IRC log of html-a11y on 2010-06-03
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 00:27:39 [MikeSmith]
- MikeSmith has joined #html-a11y
- 01:06:40 [oedipus]
- MikeSmith, rrsagent is still running - i presume it is ok to dismiss it?
- 01:07:38 [MikeSmith]
- oedipus, yep
- 01:07:45 [RRSAgent]
- I see no action items
- 15:00:29 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #html-a11y
- 15:00:29 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/06/03-html-a11y-irc
- 15:00:31 [JF_]
- Morning Jon - on my agenda is to contact you re: educause
- 15:00:31 [trackbot]
- RRSAgent, make logs world
- 15:00:31 [Zakim]
- Zakim has joined #html-a11y
- 15:00:33 [trackbot]
- Zakim, this will be 2119
- 15:00:33 [Zakim]
- ok, trackbot; I see WAI_PFWG(HTML TF)11:00AM scheduled to start now
- 15:00:34 [trackbot]
- Meeting: HTML Accessibility Task Force Teleconference
- 15:00:34 [trackbot]
- Date: 03 June 2010
- 15:00:45 [MikeSmith]
- Zakim, call Mike
- 15:00:45 [Zakim]
- ok, MikeSmith; the call is being made
- 15:00:51 [MikeSmith]
- Zakim, Mike is me
- 15:00:51 [Zakim]
- sorry, MikeSmith, I do not recognize a party named 'Mike'
- 15:01:07 [MikeSmith]
- Zakim, Mike is me
- 15:01:10 [Zakim]
- sorry, MikeSmith, I do not recognize a party named 'Mike'
- 15:01:38 [MikeSmith]
- Zakim, who is on the phone?
- 15:02:09 [Zakim]
- WAI_PFWG(HTML TF)11:00AM has not yet started, MikeSmith
- 15:02:26 [Zakim]
- On IRC I see RRSAgent, jongunderson, MikeSmith, JF_, oedipus, davidb, JF, trackbot
- 15:02:26 [oedipus]
- agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2010Jun/0010.html
- 15:03:01 [MikeSmith]
- Zakim, this will be WAI_PFWG
- 15:03:01 [Zakim]
- ok, MikeSmith, I see WAI_PFWG(HTML TF)11:00AM already started
- 15:03:05 [MikeSmith]
- Zakim, Mike is me
- 15:03:05 [Zakim]
- +MikeSmith; got it
- 15:03:34 [MikeSmith]
- agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2010Jun/0010.html
- 15:03:40 [MikeSmith]
- chair: Mike
- 15:04:35 [janina]
- janina has joined #html-a11y
- 15:05:12 [janina]
- zakim, call janina
- 15:05:12 [Zakim]
- ok, janina; the call is being made
- 15:05:14 [Zakim]
- +Janina
- 15:05:52 [Zakim]
- +??P30
- 15:06:19 [jongunderson]
- zakim, +??P30 is Jon Gunderson
- 15:06:19 [Zakim]
- I don't understand '+??P30 is Jon Gunderson', jongunderson
- 15:06:29 [jongunderson]
- zakim, +??P30 is jongunderson
- 15:06:29 [Zakim]
- sorry, jongunderson, I do not recognize a party named '+??P30'
- 15:06:37 [jongunderson]
- zakim, ??P30 is jongunderson
- 15:06:37 [Zakim]
- +jongunderson; got it
- 15:07:01 [Gez]
- Gez has joined #html-a11y
- 15:07:56 [Zakim]
- Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose jongunderson
- 15:08:12 [Zakim]
- + +1.408.307.aacc
- 15:08:25 [MikeSmith]
- scribe: jongunderson
- 15:08:36 [richardschwerdtfe]
- richardschwerdtfe has joined #html-a11y
- 15:08:41 [Zakim]
- +Michael_Cooper.a
- 15:08:42 [Zakim]
- -Michael_Cooper
- 15:09:00 [Zakim]
- +Rich
- 15:09:16 [jongunderson]
- MS: First think we want to do is check the open action items
- 15:09:21 [MichaelC]
- MichaelC has joined #html-a11y
- 15:09:30 [oedipus]
- i/MS: first think/TOPIC: Action Item Review
- 15:09:42 [MikeSmith]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/track/actions/overdue
- 15:09:48 [Marco_Ranon]
- Marco_Ranon has joined #html-a11y
- 15:09:49 [jongunderson]
- MC: I am in now I can walk the..
