15:53:34 RRSAgent has joined #rdb2rdf 15:53:34 logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/04/20-rdb2rdf-irc 15:53:36 RRSAgent, make logs world 15:53:36 Zakim has joined #rdb2rdf 15:53:38 Zakim, this will be 7322733 15:53:38 ok, trackbot; I see SW_RDB2RDF()12:00PM scheduled to start in 7 minutes 15:53:39 Meeting: RDB2RDF Working Group Teleconference 15:53:39 Date: 20 April 2010 15:53:44 Chair: Ahmed 15:53:48 And I'm always complaining I never win anything :) 15:54:08 scribenick: nunolopes 15:54:27 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdb2rdf-wg/2010Apr/0037.html 15:54:32 RRSAgent, draft minutes 15:54:32 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/04/20-rdb2rdf-minutes.html mhausenblas 15:54:39 RRSAgent, make logs public 15:56:21 Unfortunately, Dan sends his regrets. He has to attend an urgent meeting 15:57:04 Ahmed has joined #RDB2RDF 15:58:33 Zakim, who's here? 15:58:33 SW_RDB2RDF()12:00PM has not yet started, mhausenblas 15:58:35 On IRC I see Ahmed, Zakim, RRSAgent, juansequeda, hhalpin, LeeF, MacTed, nunolopes, mhausenblas, iv_an_ru_, trackbot, ericP 15:58:37 SW_RDB2RDF()12:00PM has now started 15:58:41 + +1.512.471.aaaa 15:59:05 Zakim, aa is me 15:59:13 sorry, juansequeda, I do not recognize a party named 'aa' 15:59:21 + +3539149aabb 15:59:22 Zakim, aaaa is juansequeda 15:59:23 +juansequeda; got it 15:59:36 Zakim, aabb is me 15:59:36 +mhausenblas; got it 15:59:45 Zakim, nunolopes is with mhausenblas 15:59:45 +nunolopes; got it 15:59:53 + +1.781.273.aacc 15:59:55 Zakim, who's here? 15:59:55 On the phone I see juansequeda, mhausenblas, +1.781.273.aacc 15:59:56 mhausenblas has mhausenblas, nunolopes 15:59:58 On IRC I see Ahmed, Zakim, RRSAgent, juansequeda, hhalpin, LeeF, MacTed, nunolopes, mhausenblas, iv_an_ru_, trackbot, ericP 16:00:08 Zakim, aacc is OpenLink_Software 16:00:08 +OpenLink_Software; got it 16:00:14 Zakim, OpenLink_Software is temporarily me 16:00:14 +MacTed; got it 16:00:19 whalb has joined #rdb2rdf 16:00:48 +Ashok_Malhotra 16:00:50 afogarol has joined #RDB2RDF 16:00:53 + +043316876aadd 16:01:02 Zakim, aadd is whalb 16:01:02 +whalb; got it 16:01:19 Zakim, who's here? 16:01:19 On the phone I see juansequeda, mhausenblas, MacTed, Ashok_Malhotra, whalb 16:01:21 Ashok has joined #rdb2rdf 16:01:22 mhausenblas has mhausenblas, nunolopes 16:01:24 On IRC I see afogarol, whalb, Ahmed, Zakim, RRSAgent, juansequeda, hhalpin, LeeF, MacTed, nunolopes, mhausenblas, iv_an_ru_, trackbot, ericP 16:01:34 +[IPcaller] 16:02:16 + +49.322.222.0.aaee 16:02:28 souri has joined #rdb2rdf 16:02:38 soeren has joined #RDB2RDF 16:02:39 +??P18 16:02:46 Zakim, aaee is soeren 16:02:46 +soeren; got it 16:02:50 +Souri 16:02:51 -soeren 16:02:57 lima has joined #RDB2RDF 16:03:09 Zakim, IPcaller is lima 16:03:09 +lima; got it 16:03:22 soeren, seems we've lost you on phone again 16:03:35 Zakim, who's here? 16:03:35 On the phone I see juansequeda, mhausenblas, MacTed, Ashok_Malhotra, whalb, lima, ??P18, Souri 16:03:37 mhausenblas has mhausenblas, nunolopes 16:03:39 On IRC I see lima, soeren, souri, Ashok, afogarol, whalb, Ahmed, Zakim, RRSAgent, juansequeda, hhalpin, LeeF, MacTed, nunolopes, mhausenblas, iv_an_ru_, trackbot, ericP 16:03:51 Zakim, P18 is Ahmed 16:03:51 sorry, mhausenblas, I do not recognize a party named 'P18' 16:03:55 + +039046128aaff 16:03:55 Zakim, please dial ericP-office 16:03:55 Zakim, ??P18 is Ahmed 16:03:57 ok, ericP; the call is being made 16:03:59 +Ahmed; got it 16:04:01 +EricP 16:04:02 Zakim, who's here? 16:04:07 On the phone I see juansequeda, mhausenblas, MacTed, Ashok_Malhotra, whalb, lima, Ahmed, Souri, +039046128aaff, EricP 16:04:12 mhausenblas has mhausenblas, nunolopes 16:04:16 On IRC I see lima, soeren, souri, Ashok, afogarol, whalb, Ahmed, Zakim, RRSAgent, juansequeda, hhalpin, LeeF, MacTed, nunolopes, mhausenblas, iv_an_ru_, trackbot, ericP 16:04:27 +soeren 16:04:56 Zakim, aaff is afogarol 16:04:56 +afogarol; got it 16:05:00 Zakim, who's here? 16:05:00 