IRC log of sparql on 2010-05-25

Timestamps are in UTC.

13:54:35 [RRSAgent]
RRSAgent has joined #sparql
13:54:35 [RRSAgent]
logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/05/25-sparql-irc
13:54:51 [AxelPolleres]
Zakim, this will be sparql
13:54:51 [Zakim]
ok, AxelPolleres, I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM already started
13:55:03 [AndyS]
bglimm, APIs may let you build queries in other ways.
13:55:15 [dcharbon2]
dcharbon2 has joined #sparql
13:55:30 [kasei]
bglimm, early
13:55:39 [bglimm]
ah, ok, but I don't care about that ;-) I only care about what the spec says
13:56:24 [AxelPolleres]
agenda: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-05-25
13:56:29 [AxelPolleres]
chair: Axel Polleres
13:56:39 [NickHumfrey]
zakim, who's muted?
13:56:39 [Zakim]
I see NickHumfrey muted
13:56:56 [AxelPolleres]
regrets: Sandro, chime
13:57:09 [Zakim]
+ +86528aaaa
13:57:10 [pgearon]
pgearon has joined #sparql
13:57:11 [AxelPolleres]
at risk: Alex, Paul
13:57:18 [bglimm]
Zakim, +86528aaaa is me
13:57:18 [Zakim]
+bglimm; got it
13:57:26 [bglimm]
Zakim, mute me
13:57:26 [Zakim]
bglimm should now be muted
13:58:12 [Zakim]
+AxelPolleres
13:58:22 [Zakim]
+pgearon
13:58:28 [AxelPolleres]
Zakim, who is on the phone?
13:58:28 [Zakim]
On the phone I see NickHumfrey (muted), AndyS, Ivan, bglimm (muted), AxelPolleres, pgearon
13:58:39 [AxelPolleres]
welcome, Nick!
13:58:46 [MattPerry]
MattPerry has joined #sparql
13:59:01 [Zakim]
+kasei
13:59:13 [kasei]
Zakim, mute me
13:59:13 [Zakim]
kasei should now be muted
13:59:35 [SteveH_]
SteveH_ has joined #sparql
14:00:04 [Zakim]
+MattPerry
14:00:27 [AxelPolleres]
Zakim, who is on the phone?
14:00:27 [Zakim]
On the phone I see NickHumfrey, AndyS, Ivan, bglimm (muted), AxelPolleres, pgearon, kasei (muted), MattPerry
14:00:33 [Zakim]
+OlivierCorby
14:00:41 [Zakim]
+dcharbon2
14:01:19 [Zakim]
+mischat
14:01:29 [SteveH]
Zakim, mischat is [Garlik]
14:01:29 [Zakim]
+[Garlik]; got it
14:01:38 [SteveH]
Zakim, [Garlik] is temporarily SteveH
14:01:38 [Zakim]
+SteveH; got it
14:01:43 [AndyS]
I can scribe.
14:02:06 [AndyS]
but I'll let Steve if he wants to :-)
14:02:14 [AndyS]
scribe: Andy Seaborne
14:02:20 [AndyS]
scribenick: AndyS
14:02:21 [AxelPolleres]
scribe: AndyS
14:02:37 [Zakim]
+souri
14:02:43 [AxelPolleres]
scribe next tim sandro
14:02:50 [AndyS]
Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-05-25
14:02:56 [souri]
souri has joined #sparql
14:03:01 [AndyS]
zakim, who is on the phone?
