IRC log of sparql on 2010-05-25
Timestamps are in UTC.
- 13:54:35 [RRSAgent]
- RRSAgent has joined #sparql
- 13:54:35 [RRSAgent]
- logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/05/25-sparql-irc
- 13:54:51 [AxelPolleres]
- Zakim, this will be sparql
- 13:54:51 [Zakim]
- ok, AxelPolleres, I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM already started
- 13:55:03 [AndyS]
- bglimm, APIs may let you build queries in other ways.
- 13:55:15 [dcharbon2]
- dcharbon2 has joined #sparql
- 13:55:30 [kasei]
- bglimm, early
- 13:55:39 [bglimm]
- ah, ok, but I don't care about that ;-) I only care about what the spec says
- 13:56:24 [AxelPolleres]
- agenda: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-05-25
- 13:56:29 [AxelPolleres]
- chair: Axel Polleres
- 13:56:39 [NickHumfrey]
- zakim, who's muted?
- 13:56:39 [Zakim]
- I see NickHumfrey muted
- 13:56:56 [AxelPolleres]
- regrets: Sandro, chime
- 13:57:09 [Zakim]
- + +86528aaaa
- 13:57:10 [pgearon]
- pgearon has joined #sparql
- 13:57:11 [AxelPolleres]
- at risk: Alex, Paul
- 13:57:18 [bglimm]
- Zakim, +86528aaaa is me
- 13:57:18 [Zakim]
- +bglimm; got it
- 13:57:26 [bglimm]
- Zakim, mute me
- 13:57:26 [Zakim]
- bglimm should now be muted
- 13:58:12 [Zakim]
- +AxelPolleres
- 13:58:22 [Zakim]
- +pgearon
- 13:58:28 [AxelPolleres]
- Zakim, who is on the phone?
- 13:58:28 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see NickHumfrey (muted), AndyS, Ivan, bglimm (muted), AxelPolleres, pgearon
- 13:58:39 [AxelPolleres]
- welcome, Nick!
- 13:58:46 [MattPerry]
- MattPerry has joined #sparql
- 13:59:01 [Zakim]
- +kasei
- 13:59:13 [kasei]
- Zakim, mute me
- 13:59:13 [Zakim]
- kasei should now be muted
- 13:59:35 [SteveH_]
- SteveH_ has joined #sparql
- 14:00:04 [Zakim]
- +MattPerry
- 14:00:27 [AxelPolleres]
- Zakim, who is on the phone?
- 14:00:27 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see NickHumfrey, AndyS, Ivan, bglimm (muted), AxelPolleres, pgearon, kasei (muted), MattPerry
- 14:00:33 [Zakim]
- +OlivierCorby
- 14:00:41 [Zakim]
- +dcharbon2
- 14:01:19 [Zakim]
- +mischat
- 14:01:29 [SteveH]
- Zakim, mischat is [Garlik]
- 14:01:29 [Zakim]
- +[Garlik]; got it
- 14:01:38 [SteveH]
- Zakim, [Garlik] is temporarily SteveH
- 14:01:38 [Zakim]
- +SteveH; got it
- 14:01:43 [AndyS]
- I can scribe.
- 14:02:06 [AndyS]
- but I'll let Steve if he wants to :-)
- 14:02:14 [AndyS]
- scribe: Andy Seaborne
- 14:02:20 [AndyS]
- scribenick: AndyS
- 14:02:21 [AxelPolleres]
- scribe: AndyS
- 14:02:37 [Zakim]
- +souri
- 14:02:43 [AxelPolleres]
- scribe next tim sandro
- 14:02:50 [AndyS]
- Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-05-25
- 14:02:56 [souri]
- souri has joined #sparql
- 14:03:01 [AndyS]
- zakim, who is on the phone?