On the phone I see juansequeda, mhausenblas, MacTed, Ashok_Malhotra, whalb, lima, Ahmed, Souri, afogarol, EricP, soeren 16:05:02 mhausenblas has mhausenblas, nunolopes 16:05:04 On IRC I see lima, soeren, souri, Ashok, afogarol, whalb, Ahmed, Zakim, RRSAgent, juansequeda, hhalpin, LeeF, MacTed, nunolopes, mhausenblas, iv_an_ru_, trackbot, ericP 16:05:54 +[IPcaller] 16:06:21 Topic: Admin 16:06:27 Zakim, IPCaller is Orri 16:06:27 +Orri; got it 16:06:34 Zakim, who's here? 16:06:34 On the phone I see juansequeda, mhausenblas, MacTed, Ashok_Malhotra, whalb, lima, Ahmed, Souri, afogarol, EricP, soeren, Orri 16:06:36 mhausenblas has mhausenblas, nunolopes 16:06:38 On IRC I see lima, soeren, souri, Ashok, afogarol, whalb, Ahmed, Zakim, RRSAgent, juansequeda, hhalpin, LeeF, MacTed, nunolopes, mhausenblas, iv_an_ru_, trackbot, ericP 16:07:09 + +1.603.897.aagg 16:08:04 +[IPcaller] 16:08:10 PROPOSAL: accept minutes of previous telecon http://www.w3.org/2010/04/13-rdb2rdf-minutes.html 16:08:16 Seema has joined #rdb2rdf 16:08:19 Zakim, aagg is Seema 16:08:19 +Seema; got it 16:08:20 +1 16:08:23 +1 16:08:27 ACCEPTED 16:08:50 RESOLUTION: minutes of previous telecon http://www.w3.org/2010/04/13-rdb2rdf-minutes.html accepted 16:09:14 Topic: Use Cases 16:09:18 cygri has joined #rdb2rdf 16:09:20 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/use-cases/ 16:09:25 Zakim, cygri is with mhausenblas 16:09:25 +cygri; got it 16:10:12 mhausenblas: update on use-cases, creating use case document with ericP 16:10:35 … based on pages from the wiki 16:10:50 -> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/use-cases/ UC&R publication draft 16:11:31 … overall structure of document: introduction, usecases, requirements 16:12:02 intro contains motivation and background 16:12:22 … and the setting for RDB2RDF 16:13:16 … any alternatives /suggestions to the overall structure? 16:13:57 juansequeda: I though angela, dan and I were going to work on this document 16:14:18 q+ 16:14:24 … wans't it supposed to show as well why we should do RDB2RDF 16:15:03 … this is something not present at the moment 16:15:09 q+ 16:15:48 … what we were working on includes a more overall structure, that is not included in this document 16:16:13 ack hhalpin 16:16:44 ack MacTed 16:16:57 Zakim, mute hhalpin 16:16:57 sorry, mhausenblas, I do not know which phone connection belongs to hhalpin 16:17:04 Zakim, please mute hhalpin 16:17:04 sorry, ericP, I do not know which phone connection belongs to hhalpin 16:17:07 q+ 16:17:09 Zakim, please unmute hhalpin 16:17:09 sorry, ericP, I do not know which phone connection belongs to hhalpin 16:17:45 MacTed: discussion on the generic cases and providing specific examples, which is what we call the current usecases 16:18:06 http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery-use-cases/ 16:18:06 http://www.w3.org/2008/WebVideo/Fragments/WD-media-fragments-reqs/#use-cases 16:18:16 … 3 generic cases 16:19:45 … we have several examples of rdb2rdb, 1 rdb2rdf, no examples of rdb for web 16:20:05 … the document should go from simple cases to the more complex 16:20:16 … if the complex cases are not needed should be droped 16:20:33 … going from generic usecases to more specific 16:20:48 … this is very much focused on implementation details 16:21:09 q+ to describe the XQuery Use Cases and Requirements document 16:21:19 mhausenblas: agreed, and the target audience of the docment should be on the document 16:21:44 … to juan, most of your suggesttions are in section 1.1 16:21:58 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/use-cases/#uc 16:22:08 juansequeda: my concern is about section 2 16:22:27 mhausenblas: do we talk about the overall structure or go to the specific sections 16:22:30 ack ericP 16:22:30 ericP, you wanted to describe the XQuery Use Cases and Requirements document 16:22:54 ericP: the most succssfull use cases was the xquery usecase document 16:22:54 -> http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery-use-cases/ 