14:03:01 [Zakim]
On the phone I see NickHumfrey, AndyS, Ivan, bglimm (muted), AxelPolleres, pgearon, kasei (muted), MattPerry, OlivierCorby, dcharbon2, SteveH, souri
14:03:05 [Zakim]
+Lee_Feigenbaum
14:03:07 [AxelPolleres]
PROPOSED: approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-05-18
14:03:22 [AndyS]
Regrets: chimezie, sandro
14:03:41 [AxelPolleres]
RESOLVED: approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-05-18
14:03:44 [AndyS]
regrets: +AlexPassant
14:03:56 [AndyS]
Next meeting: 1 June
14:04:08 [ivan]
me
14:04:08 [pgearon]
I'll be there
14:04:10 [LeeF]
me
14:04:11 [MattPerry]
I will be there
14:04:12 [SteveH]
I'm not going
14:04:16 [AndyS]
Regrets for next time: AndyS (unless it's raining a lot)
14:04:16 [LeeF]
Would like to know who can make the panel, in particular
14:04:23 [souri]
me too
14:04:23 [bglimm]
I'm not going
14:04:24 [AndyS]
AndyS @semtech
14:04:24 [AxelPolleres]
me unfotrunately not going
14:05:24 [LeeF]
2pm on Wednesday
14:05:31 [AxelPolleres]
must be somewhere tthere: http://www.semantic-conference.com/2010/
14:05:36 [LeeF]
Right now it says:
14:05:37 [LeeF]
Lee Feigenbaum, Cambridge Semantics Inc
14:05:37 [LeeF]
Andy Seaborne, Talis
14:05:37 [LeeF]
David S. Newman, Wells Fargo
14:05:37 [LeeF]
Ivan Herman, World Wide Web Consortium
14:05:37 [LeeF]
Paul Gearon, Fedora Commons, Inc
14:05:47 [LeeF]
I'll check with David, who hasn't participated in a while
14:06:10 [LeeF]
I'll add Souri & Matt if you'd like to join the panel?
14:06:30 [MattPerry]
Sure. Thanks Lee
14:06:31 [souri]
sure
14:06:37 [LeeF]
thanks
14:06:53 [AxelPolleres]
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Comments
14:07:21 [AxelPolleres]
topic: liaisons
14:07:57 [AndyS]
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/use-cases/
14:08:05 [AxelPolleres]
RDB2RDF docs probably next week published
14:08:35 [AndyS]
Topic:Publishing documents
14:09:02 [LeeF]
I'll let people know if I need anything from them
14:09:03 [AndyS]
LeeF: working on publishing docs
14:09:08 [LeeF]
ack me
14:09:40 [bglimm]
We also didn't decide on the entailments doc yet if I remeber correctly
14:09:42 [AndyS]
LeeF: need to resolve to publish the update doc as there have been changes
14:09:57 [bglimm]
Zakim, unmute me
14:09:58 [Zakim]
bglimm should no longer be muted
14:10:05 [AndyS]
s/update doc/update language doc/
14:10:14 [bglimm]
Zakim, mute me
14:10:14 [Zakim]
bglimm should now be muted
14:10:35 [AxelPolleres]
PROPOSED: Publish SPARQL 1.1 Update as a Working Draft
14:10:45 [LeeF]
Seconded
14:10:46 [bglimm]
+1
14:10:46 [AxelPolleres]
+1
14:10:47 [ivan]
1
14:10:53 [souri]
+1
14:10:53 [MattPerry]
+1
14:10:54 [OlivierCorby]
+1
14:10:59 [AndyS]
+1
14:11:13 [NickHumfrey]
+1
14:11:31 [pgearon]
SPARQL 1.1 Update Revision 1.47
14:11:33 [AxelPolleres]
RESOLVED: Publish SPARQL 1.1 Update as a Working Draft
14:11:46 [bglimm]
Zakim, unmute me
14:11:46 [Zakim]
bglimm should no longer be muted
14:11:49 [AndyS]
Entailment doc.
