IRC log of wam on 2010-10-21
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 12:59:20 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #wam
- 12:59:20 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/10/21-wam-irc
- 12:59:22 [Zakim]
- +Art_Barstow
- 12:59:27 [ArtB]
- RRSAgent, make log Public
- 12:59:41 [ArtB]
- ScribeNick: ArtB
- 12:59:41 [ArtB]
- Scribe: Art
- 12:59:41 [ArtB]
- Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2010OctDec/0153.html
- 12:59:41 [ArtB]
- Chair: Art
- 12:59:41 [ArtB]
- Meeting: Widgets Voice Conference
- 12:59:42 [ArtB]
- Regrets: Steven_Pemberton, Frederick_Hirsch
- 12:59:42 [Zakim]
- +Marcos
- 13:01:57 [ArtB]
- Present: Art_Barstow, Marcos_Caceres
- 13:02:02 [ArtB]
- Topic: Announcements
- 13:02:12 [ArtB]
- AB: October 26 is the deadline for comments re October 5 LCWD of Widget Packaging and Configuration ( http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-widgets-20101005/ )
- 13:04:00 [ArtB]
- AB: WAI's P&F WG would like to meet with the widgets group @ TPAC on November 1; I will send details of the meeting include voice bridge (when I have them)
- 13:10:03 [timeless_mbp]
- timeless_mbp has joined #wam
- 13:15:49 [ArtB]
- Topic: Packaging and Configuration spec
- 13:15:56 [ArtB]
- AB: I created a comment tracking doc for the LC ( http://www.w3.org/2006/02/lc-comments-tracker/42538/WD-widgets-20101005/ )
- 13:16:14 [ArtB]
- AB: we have comments from viji <viji@borqs.com> (http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2010OctDec/0130.html )
- 13:16:49 [ArtB]
- MC: Viji is from Borqs
- 13:17:04 [ArtB]
- ... they are a development arm for China Mobile
- 13:17:21 [Marcos]
- MC: AFIK
- 13:17:50 [ArtB]
- AB: Issue-150 "Email and param name and value as 'Keyword attributes' is causing confusion in Widgets P&C Spec" ( http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/150 )
- 13:17:50 [ArtB]
- AB: Issue-151 "If feature-name is not a valid IRI, and required-feature is true, then the user agent must treat this widget as an invalid widget package. but doesnt say anything about the case when it is not required." ( http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/151 )
- 13:17:50 [ArtB]
- AB: Issue-152 "test suite needs a few more XML entity cases to check for well-formed XML" ( http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/152 )
- 13:18:05 [ArtB]
- AB: 152 seems more like an action
- 13:18:13 [ArtB]
- MC: oh yes, that's true
- 13:18:26 [ArtB]
- ... can change it to an Action
- 13:18:52 [Steven]
- Steven has joined #wam
- 13:18:57 [ArtB]
- ... I am reluctant to add more tests
- 13:19:00 [Steven]
- zakim, dial steven-617
- 13:19:00 [Zakim]
- ok, Steven; the call is being made
- 13:19:02 [Zakim]
- +Steven
- 13:19:11 [ArtB]
- ... they test XML entity types
- 13:19:23 [ArtB]
- Present+ Steven_Pemberton
- 13:20:55 [ArtB]
- AB: what about issue-151?
- 13:20:55 [ArtB]
- Issue-151?
- 13:20:55 [ArtB]
- MC: we just need to add a clarification
- 13:20:55 [trackbot]
- ISSUE-151 -- [widgets] P&C Spec.... If feature-name is not a valid IRI, and required-feature is true, then the user agent must treat this widget as an invalid widget package. but doesnt say anything about the case when it is not required. -- raised
- 13:20:55 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/151
- 13:21:09 [ArtB]
- AB: yes, I agree with it is just a clarification
- 13:21:20 [ArtB]
- AB: and what about issue-150?
- 13:21:26 [ArtB]
- Issue-150?
- 13:21:26 [trackbot]
- ISSUE-150 -- [widgets] Email and param name and value as 'Keyword attributes' is causing confusion in Widgets P&C Spec -- raised
- 13:21:26 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/2008/webapps/track/issues/150
- 13:21:40 [ArtB]
- MC: this is just an editorial cleanup
- 13:21:55 [ArtB]
- ... need to define a new data type like "unlocalizable string"
- 13:22:43 [ArtB]
- ACTION: barstow update LC comment doc to show Issues 150 and 151 are clarifications and editorial, respectively
- 13:22:43 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-590 - Update LC comment doc to show Issues 150 and 151 are clarifications and editorial, respectively [on Arthur Barstow - due 2010-10-28].
