13:56:25 RRSAgent has joined #lld 13:56:25 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/09/09-lld-irc 13:56:31 will go through boston 13:56:33 rrsagent, bookmark 13:56:33 See http://www.w3.org/2010/09/09-lld-irc#T13-56-33 13:56:45 zakim, this will be lld 13:56:45 ok, TomB, I see INC_LLDXG()10:00AM already started 13:57:13 +??P14 13:57:23 zakim, ??P14 is me 13:57:23 +TomB; got it 13:57:33 fsasaki has joined #lld 13:57:44 zakim, who is on the call? 13:57:44 On the phone I see [IPcaller], TomB 13:57:54 + +1.614.764.aaaa 13:58:11 + +33.1.53.79.aabb 13:58:18 zakim, aaaa is Jeff_ 13:58:18 +Jeff_; got it 13:58:21 hi, I'm following this only via IRC (Martin Malmsten from KB, Stockholm) 13:58:22 zakim, aabb is me 13:58:22 +emma; got it 13:58:31 +??P24 13:58:42 +??P21 13:58:49 zakim, ??P24 is Bernard 13:58:49 +Bernard; got it 13:59:07 zakim, IPcaller is Gordon 13:59:07 +Gordon; got it 13:59:13 zakim, who is on the call? 13:59:13 On the phone I see Gordon, TomB, Jeff_, emma, Bernard, Felix (muted) 13:59:14 kcoyle has joined #lld 13:59:32 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xg-lld/2010Sep/0058.html 13:59:42 Andras has joined #lld 13:59:48 Regrets: Jodi, Anette, Joachim, Monica, Kim 14:00:12 +??P25 14:00:35 Previous: http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/09/02-lld-minutes.html 14:00:51 rrsagent, please make record public 14:00:59 Meeting: LLD XG 14:01:02 +??P29 14:01:02 Chair: Tom 14:01:02 whalb has joined #lld 14:01:03 + +1.361.279.aacc 14:01:07 Scribe: Bernard 14:01:15 scribenick: bernard 14:01:20 zakim, aacc is Alexander 14:01:20 +Alexander; got it 14:01:28 zakim, P29 is Andras 14:01:30 mzrcia has joined #LLD 14:01:31 sorry, Andras, I do not recognize a party named 'P29' 14:01:39 is the bristol dialin broken? 14:01:42 zakim, ??P29 is Andras 14:01:42 +Andras; got it 14:01:50 + +43.316.876.aadd 14:01:51 +[LC] 14:01:52 Regrets+: Antoine 14:01:55 zakim, aadd is me 14:01:56 +whalb; got it 14:02:06 kefo has joined #lld 14:02:16 zakim, LC is kefo 14:02:16 +kefo; got it 14:02:31 + +1.330.655.aaee 14:02:36 michaelp has joined #lld 14:03:20 Does anyone know if +44 117 370 6152 still works? 14:03:28 +Jonathan_Rees 14:03:41 I get Allison Smith's voice telling me the number I have dialed is not in service 14:03:55 jar has joined #lld 14:04:04 Allison Smith is the "voice of Asterisk" so I'm guessing it comes from the W3C voice bridge not the carrier 14:04:08 seems that only Boston bridge is working 14:04:25 as usual :-) 14:04:47 ww, are you dialing Boston: +1-617-761-6200, Nice: +33.4.26.46.79.03 , Bristol: +44.203.318.0479 - some of the numbers are new 14:05:08 on the 020 number, Allison Smith tells me "all circuits are busy now 14:05:12 + +1.423.463.aaff 14:05:17 can't easily dial internationally at the moment :( 14:05:30 +Jeff_.a 14:05:36 TomB: fwiw +4420 is London not Bristol 14:05:37 + +49.4.aagg 14:05:40 rsinger has joined #lld 14:05:53 I think... 14:06:04 zakim, aagg is jneubert 14:06:07 Zakim, mute me 14:06:11 +jneubert; got it 14:06:11 actually, usually 0207/0208 are london. 0203 might well be elsewhere 14:06:12 sorry, rsinger, I do not know which phone connection belongs to you 14:06:35 zakim, Michael is really me 14:06:35 +michaelp; got it 14:07:00 Zakim, mute me 14:07:00 rsinger should now be muted 14:07:04 Admin 14:07:08 RESOLUTION: accept previous telecon minutes 14:07:31 next meetings 14:08:35 true 14:08:42 Tom : will circulate more informatin about F2F 14:09:22 Tom : will need improvisation about phone and projector ... 