IRC log of CSS on 2010-08-11
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 15:35:11 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #CSS
- 15:35:11 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/08/11-CSS-irc
- 15:35:17 [glazou]
- Zakim, this will be Style
- 15:35:17 [Zakim]
- ok, glazou; I see Style_CSS FP()12:00PM scheduled to start in 25 minutes
- 15:35:22 [glazou]
- RRSAgent, make logs public
- 15:46:38 [arronei]
- arronei has joined #CSS
- 15:52:44 [Zakim]
- Style_CSS FP()12:00PM has now started
- 15:52:49 [Zakim]
- +dsinger
- 15:53:12 [dsinger]
- dsinger has joined #css
- 15:54:04 [dsinger]
- Zakim, who is here?
- 15:54:04 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see dsinger
- 15:54:05 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see dsinger, arronei, RRSAgent, Zakim, glazou_bbl, MoZ, dbaron, nimbupani, gsnedders, Curt`, szilles, miketaylr, krijnh, plinss, karl, lgombos, tabatkins, Hixie, Peter,
- 15:54:07 [Zakim]
- ... lhnz, anne, fantasai, Bert, trackbot, jgraham
- 15:54:18 [dsinger]
- zakim, mute dsinger
- 15:54:18 [Zakim]
- sorry, dsinger, muting is not permitted when only one person is present
- 15:55:18 [oyvind]
- oyvind has joined #css
- 15:55:21 [Zakim]
- -dsinger
- 15:55:22 [Zakim]
- Style_CSS FP()12:00PM has ended
- 15:55:22 [Zakim]
- Attendees were dsinger
- 15:55:43 [Zakim]
- Style_CSS FP()12:00PM has now started
- 15:55:45 [dethbakin]
- dethbakin has joined #css
- 15:55:50 [Zakim]
- +dsinger
- 15:56:07 [dsinger]
- dsinger has joined #css
- 15:56:34 [dsinger]
- zakim, who is here?
- 15:56:34 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see dsinger
- 15:56:36 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see dsinger, dethbakin, oyvind, arronei, RRSAgent, Zakim, glazou, dbaron, nimbupani, gsnedders, Curt`, szilles, miketaylr, krijnh, plinss, karl, lgombos, tabatkins, Hixie,
- 15:56:38 [Zakim]
- ... Peter, lhnz, anne, fantasai, Bert, trackbot, jgraham
- 15:59:18 [Zakim]
- + +1.617.650.aaaa
- 15:59:22 [dethbakin]
- Zakim, aaaa is me
- 15:59:22 [Zakim]
- +dethbakin; got it
- 15:59:22 [dsinger]
- zakim, mute dsinger
- 15:59:23 [Zakim]
- dsinger should now be muted
- 15:59:53 [Zakim]
- +glazou
- 16:00:07 [glazou]
- Zakim, who is here?
- 16:00:07 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see dsinger (muted), dethbakin, glazou
- 16:00:09 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see dsinger, dethbakin, oyvind, arronei, RRSAgent, Zakim, glazou, dbaron, nimbupani, gsnedders, Curt`, szilles, miketaylr, krijnh, plinss, karl, lgombos, tabatkins, Hixie,
- 16:00:13 [Zakim]
- ... Peter, lhnz, anne, fantasai, Bert, trackbot, jgraham
- 16:00:31 [glazou]
- hi dsinger
- 16:00:37 [Zakim]
- +[Microsoft]
- 16:00:39 [arronei]
- zakim, microsoft is me
- 16:00:39 [Zakim]
- +arronei; got it
- 16:01:16 [Zakim]
- +plinss_
- 16:01:29 [Zakim]
- +??P20
- 16:02:15 [plinss]
- zakim, ?P20 is fantasai
- 16:02:15 [Zakim]
- sorry, plinss, I do not recognize a party named '?P20'
- 16:02:21 [Zakim]
- +David_Baron
- 16:02:30 [dsinger]
- Zakim, ??p20 is fantasai
- 16:02:30 [Zakim]
- +fantasai; got it
- 16:03:24 [shepazu]
- shepazu has joined #css
- 16:03:34 [Zakim]
- + +47.21.65.aabb
- 16:03:43 [glazou]
- dsinger: trying to make us avoid next ftf ?-)
- 16:03:45 [Zakim]
- +sylvaing
- 16:03:53 [shepazu]
- shepazu has joined #css
- 16:05:43 [glazou]
- dsinger: sun for the 22nd, probability 2/5
- 16:06:55 [Zakim]
- +SteveZ
- 16:08:05 [ChrisL]
- ChrisL has joined #css
- 16:08:07 [dbaron]
- ScribeNick: dbaron
- 16:08:28 [dbaron]
- Zakim, +47 is howcome
- 16:08:28 [Zakim]
- +howcome; got it
- 16:08:29 [Zakim]
- -SteveZ
- 16:08:44 [dbaron]
- Topic: face-to-face meeting
- 16:08:49 [dbaron]
- howcome: any questions about f2f?
