15:03:20 <RRSAgent> RRSAgent has joined #htmlt
15:03:20 <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2010/04/06-htmlt-irc
15:03:43 <krisk> rssagent, set logs public
15:04:08 <trackbot> trackbot has joined #htmlt
15:04:08 <trackbot> Sorry... I don't know anything about this channel
15:04:08 <trackbot> If you want to associate this channel with an existing Tracker, please say 'trackbot, associate this channel with #channel' (where #channel is the name of default channel for the group)
15:05:52 <adrianba> trackbot, associate this channel with #html-wg
15:05:52 <trackbot> Associating this channel with #html-wg...
15:06:06 <adrianba> trackbot, start telcon
15:06:08 <trackbot> RRSAgent, make logs public
15:06:08 <Zakim> Zakim has joined #htmlt
15:06:10 <trackbot> Zakim, this will be HTML
15:06:10 <Zakim> trackbot, WAI_PFWG(HTMLTF F2F)3:30AM is already associated with an irc channel; use 'move HTML to here' if you mean to reassociate the channel
15:06:11 <trackbot> Meeting: HTML Weekly Teleconference
15:06:11 <trackbot> Date: 06 April 2010
15:06:29 <adrianba> zakim, this will be htmlt
15:06:29 <Zakim> adrianba, WAI_PFWG(HTMLTF F2F)3:30AM is already associated with an irc channel; use 'move htmlt to here' if you mean to reassociate the channel
15:06:41 <adrianba> zakim, move htmlt here
15:06:41 <Zakim> I don't understand 'move htmlt here', adrianba
15:07:27 <krisk> anyone else on the call?
15:08:55 <krisk> meeting: htmltf
15:09:29 <adrianba> zakim, move htmlt to here
15:09:29 <Zakim> htmlt matches both WAI_PFWG(HTMLTF F2F)3:30AM and HTML_WG(HTMLT)11:00AM, adrianba
15:09:45 <adrianba> zakim, move html_wg(htmlt) to here
15:09:45 <Zakim> ok, adrianba; that matches HTML_WG(HTMLT)11:00AM
15:10:59 <adrianba> zakim, zakim, who is here?
15:10:59 <Zakim> I don't understand your question, adrianba.
15:11:04 <adrianba> zakim, who is here?
15:11:04 <Zakim> On the phone I see +1.425.941.aaaa, [Microsoft]
15:11:06 <Zakim> On IRC I see trackbot, RRSAgent, adrianba, krisk, gsnedders
15:11:17 <adrianba> zakim, [Microsoft] is adrianba
15:11:17 <Zakim> +adrianba; got it
15:11:33 <adrianba> zakim, aaaa is krisk
15:11:33 <Zakim> +krisk; got it
15:12:30 <adrianba> scribe: adrianba
15:12:34 <adrianba> scribenick: adrianba
15:12:39 <adrianba> chair: krisk
15:12:51 <krisk> agenda item #1 Check for any bugs on approved tests
15:13:08 <adrianba> topic: #1 Check for any bugs on approved tests (currently zero)
15:13:31 <adrianba> krisk: don't think we have any, just checking
15:13:47 <Sharonbn> Sharonbn has joined #HTMLT
15:16:02 <adrianba> krisk: don't have any approved tests, and no bugs there
15:16:02 <Sharonbn> Sharonbn has left #HTMLT
15:16:13 <adrianba> topic: #2 Review Current Tests Posted To List For Approval
15:17:09 <adrianba> adrianba: there was discussion on the list about whether it makes sense to review a single test
15:18:03 <adrianba> adrianba: does it make sense to review in batches or individually?
15:18:17 <adrianba> krisk: small batches are good, large batches are bad
15:19:36 <adrianba> adrianba: i can see that having a suite helps to look at the direction things are going but at the same time an individual test is either valid or not
15:19:50 <Sharon> Sharon has joined #HTMLT
15:20:06 <adrianba> krisk: testing one test in isolation would be odd but knowing that there are more to come it makes sense
15:23:40 <adrianba> krisk: will continue discussion on the mailing list about approval of the current test being considered
15:25:00 <adrianba> topic: #3 Ask group for any upcoming tests to be approved/submitted
15:25:52 <adrianba> krisk: will send mail to public-html requesting more tests be submitted
15:26:16 <adrianba> topic: #4 Do we want to create a script to turn xhtml tests -> html tests where applicable?
15:26:48 <adrianba> krisk: in the past, tests were submitted in pure xml and then transformed
15:26:57 <adrianba> ... do we want to do something similar?
15:27:47 <adrianba> ... this might not work for all cases, we might need to have xhtml5 and html5 tests
15:27:56 <adrianba> ... need to discuss on the mailing list
15:29:03 <adrianba> adrianba: would be good to avoid extra work if it's not necessary
15:29:16 <adrianba> sharon: maybe it can be the test author's decision
15:29:31 <adrianba> topic: #5 Does HG have a static IP Address?  Need for X-Domain testing
15:29:52 <adrianba> krisk: i'll follow-up with plh on this - think this is the case
15:30:50 <adrianba> ...this will help to address phillip's feedback
15:31:00 <adrianba> ...about security tests
15:31:24 <adrianba> topic: #6 Start discussion on how the test suite would move from HG -> w3.org
15:32:15 <adrianba> adrianba: are the tests directly accessible with http from the repository?
15:32:38 <krisk> yes, e.g http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/html/rawfile/tip/tests/submission/Microsoft/htmldom/loader.html?anchor01.html
15:33:09 <adrianba> krisk: but we probably want a dated snapshot
15:33:25 <adrianba> ...will discuss with plh how he thinks this can work
15:33:46 <adrianba> ...not moving tests would be great
15:33:57 <adrianba> ...don't want to have different server names that could break tests
15:34:06 <adrianba> ...which might not be immediately noticed
15:34:53 <adrianba> krisk: that's everything for now
15:35:09 <adrianba> rrsagent, generate minutes
15:35:09 <RRSAgent> I have made the request to generate http://www.w3.org/2010/04/06-htmlt-minutes.html adrianba
15:36:05 <adrianba> rrsagent, make logs public
15:36:44 <Zakim> -adrianba
15:36:47 <Zakim> -krisk
15:36:50 <Zakim> HTML_WG(HTMLT)11:00AM has ended
15:36:53 <Zakim> Attendees were +1.425.941.aaaa, adrianba, krisk
16:00:00 <gsnedders> gsnedders has left #htmlt
17:33:03 <Zakim> Zakim has left #htmlt