IRC log of sparql on 2010-04-20

Timestamps are in UTC.

13:57:38 [RRSAgent]

RRSAgent has joined #sparql

13:57:38 [RRSAgent]

logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/04/20-sparql-irc

13:57:40 [trackbot]

RRSAgent, make logs world

13:57:40 [Zakim]

Zakim has joined #sparql

13:57:42 [trackbot]

Zakim, this will be 77277

13:57:42 [Zakim]

ok, trackbot; I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM scheduled to start in 3 minutes

13:57:43 [trackbot]

Meeting: SPARQL Working Group Teleconference

13:57:43 [trackbot]

Date: 20 April 2010

13:57:53 [LeeF]

Agenda: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-04-20

13:58:09 [Zakim]

SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has now started

13:58:16 [Zakim]

+ +03539149aaaa

13:58:56 [AxelPolleres]

Zakim, aaaa is me

13:58:56 [Zakim]

+AxelPolleres; got it

13:59:01 [Zakim]

+ +1.518.276.aabb

13:59:02 [kasei]

heh

13:59:06 [Zakim]

+ +0186528aacc

13:59:07 [kasei]

Zakim, aabb is me

13:59:08 [Zakim]

+kasei; got it

13:59:21 [bglimm]

Zakim, +0186528aacc is me

13:59:21 [Zakim]

+bglimm; got it

13:59:31 [Zakim]

+??P14

13:59:34 [Zakim]

+Lee_Feigenbaum

13:59:35 [bglimm]

Zakim, why don't you recognize me any more?

13:59:35 [Zakim]

I don't understand your question, bglimm.

13:59:39 [AndyS1]

zakim, ??P14 is me

13:59:39 [Zakim]

+AndyS1; got it

13:59:51 [LeeF]

zakim, mute me please

13:59:51 [Zakim]

Lee_Feigenbaum should now be muted

13:59:59 [Zakim]

+ +49.238.aadd

14:00:06 [Zakim]

+ +0208439aaee

14:00:06 [Souri]

Souri has joined #sparql

14:00:11 [LeeF]

Chair: AxelPolleres

14:00:16 [Zakim]

- +0208439aaee

14:00:27 [SteveH]

SteveH has joined #sparql

14:00:28 [ivan]

zakim, dial ivan-voip

14:00:28 [Zakim]

ok, ivan; the call is being made

14:00:28 [OlivierCorby]

Zakim, aadd is me

14:00:29 [AxelPolleres]

trackbot, start meeting

14:00:30 [Zakim]

+OlivierCorby; got it

14:00:30 [Zakim]

+Ivan

14:00:31 [trackbot]

RRSAgent, make logs world

14:00:33 [trackbot]

Zakim, this will be 77277

14:00:33 [Zakim]

ok, trackbot; I see SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM scheduled to start now

14:00:34 [trackbot]

Meeting: SPARQL Working Group Teleconference

14:00:34 [trackbot]

Date: 20 April 2010

14:00:35 [bglimm]

Zakim, mute me

14:00:35 [Zakim]

sorry, bglimm, I don't know what conference this is

14:00:41 [LeeF]

zakim, this is SPARQl

14:00:41 [Zakim]

ok, LeeF; that matches SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM

14:00:45 [LeeF]

zakim, mute bglimm

14:00:45 [Zakim]

bglimm should now be muted

14:00:46 [bglimm]

Zakim, this is SPARQL

14:00:47 [Zakim]

bglimm, this was already SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM

14:00:49 [Zakim]

ok, bglimm; that matches SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM

14:00:50 [chimezie]

chimezie has joined #sparql

14:00:56 [bglimm]

Zakim, mute me

14:00:56 [Zakim]

bglimm was already muted, bglimm

14:01:10 [chimezie]

Zakim, what is the passcode?

14:01:10 [Zakim]

the conference code is 77277 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), chimezie

14:01:10 [AxelPolleres]

chime, will you be able to scribe?

14:01:13 [Zakim]

+ +1.603.897.aagg

14:01:13 [chimezie]

yes

14:01:30 [Souri]

zakim, aagg is Souri

14:01:30 [Zakim]

+Souri; got it

14:01:43 [Zakim]

+Chimezie_Ogbuji

14:01:45 [SteveH]

Zakim, who's on the phone

14:01:45 [Zakim]

I don't understand 'who's on the phone', SteveH

14:01:50 [SteveH]

Zakim, who's on the phone?