- 14:03:01 [Zakim]
- On the phone I see NickHumfrey, AndyS, Ivan, bglimm (muted), AxelPolleres, pgearon, kasei (muted), MattPerry, OlivierCorby, dcharbon2, SteveH, souri
- 14:03:05 [Zakim]
- +Lee_Feigenbaum
- 14:03:07 [AxelPolleres]
- PROPOSED: approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-05-18
- 14:03:22 [AndyS]
- Regrets: chimezie, sandro
- 14:03:41 [AxelPolleres]
- RESOLVED: approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-05-18
- 14:03:44 [AndyS]
- regrets: +AlexPassant
- 14:03:56 [AndyS]
- Next meeting: 1 June
- 14:04:08 [ivan]
- me
- 14:04:08 [pgearon]
- I'll be there
- 14:04:10 [LeeF]
- me
- 14:04:11 [MattPerry]
- I will be there
- 14:04:12 [SteveH]
- I'm not going
- 14:04:16 [AndyS]
- Regrets for next time: AndyS (unless it's raining a lot)
- 14:04:16 [LeeF]
- Would like to know who can make the panel, in particular
- 14:04:23 [souri]
- me too
- 14:04:23 [bglimm]
- I'm not going
- 14:04:24 [AndyS]
- AndyS @semtech
- 14:04:24 [AxelPolleres]
- me unfotrunately not going
- 14:05:24 [LeeF]
- 2pm on Wednesday
- 14:05:31 [AxelPolleres]
- must be somewhere tthere: http://www.semantic-conference.com/2010/
- 14:05:36 [LeeF]
- Right now it says:
- 14:05:37 [LeeF]
- Lee Feigenbaum, Cambridge Semantics Inc
- 14:05:37 [LeeF]
- Andy Seaborne, Talis
- 14:05:37 [LeeF]
- David S. Newman, Wells Fargo
- 14:05:37 [LeeF]
- Ivan Herman, World Wide Web Consortium
- 14:05:37 [LeeF]
- Paul Gearon, Fedora Commons, Inc
- 14:05:47 [LeeF]
- I'll check with David, who hasn't participated in a while
- 14:06:10 [LeeF]
- I'll add Souri & Matt if you'd like to join the panel?
- 14:06:30 [MattPerry]
- Sure. Thanks Lee
- 14:06:31 [souri]
- sure
- 14:06:37 [LeeF]
- thanks
- 14:06:53 [AxelPolleres]
- http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Comments
- 14:07:21 [AxelPolleres]
- topic: liaisons
- 14:07:57 [AndyS]
- http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/use-cases/
- 14:08:05 [AxelPolleres]
- RDB2RDF docs probably next week published
- 14:08:35 [AndyS]
- Topic:Publishing documents
- 14:09:02 [LeeF]
- I'll let people know if I need anything from them
- 14:09:03 [AndyS]
- LeeF: working on publishing docs
- 14:09:08 [LeeF]
- ack me
- 14:09:40 [bglimm]
- We also didn't decide on the entailments doc yet if I remeber correctly
- 14:09:42 [AndyS]
- LeeF: need to resolve to publish the update doc as there have been changes
- 14:09:57 [bglimm]
- Zakim, unmute me
- 14:09:58 [Zakim]
- bglimm should no longer be muted
- 14:10:05 [AndyS]
- s/update doc/update language doc/
- 14:10:14 [bglimm]
- Zakim, mute me
- 14:10:14 [Zakim]
- bglimm should now be muted
- 14:10:35 [AxelPolleres]
- PROPOSED: Publish SPARQL 1.1 Update as a Working Draft
- 14:10:45 [LeeF]
- Seconded
- 14:10:46 [bglimm]
- +1
- 14:10:46 [AxelPolleres]
- +1
- 14:10:47 [ivan]
- 1
- 14:10:53 [souri]
- +1
- 14:10:53 [MattPerry]
- +1
- 14:10:54 [OlivierCorby]
- +1
- 14:10:59 [AndyS]
- +1
- 14:11:13 [NickHumfrey]
- +1
- 14:11:31 [pgearon]
- SPARQL 1.1 Update Revision 1.47
- 14:11:33 [AxelPolleres]
- RESOLVED: Publish SPARQL 1.1 Update as a Working Draft
- 14:11:46 [bglimm]
- Zakim, unmute me
- 14:11:46 [Zakim]
- bglimm should no longer be muted
- 14:11:49 [AndyS]
- Entailment doc.
