15:01:38 RRSAgent has joined #swxg 15:01:38 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/06/30-swxg-irc 15:01:40 RRSAgent, make logs world 15:01:40 Zakim has joined #swxg 15:01:42 Zakim, this will be 7994 15:01:42 ok, trackbot; I see INC_SWXG()11:00AM scheduled to start now 15:01:43 Meeting: Social Web Incubator Group Teleconference 15:01:43 Date: 30 June 2010 15:01:47 Zakim, who's here? 15:01:47 INC_SWXG()11:00AM has not yet started, MacTed 15:01:48 On IRC I see RRSAgent, caribou, DKA, tpa, karl, MacTed, tlr, tinkster, mischat, danbri, FabGandon, trackbot 15:01:51 Zakim, this is 7994 15:01:51 ok, MacTed; that matches INC_SWXG()11:00AM 15:01:54 Zakim, who's here? 15:01:54 On the phone I see +1.510.931.aaaa, +1.781.273.aabb, DKA 15:01:57 On IRC I see RRSAgent, caribou, DKA, tpa, karl, MacTed, tlr, tinkster, mischat, danbri, FabGandon, trackbot 15:02:05 Zakim, aabb is OpenLink_Software 15:02:05 +OpenLink_Software; got it 15:02:08 agenda: http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/weekly-agenda.html 15:02:11 Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me 15:02:11 +MacTed; got it 15:02:53 zakim, aaaa is Henry 15:02:53 +Henry; got it 15:03:47 cperey has joined #swxg 15:04:43 +Carine 15:04:58 + +1.617.848.aacc 15:05:18 zakim, 848.aacc is me 15:05:18 sorry, cperey, I do not recognize a party named '848.aacc' 15:05:29 zakim, aacc is me 15:05:29 +cperey; got it 15:05:50 yes 15:06:29 ScribeNick: caribou 15:06:32 Scribe: Dan 15:07:10 http://www.w3.org/2010/06/23-swxg-minutes.html 15:07:37 bblfish has joined #swxg 15:07:38 RESOLUTION: Approve last week's minutes. 15:07:48 phew got it 15:08:03 Agreed to meet again on the 7th. 15:08:17 regrets, I will not be available 7, 14, 21 of july 15:08:19 Topic: Final Report Action Update 15:08:50 grrr i can't dial into the UK bristol number ... 15:09:49 Topic: Action Items 15:10:18 -cperey 15:10:21 I've received feedback from Paul 15:10:23 oops! 15:10:32 I disconnected myself so Henry better go first 15:10:33 Dan: Gap analysis... 15:11:05 Henry: is there a detailed description of that? 15:11:21 +cperey 15:11:52 mischat: Bristol and Nice numbers for Zakim haven't been working for a few weeks! 15:12:24 thanks toby 15:12:58 Henry: I can make something up in this space 15:13:15 ... is there a bit more details about what you mean? 15:13:15 yes, several gaps 15:13:32 Dan: gaps where no standards exist yet 15:13:33 that is the gap analysis which is most important 15:14:18 there was also the task of identifying where there are standards but no agreement on which to use in which case 15:14:34 +[IPcaller] 15:14:41 zakim, [IPcaller] is danbri 15:14:41 +danbri; got it 15:14:43 rreck has joined #SWXG 15:14:48 me too 15:15:53 are we meeting? 15:15:53 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/UserStories 15:16:18 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/OneLiners 15:16:33 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/OneLiners 15:16:45 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/RequirementsAndUseCases 15:17:30 Henry: is there a method or procedure? 15:17:36 Christine: yes 15:17:42 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/FinalReportElementsDiscussion 15:18:03 + +1.218.296.aadd 15:18:14 zakim, +1.218.296.aadd is me 15:18:14 +rreck; got it 15:18:18 zakim, mute me 15:18:18 rreck should now be muted 15:18:20 ... Dan has drafted an intro 15:19:06 ... link your draft there, in part V. 15:19:18 ACTION: Henry to take a stab at gap analysis and add to part V on the wiki link above. 15:19:18 Created ACTION-147 - Take a stab at gap analysis and add to part V on the wiki link above. [on Henry Story - due 2010-07-07]. 15:20:40 ??: we need a link to the map of technologies 15:21:06 One could go through the inputs from all speakers (technology experts) 15:21:17 ideally some kind of crafty visualisation needed... but quite hard! 15:21:26 Dan: gap between use cases and existing technologies 15:21:47 friend relations 15:21:50 http://ostatus.org/ "OStatus lets people on different social networks follow each other. " 15:21:55 we came up with a ping protocol to make friends 15:21:57 let me find it 15:22:16 ostatus = Activity Streams + PubSubHubbub + Salmon + Webfinger 15:22:21 http://esw.w3.org/Pingback 15:22:41 Agreed 15:22:51 perhaps we should go through the State of Social Web 15:23:01 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/OneLiners 15:23:30 ACTION: Dan to add material to report around OneLiners and Guest Speaker input. 15:23:30 Sorry, amibiguous username (more than one match) - Dan 15:23:30 Try using a different identifier, such as family name or username (eg. dappelqu, danbri) 15:23:51 Henry: we can find out if we missed use cases or technologies 15:24:25 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/Business-considerations-section-draft 15:24:32 DKA: Business case. Christine? 