14:01:51 [Zakim]

On the phone I see AxelPolleres, kasei, bglimm (muted), AndyS1, Lee_Feigenbaum (muted), OlivierCorby, Ivan, +0208439aaff, Souri, Chimezie_Ogbuji

14:01:54 [MattPerry]

MattPerry has joined #sparql

14:02:08 [AxelPolleres]

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Agenda-2010-04-20

14:02:12 [SteveH]

Zakim, aaff is [Garlik]

14:02:12 [Zakim]

+[Garlik]; got it

14:02:13 [LeeF]

zakim, who's speaking?

14:02:15 [AndyS1]

zakim, AndyS1 is AndyS

14:02:15 [Zakim]

+AndyS; got it

14:02:23 [pjain]

pjain has joined #SPARQL

14:02:25 [SteveH]

loud typing

14:02:29 [Zakim]

LeeF, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: 10 (26%), AndyS1 (53%)

14:02:29 [AxelPolleres]

scribe: Chimezie Ogbuji

14:02:52 [AxelPolleres]

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-04-13

14:02:52 [Zakim]

+??P25

14:03:13 [MattPerry]

zakim, ??P25 is me

14:03:13 [Zakim]

+MattPerry; got it

14:03:15 [SteveH]

Zakim, [Garlik] is temporarily SteveH

14:03:17 [Zakim]

+SteveH; got it

14:03:20 [AxelPolleres]

PROPOSED: approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-04-13

14:03:33 [LeeF]

minutes look good to me

14:03:48 [AxelPolleres]

RESOLVED: approve minutes at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/meeting/2010-04-13

14:04:15 [AxelPolleres]

Next meeting: 2010-04-27 @ 15:00 UK / 10:00 EST

14:04:26 [LeeF]

my regrets for next week

14:04:34 [ivan]

regrets next week

14:04:36 [chimezie]

Axel: I can scribe and chair if necessary

14:04:36 [LeeF]

David

14:04:40 [LeeF]

Alex did last week

14:04:46 [LeeF]

err, not David

14:05:01 [ivan]

I hope to be at WWW (volcano willing)

14:05:02 [AxelPolleres]

Zakim, who is on the phone?

14:05:02 [LeeF]

OlivierCorby, can you scribe next week?

14:05:03 [Zakim]

On the phone I see AxelPolleres, kasei, bglimm (muted), AndyS, Lee_Feigenbaum (muted), OlivierCorby, Ivan, SteveH, Souri, Chimezie_Ogbuji, MattPerry

14:05:38 [AxelPolleres]

next time scribing Olivier

14:05:51 [chimezie]

Next: comments

14:05:55 [AxelPolleres]

topic: comments

14:05:57 [AxelPolleres]

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Comments

14:06:03 [chimezie]

Need to progress through comments

14:06:13 [AxelPolleres]

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Apr/0000.html

14:06:17 [kasei]

i've tacked that onto my other NH comments.

14:06:26 [Zakim]

+ +1.919.332.aahh

14:06:32 [kasei]

they all sort of belong together

14:06:41 [dcharbon2]

dcharbon2 has joined #sparql

14:06:47 [kasei]

sure

14:06:56 [dcharbon2]

zakim, mute me

14:06:56 [Zakim]

sorry, dcharbon2, I do not know which phone connection belongs to you

14:06:59 [AxelPolleres]

greg takes care

14:07:03 [dcharbon2]

zakim, who is on the phone?

14:07:03 [Zakim]

On the phone I see AxelPolleres, kasei, bglimm (muted), AndyS, Lee_Feigenbaum (muted), OlivierCorby, Ivan, SteveH, Souri, Chimezie_Ogbuji, MattPerry, +1.919.332.aahh

14:07:11 [dcharbon2]

zakim, aahh is me

14:07:11 [Zakim]

+dcharbon2; got it

14:07:16 [LeeF]

RDB2RDF is close to publishing a UC&R document

14:07:19 [chimezie]

Axel: Liasons. Anything to report?

