim, ??P13 is soeren
16:02:10 [Zakim]
+soeren; got it
16:02:16 [mhausenblas]
regrets+ Marcelo
16:02:20 [mhausenblas]
present+ Soeren
16:02:30 [mhausenblas]
present+ Richard
16:02:34 [mhausenblas]
present+ Michael
16:02:41 [mhausenblas]
RRSAgent, draft minutes
16:02:41 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/03/15-rdb2rdf-minutes.html mhausenblas
16:02:52 [mhausenblas]
RRSAgent, make the logs public
16:02:52 [RRSAgent]
I'm logging. I don't understand 'make the logs public', mhausenblas. Try /msg RRSAgent help
16:03:07 [mhausenblas]
RRSAgent, make logs public
16:04:08 [nunolopes]
nunolopes has joined #RDB2RDF
16:04:13 [mhausenblas]
Zakim, nunolopes is with me
16:04:13 [Zakim]
+nunolopes; got it
16:04:33 [Seema]
Seema has joined #rdb2rdf
16:05:31 [Zakim]
+ +1.603.897.aabb
16:05:44 [mhausenblas]
Zakim, aabb is Souri
16:05:44 [Zakim]
+Souri; got it
16:05:49 [mhausenblas]
present+ Souri
16:05:52 [Souri]
Souri has joined #rdb2rdf
16:06:05 [ivan]
zakim, dial ivan-voip
16:06:05 [Zakim]
ok, ivan; the call is being made
16:06:06 [Zakim]
+Ivan
16:06:20 [mhausenblas]
present+ Ivan
16:06:26 [mhausenblas]
RRSAgent, draft minutes
16:06:26 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/03/15-rdb2rdf-minutes.html mhausenblas
16:06:29 [ericP]
Zakim, please dial ericP-office
16:06:29 [Zakim]
ok, ericP; the call is being made
16:06:31 [Zakim]
+ +1.603.897.aacc
16:06:31 [Zakim]
+EricP
16:06:44 [Seema]
Zakim, aacc is Seema
16:06:44 [Zakim]
+Seema; got it
16:06:47 [mhausenblas]
present+ Eric
16:06:47 [cygri]
zakim, trackbot is with mhausenblas
16:06:47 [Zakim]
+trackbot; got it
16:06:56 [cygri]
zakim, RRSAgent is with mhausenblas
16:06:56 [Zakim]
+RRSAgent; got it
16:07:05 [cygri]
zakim, zakim is with mhausenblas
16:07:05 [Zakim]
+zakim; got it
16:07:05 [mhausenblas]
present+ Seema
16:07:26 [mhausenblas]
Zakim, who's here?
16:07:26 [Zakim]
On the phone I see mhausenblas, soeren, Souri, Ivan, Seema, EricP
16:07:28 [Zakim]
mhausenblas has mhausenblas, cygri, nunolopes, trackbot, RRSAgent, zakim
16:07:30 [Zakim]
On IRC I see Souri, Seema, nunolopes, soeren, mhausenblas, cygri, Zakim, RRSAgent, MacTed, ivan, LeeF_, LeeF, betehess, ericP, trackbot
16:07:30 [Zakim]
+Alexandre
16:07:42 [mhausenblas]
present+ Alexandre
16:08:20 [mhausenblas]
regrets+ Juan
16:08:59 [mhausenblas]
Zakim, pick a victim
16:08:59 [Zakim]
Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Souri
16:09:13 [mhausenblas]
scribenick: cygri
16:09:45 [cygri]
Topic: Admin
16:09:47 [cygri]
PROPOSAL: Accept the minutes of last meeting, see
16:09:47 [mhausenblas]
PROPOSAL: Accept the minutes of last meeting, see http://www.w3.org/2011/03/08-rdb2rdf-minutes.html
16:09:47 [cygri]
http://www.w3.org/2011/03/08-rdb2rdf-minutes.html
16:10:04 [betehess]
+1
16:10:11 [cygri]
RESOLUTION: Accept the minutes of last meeting, see http://www.w3.org/2011/03/08-rdb2rdf-minutes.html
16:10:23 [cygri]
Topic: Publication of the WD
16:10:42 [cygri]
mhausenblas: idea is to go through issues to see if they are addressed
16:10:53 [mhausenblas]
ISSUE-27?