- 16:08:57 [Zakim]
- +SteveZ
- 16:09:29 [Zakim]
- +Bert
- 16:09:49 [Zakim]
- +ChrisL
- 16:10:31 [dbaron]
- SteveZ: Wanted to add one thing to agenda; will send email.
- 16:10:34 [dbaron]
- Topic: test suite
- 16:10:49 [dbaron]
- fantasai: Arron and I went through issues list and identified which issues need tests.
- 16:10:59 [dbaron]
- fantasai: want to do beta3 at end of week
- 16:11:33 [howcome]
- howcome has joined #css
- 16:11:34 [fantasai]
- ScribeNick: fantasai
- 16:11:39 [dbaron]
- Topic: CSS 2.1 issue 185
- 16:11:43 [JohnJansen]
- JohnJansen has joined #css
- 16:11:44 [fantasai]
- fantasai: Please try to get in fixes by the end of the week
- 16:11:48 [glazou]
- http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-185
- 16:12:45 [dbaron]
- I had a proposal: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Aug/0178.html
- 16:12:47 [sylvaing]
- sylvaing has joined #css
- 16:12:47 [fantasai]
- fantasai: The mailing list also brought up the question of negative-height floats
- 16:13:20 [fantasai]
- dbaron: I do prefer the idea that zero-height floats don't push line boxes, because it's easier to think about the range we're dealing with
- 16:15:24 [shepazu]
- shepazu has joined #css
- 16:16:48 [dsinger]
- dsinger has joined #css
- 16:16:50 [fantasai]
- fantasai: And negative height floats would also be excluded because they can't satisfy both c and d at the same time
- 16:16:59 [Zakim]
- +[Apple]
- 16:17:04 [dsinger]
- zakim, [apple] has dsinger
- 16:17:04 [Zakim]
- +dsinger; got it
- 16:17:16 [Zakim]
- -dsinger
- 16:17:39 [dbaron]
- ok, so maybe s/is a vertical position/exists a point/ and add Note: this means that floats with zero height or negative height do not move line boxes.
- 16:17:47 [fantasai]
- fantasai: I would be okay with this if there was a note saying that zero-height floats don't affect line boxes (and maybe explain why that's the case wrt wording in the text)
- 16:18:31 [ChrisL]
- maybe change "when there is" to "when there exists" and
- 16:18:33 [fantasai]
- fantasai: Could we change "not above" to "below or at"? I think that would help
- 16:18:48 [ChrisL]
- that is to "that satisfies all of these four conditions
- 16:19:55 [fantasai]
- Bert: So this means the zero or negative height float won't affect line boxes next to it
- 16:20:05 [fantasai]
- Bert: but if it has clear, it still can affect layout around it
- 16:20:13 [fantasai]
- Bert: What about floats next to floats, are those rules clear?
- 16:20:20 [fantasai]
- dbaron: I think they're clear, but it might be worth rereading
- 16:20:56 [fantasai]
- Note: this means that floats with zero height or negative
- 16:20:56 [fantasai]
- height do not move line boxes.