14:08:16 [chimezie]

Souri: going over usecase, not final yet, but coming close

14:08:19 [AxelPolleres]

Souri: RDB2RDF will soon have UC doc

14:08:23 [kasei]

Zakim, mute me

14:08:23 [Zakim]

kasei should now be muted

14:08:27 [AxelPolleres]

Axel: we might want to review

14:08:33 [dcharbon2]

zakim, mute me

14:08:33 [Zakim]

dcharbon2 should now be muted

14:08:50 [Zakim]

+??P35

14:08:53 [chimezie]

Axel: Wording for conditions on entailment regimes

14:09:01 [AlexPassant]

Zakim, ??P35 is me

14:09:01 [Zakim]

+AlexPassant; got it

14:09:13 [AxelPolleres]

topic: entailment conditions rewordings

14:09:13 [AxelPolleres]

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010AprJun/0030.html

14:09:26 [AxelPolleres]

q?

14:09:38 [AxelPolleres]

birte?

14:10:17 [LeeF]

I was happy with the latest proposed text (per the mailing list)

14:10:19 [chimezie]

Axel: 1st condition. SG G is uniquely specified and E-equivalent to regime

14:10:39 [chimezie]

... need to be specific about graph equivalence

14:11:09 [AndyS]

?? If the bnode labels differ, OPTIONAL does not work?

14:11:25 [AxelPolleres]

http://www.w3.org/mid/z2i492f2b0b1004190346k2f1eb1f3z67eeb0d5071dfc22@mail.gmail.com

14:12:11 [AxelPolleres]

"uniquely" --> "uniquely up to RDF graph equivalence"

14:12:13 [AxelPolleres]

q?

14:12:14 [chimezie]

Axel: added 'uniquely up to RDF graph equivalence'

14:12:43 [bglimm]

bglimm has joined #sparql

14:12:45 [chimezie]

AndyS: how does this work with the rest of the algebra?

14:12:52 [bglimm]

Zakim, unmute me

14:12:52 [Zakim]

bglimm should no longer be muted

14:13:04 [chimezie]

... what about use of OPTIONAL, how do you roundtrip the blank nodes properly?

14:13:26 [AxelPolleres]

q?

14:15:00 [chimezie]

Axel: SG is always determined before hand

14:15:00 [chimezie]

... so, blank nodes could differ from AG but uniquely determined module bnode mapping

14:15:02 [AndyS]

OK - I understand now

14:15:11 [AxelPolleres]

Axel: I understoo that the SG is unique for the whole query

14:15:32 [AndyS]

No need to change the text proposed.

14:15:38 [AxelPolleres]

... do we need to stress that?

14:16:20 [chimezie]

AndyS: fine with condition 1 as it is now

14:16:47 [chimezie]

Axel: Each extension provides conditions to ensure finite answers

14:16:58 [chimezie]

... 1) finiteness 2) uniqueness up to blank node rephrasing

14:16:59 [bglimm]

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010AprJun/0055.html

14:17:31 [bglimm]

change from

14:17:31 [bglimm]

4 -- Each SPARQL extension must provide conditions on answer sets

14:17:31 [bglimm]

which guarantee that every BGP and AG has a finite set of answers

14:17:31 [bglimm]

which is unique up to RDF graph equivalence.

14:17:32 [bglimm]

to

14:17:32 [bglimm]

4 -- Each SPARQL extension MUST provide conditions, which guarantee

14:17:34 [bglimm]

that the answer set for every BGP and AG is uniquely specified up to

14:17:36 [bglimm]

RDF graph equivalence, and SHOULD provide further conditions to

14:17:38 [bglimm]

prevent trivial infinite answers as appropriate to the regime.

14:19:04 [AxelPolleres]

q?

14:20:27 [chimezie]

bglimm: need to say what the SG is and then what inferences you make, and then ensure the answers are the same where the only difference is blank node renaming

14:20:49 [Zakim]

+ +1.312.863.aaii

14:20:50 [chimezie]

AndyS: what is the role of blank nodes in SG, how can they vary?