- 15:09:52 [jongunderson]
- MS: Ok
- 15:09:53 [Zakim]
- +??P34
- 15:10:08 [oedipus]
- action-20?
- 15:10:08 [trackbot]
- ACTION-20 -- Wendy Chisholm to work with Charles to dig up history on column element -- due 2010-06-03 -- OPEN
- 15:10:08 [trackbot]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/track/actions/20
- 15:10:12 [jongunderson]
- MC: Action 20 is on wendy
- 15:10:19 [eric_carlson]
- eric_carlson has joined #html-a11y
- 15:10:25 [jongunderson]
- MS: Wendy is not here
- 15:10:42 [jongunderson]
- MC: This is related to tables, headers I would assume
- 15:10:53 [jongunderson]
- JS: I thnk we are fairly open on it
- 15:11:03 [MichaelC]
- action-20 due 17 June
- 15:11:03 [trackbot]
- ACTION-20 Work with Charles to dig up history on column element due date now 17 June
- 15:11:04 [jongunderson]
- MC: SHould we extend the date by a few weeks
- 15:11:06 [jongunderson]
- JS: Yes
- 15:11:09 [Zakim]
- + +0207388aadd
- 15:11:11 [jongunderson]
- MC: I will extend
- 15:11:15 [Marco_Ranon]
- Sorry for the delay.
- 15:11:38 [jongunderson]
- MC: GR, MC, Cynthia and Mike have actions, but they are not due yet, they should be pinged
- 15:11:46 [jongunderson]
- MS: Is that it for open action items?
- 15:11:49 [jongunderson]
- MC: Yes
- 15:11:54 [jongunderson]
- MS: Reports from sub teams
- 15:12:06 [jongunderson]
- MS: Canvas?
- 15:12:27 [jongunderson]
- RS: I have another proposal out that address the Apple comments
- 15:12:58 [jongunderson]
- RS: One of the features from Apple for focus areas create a rectangle, none support the rectangle, so it would be more work
- 15:13:15 [jongunderson]
- RS: Some people wanted to avoid feature creep, I hope we vote on it monday
- 15:13:33 [jongunderson]
- RS: As far as CMN proposal I have not seen it, JS have you seen it?
- 15:13:37 [jongunderson]
- JS: not a thing
- 15:13:59 [jongunderson]
- RS: The canvas will not be the road blocker for HTML 5
- 15:14:12 [Zakim]
- -Matt
- 15:14:14 [oedipus]
- s/MS: Reports from sub teams/TOPIC: Sub Team Reports/
- 15:14:23 [jongunderson]
- RS:That is not a negative statement, I just know they have alot of work to do
- 15:15:04 [jongunderson]
- RS: James added additional requirements, I addressed most of them but some are not needed right now, some things were nice but not required
- 15:15:18 [jongunderson]
- MS: ARIA Mapping?
- 15:15:46 [cyns]
- cyns has joined #html-a11y
- 15:15:48 [jongunderson]
- RS: I have attended the meetings, we went through the new HTML elements like DETAILS and TIME widget
- 15:16:04 [Zakim]
- +Matt
- 15:16:39 [jongunderson]
- RS: For the 2th for the changes in the HML5 spec we will provide a second document that will provide the API mapping, alot of the AT manuafactures have not implemented all the controls
- 15:17:09 [jongunderson]
- RS: There may be problems with implementations that require chanes
- 15:17:24 [jongunderson]
- MS: It is a recursive process to refine the spec
- 15:17:39 [jongunderson]
- RS: Give that caveat we shoudl be ready by the 24
- 15:18:00 [jongunderson]
- CS: I agree, the mapping table will be in a draft form, with some introductory text
- 15:18:08 [jongunderson]
- RS: It is more than we promised to do
- 15:18:19 [oedipus]
- media minutes 2010-06-02: http://www.w3.org/2010/06/02/html-a11y-minutes.html
- 15:18:23 [oedipus]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/Media_Accessibility_Requirements
- 15:18:26 [oedipus]
- -> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/44061/20080526_media-requirements/ Review of Media Accessibility Requirements survey
- 15:18:30 [jongunderson]
- MS: Media?