16:10:53 [trackbot]
ISSUE-27 -- NULL graphColumn value producing triples in an unnamed graph -- open
16:10:53 [trackbot]
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/27
16:11:23 [cygri]
souri: we addressed this
16:11:41 [cygri]
... document still uses "unnamed graph" in some places
16:11:50 [cygri]
... i'd prefer to keep that term
16:12:10 [cygri]
seema: i don't think we updated the document
16:12:31 [cygri]
ericP: SPARQL says, i'm querying a bunch of stores and one is the default graph
16:12:57 [cygri]
... we can define this directly like in SPARQL, or with a level of indirection
16:12:59 [cygri]
q+
16:13:12 [cygri]
mhausenblas: but needs to be clarified
16:13:27 [mhausenblas]
ack cygri
16:15:04 [Souri]
q+
16:15:06 [ivan]
q+
16:15:10 [mhausenblas]
ack Souri
16:15:29 [cygri]
cygri: we should target RDF Dataset as in SPARQL
16:15:38 [ivan]
q-
16:15:54 [cygri]
souri: but default graph in SPARQL can be constructed e.g. as union of several graphs with FROM <a> <b> <c>
16:16:08 [cygri]
q+
16:16:10 [mhausenblas]
Michael: seems this needs to be addressed in the text, propose to action Richard with it
16:16:36 [cygri]
souri: so the default graph can be synthesized or changed via protocol. you can change at query time
16:16:44 [mhausenblas]
ack cygri
16:18:07 [Seema]
we did add a special IRI rr:unnamedGraph to exlicitly refer to the unnamed graph
16:18:08 [ericP]
test case: R2RML which asserts { <s> <p> <o> } into the "unnamed" graph and some other source <foo> { <s1> <p1> <o1> } : Query: FROM <foo> SELECT { ?s ?p ?o }
16:18:13 [ericP]
does that give one triple or two?
16:18:14 [Souri]
default graph in SPARQL => synthesized at query processing by UNIONing the graphs named in the FROM clauses
16:18:47 [Souri]
default graph in SPARQL is different from unnamed graph in an RDF store
16:19:26 [Souri]
I am worried about confusing people with these two distinct concepts being named by the same term
16:19:29 [ericP]
PROPOSE that "unnamed graph" be called the "default graph" with the intension that the output of the R2RML mapping is the same RDF database described by SPARQL
16:20:41 [ericP]
q+ to see if discussing the above test case will approach consensus
16:20:54 [privera]
privera has joined #RDB2RDF
16:21:04 [cygri]
souri: propose to mark it as open issue in the spec
16:21:09 [mhausenblas]
ack ericP
16:21:09 [Zakim]
ericP, you wanted to see if discussing the above test case will approach consensus
16:21:33 [Souri]
I am ok to discuss it after the call
16:21:53 [ericP]
s/with the intension/with the intention/
16:22:13 [cygri]
ericP: i have a test case; souri does this appeal to you?
16:22:21 [Zakim]
+[IPcaller]
16:22:49 [privera]
Zakim, [IPcaller] is privera
16:22:49 [Zakim]
+privera; got it
16:22:57 [mhausenblas]
present+ Percy
16:24:09 [cygri]
(discussion of ericP's test case)
16:24:47 [privera]
Zakim mute me
16:24:55 [cygri]
souri: maybe we can get some time to discuss this (after call)
16:25:16 [privera]
Zakim, mute me
16:25:16 [Zakim]
privera should now be muted
16:25:24 [cygri]
ericP: can you put an action on souri and me to resolve this after the call
16:25:33 [mhausenblas]
ACTION: Eric and Souri to resolve ISSUE-27 (note or text proposal)
16:25:33 [trackbot]
Created ACTION-107 - And Souri to resolve ISSUE-27 (note or text proposal) [on Eric Prud'hommeaux - due 2011-03-22].
16:25:48 [mhausenblas]
ISSUE-24?
16:25:48 [trackbot]
ISSUE-24 -- Clarify support for complex joinConditions -- open
16:25:48 [trackbot]
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/24
16:26:56 [cygri]
mhausenblas: this has been addressed in section 3.9.1
16:27:00 [Souri]
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#RefObjectMapClass_joinCondition_Property
16:27:07 [cygri]
s/mhausenblas/souri/
16:27:25 [cygri]
souri: this addresses ISSUE-24 and ISSUE-32
16:27:41 [mhausenblas]
close ISSUE-24
16:27:42 [trackbot]
ISSUE-24 Clarify support for complex joinConditions closed
16:27:51 [mhausenblas]
ISSUE-22?
16:27:51 [trackbot]
ISSUE-22 -- Support for database vendor specific SQL statements. -- open
16:27:51 [trackbot]
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/22
16:28:21 [cygri]
seema: we added a note about this
16:28:41 [mhausenblas]
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#sql-conformance
16:28:49 [cygri]
souri: we extended the note that was already present in 1.3
16:28:55 [mhausenblas]
close ISSUE-22
16:28:55 [trackbot]
ISSUE-22 Support for database vendor specific SQL statements. closed
16:29:12 [mhausenblas]
ISSUE-29?
