15:51:35 RRSAgent has joined #rdb2rdf 15:51:35 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/06/29-rdb2rdf-irc 15:51:37 RRSAgent, make logs world 15:51:37 Zakim has joined #rdb2rdf 15:51:39 Zakim, this will be 7322733 15:51:39 ok, trackbot; I see SW_RDB2RDF()12:00PM scheduled to start in 9 minutes 15:51:40 Meeting: RDB2RDF Working Group Teleconference 15:51:40 Date: 29 June 2010 15:51:43 Chair: Michael 15:52:01 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2010Jun/0063.html 15:53:00 regrets+ Boris 15:53:10 regrets+ Wolfgang 15:53:21 regrets+ Marcelo 15:53:29 regrets+ Li Ma 15:53:34 Zakim, draft minutes 15:53:34 I don't understand 'draft minutes', mhausenblas 15:53:42 RRSAgent, draft minutes 15:53:42 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/06/29-rdb2rdf-minutes.html mhausenblas 15:54:02 RRSAgent, make logs public 15:57:02 Zakim, please dial ericP-office 15:57:02 ok, ericP; the call is being made 15:57:03 SW_RDB2RDF()12:00PM has now started 15:57:04 +EricP 15:57:17 Zakim, pick a victim 15:57:17 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose EricP 15:57:23 hehe 15:57:30 hey, wait a minute! 15:58:15 Zakim, code 15:58:15 I don't understand 'code', mhausenblas 15:58:19 Zakim, code? 15:58:19 the conference code is 7322733 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), mhausenblas 15:58:29 + +3539149aaaa 15:58:29 Zakim, who's here? 15:58:29 On the phone I see EricP, +3539149aaaa 15:58:31 On IRC I see RRSAgent, cygri, MacTed, LeeF, nunolopes, mhausenblas, trackbot, iv_an_ru, ericP 15:58:32 Seema has joined #rdb2rdf 15:58:38 Zakim, aaaa is me 15:58:38 +mhausenblas; got it 15:59:07 Ashok has joined #rdb2rdf 15:59:17 soeren has joined #RDB2RDF 15:59:50 juansequeda has joined #RDB2RDF 16:00:15 + +49.322.222.0.aabb 16:00:30 Zakim, aabbb is soeren 16:00:30 sorry, mhausenblas, I do not recognize a party named 'aabbb' 16:00:56 + +1.603.897.aacc 16:00:58 Zakim, aabb is soeren 16:00:58 +soeren; got it 16:01:00 +[IPcaller] 16:01:16 +Kingsley_Idehen 16:01:21 Zakim, aacc is Seema 16:01:21 +Seema; got it 16:01:34 Zakim, Kingsley_Idehen is OpenLink_Software 16:01:34 +OpenLink_Software; got it 16:01:34 Zakim, IPcaller is cygri 16:01:36 +cygri; got it 16:01:40 Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me 16:01:40 +MacTed; got it 16:01:41 Zakim, who' here? 16:01:41 I don't understand your question, mhausenblas. 16:01:43 Zakim, mute me 16:01:43 MacTed should now be muted 16:01:44 Zakim, who's here? 16:01:44 On the phone I see EricP, mhausenblas, soeren, Seema, cygri, MacTed (muted) 16:01:46 Zakim, nunolopes is with mhausenblas 16:01:46 +nunolopes; got it 16:01:49 On IRC I see juansequeda, soeren, Ashok, Seema, Zakim, RRSAgent, cygri, MacTed, LeeF, nunolopes, mhausenblas, trackbot, iv_an_ru, ericP 16:01:52 -soeren 16:02:03 Zakim, nunolopes is with mhausenblas 16:02:03 nunolopes was already listed in mhausenblas, mhausenblas 16:02:05 +Ashok_Malhotra 16:02:36 +soeren 16:02:38 regrets: LiMa, Wolfgang, Boris, Marcelo 16:02:41 dialing in a few min 16:02:58 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:02:58 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/06/29-rdb2rdf-minutes.html mhausenblas 16:03:16 Zakim, who's here? 16:03:16 On the phone I see EricP, mhausenblas, Seema, cygri, MacTed (muted), Ashok_Malhotra, soeren (muted) 16:03:19 mhausenblas has mhausenblas, nunolopes 16:03:21 On IRC I see juansequeda, soeren, Ashok, Seema, Zakim, RRSAgent, cygri, MacTed, LeeF, nunolopes, mhausenblas, trackbot, iv_an_ru, ericP 16:03:22 cygri_ has joined #rdb2rdf 16:03:30 scribenick: ericP 16:04:12 Topic: 1. Admin 16:04:27 PROPOSAL: Accept the minutes of the F2F meeting, see http://www.w3.org/2010/06/20-rdb2rdf-f2f-minutes.html 16:04:42 +[IPcaller] 16:04:56 Zakim, IPcaller is juansequeda 16:04:56 +juansequeda; got it 16:05:09 Zakim, who's here? 16:05:09 On the phone I see EricP, mhausenblas, Seema, cygri, MacTed (muted), Ashok_Malhotra, soeren (muted), juansequeda 16:05:11 mhausenblas has mhausenblas, nunolopes 16:05:13 On IRC I see