14:12:07 [AndyS]
bglimm: some changes this week, ready to go
14:12:10 [bglimm]
Zakim, mute me
14:12:10 [Zakim]
bglimm should now be muted
14:12:10 [AxelPolleres]
PROPOSED: Publish SPARQL 1.1 Entailment as a Working Draft
14:12:14 [bglimm]
+1
14:12:18 [AxelPolleres]
+1
14:12:19 [pgearon]
+1
14:12:21 [OlivierCorby]
+1
14:12:22 [souri]
+1
14:12:24 [NickHumfrey]
+1
14:12:26 [MattPerry]
+1
14:12:31 [ivan]
+1
14:12:39 [AxelPolleres]
RESOLVED: Publish SPARQL 1.1 Entailment as a Working Draft
14:13:58 [AndyS]
Topic: More Admin
14:14:20 [AndyS]
AxelPolleres: Welcome to Nick Humfrey of the BBC
14:14:49 [AndyS]
NickHumfrey: music, /progammes, DBPedia.
14:15:15 [AndyS]
... here to see what the WG is up and how it would fit in the BBC.
14:15:37 [AndyS]
Topic: Lee's Initial Issues List
14:15:41 [AxelPolleres]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010AprJun/0166.html
14:16:21 [AxelPolleres]
PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-8 with the consensus that subqueries share the same RDF dataset as their parent query, and that FROM and FROM NAMED clauses are not permitted in subqueries.
14:16:35 [souri]
+1
14:16:41 [AxelPolleres]
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/8
14:17:36 [SteveH]
+1
14:17:44 [kasei]
+1
14:17:46 [AxelPolleres]
+1
14:17:46 [MattPerry]
+1
14:17:46 [AndyS]
+1
14:17:47 [bglimm]
+1
14:17:52 [OlivierCorby]
+1
14:18:00 [ivan]
+1
14:18:02 [AxelPolleres]
RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-8 with the consensus that subqueries share the same RDF dataset as their parent query, and that FROM and FROM NAMED clauses are not permitted in subqueries.
14:18:12 [LeeF]
trackbot, close ISSUE-8
14:18:12 [trackbot]
ISSUE-8 What determines the RDF dataset for subqueries? closed
14:18:29 [LeeF]
ISSUE-8: RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-8 with the consensus that subqueries share the same RDF dataset as their parent query, and that FROM and FROM NAMED clauses are not permitted in subqueries.
14:18:29 [trackbot]
ISSUE-8 What determines the RDF dataset for subqueries? notes added
14:18:44 [AxelPolleres]
PROPOSED: Close ISSUE-14 with the consensus that SPARQL 1.1 defines the following aggregates: COUNT, SUM, MIN, MAX, AVG, GROUP_CONCAT, and SAMPLE.
14:19:00 [SteveH]
+1
14:19:01 [kasei]
+1
14:19:04 [MattPerry]
+1
14:19:05 [AxelPolleres]
+1
14:19:08 [OlivierCorby]
+1
14:19:10 [dcharbon2]
+1
14:19:12 [souri]
+1
14:19:13 [pgearon]
+1
14:19:17 [ivan]
1
14:19:20 [AndyS]
(and custom aggregates)
14:19:24 [bglimm]
+1
14:19:56 [AxelPolleres]
RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-14 with the consensus that SPARQL 1.1 defines the following aggregates: COUNT, SUM, MIN, MAX, AVG, GROUP_CONCAT, and SAMPLE
14:20:04 [LeeF]
ISSUE-14: RESOLVED: Close ISSUE-14 with the consensus that SPARQL 1.1 defines the following aggregates: COUNT, SUM, MIN, MAX, AVG, GROUP_CONCAT, and SAMPLE
14:20:05 [trackbot]
ISSUE-14 Which aggregates to include notes added
14:20:08 [LeeF]
trackbot, close ISSUE-14
14:20:08 [trackbot]
ISSUE-14 Which aggregates to include closed
14:21:01 [AxelPolleres]
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/1
14:22:02 [AxelPolleres]
ISSUE-15 -- I think we have consensus here around custom aggregate
14:22:03 [AxelPolleres]
snamed with URIs, with no keywords, allowing the DISTINCT modifier, and
14:22:03 [AxelPolleres]
allowing the parameterized syntax introduced for GROUP_CONCAT, but I'm
14:22:03 [AxelPolleres]
not positve and don't see this spelled out yet in the editor's draft, so
14:22:03 [AxelPolleres]
didn't want to propose to resolve the issue yet.
