ISSUE-5: Clarify the case where the rdf: prefix is bound to another namespace and used in @datatype
@datatype and rdf:XMLLiteral
Clarify the case where the rdf: prefix is bound to another namespace and used in @datatype
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- RDFa 1.1 Core
- Raised by:
- Manu Sporny
- Opened on:
- 2010-02-07
- Description:
- We need to clarify the case where the rdf: prefix is bound to another namespace and used in @datatype. Suppose one binds xyz: to the RDF namespace and uses it in datatype, like so:
datatype="xyz:XMLLiteral"
Should this generate an XML Literal?
More in this thread:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf/2010Feb/0017.html - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: Telecon Agenda - June 17th 2010, 1400 UTC (from knud.moeller@deri.org on 2010-06-16)
- Re: Telecon Agenda - June 17th 2010, 1400 UTC (from ivan@w3.org on 2010-06-14)
- Telecon Agenda - June 17th 2010, 1400 UTC (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-06-13)
- Re: Telecon Agenda - June 10th 2010, 1400 UTC (from ivan@w3.org on 2010-06-11)
- Re: Telecon Agenda - June 10th 2010, 1400 UTC (from mark.birbeck@webbackplane.com on 2010-06-10)
- Re: Telecon Agenda - June 10th 2010, 1400 UTC (from tai@g5n.co.uk on 2010-06-10)
- Re: Telecon Agenda - June 10th 2010, 1400 UTC (from shane@aptest.com on 2010-06-09)
- Telecon Agenda - June 10th 2010, 1400 UTC (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2010-06-09)
- ISSUE-5 (@datatype and rdf:XMLLiteral): Clarify the case where the rdf: prefix is bound to another namespace and used in @datatype [RDFa 1.1 Core] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2010-02-07)
Related notes:
RESOLVED: Add language to the RDFa Core specification that states that when a CURIE in a datatype is expanded, if it is the RDF XMLLiteral URL, generate an XMLLiteral.
http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2010-06-17#resolution_2
Display change log