- 14:12:07 [AndyS]
- bglimm: some changes this week, ready to go
- 14:12:10 [bglimm]
- Zakim, mute me
- 14:12:10 [Zakim]
- bglimm should now be muted
- 14:12:10 [AxelPolleres]
- PROPOSED: Publish SPARQL 1.1 Entailment as a Working Draft
- 14:12:14 [bglimm]
- +1
- 14:12:18 [AxelPolleres]
- +1
- 14:12:19 [pgearon]
- +1
- 14:12:21 [OlivierCorby]
- +1
- 14:12:22 [souri]
- +1
- 14:12:24 [NickHumfrey]
- +1
- 14:12:26 [MattPerry]
- +1
- 14:12:31 [ivan]
- +1
- 14:12:39 [AxelPolleres]
- RESOLVED: Publish SPARQL 1.1 Entailment as a Working Draft
- 14:13:58 [AndyS]
- Topic: More Admin
- 14:14:20 [AndyS]
- AxelPolleres: Welcome to Nick Humfrey of the BBC
- 14:14:49 [AndyS]
- NickHumfrey: music, /progammes, DBPedia.
- 14:15:15 [AndyS]
- ... here to see what the WG is up and how it would fit in the BBC.
- 14:15:37 [AndyS]
- Topic: Lee's Initial Issues List
- 14:15:41 [AxelPolleres]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010AprJun/0166.html
- 14:16:21 [AxelPolleres]
- PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-8 with the consensus that subqueries share the same RDF dataset as their parent query, and that FROM and FROM NAMED clauses are not permitted in subqueries.
- 14:16:35 [souri]
- +1
- 14:16:41 [AxelPolleres]
- http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/8
- 14:17:36 [SteveH]
- +1
- 14:17:44 [kasei]
- +1
- 14:17:46 [AxelPolleres]
- +1
- 14:17:46 [MattPerry]
- +1
- 14:17:46 [AndyS]
- +1
- 14:17:47 [bglimm]
- +1
- 14:17:52 [OlivierCorby]
- +1
- 14:18:00 [ivan]
- +1
- 14:18:02 [AxelPolleres]
- RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-8 with the consensus that subqueries share the same RDF dataset as their parent query, and that FROM and FROM NAMED clauses are not permitted in subqueries.
- 14:18:12 [LeeF]
- trackbot, close ISSUE-8
- 14:18:12 [trackbot]
- ISSUE-8 What determines the RDF dataset for subqueries? closed
- 14:18:29 [LeeF]
- ISSUE-8: RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-8 with the consensus that subqueries share the same RDF dataset as their parent query, and that FROM and FROM NAMED clauses are not permitted in subqueries.
- 14:18:29 [trackbot]
- ISSUE-8 What determines the RDF dataset for subqueries? notes added
- 14:18:44 [AxelPolleres]
- PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-14 with the consensus that SPARQL 1.1 defines the following aggregates: COUNT, SUM, MIN, MAX, AVG, GROUP_CONCAT, and SAMPLE.
- 14:19:00 [SteveH]
- +1
- 14:19:01 [kasei]
- +1
- 14:19:04 [MattPerry]
- +1
- 14:19:05 [AxelPolleres]
- +1
- 14:19:08 [OlivierCorby]
- +1
- 14:19:10 [dcharbon2]
- +1
- 14:19:12 [souri]
- +1
- 14:19:13 [pgearon]
- +1
- 14:19:17 [ivan]
- 1
- 14:19:20 [AndyS]
- (and custom aggregates)
- 14:19:24 [bglimm]
- +1
- 14:19:56 [AxelPolleres]
- RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-14 with the consensus that SPARQL 1.1 defines the following aggregates: COUNT, SUM, MIN, MAX, AVG, GROUP_CONCAT, and SAMPLE
- 14:20:04 [LeeF]
- ISSUE-14: RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-14 with the consensus that SPARQL 1.1 defines the following aggregates: COUNT, SUM, MIN, MAX, AVG, GROUP_CONCAT, and SAMPLE
- 14:20:05 [trackbot]
- ISSUE-14 Which aggregates to include notes added
- 14:20:08 [LeeF]
- trackbot, close ISSUE-14
- 14:20:08 [trackbot]
- ISSUE-14 Which aggregates to include closed
- 14:21:01 [AxelPolleres]
- http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/1
- 14:22:02 [AxelPolleres]
- ISSUE-15 -- I think we have consensus here around custom aggregate
- 14:22:03 [AxelPolleres]
- snamed with URIs, with no keywords, allowing the DISTINCT modifier, and
- 14:22:03 [AxelPolleres]
- allowing the parameterized syntax introduced for GROUP_CONCAT, but I'm
- 14:22:03 [AxelPolleres]
- not positve and don't see this spelled out yet in the editor's draft, so
- 14:22:03 [AxelPolleres]
- didn't want to propose to resolve the issue yet.