- 13:22:58 [ArtB]
- action: caceres to checkin updates for issues 150 and 151
- 13:23:00 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-591 - Checkin updates for issues 150 and 151 [on Marcos Caceres - due 2010-10-28].
- 13:23:28 [ArtB]
- AB: anything else on P&C for today?
- 13:23:47 [ArtB]
- MC: can we talk about embedding?
- 13:23:55 [ArtB]
- AB: let's talk about that during AoB
- 13:23:57 [ArtB]
- MC: ok
- 13:24:04 [ArtB]
- Topic: Widget Interface spec
- 13:24:10 [ArtB]
- AB: Addison's October 14 e-mail ( http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2010OctDec/0096.html )
- 13:24:58 [ArtB]
- AB: he wants a locale attribute off the widget object
- 13:25:07 [ArtB]
- MC: yes, that's right
- 13:25:21 [ArtB]
- ... think he should just use navigator.language
- 13:25:59 [fjh]
- fjh has joined #wam
- 13:26:59 [ArtB]
- AB: let me find the relevant email in the archive
- 13:27:09 [ArtB]
- ... here is your response to Addison: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2010OctDec/0033.html
- 13:27:44 [Zakim]
- -Steven
- 13:27:55 [Steven]
- zakim, dial steven-617
- 13:27:55 [Zakim]
- ok, Steven; the call is being made
- 13:27:57 [Zakim]
- +Steven
- 13:28:07 [Marcos]
- http://www.iamcal.com/understanding-bidirectional-text/
- 13:28:12 [ArtB]
- MC: I have another response that I drafted but haven't yet set
- 13:28:12 [ArtB]
- ... think he misunderstood what me
- 13:30:23 [ArtB]
- Regrets: Frederick_Hirsch
- 13:31:09 [ArtB]
- MC: my answer to the locale is to use navigator.language
- 13:32:51 [ArtB]
- AB: Addison also is asking "how does the API expose a string's direction?"
- 13:33:02 [ArtB]
- ... the problem is that the "span-able" elements may have any number of directions
- 13:33:09 [ArtB]
- ... so there is no single direction
- 13:34:03 [ArtB]
- ... I know you responded to Addison; I think you are talking past each other
- 13:34:03 [ArtB]
- MC: correct; a string can have N directions
- 13:34:14 [ArtB]
- ... can use unicode markers
- 13:34:31 [ArtB]
- ... e.g. http://www.iamcal.com/understanding-bidirectional-text/
- 13:34:50 [ArtB]
- ... can have a leading direction but then substrings may change direction
- 13:35:19 [ArtB]
- AB: is there a precedence we can build upon?
- 13:35:21 [Marcos]
- e.g. U+202E A B C U+202C
- 13:35:32 [Marcos]
- OR: start {LRE} foo {RLE} bar {PDF} baz {PDF} end
- 13:36:45 [Marcos]
- MC: in P&C, the i18n string is represented as (start {LRE} foo {RLE} bar {PDF} baz {PDF} end)
- 13:37:46 [ArtB]
- MC: in the API we can note what the string can look like (pointing to P&C spec)
- 13:38:40 [Marcos]
- widget.name == "u/202E foo u/1231 bar u/123 baz /3112 end u/1231
- 13:38:41 [Marcos]
- "
- 13:39:27 [Marcos]
- document.write(widget.name)
- 13:39:41 [Marcos]
- http://www.iamcal.com/understanding-bidirectional-text/
- 13:40:02 [Marcos]
- putInPlace(string, widget.name)
- 13:40:18 [Marcos]
- putInPlace(element, widget.name)
- 13:40:42 [ArtB]
- MC: this isn't something that can be done at the widget API level
- 13:40:50 [ArtB]
- ... it could be something done at the DOM level
- 13:41:17 [ArtB]
- ... don't think this is something that needs to be standardized
- 13:42:05 [ArtB]
- AB: can you respond to Addison with your proposal?
- 13:42:10 [Marcos]
- winget.name.lang
- 13:42:12 [ArtB]
- MC: yes, I will do that
- 13:42:35 [ArtB]
- ... for locale use, widget.name.lang
- 13:42:54 [ArtB]
- ... and for directionality, I will reiterate what I've previously said
- 13:43:19 [ArtB]
- ... we are going to return strings with Unicode markers
- 13:43:55 [ArtB]
- AB: ok; sounds good; I would welcome his feedback on what other WGs have done here
- 13:44:45 [ArtB]
- Topic: Widget Requirements: CfC to publish a new WD; only changes are updating references and the now obsolete spec titles (e.g. Widgets 1.0: Packaging and Configuration) <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets-reqs/>
- 13:45:57 [ArtB]
- AB: any objections to publishing this WD?