14:09:25 LarsG has joined #lld 14:09:39 ... agenda is on the wiki 14:09:55 draft agenda for F2F : http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/F2F_Pittsburgh 14:10:39 ACTION; all add their attendance on the wiki 14:10:50 ACTION: all add their attendance on the wiki 14:11:10 ACTION: Potential attendees in Pittsburgh to use wiki page to indicate whether they are attending or not at http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/F2F [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/08/26-lld-minutes.html#action01] 14:11:15 --continues 14:11:28 + +49.613.692.aahh 14:11:40 ACTION: Potential attendees in Pittsburgh to use wiki page to indicate whether they are attending or not at http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/F2F 14:12:13 Tom : informal meeting in Cologne 14:12:26 Informal meeting of XG members at SWBIB 2010 on the morning of 1 December - contact Joachim Neubert 14:12:42 Use cases and case studies - update 14:13:56 Tom: next week pick two use cases for detailed discussion 14:14:38 ACTION: By Monday Sept. 6 members should add to list of email lists at http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Dissemination_Lists [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/09/02-lld-minutes.html#action05] 14:14:43 --DONE 14:14:56 ACTION: Group to comment on email text at http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Use_Case_Call_Mail by Monday, Sept. 6 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/09/02-lld-minutes.html#action06] 14:14:58 --DONE 14:15:09 ACTION: Everyone to elaborate on topics in the wiki [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/07/08-lld-minutes.html#action08] 14:15:10 4. RDA 14:15:12 --CONTINUE 14:15:32 ACTION: Gordon will prepare something on RDA, FRBR etc. for discussion in Sept. agenda [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/07/29-lld-minutes.html#action06] 14:15:36 --DONE 14:15:39 -- To be discussed: http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Library_standards_and_linked_data 14:16:08 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/09/09-lld-minutes.html emma 14:16:11 gneher has joined #lld 14:18:12 GordonD commenting http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Library_standards_and_linked_data 14:19:34 Within IFLA, new technical group for namespaces, coordination of standards in SW framwork, etc - will report to new core activity that resurrects something abandoned a few years ago - concept of universal bibliographic control. One or two months. 14:20:43 +??P20 14:21:05 GordonD: no formal connection between FRBR and RDA activities 14:21:16 ... special interest group for SW issues. Producing mappings beyond IFLA, e.g. for RDA, remains semi-formal - no formal orgn looking at mappings with RDA. Only joint membership in activiities. 14:22:02 Publication of standards in RDF not synchronized 14:22:08 s/activiities/activities 14:22:34 ... Trying to convey complexity of issues - if we are to get these standards to work together effectively. 14:23:14 GordonD : Issues section gathers issues discussed in both groups 14:23:45 GordonD: Constrained versus unconstrained properties and classes is the main issue ... 14:24:01 matolat has joined #lld 14:25:03 no specification of constraints in RDA ... 14:25:13 +michaelp.a 14:25:33 pressure from non-lib community for unconstrained properties but RDA, JSC and IFLA groups are convinced that constrained versions ar necessary 14:25:47 q+ 14:25:52 recent IFLA meeting consider publishing unconstrained versions, linked with constrained ones. 14:25:59 q+ to talk about constraints 14:26:05 zakim michaelp.a is matolat 14:26:08 Gordon: IFLA persuaded, JSC coming around - have indicated they will not block unconstrained properties. 14:26:13 zakim, unmute me 14:26:13 michaelp should no longer be muted 14:27:18 kcoyle: another issue has to do with the way constraints are expressed and how they are enforced in applications 14:27:36 kcoyle: not sure the RDA method actually works 14:28:08 GordonD: constraints are not enforced on applications 14:28:40 GordonD: constraints are useful to check legacy data 14:29:12 kcoyle: there is a sort a contradiction there 14:29:31 Gordon: They are constraints on _inferences_. Powerful if you consider there may be billions of triples eventually. Records can be "filled in" using inferences. 