- 14:22:35 [AndyS]
- q+
- 14:22:54 [kasei]
- I think that was Nicholas when he joined the call.
- 14:22:59 [AxelPolleres]
- ack AndyS
- 14:23:41 [SteveH]
- q+
- 14:23:45 [LeeF]
- ack ??P0
- 14:24:29 [NickHumfrey]
- queue-
- 14:24:35 [AxelPolleres]
- AndyS: rather would go for simple spolution not allowing parameterised syntax in custom aggregates
- 14:24:44 [NickHumfrey]
- queue- ?P0
- 14:24:44 [AxelPolleres]
- ack SteveH
- 14:25:09 [AxelPolleres]
- SteveH: seconded what Steve said
- 14:25:10 [SteveH]
- loud typing noise
- 14:25:11 [AndyS]
- SteveH: agree - complexity is not justified
- 14:25:18 [NickHumfrey]
- arg - sorry. Yes, P0 was me. Trying to learn all this!
- 14:25:36 [LeeF]
- not me!
- 14:26:00 [AxelPolleres]
- strawpoll: prohibit parameterised syntax for custom aggregates?
- 14:26:07 [kasei]
- 0
- 14:26:09 [AndyS]
- AxelPolleres: anyone in favour of named parameters to custom aggregates?
- 14:26:13 [souri]
- +1
- 14:26:20 [AndyS]
- prohibit
- 14:26:23 [OlivierCorby]
- 0
- 14:26:25 [pgearon]
- prohibit
- 14:26:29 [SteveH]
- prohibit
- 14:26:31 [MattPerry]
- prohibit
- 14:26:36 [pgearon]
- +1
- 14:26:37 [NickHumfrey]
- prohibit
- 14:26:38 [souri]
- prohibit
- 14:26:40 [bglimm]
- prohibit
- 14:28:16 [AxelPolleres]
- PROPOSED: close ISSUE-15 with consensus around custom aggregates named with URIs, with no keywords, allowing the DISTINCT modifier, and disallowing the parameterized syntax introduced for GROUP_CONCAT for custom aggregates
- 14:28:34 [SteveH]
- +1
- 14:28:38 [MattPerry]
- +1
- 14:28:43 [bglimm]
- +1
- 14:28:46 [AndyS]
- +1
- 14:28:50 [OlivierCorby]
- +1
- 14:28:55 [NickHumfrey]
- +1
- 14:28:56 [dcharbon2]
- +1
- 14:28:57 [souri]
- +1
- 14:28:59 [pgearon]
- +1
- 14:29:17 [AxelPolleres]
- RESOLVED: close ISSUE-15 with consensus around custom aggregates named with URIs, with no keywords, allowing the DISTINCT modifier, and disallowing the parameterized syntax introduced for GROUP_CONCAT for custom aggregates
- 14:29:27 [AxelPolleres]
- trackbot, close ISSUE-15
- 14:29:27 [trackbot]
- ISSUE-15 Extensibility of aggregate functions closed
- 14:30:03 [AxelPolleres]
- http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/16
- 14:30:04 [AndyS]
- http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/16 : Dealing with aggregates over mixed datatypes
- 14:31:44 [kasei]
- so what is the current status right now?
- 14:31:50 [kasei]
- undefined over mixed datatypes?
- 14:32:11 [LeeF]
- I want to close this, but I would like to understand what's in the document currently, too
- 14:33:09 [SteveH]
- +1 to AndyS
- 14:33:12 [AxelPolleres]
- may be safer to keep the issue open until steve went over the last f2f resolutions with scrutinity
- 14:33:31 [AndyS]
- AndyS: will want to discuss presentation of design *after* the next publication.
- 14:34:18 [AndyS]
- LeeF: Next step is what?