cygri, juansequeda, soeren, Ashok, Seema, Zakim, RRSAgent, MacTed, LeeF, nunolopes, mhausenblas, trackbot, iv_an_ru, ericP 16:05:19 +1 16:05:37 RESOLVED: Accept the minutes of the F2F meeting, see http://www.w3.org/2010/06/20-rdb2rdf-f2f-minutes.html 16:05:44 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:05:44 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/06/29-rdb2rdf-minutes.html mhausenblas 16:05:56 Ashok: kudos to harry for cleaning minutes 16:06:13 + +046128aadd 16:06:48 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/open 16:06:52 angela has joined #rdb2rdf 16:06:55 Zakim, +046128aadd is angela 16:06:55 +angela; got it 16:07:32 mhausenblas: i cleaned up f2f-related actions and changed the due date for remaining actions to next week 16:07:57 +Souri 16:08:08 Topic: Report on SemTech 2010 panel 16:08:31 Zakim, who's here? 16:08:31 On the phone I see EricP, mhausenblas, Seema, cygri, MacTed (muted), Ashok_Malhotra, soeren (muted), juansequeda, angela, Souri 16:08:33 mhausenblas has mhausenblas, nunolopes 16:08:35 On IRC I see angela, cygri, juansequeda, soeren, Ashok, Seema, Zakim, RRSAgent, MacTed, LeeF, nunolopes, mhausenblas, trackbot, iv_an_ru, ericP 16:08:54 Ashok: souri, juansequeda and cygri were at the panel 16:09:20 juansequeda: the public is looking forward to a standard mapping language 16:09:28 mhausenblas: what sort of audience? 16:09:57 souri: good turn-out (more than SPARQL) in a large conference room 16:10:24 ... no question about whether a standard is necesary 16:10:40 ... heard "how will you do inference?" 16:11:00 ... said "the inferred data can sit in a triple store and the asserted data in relational tables" 16:11:25 ... that question from a fellow from gallery systems in new york (they manage museums) 16:11:47 juansequeda: audience was mostly industry. i talked with someone from chevron 16:12:08 cygri: after the panel, i heard questions about timeframe for spec and implementations 16:12:22 ... indicates (industry) eagerness 16:12:53 mhausenblas: did any new faces show up with implementations or use cases? 16:12:57 Souri has joined #rdb2rdf 16:13:25 ... e.g. someone from wordpress giving a requirement 16:13:51 dan: heard a request that UC&R include OLAP application 16:15:03 juansequeda: i asked folks to look over UC&R and email on the comments list 16:15:04 ACTION dan: work on UC&R on OLAP application 16:15:04 Sorry, couldn't find user - dan 16:15:19 ACTION: Dan to work on UC&R on OLAP application 16:15:19 Sorry, couldn't find user - Dan 16:15:19 mhausenblas: did we hear from IBM or MS? 16:15:35 [no] 16:15:48 ACTION miranker: work on UC&R on OLAP application 16:15:48 Sorry, couldn't find user - miranker 16:15:54 mhausenblas: sounds like we're motivated to finish quickly 16:16:22 juansequeda: we heard "will there be write?" 16:16:25 Dan, what's your moniker on Zakim 16:16:31 ... answered "we're chartered for read-only" 16:17:04 ACTION: ddanielm to work on UC&R on OLAP application 16:17:04 Created ACTION-69 - Work on UC&R on OLAP application [on Daniel Daniel Miranker - due 2010-07-06]. 16:17:58 ACTION: Michael to slap Eric very soon 16:17:58 Created ACTION-70 - Slap Eric very soon [on Michael Hausenblas - due 2010-07-06]. 16:18:13 close ACTION-70 16:18:13 ACTION-70 Slap Eric very soon closed 16:18:43 topic: report of F2F meeting 16:19:10 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:19:10 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/06/29-rdb2rdf-minutes.html mhausenblas 16:19:25 Ashok: would have been better with more attendance, but we did what we could 16:19:53 ... started with talk by juansequeda and dan about using the appropriate terminology vis a vis ontologies etc. 16:20:06 ... action 68 records an action for them to write that up 16:20:22 ... souri introduced SQL approach: 16:20:30 ... .. 