14:20:57 [AxelPolleres]

q+ to ask about blank nodes

14:20:59 [chimezie]

bglimm: you can invent new ones

14:21:09 [pgearon]

Zakim, aaii is me

14:21:09 [Zakim]

+pgearon; got it

14:23:33 [chimezie]

P(BGP) is the answer set 'graph'

14:25:06 [AxelPolleres]

I think we can resolve on condition 1... we need a wording for condition 4.

14:25:09 [bglimm]

bglimm has joined #sparql

14:25:47 [chimezie]

Axel: should we take this to the ML

14:25:48 [bglimm]

bglimm has joined #sparql

14:26:01 [AxelPolleres]

PROPOSED: change Condition 1 as suggested in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010AprJun/0055.html

14:26:35 [bglimm]

1 -- The scoping graph, SG, corresponding to any consistent active

14:26:35 [bglimm]

graph AG is specified uniquely up to RDF graph equivalence and is

14:26:35 [bglimm]

E-equivalent to AG.

14:26:56 [bglimm]

+1

14:27:09 [AxelPolleres]

RESOLVED: change Condition 1 as suggested in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010AprJun/0055.html

14:27:36 [AxelPolleres]

ACTION: Birte to reformulate Condition 4

14:27:36 [trackbot]

Created ACTION-221 - Reformulate Condition 4 [on Birte Glimm - due 2010-04-27].

14:27:55 [chimezie]

Axel: next on agenda - issue 49

14:27:56 [bglimm]

Zakim, mute me

14:27:58 [Zakim]

bglimm should now be muted

14:28:11 [chimezie]

... Graphs as information resources, etc.

14:28:12 [AxelPolleres]

topic: ISSUE-49

14:28:13 [AxelPolleres]

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010AprJun/0048.html

14:28:34 [kasei]

Zakim, unmute me

14:28:34 [Zakim]

kasei should no longer be muted

14:29:05 [chimezie]

Greg: I brought this up on behalf of Kjetl

14:29:11 [AndyS]

"Information resource" => "A resource which has the property that all of its essential characteristics can be conveyed in a message." (AWWW)

14:29:14 [chimezie]

... the definitions are loose, the wording should be cleared up

14:29:35 [chimezie]

... distinction between graphs and IRI used to reference the graph or the IR serialized by the graph

14:29:48 [chimezie]

... terminology is confusing

14:29:50 [AxelPolleres]

q?

14:29:56 [AxelPolleres]

ack me

14:29:56 [Zakim]

AxelPolleres, you wanted to ask about blank nodes

14:29:58 [chimezie]

... need to clear up the language

14:30:21 [AxelPolleres]

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/http-rdf-update/#http-get

14:31:39 [ivan]

there is no serialization involved, is there?

14:31:55 [chimezie]

... the distinction is important with regards to http-range-4

14:32:25 [ivan]

q+

14:32:25 [chimezie]

Axel: assumed that the issue was the use of the word equivalence

14:32:35 [AlexPassant]

s/4/14

14:33:14 [AxelPolleres]

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010AprJun/0065.html

14:33:27 [AxelPolleres]

This is equivalent to the following SPARQL query:

14:33:27 [AxelPolleres]

14:33:28 [AxelPolleres]

CONSTRUCT { ?s ?p ?o } WHERE { GRAPH <graph_uri> { ?s ?p ?o } }

14:33:29 [chimezie]

... in the SPARQL 1.0 document, there is some confusion but it the uri does not reference the graph

14:33:45 [ivan]

q-

14:33:48 [AxelPolleres]

"This may be viewed equivalent to the following SPARQL query:

14:33:48 [AxelPolleres]

CONSTRUCT { ?s ?p ?o } WHERE { GRAPH <graph_uri> { ?s ?p ?o } }

14:33:49 [AxelPolleres]

posed to a SPARQL endpoint which had any Web retrievable RDF graph in it's

14:33:49 [AxelPolleres]

<a href="referencetodefinition of Graph store in Update 1.1">Graph store</a>.

14:33:49 [AxelPolleres]

"

14:34:24 [kasei]

<graph_uri>

14:35:50 [kasei]

from SPARQL 1.0:

14:35:53 [kasei]

"""The FROM NAMED syntax suggests that the IRI identifies the corresponding graph, but the relationship between an IRI and a graph in an RDF dataset is indirect. The IRI identifies a resource, and the resource is represented by a graph (or, more precisely: by a document that serializes a graph)."""