14:22:35 [AndyS]
q+
14:22:54 [kasei]
I think that was Nicholas when he joined the call.
14:22:59 [AxelPolleres]
ack AndyS
14:23:41 [SteveH]
q+
14:23:45 [LeeF]
ack ??P0
14:24:29 [NickHumfrey]
queue-
14:24:35 [AxelPolleres]
AndyS: rather would go for simple spolution not allowing parameterised syntax in custom aggregates
14:24:44 [NickHumfrey]
queue- ?P0
14:24:44 [AxelPolleres]
ack SteveH
14:25:09 [AxelPolleres]
SteveH: seconded what Steve said
14:25:10 [SteveH]
loud typing noise
14:25:11 [AndyS]
SteveH: agree - complexity is not justified
14:25:18 [NickHumfrey]
arg - sorry. Yes, P0 was me. Trying to learn all this!
14:25:36 [LeeF]
not me!
14:26:00 [AxelPolleres]
strawpoll: prohibit parameterised syntax for custom aggregates?
14:26:07 [kasei]
0
14:26:09 [AndyS]
AxelPolleres: anyone in favour of named parameters to custom aggregates?
14:26:13 [souri]
+1
14:26:20 [AndyS]
prohibit
14:26:23 [OlivierCorby]
0
14:26:25 [pgearon]
prohibit
14:26:29 [SteveH]
prohibit
14:26:31 [MattPerry]
prohibit
14:26:36 [pgearon]
+1
14:26:37 [NickHumfrey]
prohibit
14:26:38 [souri]
prohibit
14:26:40 [bglimm]
prohibit
14:28:16 [AxelPolleres]
PROPOSED: close ISSUE-15 with consensus around custom aggregates named with URIs, with no keywords, allowing the DISTINCT modifier, and disallowing the parameterized syntax introduced for GROUP_CONCAT for custom aggregates
14:28:34 [SteveH]
+1
14:28:38 [MattPerry]
+1
14:28:43 [bglimm]
+1
14:28:46 [AndyS]
+1
14:28:50 [OlivierCorby]
+1
14:28:55 [NickHumfrey]
+1
14:28:56 [dcharbon2]
+1
14:28:57 [souri]
+1
14:28:59 [pgearon]
+1
14:29:17 [AxelPolleres]
RESOLVED: close ISSUE-15 with consensus around custom aggregates named with URIs, with no keywords, allowing the DISTINCT modifier, and disallowing the parameterized syntax introduced for GROUP_CONCAT for custom aggregates
14:29:27 [AxelPolleres]
trackbot, close ISSUE-15
14:29:27 [trackbot]
ISSUE-15 Extensibility of aggregate functions closed
14:30:03 [AxelPolleres]
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/16
14:30:04 [AndyS]
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/16 : Dealing with aggregates over mixed datatypes
14:31:44 [kasei]
so what is the current status right now?
14:31:50 [kasei]
undefined over mixed datatypes?
14:32:11 [LeeF]
I want to close this, but I would like to understand what's in the document currently, too
14:33:09 [SteveH]
+1 to AndyS
14:33:12 [AxelPolleres]
may be safer to keep the issue open until steve went over the last f2f resolutions with scrutinity
14:33:31 [AndyS]
AndyS: will want to discuss presentation of design *after* the next publication.
14:34:18 [AndyS]
LeeF: Next step is what?
14:34:29 [AndyS]
SteveH: examples to add
14:35:22 [AxelPolleres]
ACTION: steveh to give examples that highlight possible ambiguities in the resolutions from last f2f concerning ISSUE-16
14:35:22 [trackbot]
Created ACTION-247 - Give examples that highlight possible ambiguities in the resolutions from last f2f concerning ISSUE-16 [on Steve Harris - due 2010-06-01].