3 kinds of statements 16:20:41 ... .. .. this class can be populated with this SQL view 16:20:53 ... .. .. this *data* can be populated with this SQL view 16:21:02 ... .. .. constraint statement 16:21:20 ... we need to create a syntax and write this up as a starting point 16:21:53 ... issue: must the class be expressed? (cygri's question) 16:22:23 ... cygri discussed RDF-based approach 16:22:29 ... made some progress 16:23:00 ... RDF-based approach is really mapping SQL to a default mapping and then default to the desired ontology 16:23:34 ... some of the functionality requires SPARQL11 (still in progress) 16:23:49 ... we can translate from the SQL statement to the RDF syntax 16:24:04 Zakim, who's making noise? 16:24:10 ... if this is possible, we don't need two totally difference approaches 16:24:15 MacTed, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: mhausenblas (4%), Ashok_Malhotra (44%), angela (51%) 16:24:23 ... seemed like a good idea to me 16:24:23 Zakim, mute angela 16:24:23 angela should now be muted 16:24:30 q? 16:25:55 ... do we want to write this up? 16:26:31 ericP: not much to write; it's directMapping + perhaps some defined RIF or SPARQL functions to bi-map node transformations 16:26:51 juansequeda: dan and i chatted with Harold Boley 16:27:05 ... (of RuleML, RIF) 16:27:47 ... i think we're pretty close to done if we finish the direct mapping 16:28:10 ... the syntax needs to be done, but the semantics is all done for us 16:28:47 -soeren 16:29:08 ... given Direct_Mapping_in_RIF, we already have the semantics 16:29:27 vindication! :-) 16:29:29 +soeren 16:29:48 ... marcelo says we can write the semantics with datalog 16:30:28 cygri: of the semantics and syntax, the semantics is simple 16:30:37 ... the syntax is still hard and undone 16:31:05 ... whatever approach we come up with, the semantics should be do-able 16:31:11 q+ to propose syntax 16:31:31 juansequeda: i'd still like to create a group to write the semantics 16:31:47 ... i'll work on it with dan and marcello 16:33:05 ericP: is http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/directGraph/ insufficient? 16:33:18 cygri: folks seem to mean two things: 16:33:23 ... .. data mapping 16:33:26 Zakim, who'd making noise? 16:33:26 I don't understand your question, mhausenblas. 16:33:27 ... .. schema mapping 16:33:31 Zakim, who's making noise? 16:33:42 mhausenblas, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: soeren (42%), EricP (45%) 16:33:51 mute soeren 16:33:57 Zakim, mute soeren 16:33:57 soeren should now be muted 16:33:58 Zakim, mute soeren 16:33:58 soeren was already muted, soeren 16:34:08 ericP: how is the generated schema used? 16:34:08 sorry 16:34:23 juansequeda: it's the only source we have 16:34:53 ... when you decide something is a class, you need to make it explicit 16:35:27 ... the directGraph is insufficient 'cause it doens't include the schema 16:35:50 cygri: "insufficient" must mean insufficient for some purpose 16:36:01 ... what use cases does the data mapping not meet? 16:36:21 dan: right, we don't need the schema semantics to be expressed in OWL or RDFS 16:36:44 ... but if we're going to develop a meaning for this mapping, they must be represented 16:37:06 Zakim, unmute me 16:37:06 MacTed should no longer be muted 16:37:59 ericP: having the schema explicit is nice because it serves as documentation for querying 16:38:42 ericP: another use case could be: machines can do faceted browsing or assisted exploration of the data 16:38:56 ericP: but i believe those are secondary to creating the data mapping itself 16:39:33 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:39:33 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/06/29-rdb2rdf-minutes.html mhausenblas 16:39:42 dan: after the vendors implement the standard, we need to allow folks *not* on the committee to e.g. say "this table name appears here" 16:39:56 Without carefully going thru the high volume data (sitting in relational tables), the only other way I can think of writing a SPARQL query against that data is to look at the RDFS/OWL schema that is the basis of the data 16:41:05 ... we can't do our job without saying how an implementor will map symbols from the data to the interface 16:41:16 cygri: but that's already