- 15:18:30 [oedipus]
- -> http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/44061/20080526_media-requirements/results results of Review of Media Accessibility Requirements survey
- 15:18:51 [jongunderson]
- JF: We had a lengthy discussion about the survey and what we were trying to do
- 15:19:03 [MikeSmith]
- RRSAgent, make minutes
- 15:19:03 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/06/03-html-a11y-minutes.html MikeSmith
- 15:19:12 [jongunderson]
- JF: We were trying to get to the user requirements without the technical issues
- 15:19:15 [oedipus]
- GJR reminds others that if form too long, there is a text alternative: http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/44061/20080526_media-requirements/text
- 15:19:17 [MikeSmith]
- RRSAgent, make logs public
- 15:19:47 [jongunderson]
- JF: We really need to get the user requirements and there was not alot of response, we extended the response time to Monday
- 15:20:10 [jongunderson]
- JF: We need to get as many responses as possible
- 15:20:31 [jongunderson]
- JF: We need this infomration to make sure the technology specs will meet the user needs
- 15:21:00 [jongunderson]
- JF: There are some questions of when we use "should" and "must" in the technical specs
- 15:21:33 [jongunderson]
- JF: Some technologies cannot handle multiple streams
- 15:22:05 [jongunderson]
- JF: I encourage people to go throuh the survey it will take 30-40 minutes
- 15:22:11 [MikeSmith]
- q?
- 15:22:25 [jongunderson]
- JF: This is the primary focus, we cannot move on until we get this part done
- 15:22:41 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/06/03-html-a11y-minutes.html oedipus
- 15:22:48 [jongunderson]
- MS: I encourage people to respond, please take some time today or tomorrow to do that
- 15:23:01 [oedipus]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Jun/0007.html Copy to Clipboard - ambush and abuse by javascript (post to www-tag by Tim Berners-Lee)
- 15:23:03 [jongunderson]
- MS: We have Gez today to talk about Drag and Drop
- 15:23:13 [jongunderson]
- MS: I will post some links on the subject
- 15:23:28 [oedipus]
- i/MS: We have Gez/TOPIC: Drag and Drop/
- 15:23:47 [oedipus]
- compare: http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/aria-practices/#dragdrop to http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/dnd.html#dnd
- 15:23:48 [jongunderson]
- Gez: I would like to compare HTML5 and ARIA, there are three issues, 2 trival and one serious
- 15:23:57 [MikeSmith]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2010May/0179.html HTML5 Drag and Drop Model (summary from Gez)
- 15:24:05 [MikeSmith]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2010May/0179.html
- 15:24:37 [jongunderson]
- Gez: Difference is include information on whether something is being dragged, it is relatively straight forward to add to HTML 5
- 15:24:52 [oedipus]
- i/MS: First think/TOPIC: Action Item Review/
- 15:25:01 [MikeSmith]
- -> http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/aria-practices/#dragdrop WAI-ARIA Authoring Practices: Drag-and-Drop Support
- 15:25:16 [jongunderson]
- Gez: The Drop effect attribute, in HTML5 does not have values "execute" and "popup"
- 15:25:18 [MikeSmith]
- http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/aria-practices/#dragdrop
- 15:25:34 [oedipus]
- verbiage currently in HTML5 draft: "On media without a pointing device, the user would probably have to explicitly indicate his intention to perform a drag-and-drop operation, stating what he wishes to drag and what he wishes to drop, respectively."
- 15:25:42 [jongunderson]
- Gez: These have more to do with functionality than accessibility
- 15:26:29 [jongunderson]
- Gez: i was not able to make a drag and drop example in a way that the browser new was going on, maybe it is a browser implementation issue
- 15:26:30 [MikeSmith]
- -> http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/dnd.html "Drag and drop" section of HTML5 spec
- 15:27:26 [jongunderson]
- Gez: Couple of events that are needed for "mouseover" keyboard, if they were implemented as keyboard you would be thinking "onfocus"
- 15:27:47 [jongunderson]
- Gez: Earlier on in discussion there was talk about "copy and Paste" function
- 15:28:03 [oedipus]
- -> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010Jun/0007.html Copy to Clipboard - ambush and abuse by javascript (post to www-tag by Tim Berners-Lee)
- 15:28:04 [jongunderson]
- Gez: What is the effect of the paste
- 15:28:24 [MikeSmith]
- q?
- 15:28:27 [jongunderson]
- Gez: I am not sure why it was reoved from the spec
- 15:28:52 [JF_]
- (JF thinks re-adding Copy and Paste API would be a good thing...)
- 15:29:05 [jongunderson]
- Gez: the end of this it would be good, for there would be a group of people to come up with a recommendation on an input device independent way
- 15:29:30 [jongunderson]
- Gez: Anyone with experience with drag and drop, we could get together and come up with a set of recomendations
- 15:29:49 [jongunderson]
- MS: Ok, so, is there anyone on the call who could help Gez with this?
