17:01:22 RRSAgent has joined #tagmem 17:01:22 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/05/13-tagmem-irc 17:01:30 zakim, who is here? 17:01:33 johnk has joined #tagmem 17:01:34 noah has joined #tagmem 17:01:46 On the phone I see DKA, Jonathan_Rees, DanC 17:02:05 On IRC I see noah, johnk, RRSAgent, jar, DKA, Zakim, timbl, DanC, trackbot 17:02:26 chair: Noah Mendelsohn 17:02:27 +Noah_Mendelsohn 17:02:31 scribe: Jonathan Rees 17:02:34 scribenick: jar 17:02:38 +John_Kemp 17:02:41 Ashok has joined #tagmem 17:03:27 +Ashok_Malhotra 17:03:53 agenda: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2010/05/13-agenda 17:04:02 zakim, who is here? 17:04:05 On the phone I see DKA, Jonathan_Rees, DanC, Noah_Mendelsohn, John_Kemp, Ashok_Malhotra 17:04:06 On IRC I see Ashok, noah, johnk, RRSAgent, jar, DKA, Zakim, timbl, DanC, trackbot 17:04:10 fixed regrets in http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2010/05/06-minutes Date: 2010/05/13 17:03:35 17:05:04 topic: Convene 17:05:31 F2F regrets JohnK, DanC, Raman 17:06:06 topic: Minutes 17:06:16 noah: they look ok 17:06:32 RESOLUTION: approve http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2010/05/06-minutes 17:06:54 topic: Administrative items 17:07:08 (Dan A with info about the F2F) 17:08:12 (discussion of ash cloud) 17:09:15 topic: Overdue Action Items 17:09:50 action-352? 17:09:50 ACTION-352 -- John Kemp to integrate whiteboard drawings into a prose document about ways to distribute applications -- due 2010-05-06 -- OPEN 17:09:50 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/352 17:09:57 action-352? 17:09:57 ACTION-352 -- John Kemp to integrate whiteboard drawings into a prose document about ways to distribute applications -- due 2010-05-06 -- OPEN 17:09:57 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/352 17:10:21 johnk: Is integrated into document that Ashok is preparing 17:10:44 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2010/04/22-minutes#item08 17:10:45 ACTION-416? 17:10:45 ACTION-416 -- John Kemp to work on diagrams in "From Server-side to client-side" section of webapps material -- due 2010-06-06 -- OPEN 17:10:45 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/416 17:11:08 q+ 17:11:12 action-352? 17:11:12 ACTION-352 -- John Kemp to integrate whiteboard drawings into a prose document about ways to distribute applications -- due 2010-03-08 -- PENDINGREVIEW 17:11:12 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/352 17:11:12 I cannot cahnge the access right -- needs team priviledges 17:11:12 John, should we close 352 17:11:14 john, NM thinks maybe it's just an admin error that 352 isn't closed 17:11:16 should we have closed it at the F2F? 17:11:18 I did ACTION-352, but, at the F2F we decided to keep the action open 17:12:22 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2010/03/web-apps-taxonomy/web-apps-taxonomy.html 17:12:42 action-352: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2010/04/WebApps.html 17:12:42 ACTION-352 Integrate whiteboard drawings into a prose document about ways to distribute applications notes added 17:12:58 noah: please add link & then close 352 17:13:15 s/please/JohnK please/ 17:13:18 close action-352 17:13:18 ACTION-352 Integrate whiteboard drawings into a prose document about ways to distribute applications closed 17:13:39 action-352: see action-416 for follow-up 17:13:39 ACTION-352 Integrate whiteboard drawings into a prose document about ways to distribute applications notes added 17:14:52 johnk: busy, hoping to make progress before f2f (it will be close) 17:15:28 ACTION-355? 17:15:28 ACTION-355 -- John Kemp to explore the degree to which AWWW and associated findings tell the interaction story for Web Applications -- due 2010-05-08 -- OPEN 17:15:28 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/355 17:15:33 ashok: JohnK and I will talk & then provide f2f agenda input 17:16:03 Zakim, pick a victim 17:16:03 Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose DanC 17:17:03 ACTION-355: due + 1 month 17:17:03 ACTION-355 Explore the degree to which AWWW and associated findings tell the interaction story for Web Applications notes added 17:17:51 ACTION-355 due + 1 month 17:17:51 ACTION-355 Explore the degree to which AWWW and associated findings tell the interaction story for Web Applications due date now + 1 month 17:18:34 action-390? 17:18:34 ACTION-390 -- Daniel Appelquist to review ISSUE-58 and suggest next steps, due 2010-03-03 -- due 2010-04-29 -- OPEN 17:18:34 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/390 17:18:48 ACTION-420? 