- 16:21:01 [fantasai]
- oops
- 16:21:07 [fantasai]
- In other words, we could add a sentence after (maybe immediately
- 16:21:07 [fantasai]
- after, maybe a little later): # However, line boxes created next to the float are shortened to # make room for the margin box of the float.
- 16:21:10 [fantasai]
- that says something like: | A line box is next to a float when there exists a vertical position | that satisfies all of these four conditions: | (a) at or below the top of the line box, (b) at or above the | bottom of the line box, (c) below the top margin edge of the | float, and (d) above the bottom margin edge of the float. | Note: this means that floats with zero height or negative
- 16:21:16 [fantasai]
- | heght do not m ove line boxes.
- 16:21:18 [fantasai]
- ....
- 16:21:49 [fantasai]
- Arron: I have a testcase for zero-height floats in the middle of the line box.
- 16:21:59 [fantasai]
- ...
- 16:22:45 [fantasai]
- dbaron: Last I checked neither Opera nor Webkit handle positive height floats in the middle of the line anyway
- 16:23:11 [dbaron]
- maybe Opera is ok; my memory is a little fuzzy
- 16:24:01 [fantasai]
- dbaron and Arron discuss the testcase
- 16:25:50 [arronei]
- http://test.csswg.org/source/contributors/microsoft/incoming/float-zero-height.htm
- 16:26:23 [fantasai]
- http://pastebin.mozilla.org/766057
- 16:27:49 [gsnedders]
- Opera indeed doesn't handle it
- 16:29:59 [fantasai]
- Peter: Any other comments on the proposal?
- 16:30:19 [fantasai]
- ChrisL: I'm hearing disagreement on which implementations need to change, but everyone seems to like the wording.
- 16:30:32 [fantasai]
- RESOLVED: dbaron's proposal accepted as modified above
- 16:31:40 [fantasai]
- Peter: CSS2.1 Issue 118
- 16:31:43 [plinss]
- http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-118
- 16:33:06 [glazou]
- +1
- 16:33:42 [fantasai]
- Steve: The existing text makes a reference to centering, but it's not clear what it centers or what it means.
- 16:33:56 [fantasai]
- Steve: The text I suggested clarifies that, and Bert confirms that's what it means
- 16:34:35 [glazou]
- Zakim, mute me
- 16:34:35 [Zakim]
- glazou should now be muted
- 16:34:45 [fantasai]
- Bert: I will try to avoid the word "centering"; your text describes what actually should be done.
- 16:35:14 [glazou]
- Zakim, unmute me
- 16:35:14 [Zakim]
- glazou should no longer be muted
- 16:36:21 [fantasai]
- WG votes to resolve on this now and protest Bert's edits afterwards if necessary
- 16:36:37 [fantasai]
- RESOLVED: Bert's proposal accepted with Steve's modifications as to be edited in by Bert
- 16:37:41 [plinss]
- http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-144
- 16:39:51 [fantasai]
- dbaron: Given the new model for text decoration that we haven't implemented yet, I would follow Opera's lead on question one
- 16:40:34 [fantasai]
- arronei: I'm running the tests and everyone shows the underline
- 16:40:45 [fantasai]
- ChrisL: Is there a use case for showing the nderline under invisible text?
- 16:40:58 [fantasai]
- fantasai: No, it's just something that falls out of the previous model.
- 16:41:35 [fantasai]
- fantasai: It doesn't make much sense to show the underline if you're trying to hide something.
- 16:41:59 [glazou]
- Gecko 2.0 underlines once the whole thing
- 16:42:20 [fantasai]
- ChrisL: Then perhaps we should change it to be more useful, not as likely to break things.
- 16:42:33 [fantasai]
- ChrisL: But if we don't have implementations, that will hold back PR.
- 16:42:40 [fantasai]
- Steve: We could go with "it's undefined".
- 16:43:15 [fantasai]
- dbaron: I think we're already at the place where most implementations disagree with the spec on text-decoration, and we're planning to fix it but we haven't gotten around to it yet
- 16:43:29 [fantasai]
- Steve: So you're going to have to change it to match the current 2.1 text anyway
- 16:43:42 [fantasai]
- Steve: If that's true, fine, we'll just make it another piece of the model change.