- 14:34:29 [AndyS]
- SteveH: examples to add
- 14:35:22 [AxelPolleres]
- ACTION: steveh to give examples that highlight possible ambiguities in the resolutions from last f2f concerning ISSUE-16
- 14:35:22 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-247 - Give examples that highlight possible ambiguities in the resolutions from last f2f concerning ISSUE-16 [on Steve Harris - due 2010-06-01].
- 14:36:01 [AndyS]
- Topic: Issues and Scedule
- 14:36:08 [AndyS]
- Topic: Issues and Schedule
- 14:36:24 [AndyS]
- Property path telecon on Thursday
- 14:37:03 [AndyS]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010AprJun/0243.html
- 14:37:16 [LeeF]
- I need to reserve zakim
- 14:37:21 [LeeF]
- ivan, can you help with that?
- 14:37:28 [AndyS]
- 10:00am EDT / 15:00 GMTDT for up to 2 hours
- 14:37:42 [AxelPolleres]
- ACTION: leef to reserve zakim for property path TC
- 14:37:42 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-248 - Reserve zakim for property path TC [on Lee Feigenbaum - due 2010-06-01].
- 14:37:43 [ivan]
- you can do it ad hoc, but I can also send a request if you want
- 14:37:43 [AndyS]
- Can we just use this channel?
- 14:37:57 [LeeF]
- yes, let's use #sparql like normal
- 14:38:14 [ivan]
- '' /invite zakim; zakim, space for 10? "
- 14:39:10 [AxelPolleres]
- + "/invite rrsagent"
- 14:40:24 [AxelPolleres]
- ACTION: axel to check back with Lee on how/when to schedule theother special TCs
- 14:40:24 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-249 - Check back with Lee on how/when to schedule theother special TCs [on Axel Polleres - due 2010-06-01].
- 14:41:20 [AxelPolleres]
- topic: http-update-protocol issue
- 14:41:23 [AxelPolleres]
- http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010AprJun/0238.html
- 14:41:27 [AndyS]
- Topic: discussion on http-update-protocol.
- 14:41:44 [AndyS]
- AxelPolleres: issue is base URI in updates
- 14:42:28 [AxelPolleres]
- "In situations where there is no Base URI in the payload and a graph IRI is
- 14:42:28 [AxelPolleres]
- embedded, the RDF document that represents [AWWW] the networked RDF
- 14:42:28 [AxelPolleres]
- knowledge identified by the embedded graph IRI SHOULD be considered the
- 14:42:28 [AxelPolleres]
- retrieval context (5.1.2) [RFC3986]. Thus, the default base URI is the base
- 14:42:29 [AxelPolleres]
- URI of that RDF document."
- 14:43:10 [AndyS]
- I would need examples to understand that.
- 14:43:15 [SteveH]
- me too
- 14:44:29 [pgearon]
- +q
- 14:44:42 [pgearon]
- http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/37
- 14:44:46 [AndyS]
- pgearon: Issue 37
- 14:45:02 [AndyS]
- Issue 37 : How does basic federated query interact with SPARQL/Update?
- 14:45:03 [AxelPolleres]
- "How does basic federated query interact with SPARQL/Update?"
- 14:45:39 [pgearon]
- "SPARQL/Update allows the use of SERVICE in the WHERE clause"
- 14:45:48 [SteveH]
- typing noise
- 14:45:49 [AndyS]
- pgearon: can allow in the graph pattern, but should not also do federated change
- 14:46:22 [AndyS]
- Fine in intent.
- 14:46:29 [SteveH]
- q+
- 14:46:33 [AndyS]
- But not in DELETE WHERE please :-)
- 14:46:36 [pgearon]
- q-
- 14:48:22 [AndyS]
- SteveH: complicated case : update calls back to same service
- 14:49:29 [pgearon]
- +1 to allow everything in the WHERE clause that is allowed in SPARQL 1.1
- 14:50:24 [AxelPolleres]
- ACTION: steveh to take the discussion on SERVICE in Update to email, highlighting potential problem cases
- 14:50:24 [trackbot]
- Created ACTION-250 - Take the discussion on SERVICE in Update to email, highlighting potential problem cases [on Steve Harris - due 2010-06-01].
- 14:51:11 [AndyS]
- Chair: Any other business?