16:23:08 … served as a guide not only to the users but also for the WG 16:23:34 … to determine what is already done/missing 16:24:43 mhausenblas: we also though about merging the two approaches, having a generic overview and a more detailed description 16:26:19 q- hhalpin 16:26:30 mhausenblas: going through the document 16:26:50 Ahmed: the motivations section is missing 16:27:06 mhausenblas: I created 2 subsections in sec 1 16:27:16 … 1.1 is why to map 16:27:28 … 1.2 is the more concrete usecases 16:28:07 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/use-cases/ 16:28:45 … here should be revision 1.11 16:28:58 s/1.11/1.12/ 16:29:51 mhausenblas: at the end of 1.1 has an extention about the overview of RDB2RDF and some more definitions 16:29:52 -soeren 16:30:19 +soeren 16:30:33 juansequeda: i'm ok with Section 1 16:31:00 mhausenblas: 1.2 is why a standard RDB2RDF method 16:31:12 well there has been argument against a standard from at least one person :) 16:31:14 … a bit unusual for W3C but I think it's a good idea 16:31:47 Ashok: at the end of the section you have a quote, it should be a paragraph? 16:32:36 mhausenblas: only due to missuse of XML spec … need to work on this 16:33:16 … also pointing out we are only dealing with read-only access 16:33:22 +1 16:33:27 … any other comments on Section 1? 16:33:49 … No, moving to Section 2 16:34:14 …. we took the old wiki page here and we have a new structure in the old wiki location 16:34:40 MacTed: this doesn't reflect the primitives I mentioned before. 16:35:07 11:00:35 1. joining incompatible RDB schema (fully structured data) 16:35:07 11:00:35 2. joining RDB against RDF (semi-structured data) 16:35:07 11:00:35 3. joining RDB against the Web (unstructured data) 16:35:08 clarification re old and new UC 16:35:14 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/Use_Cases_and_Requirements is the NEW 16:35:30 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/Draft_of_Use_Cases is the OLD (content) 16:36:11 mhausenblas: you are proposing 3 generic uses , 1 incompativble RDB schema 16:36:46 … any better title for this use case? 16:37:01 Ahmed: Database integration 16:37:38 http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/rdb2rdf/wiki/Use_Cases_and_Requirements#Use_Cases 16:37:52 … 2. joining RDB against RDF. Do we have a more specific use case on this? 16:38:21 juansequeda: we have 3 use cases in the document 16:38:50 … aligned with the 3 topics MacTed was talking about 16:39:47 soeren: 2.3 Integrating Enterprise Relational databases is not a use case for RDB2RDF 16:40:01 disagreed in general 16:41:04 MacTed: all the usecases have the generic topic of integrating data 16:41:23 this is not contradictory 16:42:07 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:42:07 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/04/20-rdb2rdf-minutes.html mhausenblas 16:42:09 Ahmed: these integrations can all map to RDF, shouldn't be a problem 16:42:37 MacTed: integration with existing RDF 16:43:09 RRSAgent, draft minutes 16:43:09 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/04/20-rdb2rdf-minutes.html nunolopes 16:45:55 juansequeda: all the scenarios are different, although all refering to integration 16:46:24 q+ 16:47:35 agree, hhalpin - we should get on with it 16:47:45 MacTed: the mapping can be done in seperate stages.. 16:47:56 q+ 16:48:15 … transforming RDB to RDF does not mean you can asnwer the question you want 16:48:26 q+ 16:48:27 -[IPcaller] 16:48:32 q+ 16:48:37 … may be necessarey to have other steps like reasoning 16:49:24 +1 to MacTed, and question: what is in the scope of our charter? 