14:30:00 GordonD: I won't call them "unformal" constraints 14:30:24 AlexanderH has joined #lld 14:30:47 ack Michaelp 14:30:47 michaelp, you wanted to talk about constraints 14:31:03 GordonD: We need more technical investigation 14:31:24 hearing loud typing 14:31:31 Michaelp : there is a bit of confusion about constraints and validation 14:32:03 Michaelp: In OWL the constraints are enabling, not restricting 14:32:41 Michaelp: There are different of constraints like in XML schemas 14:33:30 GordonD: Indeed a big deal of confusion in this area 14:33:49 zakim, mute me 14:33:49 Bernard should now be muted 14:34:08 q+ 14:34:15 GordonD: RDA wants to be validated as a schema 14:35:18 GordonD: but also enabling as Michaelp has pointed 14:35:25 ack jeff_ 14:36:25 q+ 14:36:34 ack kcoyle 14:36:45 Jeff_: The same model can be used either as a schema, either as enabling depending on the use case 14:37:11 kcoyle: we should clarify which constraints we are speaking about 14:38:00 GordonD: There are a lot of value constraints in RDA 14:38:04 Karen : RDA primary constraints are about constraining a property to a FRBR entity, not the values 14:39:55 GordonD: RDA should keep its own versions of FRBR constraints ... 14:40:18 Tom : move on to next topics 14:40:37 Tom : port this discussion to F2F 14:40:52 +1 14:41:01 +1 14:41:02 +1 14:41:31 GordonD : next topic is "Application profiles or OWL ontologies" 14:42:22 * Zakim please mute me 14:42:39 GordonD : ISBD elements have a sequence + indicate if mandatory or not, so need for application profile 14:43:25 GordonD: What LLD can bring is clarification of when using application profiles and when using OWL 14:43:53 next topic : Use of published properties and classes 14:45:42 GordonD: How can library comunity be made aware of and re-use widely used classes and properties? 14:46:12 q+ to suggest the need to encourage the use of widespread standards 14:46:35 Need to acknowledge overlap between libray and "open Web" classes and properties 14:46:45 q+ to suggest additional attention to "alignment" - mappings and "identity links" between vocabularies 14:46:52 ack emma 14:46:53 emma, you wanted to suggest the need to encourage the use of widespread standards 14:47:12 emma: Agreed with GordonD ... 14:47:23 it's very much an issue of trust ... 14:47:45 FRSAD intent to use skos semantic relationships instead of repeating to define them 14:47:47 LLD should encourage library community not to be shy about this use 14:48:15 q+ 14:48:25 ack TomB 14:48:25 TomB, you wanted to suggest additional attention to "alignment" - mappings and "identity links" between vocabularies 14:48:37 emma: library community not used t o multiplicity of representations 14:48:53 Gordon, you should add OWL to the list of DC, FOAF, SKOS at http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Library_standards_and_linked_data#Use_of_published_properties_and_classes 14:49:17 Jeff, will do 14:49:25 ack mzrcia 14:50:23 marcia : We have already actions on declaring relationships using "sameAs" or "equivalent classes" 14:50:44 using SKOS secmantic relationships 14:51:04 such as broader, narrower... between themas 14:51:22 q+ 14:51:30 GordonD: The library community should not be childish in saying "not invented here" 14:52:23 GordonD: Elements coming from the library models will be useful elsewhere also 14:52:38 bernard: churlish, not childish 14:52:47 sorry :)) 14:53:01 I was also into the discussion of reusing/borwwring the assotiative relationships between concepts/topics defined by the Getty vocabulary 14:53:33 -Felix 14:54:37 GordonD: How can LLD can have action on milestones in this area? 14:55:23 GordonD : Library linked-data and legacy records ... 14:55:45 potential to generate billions of instances ... 14:56:36 ... copyright is a critical issue here ... 14:57:03 GordonD : Need from LLD community to encourage freeing the data 14:57:09 It's a political issue (How can libraries be encouraged to "free" their records?) 14:57:34 GordonD : Technical infrastructure ... 