- 15:30:10 [oedipus]
- -> http://www.w3.org/TR/clipboard-apis/ Clipboard Operations for the Web: Copy Paste and Drag and Drop (November 2008)
- 15:30:20 [jongunderson]
- Gez: If we could use the paste function we could use the drop effect
- 15:30:47 [jongunderson]
- RS: The popup is going tobe really important, if you need to make a decision
- 15:31:34 [jongunderson]
- RS: Some of the functions were only available using th emouse, will there be any visible indication when people are using the keyboard
- 15:32:21 [jongunderson]
- Gez: There are certain events that allow you to do this, but not with the keyboard, the drag over needs a keyboard equivalent, ....
- 15:32:52 [jongunderson]
- RS: Sounds like you want the ability to trigger the drag over
- 15:33:01 [jongunderson]
- RS: What are you thinking?
- 15:33:33 [oedipus]
- regrets: Jim Allan, Denis Boudreau, Kelly Ford, Ben Caldwell, Martin Kliehm, Silvia Pfeiffer, Leif
- 15:33:46 [jongunderson]
- Gez: If we have the equivalent of a copy and paste; I don't understand the drag over event, you might update things as you drag over an area
- 15:34:15 [jongunderson]
- Gez: My main concern is this "dragover" event, why does a developer need to do that?
- 15:34:37 [jongunderson]
- CS: What about a sighted user, so you know where to drop something
- 15:34:59 [jongunderson]
- Gez: That does make sense, but if you were a keyboard user you would gather your thoughts....
- 15:35:13 [jongunderson]
- Gez: You will never really raise that event with the keyboartd
- 15:35:53 [jongunderson]
- MS: I am wondering if it woul dmake sense to post a message to the HTML5 working group to get clarification on the usage of these events
- 15:36:02 [jongunderson]
- Gez: I think that is a good next plan
- 15:36:22 [jongunderson]
- RS We talked about using the clip board, what about moving by reference
- 15:36:41 [jongunderson]
- Gez: that would be the result of sepecting the target, like in ARIA
- 15:37:05 [jongunderson]
- RS: It sounds like there are some implementation issues or the use of ARIA to supplement
- 15:37:23 [jongunderson]
- RS: DO you want to use ARIA or get HTML5 integration
- 15:37:27 [oedipus]
- plus 1 to solve natively and not use ARIA to plug hole (ARIA should be used only when hole cannot be plugged natively)
- 15:37:53 [jongunderson]
- Gez: there is not that much that needs to be added to HTML 5, the way it is currently setup is using the mouse
- 15:38:20 [jongunderson]
- Gez; the current spec is very complicated to use drag and drop
- 15:38:45 [jongunderson]
- RS: There is an action item on how to do this with a keyboard
- 15:39:02 [jongunderson]
- RS: If we identify holes we can take them back to the HTML 5 working group
- 15:39:22 [jongunderson]
- RS: The mousedrag over needs to be done with the keyboard, this is a show stopper
- 15:40:02 [jongunderson]
- Gez: All of the events do not specify the input device, but the dragover seems like it can only be done with the keyboard
- 15:40:27 [MikeSmith]
- RRSAgent, make minuted
- 15:40:27 [RRSAgent]
- I'm logging. I don't understand 'make minuted', MikeSmith. Try /msg RRSAgent help
- 15:40:29 [MikeSmith]
- RRSAgent, make minutes
- 15:40:29 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/06/03-html-a11y-minutes.html MikeSmith
- 15:40:42 [jongunderson]
- RS: It sounds like you want a navigate too function, if you can write up how a browser manufacture could do this and identify the holes
- 15:40:49 [jongunderson]
- Gez: that makes sense
- 15:41:06 [jongunderson]
- Gez: That sounds like a good plan, is there a deadline
- 15:41:17 [jongunderson]
- MS: We do not have an issue int he HTML 5 tracker
- 15:41:36 [jongunderson]
- MS: We have been driving this from the task force side, there is not HTML5 deadline
- 15:41:49 [jongunderson]
- MC: We have inforstate, we have not provided
- 15:42:04 [jongunderson]
- RS: Tehy are asking us for how do you make this accessible with the keyboard
- 15:42:39 [oedipus]
- a really big thanks to Gez for herding these cats for the TF!