17:18:49 ACTION-420 -- Daniel Appelquist to what is different about xhtml basic 1.1 (in particular re: namespaces) -- due 2010-04-29 -- OPEN 17:18:49 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/420 17:19:08 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2010May/0032.html 17:19:27 dka: Sent email re 420 today 17:20:21 q? 17:21:12 q- 17:22:20 (trying to remember why we wanted DKA to do this... context: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2010/03/26-minutes.html#item06 ) 17:23:05 *** NOTE TO MINUTES EDITOR: give action 420 discussion its own section heading *** 17:23:25 XHTML Basic 17:25:30 dka: I'll send email about differences between XHTML strict and XHTML basic 17:25:51 close ACTION-240 17:25:51 ACTION-240 Read thread on RDFa, CURIEs and profile and summarize http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2009Feb/0295.html closed 17:25:58 ACTION-390? 17:25:58 ACTION-390 -- Daniel Appelquist to review ISSUE-58 and suggest next steps, due 2010-03-03 -- due 2010-04-29 -- OPEN 17:25:58 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/390 17:26:33 issue-58? 17:26:34 ISSUE-58 -- Scalability of URI Access to Resources -- OPEN 17:26:34 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/issues/58 17:26:50 close ACTION-420 17:26:50 ACTION-420 What is different about xhtml basic 1.1 (in particular re: namespaces) closed 17:27:37 topic: Overdue Action Items 17:27:51 action-413? 17:27:51 ACTION-413 -- Dan Connolly to suggest a path thru some logic terminology that might speed up httpSemantics discussions -- due 2010-05-07 -- PENDINGREVIEW 17:27:51 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/413 17:29:44 topic: W3C Vision 17:30:23 johnk_ has joined #tagmem 17:30:34 ACTION-431? 17:30:36 . close action-431 17:32:17 action-431? 17:32:17 ACTION-431 -- Ashok Malhotra to contact Jeff/PLH regarding particiapation in W3C core mission TF -- due 2010-05-13 -- OPEN 17:32:17 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/431 17:32:30 timbl has joined #tagmem 17:33:03 dka: Would like to participate. Will contact JJ 17:34:47 topic: HTML 5 review 17:35:15 noah: availability of schemas - let's take this up when Larry's here 17:35:53 action-413? 17:36:04 action-413? 17:36:04 ACTION-413 -- Dan Connolly to suggest a path thru some logic terminology that might speed up httpSemantics discussions -- due 2010-05-07 -- PENDINGREVIEW 17:36:04 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/group/track/actions/413 17:36:17 topic: Logic terminology for httpSemantics 17:37:09 -John_Kemp 17:37:54 johnk_ has joined #tagmem 17:38:00 http://docs.google.com/present/view?id=dfhtjfgw_9chw68rcm 17:38:33 NM: Author is you, DanC? 17:38:35 DC: Yes. 17:40:32 danc: At the F2F there was an objection to the FOL presentation around ambiguity 17:41:10 ... and JAR and I said if you just took the usual FOL approach the confusion is dispelled (ambiguity is inherent and controlled) 17:41:54 (danc going through slides) 17:48:25 noah: A few more words around slide 8 please? 17:57:39 noah: slide 12: Can you tell me why we speak of constants separately from the things in D? 17:59:00 ... ok, constants are symbols, while D contains domain elements ("real things") 18:04:13 doesn't (~M(x) | D(x))) imply that anything that is not a man does not die? 18:09:54 johnk__ has joined #tagmem 18:16:41 johnk__ has joined #tagmem 18:16:50 Note: Provenance incubator group working on provenance - worth getting a report on that? http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/prov/ 18:19:19 danc: JAR said, ambiguity is what happens when there's more than one satisfying interpretation, and that's almost always 18:19:45 ... if only I could get TimBL to stipulate that 18:20:56 ... then I'd understand Tim's position better 18:23:12 (fwiw, records of the genesis of this action http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2010/03/25-minutes.html#item03x ) 18:25:59 close action-413 18:25:59 ACTION-413 Suggest a path thru some logic terminology that might speed up httpSemantics discussions closed 18:28:39 no, (~M(x) | D(x))) does not imply that anything that is not a man does not die. ~F|G and ~F do not imply ~G. 18:29:02 -DKA 18:29:06 -Noah_Mendelsohn 18:29:07 provenance IG is an interesting idea; maybe I'll have a look around there 18:29:07 -Ashok_Malhotra 18:29:08 -Jonathan_Rees 18:29:13 rrsagent. make logs public 18:29:36 rrsagent, make logs public 18:29:48 ADJOURNED 18:30:09 zakim, close meeting 18:30:09 I don't understand 'close meeting', jar 18:31:07 zakim, list attendee 18:31:07 I don't understand 'list attendee', jar 18:31:18 zakim, list attendees 18:31:18 As of this point the attendees have been DKA, Jonathan_Rees, DanC, Noah_Mendelsohn, John_Kemp, Ashok_Malhotra 18:35:00 disconnecting the lone participant, DanC, in TAG_Weekly()1:00PM 18:35:03 TAG_Weekly()1:00PM has ended 18:35:05 Attendees were DKA, Jonathan_Rees, DanC, Noah_Mendelsohn, John_Kemp, Ashok_Malhotra 19:23:38 zakim, excuse us 19:23:38 Zakim has left #tagmem 19:28:32 rrsagent. pointer 19:28:44 rrsagent, pointer 19:28:44 See http://www.w3.org/2010/05/13-tagmem-irc#T19-28-44