14:58:01 q+ 14:58:22 Library system vendors will only change if customers ask for it 14:58:25 ack kcoyle 14:58:32 How are vendors to see the ROI? 14:58:42 Duplication and identifiers 14:58:58 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/09/09-lld-minutes.html emma 14:59:16 GordonD : identifying different records for the same thing is also a big issue .. 15:00:19 ... Libray culture ... 15:00:41 ... sociological barriers to address ... 15:00:43 s/Libray/Library 15:01:09 q? 15:01:11 ack jeff_ 15:01:17 GordonD++ #awesome 15:01:40 +1, Thanks GordonD ! 15:02:00 +1, Gordon! 15:02:21 +1 GordonD, Great! 15:02:23 +1 great summary of the issues! 15:02:36 All, thanks! 15:02:51 TomB : a lot of congratulations to Gordon! 15:03:00 -kcoyle 15:03:01 -whalb 15:03:03 -jeff_ 15:03:04 -Jonathan_Rees 15:03:06 -Andras 15:03:07 -michaelp.a 15:03:09 -Alexander 15:03:11 -GordonD 15:03:12 -jneubert 15:03:13 gneher has left #lld 15:03:14 -michaelp 15:03:16 -LarsG 15:03:17 zakim, list attendees 15:03:18 -kefo 15:03:20 -rsinger 15:03:22 -marcia 15:03:23 bye 15:03:24 As of this point the attendees have been TomB, +1.614.764.aaaa, +33.1.53.79.aabb, emma, Felix, Bernard, GordonD, kcoyle, +1.361.279.aacc, Alexander, Andras, +43.316.876.aadd, 15:03:31 ... whalb, kefo, +1.330.655.aaee, marcia, Jonathan_Rees, +1.423.463.aaff, +49.4.aagg, jneubert, rsinger, jeff_, michaelp, +49.613.692.aahh, LarsG, gneher 15:03:32 zakim, unmute bernard 15:03:34 michaelp has left #lld 15:03:40 -gneher 15:03:41 Bernard should no longer be muted 15:04:12 rrsagent, please draft minutes 15:04:12 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/09/09-lld-minutes.html TomB 15:04:22 [adjourned] 15:08:46 zakim, bye 15:08:46 leaving. As of this point the attendees were TomB, +1.614.764.aaaa, +33.1.53.79.aabb, emma, Felix, Bernard, GordonD, kcoyle, +1.361.279.aacc, Alexander, Andras, +43.316.876.aadd, 15:08:46 Zakim has left #lld 15:08:49 ... whalb, kefo, +1.330.655.aaee, marcia, Jonathan_Rees, +1.423.463.aaff, +49.4.aagg, jneubert, rsinger, jeff_, michaelp, +49.613.692.aahh, LarsG, gneher 15:08:52 rrsagent, bye 15:08:52 I see 7 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2010/09/09-lld-actions.rdf : 15:08:52 ACTION: all add their attendance on the wiki [1] 15:08:52 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/09/09-lld-irc#T14-10-50 15:08:52 ACTION: Potential attendees in Pittsburgh to use wiki page to indicate whether they are attending or not at http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/F2F [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/08/26-lld-minutes.html#action01] [2] 15:08:52 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/09/09-lld-irc#T14-11-10 15:08:52 ACTION: Potential attendees in Pittsburgh to use wiki page to indicate whether they are attending or not at http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/F2F [3] 15:08:52 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/09/09-lld-irc#T14-11-40 15:08:52 ACTION: By Monday Sept. 6 members should add to list of email lists at http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Dissemination_Lists [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/09/02-lld-minutes.html#action05] [4] 15:08:52 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/09/09-lld-irc#T14-14-38 15:08:52 ACTION: Group to comment on email text at http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/wiki/Use_Case_Call_Mail by Monday, Sept. 6 [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/09/02-lld-minutes.html#action06] [5] 15:08:52 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/09/09-lld-irc#T14-14-56 15:08:52 ACTION: Everyone to elaborate on topics in the wiki [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/07/08-lld-minutes.html#action08] [6] 15:08:52 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/09/09-lld-irc#T14-15-09 15:08:52 ACTION: Gordon will prepare something on RDA, FRBR etc. for discussion in Sept. agenda [recorded in http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/lld/minutes/2010/07/29-lld-minutes.html#action06] [7] 15:08:52 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/09/09-lld-irc#T14-15-32