- 15:42:39 [jongunderson]
- MS: there is not hard dealine, but there is a sense an urgency, we would like to have this resolved before last call, how about 3 weeks
- 15:42:43 [jongunderson]
- Gez: I will try
- 15:43:15 [jongunderson]
- MS: Is there any help you need form the task force? We can send a message out to try to get you some help and what you need.
- 15:43:29 [jongunderson]
- Gez: I would appreciate some help if someone can
- 15:43:42 [jongunderson]
- MS: JS and MC?
- 15:44:08 [jongunderson]
- JS: I think this has been a useful discussion, it does not seem we are ready to write a change propsoal
- 15:44:22 [jongunderson]
- MS: Gez will be drafting the change proposal
- 15:44:33 [jongunderson]
- JS: Thank you Gez for coming to this call
- 15:44:44 [jongunderson]
- Gez: Your welcome
- 15:45:17 [jongunderson]
- MS: Every week laurie sends out a report on resolved and rejected bugs, we usually do not have time to review
- 15:45:38 [MikeSmith]
- Topic: triage of Weekly Resolved & Rejected Bugs Report
- 15:45:50 [MikeSmith]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2010May/0205.html
- 15:46:26 [jongunderson]
- MS: Is there anyone willing to help with triage before this meeting to see what is a priority for the group to discuss
- 15:47:04 [jongunderson]
- MS: What we can try to do today and see what we should take actio on
- 15:48:04 [jongunderson]
- MS: I think we should add the task force keyword?
- 15:48:08 [MikeSmith]
- http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9817
- 15:48:15 [jongunderson]
- MC: I am still trying to get oriented to the bugs
- 15:48:29 [MikeSmith]
- bug from Rich: Details element Focus problem
- 15:48:32 [jongunderson]
- MS: One by RS about the process for dealing with these types of issues
- 15:48:45 [jongunderson]
- MS: A11YTF with out an underscore
- 15:49:11 [oedipus]
- s/MS: Every week laurie/MS: MS: Every week Laura/
- 15:49:16 [jongunderson]
- MC: The other thing to do is to put the Task force ont he CC list
- 15:49:41 [jongunderson]
- MS: I am not sure what 9804 is about
- 15:49:50 [MikeSmith]
- http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=9775
- 15:49:56 [jongunderson]
- MS: 9975
- 15:50:06 [oedipus]
- SteveF to file bug on problem reported in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2010Jun/0023.html
- 15:50:51 [jongunderson]
- JF: The next 3 are all related 9773, 9774 9775. These are more like question, we do not really have answers
- 15:51:02 [MichaelC]
- looks like the task force email was already added to these bugs; so we just have to mark a11ytf keyword on the ones we're tracking
- 15:51:22 [MichaelC]
- note, I think we shouldn't have the task force email on bugs until they get the a11ytf
- 15:51:27 [jongunderson]
- JF: What is the difference between sub tiltes and captions? There are differences, but not usually from the technology perspective.
- 15:52:10 [jongunderson]
- MS: My inclination on these is to get a response from hixy, it seems like they are more clarification that substantive issues
- 15:52:53 [jongunderson]
- JF: I don't have an objection, 9773 is been viewed as a technical question, but I am not sure it is, I will keep track of them
- 15:53:16 [oedipus]
- q+ to ask if we are actually planning on following up on Paul Cotton's idea that we file a bug against the HTML5 spec asking that -- where accessibility features have been removed or for which superior replacements have not yet been identified -- the a11y features of HTML 4.01 be restored
- 15:53:22 [jongunderson]
- JS: I think the media sub group could discuss the merits to have separate tracks for captions and sub titltes
- 15:53:49 [jongunderson]
- JF: We are talking about deinitiions, and not just technical
- 15:54:23 [jongunderson]
- JF: Some of the questions need to clarify the technical and definitional issues of the issue
- 15:54:45 [jongunderson]
- JS: The last one is a concern from an alanog broadcast medium, thats legacy
- 15:54:58 [jongunderson]
- MS: This is something the media sub grou can keep track of
- 15:55:25 [jongunderson]
- JS: Maybe it does get the A11YTF keyboard there
- 15:55:38 [jongunderson]
- MS: They already have the media keyboard
- 15:55:59 [jongunderson]
- MC: We should also have the TF keyboard even if it is being worked in the sub groups
- 15:56:09 [jongunderson]
- MS: Add the TF to the three issues
- 15:56:14 [oedipus]
- q?