- 14:51:26 [AndyS]
- Adjourned
- 14:51:32 [Zakim]
- -SteveH
- 14:51:32 [bglimm]
- bye
- 14:51:33 [ivan]
- zakim, drop me
- 14:51:33 [Zakim]
- Ivan is being disconnected
- 14:51:33 [Zakim]
- -dcharbon2
- 14:51:35 [Zakim]
- -Ivan
- 14:51:36 [MattPerry]
- bye
- 14:51:37 [Zakim]
- -AxelPolleres
- 14:51:38 [Zakim]
- -souri
- 14:51:40 [Zakim]
- -kasei
- 14:51:41 [Zakim]
- -pgearon
- 14:51:42 [Zakim]
- -OlivierCorby
- 14:51:43 [Zakim]
- -MattPerry
- 14:51:47 [AndyS]
- Please remember the property path call on Thursday.
- 14:51:47 [Zakim]
- -NickHumfrey
- 14:51:53 [AxelPolleres]
- rrsagent, make records public
- 14:51:56 [pgearon]
- pgearon has left #sparql
- 14:51:56 [Zakim]
- -Lee_Feigenbaum
- 14:52:07 [Zakim]
- -AndyS
- 14:52:14 [AxelPolleres]
- andyS, minutes magic... u or me do it? :-)
- 14:56:45 [OlivierCorby]
- OlivierCorby has left #sparql
- 14:57:19 [AndyS]
- I may not be able to do it until Thursday - travelling tomorrow and no way am I trying using 3G
- 15:01:00 [LeeF]
- RRSAgent, pointer?
- 15:01:00 [RRSAgent]
- See http://www.w3.org/2010/05/25-sparql-irc#T15-01-00
- 15:03:13 [LeeF]
- pgearon_, AlexPassant -- I'm going to work on getting SPARQL 1.1 Update pubrlues compliant now -- is what's checked in OK to go?
- 15:05:45 [AxelPolleres]
- no worries, will do the minutes
- 15:06:26 [kasei]
- LeeF: should I remove the old SD doc diff paragraph and commit the new one in its place?
- 15:07:11 [LeeF]
- yes, please
- 15:07:15 [kasei]
- also, (unrelated), my ACTION-235 can be closed.
- 15:10:19 [SteveH]
- SteveH has joined #sparql
- 15:10:20 [kasei]
- LeeF, ok, the new changes section is committed. Please let me know if there's anything else I can do to help with the publication.
- 15:10:48 [AxelPolleres]
- hmmm, how to I get CommonScribe to recognise Nick?
- 15:13:05 [LeeF]
- i'm not sure, AxelPolleres - ask sandro
- 15:13:12 [LeeF]
- kasei, ok, I will when I get to the SD doc
- 15:13:14 [LeeF]
- thanks
- 15:13:18 [LeeF]
- trackbot, close ACTION-235
- 15:13:18 [trackbot]
- ACTION-235 Review HTTP Uniform Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs closed
- 15:13:23 [LeeF]
- trackbot, close ACTION-250
- 15:13:23 [trackbot]
- ACTION-250 Take the discussion on SERVICE in Update to email, highlighting potential problem cases closed
- 15:25:41 [AxelPolleres]
- minutes... http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-05-25
- 15:35:01 [Zakim]
- disconnecting the lone participant, bglimm, in SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM
- 15:35:04 [Zakim]
- SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has ended
- 15:35:06 [Zakim]
- Attendees were NickHumfrey, AndyS, Ivan, bglimm, AxelPolleres, pgearon, kasei, MattPerry, OlivierCorby, dcharbon2, SteveH, souri, Lee_Feigenbaum
- 16:43:33 [LeeF]
- pgearon_, AlexPassant, any chance you could write a brief summary of changes since the previous WD?
- 16:44:49 [LeeF]
- I can try based on CVS history
- 16:54:50 [LeeF]
- kasei, FYI I'm going to work on SD now
- 17:03:05 [AndyS1]
- AndyS1 has joined #sparql
- 17:28:25 [AxelPolleres]
- AxelPolleres has left #sparql
- 17:52:43 [pgearon]
- pgearon has joined #sparql
- 18:29:45 [SteveH]
- SteveH has joined #sparql
- 18:47:18 [LeeF]
- yay! finally finished prepping documents and submitted the publication request
- 19:49:59 [SteveH]
- SteveH has joined #sparql
- 23:35:25 [LeeF]
- LeeF has joined #sparql