Warning:
This wiki has been archived and is now read-only.
TouchEvents-LCWD-24-Jan-2013
From Web Events Wiki
NOTE: the Web Events Working Group closed in November 2013 because it completed its technical work with the publication of the 10 October 2013 Touch Events Recommendation. As such, this document is NO longer maintained.
This is the comment tracking document for the 24 January 2013 Touch Events v1 Last Call Working Draft.
The comment ids are numbered in the order the comments were submitted (i.e. LC-1 submitted before LC-2).
LC-1
- Commenter: Sanghwan Moon ; 30-Jan-2013
- Title: Adding implementor's note about event targets?
- Summary: Sangwhan requests the spec be clearer regarding User agents ensuring a TouchEvent dispatched from a single Document origin stays within the Document boundaries.
- URL: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webevents/2013JanMar/0037.html>
- WG Response: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webevents/2013JanMar/0092.html>. Group agreed to add a non-normative note to address this comment.
- Changeset: 1
- Commenter Reply: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webevents/2013JanMar/0094.html>
- Status: Commenter agrees with WG Response
LC-2
- Commenter: Michael Cooper on behalf of WAI PF WG ; 13-Feb-2013
- Title: PFWG comments on Touch Events, 24 Jan 2013 version
- Summary: PF WG requested the spec include a non-normative note regarding "mapping Web Events to other hardware events"
- URL: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webevents/2013JanMar/0042.html>
- WG Response: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webevents/2013JanMar/0053.html>. Group agreed to add a non-normative note that links to a related document that was created and maintained by the PFWG.
- Changeset: 1
- Commenter Reply: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webevents/2013JanMar/0098.html>
- Status: Commenter agrees with WG Response
LC-3
- Commenter: Boris Zbarsky; 06-Mar-2013
- Title: createTouch uses undefined interface AbstractView
- Summary: Boris identified some non-substantive bugs in the spec's usage of WebIDL and spec text.
- URL: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webevents/2013JanMar/0064.html>
- WG Response: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webevents/2013JanMar/0085.html>. Group agreed to fix these non-substantive bugs.
- Changesets: 1, 2; non-substantive clarifications and Web IDL bug fixes; new test case added
- Commenter Reply: #1 <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webevents/2013JanMar/0087.html>; #2 <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webevents/2013JanMar/0090.html>.
- Status: Commenter agrees with WG Response
LC-4
- Commenter: Ms2ger (Mozilla); 17-Mar-2013
- Title: TouchList interface
- Summary: Ms2ger reported a subset of the IDL bugs Boris reported in comment LC-3
- URL: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webevents/2013JanMar/0077.html>
- WG Response: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webevents/2013JanMar/0079.html>. Group agreed to fix these bugs as part of LC-3.
- Changeset: 1
- Commenter Reply: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webevents/2013JanMar/0080.html>
- Status: Commenter agrees with WG Response
LC-5
- Commenter: Kang-Hao (Kenny); 25-Mar-2013
- Title: document.createTouch/document.createTouchList are useless without new TouchEvent() or event.initTouchEvent()
- Summary: Need to clarify initTouchEvent (which is not-standard but has some implementation)
- URL: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webevents/2013JanMar/0097.html>
- WG Response: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webevents/2013AprJun/0011.html>. Group agreed to add a non-normative note.
- Changeset: 1, 2
- Commenter Reply: <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webevents/2013AprJun/0011.html>
- Status: Commenter agrees with WG Response