ISSUE-136: RDFa Lite 1.1 Conformance Section - host language attributes

RDFa Lite conformance

State:

CLOSED

Product:

RDFa Core, Lite, and XHTML+RDFa CR comments

Raised by:

Ivan Herman

Opened on:

2012-04-24

Description:

See Alex' mail:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2012Apr/0071.html

Essentially, the RDFa Lite conformance seems to be too silent on some attributes...

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

Re: Re 2: RDFa Lite 1.1 Conformance Section - host language attributes (ISSUE-136) (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-04-25)
Re: Re 2: RDFa Lite 1.1 Conformance Section - host language attributes (ISSUE-136) (from scorlosquet@gmail.com on 2012-04-25)
Re 2: RDFa Lite 1.1 Conformance Section - host language attributes (ISSUE-136) (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-04-25)
Re: RDFa Lite 1.1 Conformance Section - host language attributes (ISSUE-136) (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-04-25)
Re: RDFa Lite 1.1 Conformance Section - host language attributes (ISSUE-136) (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-04-25)
Re: RDFa Lite 1.1 Conformance Section - host language attributes (ISSUE-136) (from alex@milowski.com on 2012-04-24)
Re: RDFa Lite 1.1 Conformance Section - host language attributes (ISSUE-136) (from shane@aptest.com on 2012-04-24)
Re: RDFa Lite 1.1 Conformance Section - host language attributes (ISSUE-136) (from alex@milowski.com on 2012-04-24)
Re: Telecon Agenda - April 26th 2012, 1500 UTC (from scorlosquet@gmail.com on 2012-04-24)
Re: Telecon Agenda - April 26th 2012, 1500 UTC (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-04-24)
Re: RDFa Lite 1.1 Conformance Section - host language attributes (ISSUE-136) (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-04-24)
ISSUE-136 (RDFa Lite conformance): RDFa Lite 1.1 Conformance Section - host language attributes [RDFa Core, Lite, and XTHML+RDFa CR comments] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-04-24)

Discussed here:

http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2012-04-26#ISSUE__2d_136__3a__RDFa_Lite_1__2e_1_Document_Conformance_regarding___40_href__2f___40_src_and___40_rel__2f___40_rev

RESOLVED: Update the RDFa Lite 1.1 specification using something to the effect of: "It must not use any additional RDFa attributes other than vocab, typeof, property, resource, and prefix; it may also use href and src, when the Host Language authorizes their usage. However, even if authorized by the Host Language, the usage of rel and rev should be restricted to non-RDFa usage patterns, as defined by the Host Language."

http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2012-04-26#resolution_2

Response from submitter:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdfa-wg/2012Apr/0150.html

Manu Sporny, 28 Apr 2012, 20:35:07