- 16:44:09 [fantasai]
- fantasai: we could change it and mark it at-risk
- 16:45:32 [fantasai]
- Seem to have agreement that if the text isn't there, the underline shouldn't be either.
- 16:46:37 [fantasai]
- Bert: I would expect to see the blue line, but not the red one in that email
- 16:49:05 [fantasai]
- fantasai summarizes Appendix E's contents
- 16:49:35 [fantasai]
- fantasai: If you want the underline visible but not the text, you can make the text transparent.
- 16:51:28 [fantasai]
- Bert and Peter discuss the underlining model -- specifically that the underline is continuous through the child elements, and if they have underlines they are additional (may paint over)
- 16:51:53 [fantasai]
- Steve: I'm confused about what the current model is.
- 16:52:03 [fantasai]
- Steve: There's two ways of thinking about it. One is, the property draws an underline
- 16:52:22 [fantasai]
- Steve: The other way is that it turns on a mode so that each glyph draws its own piece of the underline
- 16:52:31 [fantasai]
- Steve: I thought that the latter model is what the new one is doing
- 16:54:41 [fantasai]
- fantasai explains the current model
- 16:56:04 [fantasai]
- fantasai: The question is now whether the underline is drawn with the color *and* visibility of the underlining element, or it uses the visibility of the element with the text being underline
- 16:56:08 [fantasai]
- dd
- 16:56:43 [fantasai]
- Steve: Suppose that you're animating the text to disappear, so the underline is there. What should happen at the end of the animation?
- 16:56:51 [fantasai]
- Steve: Does the underline now jump to the text around it?
- 16:57:21 [fantasai]
- Bert: The underline's position can be adapted to the child elements; it doesn't have to but it may.
- 16:57:38 [fantasai]
- (but it has to be a single line per linebox)
- 17:00:59 [fantasai]
- fantasai: Consider also if I set text-decoration on a <div> with block-level children
- 17:01:31 [fantasai]
- fantasai: If you set visibility hidden on one of them, would it disappear the text but not the underlining?
- 17:03:02 [fantasai]
- Arron: Older versions of IE don't draw the underline, but they're just mostly broken
- 17:03:17 [glazou]
- unicorn underlines
- 17:03:25 [Zakim]
- -ChrisL
- 17:03:26 [fantasai]
- Over time
- 17:03:29 [fantasai]
- Meeting closed.
- 17:03:32 [Zakim]
- -arronei
- 17:03:34 [Zakim]
- -dethbakin
- 17:03:34 [Zakim]
- -sylvaing
- 17:03:35 [Zakim]
- -Bert
- 17:03:36 [Zakim]
- -plinss_
- 17:03:39 [Zakim]
- -[Apple]
- 17:03:41 [Zakim]
- -glazou
- 17:03:42 [Zakim]
- -SteveZ
- 17:03:46 [Zakim]
- -howcome
- 17:03:51 [Zakim]
- -David_Baron
- 17:08:51 [Zakim]
- disconnecting the lone participant, fantasai, in Style_CSS FP()12:00PM
- 17:08:55 [Zakim]
- Style_CSS FP()12:00PM has ended
- 17:08:57 [Zakim]
- Attendees were dsinger, +1.617.650.aaaa, dethbakin, glazou, arronei, plinss_, David_Baron, fantasai, +47.21.65.aabb, sylvaing, SteveZ, howcome, Bert, ChrisL
- 18:06:57 [dsinger]
- dsinger has joined #css
- 18:41:04 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #CSS
- 19:52:14 [tabatkins]
- fantasai: You interested in staying in the Oslo apartment an extra day with dbaron and tantek?
- 20:11:48 [fantasai]
- tabatkins: yes
- 20:12:15 [tabatkins]
- k, I'll confirm with the rental dude.
- 20:21:36 [dbaron]
- ooh, fantasai is around
- 20:21:57 [dbaron]
- (do we know when the other people staying in the Apartment are leaving?)