ISSUE-129: Change the power of @vocab, related to default term interpretation

Power of @vocab

Change the power of @vocab, related to default term interpretation

State:

CLOSED

Product:

3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core

Raised by:

Niklas Lindström

Opened on:

2012-02-13

Description:

The essence of the proposal change the rules in 7.4.3 to:

[[[
* If there is a local default vocabulary, the IRI is obtained by
concatenating that value and the term.
* Otherwise, check if the term matches an item in the list of local
term mappings. First compare against the list case-sensitively, and if
there is no match then compare case-insensitively. If there is a
match, use the associated IRI.
* Otherwise, the term has no associated IRI and must be ignored.
]]]

See related mails

Related Actions Items:

No related actions

Related emails:

1. Re: Summary of current state of ISSUE-135 (from lindstream@gmail.com on 2012-09-06)
2. Re: Official Response to ISSUE-129 from RDF Web Apps WG (from lindstream@gmail.com on 2012-02-27)
3. Official Response to ISSUE-129 from RDF Web Apps WG (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2012-02-26)
4. [REVISED] Telecon Agenda - February 23rd 2012, 1500 UTC (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2012-02-23)
5. Re: ISSUE-129 (Power of @vocab): Change the power of @vocab, related to default term interpretation [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core] (from lindstream@gmail.com on 2012-02-17)
6. Re: Regarding @vocab and terms (ISSUE-129) (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-02-14)
7. Re: ISSUE-129 (Power of @vocab): Change the power of @vocab, related to default term interpretation [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core] (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-02-14)
8. Fwd: Regarding @vocab and terms (ISSUE-129) (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-02-14)
9. Re: ISSUE-129 (Power of @vocab): Change the power of @vocab, related to default term interpretation [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core] (from lindstream@gmail.com on 2012-02-14)
10. Re: Regarding @vocab and terms (ISSUE-129) (from gregg@kellogg-assoc.com on 2012-02-13)
11. Re: Regarding @vocab and terms (ISSUE-129) (from lindstream@gmail.com on 2012-02-13)
12. Re: ISSUE-129 (Power of @vocab): Change the power of @vocab, related to default term interpretation [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core] (from shane@aptest.com on 2012-02-13)
13. Re: ISSUE-129 (Power of @vocab): Change the power of @vocab, related to default term interpretation [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core] (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-02-13)
14. Re: ISSUE-129 (Power of @vocab): Change the power of @vocab, related to default term interpretation [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core] (from shane@aptest.com on 2012-02-13)
15. Re: ISSUE-129 (Power of @vocab): Change the power of @vocab, related to default term interpretation [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core] (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-02-13)
16. Re: ISSUE-129 (Power of @vocab): Change the power of @vocab, related to default term interpretation [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core] (from shane@aptest.com on 2012-02-13)
17. Re: ISSUE-129 (Power of @vocab): Change the power of @vocab, related to default term interpretation [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core] (from lindstream@gmail.com on 2012-02-13)
18. Re: ISSUE-129 (Power of @vocab): Change the power of @vocab, related to default term interpretation [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core] (from shane@aptest.com on 2012-02-13)
19. Re: Regarding @vocab and terms (ISSUE-129) (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-02-13)
20. Regarding @vocab and terms (ISSUE-129) (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-02-13)
21. ISSUE-129 (Power of @vocab): Change the power of @vocab, related to default term interpretation [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-02-13)

Related notes:

Display change log