14:36:01 [AndyS]
Topic: Issues and Scedule
14:36:08 [AndyS]
Topic: Issues and Schedule
14:36:24 [AndyS]
Property path telecon on Thursday
14:37:03 [AndyS]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010AprJun/0243.html
14:37:16 [LeeF]
I need to reserve zakim
14:37:21 [LeeF]
ivan, can you help with that?
14:37:28 [AndyS]
10:00am EDT / 15:00 GMTDT for up to 2 hours
14:37:42 [AxelPolleres]
ACTION: leef to reserve zakim for property path TC
14:37:42 [trackbot]
Created ACTION-248 - Reserve zakim for property path TC [on Lee Feigenbaum - due 2010-06-01].
14:37:43 [ivan]
you can do it ad hoc, but I can also send a request if you want
14:37:43 [AndyS]
Can we just use this channel?
14:37:57 [LeeF]
yes, let's use #sparql like normal
14:38:14 [ivan]
'' /invite zakim; zakim, space for 10? "
14:39:10 [AxelPolleres]
+ "/invite rrsagent"
14:40:24 [AxelPolleres]
ACTION: axel to check back with Lee on how/when to schedule theother special TCs
14:40:24 [trackbot]
Created ACTION-249 - Check back with Lee on how/when to schedule theother special TCs [on Axel Polleres - due 2010-06-01].
14:41:20 [AxelPolleres]
topic: http-update-protocol issue
14:41:23 [AxelPolleres]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010AprJun/0238.html
14:41:27 [AndyS]
Topic: discussion on http-update-protocol.
14:41:44 [AndyS]
AxelPolleres: issue is base URI in updates
14:42:28 [AxelPolleres]
"In situations where there is no Base URI in the payload and a graph IRI is
14:42:28 [AxelPolleres]
embedded, the RDF document that represents [AWWW] the networked RDF
14:42:28 [AxelPolleres]
knowledge identified by the embedded graph IRI SHOULD be considered the
14:42:28 [AxelPolleres]
retrieval context (5.1.2) [RFC3986]. Thus, the default base URI is the base
14:42:29 [AxelPolleres]
URI of that RDF document."
14:43:10 [AndyS]
I would need examples to understand that.
14:43:15 [SteveH]
me too
14:44:29 [pgearon]
+q
14:44:42 [pgearon]
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/issues/37
14:44:46 [AndyS]
pgearon: Issue 37
14:45:02 [AndyS]
Issue 37 : How does basic federated query interact with SPARQL/Update?
14:45:03 [AxelPolleres]
"How does basic federated query interact with SPARQL/Update?"
14:45:39 [pgearon]
"SPARQL/Update allows the use of SERVICE in the WHERE clause"
14:45:48 [SteveH]
typing noise
14:45:49 [AndyS]
pgearon: can allow in the graph pattern, but should not also do federated change
14:46:22 [AndyS]
Fine in intent.
14:46:29 [SteveH]
q+
14:46:33 [AndyS]
But not in DELETE WHERE please :-)
14:46:36 [pgearon]
q-
14:48:22 [AndyS]
SteveH: complicated case : update calls back to same service
14:49:29 [pgearon]
+1 to allow everything in the WHERE clause that is allowed in SPARQL 1.1
14:50:24 [AxelPolleres]
ACTION: steveh to take the discussion on SERVICE in Update to email, highlighting potential problem cases
14:50:24 [trackbot]
Created ACTION-250 - Take the discussion on SERVICE in Update to email, highlighting potential problem cases [on Steve Harris - due 2010-06-01].
14:51:11 [AndyS]
Chair: Any other business?