- 15:56:45 [jongunderson]
- MSL There is another issue that Laurie identified, we had a discussion a couple months ago about adding that keyboard
- 15:57:14 [MikeSmith]
- ack oedipus
- 15:57:14 [Zakim]
- oedipus, you wanted to ask if we are actually planning on following up on Paul Cotton's idea that we file a bug against the HTML5 spec asking that -- where accessibility features
- 15:57:15 [oedipus]
- if we are planning on following up on Paul Cotton's idea that we file a bug against the HTML5 spec asking that -- where accessibility features have been removed or for which superior replacements have not yet been identified -- the a11y features of HTML 4.01 be restored: should it happen before or after heartbeat draft published?
- 15:57:17 [Zakim]
- ... have been removed or for which superior replacements have not yet been identified -- the a11y features of HTML 4.01 be restored
- 15:57:18 [jongunderson]
- MS: I am not sure it is something we need to do in marking, I am not sure we should let anyone add the keyboard
- 15:57:53 [jongunderson]
- GR: I have a strategic question, that accessibility HTML 4.01 features should be restored ...
- 15:58:13 [jongunderson]
- MS: Unless we are asking for a delay, we will have to waite until after
- 15:58:24 [JF_]
- +1 to that Greg
- 15:58:51 [jongunderson]
- GR: I want this as a safety net back in, i will do some more work on this and have "this should be retained until"
- 15:59:01 [jongunderson]
- MS: That owuld be good to have on the wiki
- 15:59:10 [MichaelC]
- q+ to say TF members can recommend bugs we take on formally, but +1 to MS that we need a group decision to do so
- 15:59:40 [jongunderson]
- JF: The use of the A11YTF keyboard maybe we should do this part in our weekly calls, make this part of the weekly call, right after actin items
- 15:59:50 [MikeSmith]
- ack MichaelC
- 15:59:50 [Zakim]
- MichaelC, you wanted to say TF members can recommend bugs we take on formally, but +1 to MS that we need a group decision to do so
- 16:00:16 [jongunderson]
- JF: the keyword is applied in the weekly call, we have clear an open forum, peple who have an issue can join the call
- 16:00:37 [jongunderson]
- MS: We could also do this on the mailing list, JS and I could send a message to the list serv
- 16:01:09 [jongunderson]
- MC: I think it is a good thing to formally adopt and issue, people should vote for bugs
- 16:01:26 [jongunderson]
- MS: That is as much we can do for today, any other business
- 16:01:35 [jongunderson]
- MS: We are on for next week at the same time
- 16:01:50 [jongunderson]
- MS: ANy voluneteers to scribe next week
- 16:02:02 [Zakim]
- -Matt
- 16:02:03 [MikeSmith]
- [adjourned]
- 16:02:04 [Zakim]
- - +1.650.862.aaaa
- 16:02:05 [Zakim]
- - +1.408.307.aacc
- 16:02:07 [Zakim]
- -Janina
- 16:02:07 [MikeSmith]
- Zakim, drop Mike
- 16:02:08 [Zakim]
- MikeSmith is being disconnected
- 16:02:08 [Zakim]
- -Gregory_Rosmaita
- 16:02:09 [Zakim]
- - +67079aabb
- 16:02:09 [Zakim]
- -MikeSmith
- 16:02:11 [janina]
- janina has left #html-a11y
- 16:02:13 [Zakim]
- -Rich
- 16:02:17 [Zakim]
- - +0207388aadd
- 16:02:19 [Zakim]
- -??P34
- 16:02:21 [Zakim]
- -Michael_Cooper.a
- 16:02:29 [Zakim]
- -jongunderson
- 16:02:31 [Zakim]
- WAI_PFWG(HTML TF)11:00AM has ended
- 16:02:33 [Zakim]
- Attendees were +1.650.862.aaaa, +67079aabb, Gregory_Rosmaita, Matt, Michael_Cooper, MikeSmith, Janina, jongunderson, +1.408.307.aacc, Rich, +0207388aadd
- 16:02:50 [JF_]
- JF_ has left #html-a11y
- 16:03:01 [jongunderson]
- rrsagent
- 16:03:06 [jongunderson]
- ,
- 16:03:14 [jongunderson]
- rrsagent, make minutes
- 16:03:14 [RRSAgent]
- I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/06/03-html-a11y-minutes.html jongunderson
- 16:04:58 [Laura]
- Laura has joined #html-a11y
- 16:31:08 [Zakim]
- Zakim has left #html-a11y
- 16:31:25 [RRSAgent]
- I see no action items