16:29:12 [trackbot]
ISSUE-29 -- Require blank node and IRI identifier expressions to produce strings -- open
16:29:12 [trackbot]
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/29
16:29:21 [mhausenblas]
ACTION-105?
16:29:21 [trackbot]
ACTION-105 -- Eric Prud'hommeaux to provide text for ISSUE-29 -- due 2011-03-15 -- OPEN
16:29:21 [trackbot]
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/105
16:29:46 [cygri]
ericP: can anybody hear me?
16:29:55 [cygri]
mhausenblas: yes we can. nice try!
16:30:32 [cygri]
ericP: this was about how SQL does datatype conversions/casting
16:31:56 [ivan]
q+ back to the join condition
16:32:04 [mhausenblas]
ack ivan
16:32:13 [mhausenblas]
q?
16:32:37 [cygri]
ericP: ACTION-105 continues
16:32:39 [mhausenblas]
ack back
16:32:39 [Zakim]
back, you wanted to the join condition
16:33:10 [mhausenblas]
RRSAgent, draft minutes
16:33:10 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/03/15-rdb2rdf-minutes.html mhausenblas
16:33:14 [cygri]
ivan: re ISSUE-22 changed text, are the curlies in the right place?
16:33:30 [cygri]
seema: we missed it in the last example
16:33:40 [cygri]
souri: yes this has to be changed
16:34:07 [cygri]
ivan: i don't understand this one. why do we need the curlies around the pseudo table names?
16:34:13 [cygri]
souri: so we can avoid parsing the SQL
16:34:14 [cygri]
q+
16:34:39 [cygri]
ivan: i guess that's where i'll have to believe you
16:35:00 [cygri]
souri: (explains example)
16:35:35 [mhausenblas]
regrets+ Boris
16:35:51 [mhausenblas]
regrets+ Alex
16:35:58 [mhausenblas]
RRSAgent, draft minutes
16:35:58 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/03/15-rdb2rdf-minutes.html mhausenblas
16:36:19 [mhausenblas]
q?
16:36:33 [cygri]
souri: we tried to make the name of the pseudo tables very esoteric to avoid clashes
16:37:02 [cygri]
ivan: what would happen if i bound the rr namespace URI to bla: instead of rr: ?
16:37:31 [cygri]
souri: it would not change anything here. maybe we can make this simpler
16:38:01 [cygri]
... maybe we don't need the 'rr:' part in there
16:38:14 [mhausenblas]
ack cygri
16:38:46 [cygri]
... so we'll take that out
16:38:46 [Souri]
Issue-24, Issue-32
16:38:51 [cygri]
ISSUE-32?
16:38:51 [trackbot]
ISSUE-32 -- Remove the use of curly braces in joinCondition -- open
16:38:51 [trackbot]
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/32
16:40:59 [Souri]
then they must escape the { and } with \
16:43:27 [cygri]
cygri: (wants either limited expressivity in the join, or allow full sql without curlies)
16:43:34 [cygri]
mhausenblas: so how to resolve?
16:44:00 [cygri]
souri: well limited expressivity might also be ok
16:44:11 [cygri]
... i'm not sure which one is better
16:44:22 [cygri]
... yes a bit hacky, you have to escape curlies
16:44:42 [cygri]
... but there are similar examples in other languages
16:45:18 [mhausenblas]
PROPOSAL: postpone ISSUE-32, put a note in the R2RML text explaining the options (limited expressivity, current hack, full SQL)
16:46:50 [cygri]
+1
16:47:14 [cygri]
RESOLUTION: postpone ISSUE-32, put a note in the R2RML text explaining the options (limited expressivity, current hack, full SQL)
16:47:18 [mhausenblas]
ACTION: Richard to add note re ISSUE-32 to R2RML
16:47:18 [trackbot]
Created ACTION-108 - Add note re ISSUE-32 to R2RML [on Richard Cyganiak - due 2011-03-22].
16:47:30 [Souri]
a PL/SQL string with SQL query: select empno || 'Souri''s document' from emp -- notice the double single-quote
16:47:31 [mhausenblas]
ISSUE-30?
16:47:31 [trackbot]
ISSUE-30 -- Different blank node identifier than was defined in mapping -- open
16:47:31 [trackbot]
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/30
16:47:32 [cygri]
Topic: ISSUE-30
16:47:59 [Zakim]
-soeren
16:48:24 [mhausenblas]
ACTION: Richard to address ISSUE-30
16:48:25 [trackbot]
Created ACTION-109 - Address ISSUE-30 [on Richard Cyganiak - due 2011-03-22].