- 13:46:01 [ArtB]
- MC: no
- 13:46:05 [ArtB]
- SP: good plan
- 13:46:22 [ArtB]
- RESOLUTION: agree to publish the new WD of the Widget Requirements doc
- 13:46:36 [ArtB]
- ACTION: barstow submit a publication request to publish new WD of Widget Requirements
- 13:46:36 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-592 - Submit a publication request to publish new WD of Widget Requirements [on Arthur Barstow - due 2010-10-28].
- 13:46:43 [ArtB]
- Topic: AoB
- 13:47:39 [ArtB]
- AB: there has been some discussion about packaging web apps for browsers
- 13:48:04 [ArtB]
- ... Mozilla's Mike Hanson elaborated on how their approach relates to P&C: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2010OctDec/0159.html
- 13:48:35 [ArtB]
- ... Doug mentioned this could be in scope via WebApps' "Widget Embedding" deliverable
- 13:49:06 [ArtB]
- ... Someone else mentioned, this appears to be similar to Chrome extensions framework, at least from the manifest perspective
- 13:49:14 [ArtB]
- ... they also use JSON
- 13:49:19 [ArtB]
- MC: yes
- 13:49:43 [ArtB]
- AB: we can certainly do some work in this area
- 13:49:55 [ArtB]
- MC: yes, we should discuss this
- 13:51:39 [ArtB]
- ... don't want fragmentation
- 13:52:01 [ArtB]
- AB: I think it would be good to talk about the UCs and Reqs
- 13:52:20 [timeless_mbp]
- timeless_mbp has joined #wam
- 13:52:22 [ArtB]
- ... I do think our priority here should be to complete work we already started
- 13:52:30 [ArtB]
- ... but most of the work is already done
- 13:52:47 [ArtB]
- MC: I'm willing to put in hooks to accomdate future devlopment
- 13:53:00 [ArtB]
- ... but I do not want to break any normative parts of the P&C spec
- 13:53:08 [ArtB]
- AB: agree
- 13:53:42 [ArtB]
- AB: it may be too late to schedule related discussions for TPAC
- 13:53:55 [ArtB]
- ... but we can certainly start discussions on the mail list
- 13:54:01 [ArtB]
- ... and have informal discussions in Lyon
- 13:54:13 [ArtB]
- MC: yes, I agree
- 13:54:48 [ArtB]
- AB: not sure how to proceed
- 13:55:04 [ArtB]
- ... assume people will respond to the thread already started
- 13:55:51 [ArtB]
- AB: the action is for anyone interested in "Widget Embedding" to use public-webapps for discussions
- 13:56:32 [ArtB]
- AB: regarding next call, I think after TPAC makes sense
- 13:57:10 [ArtB]
- MC: yes, we should continue to use the list, especially for P&C and Interface specs
- 13:57:38 [ArtB]
- AB: tentatively, the next call would be November 4
- 13:57:45 [ArtB]
- AB: anything else for today?
- 13:58:45 [ArtB]
- AB: meeting adjourned
- 13:58:51 [Zakim]
- -Art_Barstow
- 13:58:53 [Zakim]
- -Marcos
- 13:58:57 [ArtB]
- RRSAgent, make minutes
- 13:58:57 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/10/21-wam-minutes.html ArtB
- 14:01:27 [Zakim]
- -Steven
- 14:01:30 [Zakim]
- IA_WebApps(Widgets)9:00AM has ended
- 14:01:32 [Zakim]
- Attendees were Art_Barstow, Marcos, Steven
- 14:06:54 [ArtB]
- zakim, bye
- 14:06:54 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #wam
- 14:06:59 [ArtB]
- rrsagent, bye
- 14:06:59 [RRSAgent]
- I see 3 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2010/10/21-wam-actions.rdf :
- 14:06:59 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: barstow update LC comment doc to show Issues 150 and 151 are clarifications and editorial, respectively [1]
- 14:06:59 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/10/21-wam-irc#T13-22-43
- 14:06:59 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: caceres to checkin updates for issues 150 and 151 [2]
- 14:06:59 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/10/21-wam-irc#T13-22-58
- 14:06:59 [RRSAgent]
- ACTION: barstow submit a publication request to publish new WD of Widget Requirements [3]
- 14:06:59 [RRSAgent]
- recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/10/21-wam-irc#T13-46-36