15:24:43 Christine: in the wiki page 15:24:55 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/Business-considerations-section-draft 15:25:05 ACTION: Dan Appelquist to add material to report around OneLiners and Guest Speaker input. 15:25:05 Sorry, amibiguous username (more than one match) - Dan 15:25:05 Try using a different identifier, such as family name or username (eg. dappelqu, danbri) 15:25:13 ACTION: Appelquist to add material to report around OneLiners and Guest Speaker input. 15:25:13 Created ACTION-148 - Add material to report around OneLiners and Guest Speaker input. [on Daniel Appelquist - due 2010-07-07]. 15:25:22 Christine: it covers the basis 15:25:39 DKA: complete? 15:26:30 re " Observers have speculated that Facebook," ... is it possible to cite sources here? 15:26:50 is it the same src as "Inside Facebook blog" cited for fig1? 15:27:17 Christine: suggests identity management services, content management services 15:27:24 are there any use cases for software providers? 15:27:39 (thanks!) 15:27:45 ... things in the PDF not in wiki 15:27:58 (no further comments from me right now) 15:28:00 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/File:Chapter_VI_Business_Considerations.pdf 15:29:20 Christine: if we can't propose business opportunities, it will not be successful 15:31:21 re Why matters? a few years ago MySpace was the giant. Then Orkut (from giant Google), who took over from Friendster, who grew big as SixDegrees.com faded into history. Just as in search, AltaVista once seemed unassailable. So assuming it is now Facebook forever isn't supported by history... 15:31:22 DKA: maybe we can get some people, e.g. FB to comment 15:33:03 Christine: if we don't have ability to maintain current business model, i.e. advertising, we need to combine with new ones 15:33:19 re not preserving advertising ... danger of 'proving' (by analogy) that bittorrent could never exist, since the content businesses need advertising to survive 15:33:43 ... so identity management, profile management services.... 15:33:57 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=994DvSJZyww&feature=channel 15:34:00 ... we can probably ask someone from FB to read the document and comment 15:34:04 q+ to note that some businesses *will* fail, in part due to new tech landscape 15:36:08 Henry: Metcalfe's law shows the value of a network 15:37:01 ... you can calculate the value 15:37:18 Christine: I don't think all have a convertible value 15:37:19 (are nodes people, or accounts?) 15:37:44 Henry: look at the big players and take their yearly budget 15:37:56 ... add up together 15:39:06 bblfish, http://www.wheredoesmymoneygo.org/dashboard/#/uk-bubble-chart/focus=02-02.1&year=2010-11 :) 15:39:20 Christine: I won't be doing that. 15:40:07 -Henry 15:40:20 ack danbri 15:40:20 danbri, you wanted to note that some businesses *will* fail, in part due to new tech landscape 15:40:42 danbri: the tech landscape is moving very quickly 15:40:53 ... nobody knows in advance 15:41:07 bblfish1 has joined #swxg 15:41:08 ... the current businesses need Ads to continue 15:41:52 ... if you look at the content industry, it's possible that decentralized system will cut down existing systems 15:42:03 +Henry 15:42:06 hi 15:42:16 christine: existing businesses can be damaged by social web? 15:42:17 connection broke 15:42:35 seems not so much *businesses* but *business models* 15:42:45 danbri: yes. If there's success for OpenSocial, e.g., it could damage existing SN 15:43:03 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metcalfe's_law 15:44:20 for the various scenarios, q of what costs need covering 15:44:22 Henry: look at what's missing and you see the opportunities 15:44:25 i agree social networking software to companies 15:44:39 ... e.g. selling SN software/maintainance to companies 15:44:51 ... specific tools 15:45:04 a SN oriented at trust/veracity 15:45:11 ... with lots of privacy rules 15:45:33 ... it would be a big new opportunity. It's not just advertising 15:46:04 Christine: this paper focusses on consumer market, not enterprise 15:46:20 Henry: there are other markets 15:46:23 research is a good one 15:47:01 statusnet (evan p, one of our guests) are very much in area of corporate social networks 15:47:17 -> http://status.net/products 15:47:44 DKA: will take an action to balance that 15:49:03 danbri: anybody attending ??? 15:49:07 DKA: may go 15:50:01 so other markets: health care (doctor and patiens and hostpitals, etc..), research, business to buisness to customer, defense, law, … each of these are social networks that need to be open to other players - I think we also spoke of managment of catastrophes during the initial meeting. 