ISSUE-148: LC HTML+RDFa 1.1: Example 1 and 2 in section 2.1 issue
schumacher-1
LC HTML+RDFa 1.1: Example 1 and 2 in section 2.1 issue
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- LC Comments HTML5+RDFa
- Raised by:
- Ivan Herman
- Opened on:
- 2013-02-09
- Description:
- Hello working group!
In EXAMPLE 2 in section 2.1, there is a 'schema:':
@prefix schema: <http://schema.org/> .
It is not really clear, how the RDFa processor gets the information
to put this schema: prefix, because there is no obvious
explanation/declaration in EXAMPLE 1. It might be declared in the
initial context, but the innocent reader might not now.
Not sure, if it is really necessary to add a sentence for that, just
thought, first examples should be understandable without any
questions open.
Stefan - Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: Official Response to ISSUE-148: Stefan Schumacher's Last Call Review Comments (from stefan@duckflight.de on 2013-03-11)
- Official Response to ISSUE-148: Stefan Schumacher's Last Call Review Comments (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2013-03-10)
- RDFa WG Telecon Agenda - February 28th 2012, 1500 UTC (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2013-02-25)
- Admin (LC HTML+RDFa 1.1: Example 1 and 2 in section 2.1 issue (ISSUE-148)) (from ivan@w3.org on 2013-02-09)
- ISSUE-148 (schumacher-1): LC HTML+RDFa 1.1: Example 1 and 2 in section 2.1 issue [LC Comments HTML5+RDFa] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2013-02-09)
Related notes:
Came in through: http://www.w3.org/mid/5115FE6B.31181.3E7037F@stefan.duckflight.de
Ivan Herman, 9 Feb 2013, 12:29:29Came in through: http://www.w3.org/mid/5115FE6B.31181.3E7037F@stefan.duckflight.de
Ivan Herman, 9 Feb 2013, 12:31:52Resolved via editorial change here:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2013Mar/0011.html
Display change log