16:48:33 [mhausenblas]
ISSUE-31?
16:48:34 [trackbot]
ISSUE-31 -- Clarify reference to "blank node label" -- open
16:48:34 [trackbot]
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/31
16:48:36 [cygri]
cygri: i said i'd modify the text, didn't do yet, can i have an issue?
16:48:42 [cygri]
Topic: ISSUE-32
16:49:06 [cygri]
souri: i clarified the text to consistently call it "blank node identifier"
16:49:18 [cygri]
... only required a change in section 5.1
16:49:30 [mhausenblas]
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/r2rml/#Blank_Nodes
16:49:51 [Souri]
-1
16:49:52 [cygri]
s/Topic: ISSUE-32/Topic/ISSUE-31/
16:50:04 [ericP]
i OBJECT!
16:50:12 [cygri]
s/-1/+1/
16:50:21 [mhausenblas]
close ISSUE-31
16:50:21 [trackbot]
ISSUE-31 Clarify reference to "blank node label" closed
16:50:30 [ericP]
s/i OBJECT/tacit approval/
16:50:32 [cygri]
Topic: ISSUE-7
16:50:33 [mhausenblas]
ISSUE-7
16:50:36 [mhausenblas]
ISSUE-7?
16:50:36 [trackbot]
ISSUE-7 -- Linked Data aspects for mapping RDB2RDF -- open
16:50:36 [trackbot]
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/7
16:50:41 [mhausenblas]
ACTION-106?
16:50:41 [trackbot]
ACTION-106 -- Sören Auer to review R2RML draft and tell editors where notes should be made -- due 2011-03-15 -- OPEN
16:50:41 [trackbot]
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/106
16:50:57 [cygri]
mhausenblas: we lost soeren
16:51:01 [mhausenblas]
soeren?
16:51:26 [mhausenblas]
Michael: see discussion http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Mar/0044.html
16:53:14 [mhausenblas]
close ACTION-106
16:53:14 [trackbot]
ACTION-106 Review R2RML draft and tell editors where notes should be made closed
16:55:28 [cygri]
ISSUE-28?
16:55:28 [trackbot]
ISSUE-28 -- Clarify whether blank nodes are equivalent based on their identifier -- open
16:55:28 [trackbot]
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/28
16:56:00 [mhausenblas]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Mar/0048.html
16:56:02 [cygri]
Topic: ISSUE-28
16:56:08 [cygri]
mhausenblas: there's a new test case
16:57:34 [mhausenblas]
RRSAgent, draft minutes
16:57:34 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/03/15-rdb2rdf-minutes.html mhausenblas
16:58:49 [cygri]
souri: there was discussion on how to generate class URIs ... we'll handle without ISSUE/ACTION
16:58:53 [cygri]
Topic: Direct mapping
16:58:56 [mhausenblas]
ISSUE-10?
16:58:56 [trackbot]
ISSUE-10 -- Hash vs Slash -- open
16:58:56 [trackbot]
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/10
16:58:59 [cygri]
Topic: ISSUE-10
16:59:05 [mhausenblas]
ACTION-104?
16:59:05 [trackbot]
ACTION-104 -- Juan Sequeda to implement decision re ISSUE-10 (remove hash) and close ISSUE-10 -- due 2011-03-15 -- OPEN
16:59:05 [trackbot]
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/104
16:59:30 [cygri]
ivan: last time i checked this wasn't done yet in the spec
16:59:35 [mhausenblas]
ISSUE-9?
16:59:35 [trackbot]
ISSUE-9 -- Generate Blank Nodes for duplicate tuples -- open
16:59:35 [trackbot]
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/issues/9
16:59:37 [cygri]
Topic: ISSUE-9
16:59:41 [Souri]
Richard's email regarding rr:class: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2011Mar/0063.html
16:59:54 [cygri]
mhausenblas: we also asked the RDF WG about this
17:00:02 [cygri]
... so i'd prefer to keep that open
17:00:37 [mhausenblas]
PROPOSAL: postpone ISSUE-9 and take feedback from RDF WG into account
17:01:05 [ivan]
+1
17:01:20 [cygri]
RESOLUTION: postpone ISSUE-9 and take feedback from RDF WG into account
17:02:27 [cygri]
mhausenblas: all editors, could the drafts be ready for review on monday morning?
17:02:43 [cygri]
ericP: should we line up reviewers?
