ISSUE-127: What is the effect of @inlist when no triples are generated?
Empty Lists?
What is the effect of @inlist when no triples are generated?
- State:
- CLOSED
- Product:
- 3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core
- Raised by:
- Ivan Herman
- Opened on:
- 2012-02-09
- Description:
- See http://www.w3.org/mid/CA894838-BFE8-48CC-984D-F304A6D32251@w3.org for further details, this is just to add this question to the issue list.
- Related Actions Items:
- No related actions
- Related emails:
- Re: Official Response to ISSUE-127 from RDF Web Apps WG (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-02-26)
- Official Response to ISSUE-127 from RDF Web Apps WG (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2012-02-26)
- Re: ISSUE-127 (Empty Lists?): What is the effect of @inlist when no triples are generated? [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core] (from lindstream@gmail.com on 2012-02-23)
- Re: ISSUE-127 (Empty Lists?): What is the effect of @inlist when no triples are generated? [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core] (from ivan@w3.org on 2012-02-23)
- Re: ISSUE-127 (Empty Lists?): What is the effect of @inlist when no triples are generated? [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core] (from lindstream@gmail.com on 2012-02-23)
- [REVISED] Telecon Agenda - February 23rd 2012, 1500 UTC (from msporny@digitalbazaar.com on 2012-02-23)
- ISSUE-127 (Empty Lists?): What is the effect of @inlist when no triples are generated? [3rd LC Comments - RDFa 1.1 Core] (from sysbot+tracker@w3.org on 2012-02-09)
Related notes:
PROPOSAL: If the [local list mapping] is empty, no list triples are generated.
Manu Sporny, 23 Feb 2012, 05:19:18RESOLVED: There is no issue, the specification is correct, @inlist specified w/o any content still generates an empty list. (non-substantive) â†
http://www.w3.org/2010/02/rdfa/meetings/2012-02-23#resolution_5
Display change log