written down 16:41:49 dan: i'd like ericP to assert some correctness semantics 16:41:59 q? 16:42:09 ack ericP 16:42:09 ericP, you wanted to propose syntax 16:43:27 +soeren 16:43:36 +q 16:44:01 MacTed: a goal is to cross-join against e.g. SQL dbs 16:44:11 q? 16:44:16 ... is field db1.x == db2.y? 16:44:37 zakim, unmute me 16:44:37 soeren should no longer be muted 16:44:37 ack soeren 16:45:17 ... making the schema available is required to enable these cross-joins 16:46:19 ... i think the directGraph is uninteresting until we map to an interface graph 16:46:37 +1 to what soeren said 16:47:23 zakim, mute me 16:47:23 soeren should now be muted 16:48:03 q? 16:48:18 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/directGraph/ 16:48:32 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/directGraph/schema 16:48:53 second one this? http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/Direct_Mapping_in_RIF 16:48:57 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:48:57 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/06/29-rdb2rdf-minutes.html mhausenblas 16:50:24 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/directGraph/schema no longer 404s 16:51:14 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/open 16:51:31 ACTION-66? 16:51:31 ACTION-66 -- Richard Cyganiak to document issues on the SQL-based approach due July 8 -- due 2010-07-06 -- OPEN 16:51:31 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/66 16:51:37 topic: pending actions 16:52:05 cygri: per 66, souri had some slides which gave an abstraction of the sql approach 16:52:51 ... we discussed expressivity. i took an action for writing requirements for this approach 16:52:52 ACTION-67? 16:52:52 ACTION-67 -- Souripriya Das to write first draft of SQL-based approach due July 22 -- due 2010-07-06 -- OPEN 16:52:52 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/67 16:53:18 Souri: per 67, will work on the SQL-based approach draft 16:53:38 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/directGraph/Overview.xml 16:55:47 -soeren 16:56:11 ACTION-68? 16:56:11 ACTION-68 -- Juan Sequeda to write note on Ways to Leverage Ontologies due July 8 -- due 2010-07-06 -- OPEN 16:56:11 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/track/actions/68 16:56:37 juansequeda: per 68, when we utter "ontology" we mean different things 16:58:51 Topic: AOB 16:58:59 PROPOSAL: Cancel call on 6 July 2010 due to holiday week in the US 16:59:00 +1 to cancelling next week 16:59:18 +1 to cancellign 16:59:20 ericP: if i include e.g. FOAF, DCIM, uniprot, in an interface graph, do i have one ontology which includes all these other ontologies? 16:59:30 juansequeda: that will come out with the document 16:59:48 mhausenblas: how shall we proceed this summer? 16:59:57 ... i'll be gone mid-july to mid-august 17:00:10 ... make up your minds and be ready to discuss next week 17:00:21 RRSAgent, please draft minutes 17:00:21 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/06/29-rdb2rdf-minutes.html ericP 17:00:28 RRSAgent, please make log world-visible 17:00:29 -Souri 17:00:31 -mhausenblas 17:00:32 -MacTed 17:00:33 -angela 17:00:34 -Seema 17:00:34 -juansequeda 17:00:36 -Ashok_Malhotra 17:00:38 -EricP 17:00:38 SW_RDB2RDF()12:00PM has ended 17:00:40 Attendees were EricP, +3539149aaaa, mhausenblas, +49.322.222.0.aabb, +1.603.897.aacc, soeren, Seema, cygri, MacTed, nunolopes, Ashok_Malhotra, juansequeda, angela, Souri 17:00:59 thanks a lot for scribing ericP ! 17:01:07 RRSAgent, draft minutes 17:01:07 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/06/29-rdb2rdf-minutes.html mhausenblas 17:01:45 ericP, one last favour please: send out the minutes for review, yes? 17:04:16 ok, gotta run - hope you find my message here, ericP :D 17:55:58 cygri has joined #rdb2rdf 18:41:56 cygri has joined #rdb2rdf 18:58:44 Zakim has left #rdb2rdf 19:27:29 cygri_ has joined #rdb2rdf 20:28:33 cygri has joined #rdb2rdf 20:41:17 nunolopes has joined #RDB2RDF 22:01:51 cygri has joined #rdb2rdf 22:49:51 cygri has joined #rdb2rdf