16:49:47 ack me 16:49:58 q- 16:50:00 mhausenblas: 2 issues: structured usecases 16:50:04 q? 16:50:06 … flat model with all use cases 16:50:16 +1 mhausenblas We need to choose one 16:50:31 q? 16:50:44 ack afogarol 16:50:47 q? 16:51:11 q+ to suggest we can make our lives easier if we document only our expressivity 16:51:16 angela: there is some work to be done after the mapping but these are not part of our work 16:51:42 ack ericP 16:51:42 ericP, you wanted to suggest we can make our lives easier if we document only our expressivity 16:51:42 ack me 16:51:47 Ahmed: agreed, mapping is not the same as data integration 16:52:18 we can include the extra steps in the UseCases, but also point out where RDB2RDF will stop and what is extra 16:52:19 hhalpin: write the doc to inform people why it's usefull, or we can just report on the expressivity 16:52:23 q+ 16:52:49 … proposing we don't try to agree on wording on how we talk about next steps 16:52:59 ack juansequeda 16:52:59 Ahmed: agreed, 16:53:07 I'll just type it it: 16:53:22 we need at this point to only accept exact text proposal 16:53:36 not high-level discussions that do not have exact proposals 16:53:43 juansequeda: I agree with mhausenblas, we can come up with new use cases and not classify them 16:53:52 … we can think about the role of the ontology 16:54:03 mhausenblas: we go ahead with the flat format 16:54:32 … Section 3, Requirement 16:54:35 Zakim, what's the code? 16:54:35 the conference code is 7322733 (tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152), hhalpin 16:54:47 Zakim, who is making noise? 16:54:58 ericP, listening for 10 seconds I heard sound from the following: mhausenblas (40%), MacTed (26%), soeren (24%) 16:55:23 … 3.1 section expressivitty, 3 concrete requirenmnets 16:55:45 … did not include the language requirements from the charter 16:56:10 …. unless we come up with concrete requirements from those 16:56:52 soeren: we need to extend this section 16:56:52 -soeren 16:57:01 … attaching metadata 16:57:04 weak! 16:57:36 +soeren 16:58:27 mhausenblas: any more suggestions? 16:58:37 juansequeda: the usecases stiill needs some work 16:58:52 ericP: we can revisit this after publication 16:59:10 mhausenblas: we could publish what we have as a first working draft 16:59:33 +??P1 16:59:37 ericP: this is not unusual to have still missing parts in the working drafts 16:59:43 Zakim, ??P1 is hhalpin 16:59:43 +hhalpin; got it 17:00:16 q+ 17:00:23 ack hhalpin 17:01:04 ericP: when suggesting changes we should be more specific: this exact text should be added at some specific point 17:01:08 mhausenblas: +1 17:01:29 the editors can reserve the right to not do any changes if they are not provided any exact text 17:01:44 … it really helps if we don't have to keep asking clarifications 17:03:08 s/ericP/hhalpin/ 17:03:26 -Ahmed 17:03:29 RRSAgent, draft minutes 17:03:29 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/04/20-rdb2rdf-minutes.html nunolopes 17:03:30 -Seema 17:03:32 -MacTed 17:03:34 -soeren 17:03:36 -lima 17:03:38 -Souri 17:03:43 -EricP 17:03:44 -whalb 17:03:45 -Ashok_Malhotra 17:03:48 -juansequeda 17:03:50 -Orri 17:03:54 -mhausenblas 17:03:54 adjouned 17:03:59 -afogarol 17:04:12 s/ adjouned/adjourned 17:04:30 s/adjouned/adjourned/ 17:05:05 zakim, list attendees 17:05:05 As of this point the attendees have been +1.512.471.aaaa, +3539149aabb, juansequeda, mhausenblas, nunolopes, +1.781.273.aacc, MacTed, Ashok_Malhotra, +043316876aadd, whalb, 17:05:08 ... +49.322.222.0.aaee, soeren, Souri, lima, +039046128aaff, Ahmed, EricP, afogarol, Orri, +1.603.897.aagg, [IPcaller], Seema, cygri, hhalpin 17:05:14 RRSAgent, draft minutes 17:05:14 I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/04/20-rdb2rdf-minutes.html nunolopes 17:05:50 thanks guys for the work you have done on the use cases..let me know if you need help 17:06:04 Zakim, bye 17:06:04 leaving. As of this point the attendees were +1.512.471.aaaa, +3539149aabb, juansequeda, mhausenblas, nunolopes, +1.781.273.aacc, MacTed, Ashok_Malhotra, +043316876aadd, whalb, 17:06:04 Zakim has left #RDB2RDF 17:06:07 ... +49.322.222.0.aaee, soeren, Souri, lima, +039046128aaff, Ahmed, EricP, afogarol, Orri, +1.603.897.aagg, [IPcaller], Seema, cygri, hhalpin 17:06:18 RRSAgent, bye 17:06:18 I see no action items