17:03:38 [Souri]
I have updated, based on Ivan's comment, the rr:joinCondition section and corr examples: new version 1.45
17:04:10 [ivan]
Thanks SOuri
17:07:19 [mhausenblas]
RRSAgent, draft minutes
17:07:19 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/03/15-rdb2rdf-minutes.html mhausenblas
17:08:29 [mhausenblas]
close ACTION-104
17:08:29 [trackbot]
ACTION-104 Implement decision re ISSUE-10 (remove hash) and close ISSUE-10 closed
17:08:31 [cygri]
(discussing how to get the remaining actions done and till when)
17:08:45 [mhausenblas]
ACTION: Eric to implement decision re ISSUE-10 (remove hash) and close ISSUE-10
17:08:46 [trackbot]
Created ACTION-110 - Implement decision re ISSUE-10 (remove hash) and close ISSUE-10 [on Eric Prud'hommeaux - due 2011-03-22].
17:08:49 [cygri]
ericP: (volunteers to take over ACTON-104)
17:09:28 [mhausenblas]
PROPOSAL: Both R2RML and DM address all open action till Fr 18 March and report on the list
17:09:32 [cygri]
+1
17:10:25 [ivan]
+1
17:10:26 [cygri]
RESOLUTION: Both R2RML and DM address all open action till Fr 18 March and report on the list
17:10:40 [betehess]
+1
17:11:10 [cygri]
ericP: is it acceptable to refer to the draft version of SQL?
17:11:17 [cygri]
mhausenblas: as fallback, yes
17:11:46 [cygri]
mhausenblas: adjourned
17:11:46 [ivan]
zakim, drop me
17:11:46 [Zakim]
Ivan is being disconnected
17:11:48 [Zakim]
-Ivan
17:11:49 [mhausenblas]
[meeting adjourned]
17:11:53 [Zakim]
-Alexandre
17:11:56 [Zakim]
-mhausenblas
17:11:59 [privera]
Zakim, drop me
17:11:59 [Zakim]
privera is being disconnected
17:12:01 [Zakim]
-privera
17:12:02 [Zakim]
-Seema
17:12:11 [mhausenblas]
RRSAgent, draft minutes
17:12:11 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/03/15-rdb2rdf-minutes.html mhausenblas
17:12:42 [privera]
privera has left #RDB2RDF
17:13:46 [ivan]
ivan has joined #rdb2rdf
17:14:02 [nunolopes]
nunolopes has joined #RDB2RDF
17:14:14 [ivan]
zakim, code?
17:14:14 [Zakim]
the conference code is 7322733 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.26.46.79.03 tel:+44.203.318.0479), ivan
17:20:22 [Souri]
FROM <g1> FROM <g2> ... FROM NAMED <ng1> FROM NAMED <ng2> ...
17:22:00 [boris]
boris has joined #RDB2RDF
17:23:30 [Souri]
default graph = UNION(<g1>,<g2>)
17:44:53 [MacTed]
boo, calendar fail... :-(
17:49:32 [Zakim]
-Souri
18:05:00 [Zakim]
disconnecting the lone participant, EricP, in SW_RDB2RDF()12:00PM
18:05:01 [Zakim]
SW_RDB2RDF()12:00PM has ended
18:05:05 [Zakim]
Attendees were +3539149aaaa, mhausenblas, cygri, soeren, nunolopes, +1.603.897.aabb, Souri, Ivan, +1.603.897.aacc, EricP, Seema, trackbot, RRSAgent, zakim, Alexandre, privera
18:11:15 [mhausenblas]
trackbot, end telecon
18:11:15 [trackbot]
Zakim, list attendees
18:11:15 [Zakim]
sorry, trackbot, I don't know what conference this is
18:11:16 [trackbot]
RRSAgent, please draft minutes
18:11:16 [RRSAgent]
I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2011/03/15-rdb2rdf-minutes.html trackbot
18:11:17 [trackbot]
RRSAgent, bye
18:11:17 [RRSAgent]
I see 4 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2011/03/15-rdb2rdf-actions.rdf :
18:11:17 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: Eric and Souri to resolve ISSUE-27 (note or text proposal) [1]
18:11:17 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/03/15-rdb2rdf-irc#T16-25-33
18:11:17 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: Richard to add note re ISSUE-32 to R2RML [2]
18:11:17 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/03/15-rdb2rdf-irc#T16-47-18
18:11:17 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: Richard to address ISSUE-30 [3]
18:11:17 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/03/15-rdb2rdf-irc#T16-48-24
18:11:17 [RRSAgent]
ACTION: Eric to implement decision re ISSUE-10 (remove hash) and close ISSUE-10 [4]
18:11:17 [RRSAgent]
recorded in http://www.w3.org/2011/03/15-rdb2rdf-irc#T17-08-45