15:50:02 i would help reading/editing content if that helps, someone email me rreck@rrecktek.com 15:50:02 Christine: we could work on the section that Harry put together 15:50:10 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/StateOfSocialWeb 15:50:31 phone dying 15:50:31 (sorry had to drop; the ostatus etc meeting looks very interesting, i'll try to make some technical submission to it remotely) 15:50:56 thanks for all your efforts cperey 15:51:29 christine: I think Privacy should not be the key functionality of new social web sites 15:51:34 -rreck 15:51:39 s/sites// 15:51:57 ... would rather point to data portability 15:52:14 ... look back at my paper 15:52:31 http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/SocialWebFrameworks2#Social_Graph_Management_Today 15:52:56 DKA: agree that privacy should not be the first thing 15:53:58 [probably not the first priority for businesses, but what about the users?] 15:55:04 q? 15:55:08 DKA: go ahead and edit 15:55:20 :) 15:55:53 yes 15:57:13 data ownership is also wrong 15:57:19 :) 15:57:19 control is more correct 15:57:20 all these services have APIs lately; being able to get at the data is easy 15:57:23 yes, it's about control 15:57:25 you can't own data 15:57:27 really 15:57:36 which takes us towards dns imho, as profiles are tied to uris are tied to dns, typically 15:58:01 Who can take an action to help flesh out http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/StateOfSocialWeb 15:58:07 mischat? 15:58:09 EU directives use the terms data suject and data controller 15:58:10 I think speech act theory is the place to look 15:58:29 DKA: I can, have been writing stuff in that space anyways 15:58:46 can spend a day on it before next meeting 15:58:52 am guessing this doc : http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/StateOfSocialWeb 15:58:53 action: mischa to add some material to http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/StateOfSocialWeb 15:58:53 Created ACTION-149 - Add some material to http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/StateOfSocialWeb [on Mischa Tuffield - due 2010-07-07]. 15:59:03 DKA: come on 5 more ;) 15:59:16 s/DKA:/DKA,/ 15:59:17 s/DKA:/DKA,/ 15:59:27 ok 16:00:12 did you add a action for me? 16:00:14 -DKA 16:00:16 -danbri 16:00:18 -cperey 16:00:19 -Carine 16:00:21 -MacTed 16:00:24 well no 16:00:28 bye 16:00:29 As of this point the attendees have been +1.510.931.aaaa, +1.781.273.aabb, DKA, MacTed, Henry, Carine, +1.617.848.aacc, cperey, danbri, rreck 16:00:32 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 16:00:32 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/06/30-swxg-minutes.html DKA 16:00:37 Scribe: carine 16:00:42 rrsagent, make minutes public 16:00:42 I'm logging. I don't understand 'make minutes public', DKA. Try /msg RRSAgent help 16:00:47 -Henry 16:00:47 RRSAgent, make logs member 16:00:48 rrsagent, make logs public 16:00:48 INC_SWXG()11:00AM has ended 16:00:49 Attendees were +1.510.931.aaaa, +1.781.273.aabb, DKA, MacTed, Henry, Carine, +1.617.848.aacc, cperey, danbri, rreck 16:00:54 DKA: am messing around with onesocialweb at the moment 16:01:05 RRSAgent, make minutes 16:01:05 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/06/30-swxg-minutes.html caribou 16:01:07 s/DKA:/DKA./ 16:01:14 RRSAgent, stop logging 16:01:14 I'm logging. I don't understand 'stop logging', caribou. Try /msg RRSAgent help 16:01:20 is that your doing, DKA ? 16:01:31 are the devs based in London per chance ? 16:01:31 RRSAgent, bye 16:01:31 I see 5 open action items saved in http://www.w3.org/2010/06/30-swxg-actions.rdf : 16:01:31 ACTION: Henry to take a stab at gap analysis and add to part V on the wiki link above. [1] 16:01:31 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/06/30-swxg-irc#T15-19-18 16:01:31 ACTION: Dan to add material to report around OneLiners and Guest Speaker input. [2] 16:01:31 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/06/30-swxg-irc#T15-23-30 16:01:31 ACTION: Dan Appelquist to add material to report around OneLiners and Guest Speaker input. [3] 16:01:31 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/06/30-swxg-irc#T15-25-05 16:01:31 ACTION: Appelquist to add material to report around OneLiners and Guest Speaker input. [4] 16:01:31 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/06/30-swxg-irc#T15-25-13 16:01:31 ACTION: mischa to add some material to http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/socialweb/wiki/StateOfSocialWeb [5] 16:01:31 recorded in http://www.w3.org/2010/06/30-swxg-irc#T15-58-53 16:01:45 ciao 16:01:54 nooo