14:39:59 [chimezie]

"We recall from [SPARQL] that IRIs for RDF graphs in SPARQL queries identify a resource, and the resource is represented by a graph (or, more precisely: by a document that serializes a graph)"

14:40:38 [kasei]

+1 AndyS

14:43:29 [kasei]

the trouble is the parenthetical

14:43:40 [kasei]

AndyS is talking about the parenthetical, Chimezie about the thing right before it.

14:44:23 [AxelPolleres]

could we type in a rephrasing?

14:45:05 [kasei]

just merging the parenthetical back into the sentence would be a good start.

14:45:20 [Zakim]

-AlexPassant

14:46:46 [AxelPolleres]

ACTION: chime to propose rewordings on mailinglist on http-protocol which clarify ISSUE-49

14:46:47 [trackbot]

Created ACTION-222 - Propose rewordings on mailinglist on http-protocol which clarify ISSUE-49 [on Chimezie Ogbuji - due 2010-04-27].

14:46:58 [AxelPolleres]

q?

14:47:34 [Zakim]

+??P35

14:47:36 [AlexPassant]

Zakim, ??P35 is me

14:47:36 [Zakim]

+AlexPassant; got it

14:47:52 [kasei]

Zakim, mute me

14:47:52 [Zakim]

kasei should now be muted

14:48:13 [AxelPolleres]

http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-update/#sec_graphStore

14:49:24 [AxelPolleres]

q?

14:50:08 [AxelPolleres]

topic: test suite

14:50:29 [AxelPolleres]

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/README.html

14:50:37 [Zakim]

-AndyS

14:51:39 [chimezie]

Axel: will need multiple manifests for testing framework

14:52:16 [chimezie]

... keep SPARQL 1.0 test cases as is and extend for 1.1 features?

14:53:17 [chimezie]

... my proposal is to include reference to old test cases - copying old manifest - and create new subdirectories for 1.1 features

14:53:25 [chimezie]

... but still only have 1 manifest file that extends the old one

14:53:58 [chimezie]

Axel: what to do about update test cases?

14:54:27 [chimezie]

... update evaluation test cases need to cover different kinds of results: errors, results, etc..

14:54:40 [chimezie]

... need to also describe before and after status of the graph store

14:55:03 [AxelPolleres]

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/README.html

14:56:21 [AxelPolleres]

ut:unnamedGraph, ut:namedGraph

14:56:40 [AxelPolleres]

ut:graph

14:56:44 [AxelPolleres]

ut:named

14:57:11 [AxelPolleres]

objections? comments?

14:57:34 [AxelPolleres]

zakim, pick a victim

14:57:34 [Zakim]

Not knowing who is chairing or who scribed recently, I propose Chimezie_Ogbuji

14:57:55 [bglimm]

I'll look and see how entailments could fit in

14:57:58 [AxelPolleres]

ACTION: chime to look over http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/README.html

14:57:58 [trackbot]

Created ACTION-223 - Look over http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/README.html [on Chimezie Ogbuji - due 2010-04-27].

14:58:25 [kasei]

when are we scheduled for next publication?

14:58:32 [AndyS1]

AndyS1 has joined #sparql

14:59:46 [AxelPolleres]

ACTION: axel to check with editors what's the status of docs wrt. publication schedule

14:59:46 [trackbot]

Created ACTION-224 - Check with editors what's the status of docs wrt. publication schedule [on Axel Polleres - due 2010-04-27].

14:59:46 [Zakim]

-bglimm

15:00:36 [AxelPolleres]

summary: next time discuss Fed queries and publication schedule, all editors, let us know how far you are wrt. publication of next round!