14:51:26 [AndyS]
Adjourned
14:51:32 [Zakim]
-SteveH
14:51:32 [bglimm]
bye
14:51:33 [ivan]
zakim, drop me
14:51:33 [Zakim]
Ivan is being disconnected
14:51:33 [Zakim]
-dcharbon2
14:51:35 [Zakim]
-Ivan
14:51:36 [MattPerry]
bye
14:51:37 [Zakim]
-AxelPolleres
14:51:38 [Zakim]
-souri
14:51:40 [Zakim]
-kasei
14:51:41 [Zakim]
-pgearon
14:51:42 [Zakim]
-OlivierCorby
14:51:43 [Zakim]
-MattPerry
14:51:47 [AndyS]
Please remember the property path call on Thursday.
14:51:47 [Zakim]
-NickHumfrey
14:51:53 [AxelPolleres]
rrsagent, make records public
14:51:56 [pgearon]
pgearon has left #sparql
14:51:56 [Zakim]
-Lee_Feigenbaum
14:52:07 [Zakim]
-AndyS
14:52:14 [AxelPolleres]
andyS, minutes magic... u or me do it? :-)
14:56:45 [OlivierCorby]
OlivierCorby has left #sparql
14:57:19 [AndyS]
I may not be able to do it until Thursday - travelling tomorrow and no way am I trying using 3G
15:01:00 [LeeF]
RRSAgent, pointer?
15:01:00 [RRSAgent]
See http://www.w3.org/2010/05/25-sparql-irc#T15-01-00
15:03:13 [LeeF]
pgearon_, AlexPassant -- I'm going to work on getting SPARQL 1.1 Update pubrlues compliant now -- is what's checked in OK to go?
15:05:45 [AxelPolleres]
no worries, will do the minutes
15:06:26 [kasei]
LeeF: should I remove the old SD doc diff paragraph and commit the new one in its place?
15:07:11 [LeeF]
yes, please
15:07:15 [kasei]
also, (unrelated), my ACTION-235 can be closed.
15:10:19 [SteveH]
SteveH has joined #sparql
15:10:20 [kasei]
LeeF, ok, the new changes section is committed. Please let me know if there's anything else I can do to help with the publication.
15:10:48 [AxelPolleres]
hmmm, how to I get CommonScribe to recognise Nick?
15:13:05 [LeeF]
i'm not sure, AxelPolleres - ask sandro
15:13:12 [LeeF]
kasei, ok, I will when I get to the SD doc
15:13:14 [LeeF]
thanks
15:13:18 [LeeF]
trackbot, close ACTION-235
15:13:18 [trackbot]
ACTION-235 Review HTTP Uniform Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs closed
15:13:23 [LeeF]
trackbot, close ACTION-250
15:13:23 [trackbot]
ACTION-250 Take the discussion on SERVICE in Update to email, highlighting potential problem cases closed
15:25:41 [AxelPolleres]
minutes... http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-05-25
15:35:01 [Zakim]
disconnecting the lone participant, bglimm, in SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM
15:35:04 [Zakim]
SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has ended
15:35:06 [Zakim]
Attendees were NickHumfrey, AndyS, Ivan, bglimm, AxelPolleres, pgearon, kasei, MattPerry, OlivierCorby, dcharbon2, SteveH, souri, Lee_Feigenbaum
16:43:33 [LeeF]
pgearon_, AlexPassant, any chance you could write a brief summary of changes since the previous WD?
16:44:49 [LeeF]
I can try based on CVS history
16:54:50 [LeeF]
kasei, FYI I'm going to work on SD now
17:03:05 [AndyS1]
AndyS1 has joined #sparql
17:28:25 [AxelPolleres]
AxelPolleres has left #sparql
17:52:43 [pgearon]
pgearon has joined #sparql
18:29:45 [SteveH]
SteveH has joined #sparql
18:47:18 [LeeF]
yay! finally finished prepping documents and submitted the publication request
19:49:59 [SteveH]
SteveH has joined #sparql
23:35:25 [LeeF]
LeeF has joined #sparql