15:00:46 [MattPerry]

quit

15:00:46 [Zakim]

-Chimezie_Ogbuji

15:00:47 [ivan]

zakim, drop me

15:00:47 [Zakim]

-Souri

15:00:47 [Zakim]

-dcharbon2

15:00:47 [Zakim]

-SteveH

15:00:48 [Zakim]

Ivan is being disconnected

15:00:48 [Zakim]

-Ivan

15:00:49 [Zakim]

-kasei

15:00:51 [Zakim]

-pgearon

15:00:51 [AxelPolleres]

chair: axel polleres

15:00:59 [Zakim]

-OlivierCorby

15:01:01 [Zakim]

-Lee_Feigenbaum

15:01:03 [Zakim]

-MattPerry

15:01:04 [AxelPolleres]

rrsagent, make records public

15:01:13 [Zakim]

-AlexPassant

15:01:15 [Zakim]

-AxelPolleres

15:01:19 [Zakim]

SW_(SPARQL)10:00AM has ended

15:01:21 [Zakim]

Attendees were +03539149aaaa, AxelPolleres, +1.518.276.aabb, kasei, bglimm, Lee_Feigenbaum, +49.238.aadd, +0208439aaee, OlivierCorby, Ivan, +0208439aaff, +1.603.897.aagg, Souri,

15:01:21 [kasei]

sandro, any eta on the service description graph naming issue response?

15:01:28 [Zakim]

... Chimezie_Ogbuji, AndyS, MattPerry, SteveH, +1.919.332.aahh, dcharbon2, AlexPassant, +1.312.863.aaii, pgearon

15:02:14 [AxelPolleres]

CTION: axel to fix the example in http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/README.html

15:02:18 [AxelPolleres]

ACTION: axel to fix the example in http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/README.html

15:02:18 [trackbot]

Created ACTION-225 - Fix the example in http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/README.html [on Axel Polleres - due 2010-04-27].

15:02:21 [AxelPolleres]

adjourned

15:02:27 [AxelPolleres]

member:rrsagent, make records public

15:02:40 [AxelPolleres]

rrsagent, make records public

15:11:59 [LeeF]

Are there any XML schema datatypes that have a value space that maintains precision (i.e. lexical forms "2.0" and "2.00" correspond to different values)?

15:13:13 [OlivierCorby]

OlivierCorby has left #sparql

15:17:20 [kasei]

ick

15:17:23 [SteveH]

LeeF, string :)

15:20:00 [kasei]

haha

15:20:54 [LeeF]

oy

15:21:00 [LeeF]

what should i tell my scientist users? :)

15:21:59 [SteveH]

they should relax? ;)

15:22:11 [LeeF]

lol

15:23:43 [SteveH]

SteveH has joined #sparql

15:24:10 [LeeF]

I'm going to tell them to call you, Steve.

15:32:27 [kasei]

LeeF, why are you constrained to XSD? If you've got specific needs, why not make your own?

16:12:05 [LeeF]

because i don't want to invent a wheel on my own

16:12:45 [LeeF]

i've got a bunch of software based around RDF (which means XSD as the basis for literal typing), and I'd like to support a use case that requires this, but it's not the core of what i do :)

16:24:21 [SteveH]

if they have "12.000"^^sci:number they can cast as appropriate

16:26:04 [AndyS]

AndyS has joined #sparql

17:13:33 [Zakim]

Zakim has left #sparql

18:50:42 [SteveH_]

SteveH_ has joined #sparql

19:10:33 [kasei]

http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:NH-1

19:10:37 [kasei]

anyone want to glance over that?

19:12:04 [kasei]

Mostly concerned about the last paragraph. Not sure it's exactly "beyond the scope" of the SD work, but it's never been discussed before and I'm not sure there are any implementations (except NH's week-old one which brought up the issue) which do it.

19:12:38 [kasei]

so worried about the timing and feature creep

19:20:23 [LeeF]

trackbot, close ACTION-189

19:20:23 [trackbot]

ACTION-189 Get back to ivanh on the usabuility of POWDER for SD. closed

19:20:26 [LeeF]

trackbot, close ACTION-214

19:20:26 [trackbot]

ACTION-214 Add ability to mark individual graphs with their entailment regime closed

19:22:19 [LeeF]

kasei, I think that response is fine

19:22:40 [kasei]

ok. the one thing I haven't addressed yet is his question about indicating parsable formats.

19:22:55 [kasei]

we're now doing result formats, but not parsing formats.

19:23:11 [kasei]

hesitant to keep adding things, but does seem like a strange asymmetry.

20:35:23 [LeeF]

LeeF has joined #sparql